|
Radbot posted:And I'm just pointing out the anti-Semitic streak in many Sanders non-supporters. Do you have specific examples of anti-Semitic rhetoric used to attack Sanders?
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:16 |
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Do you have specific examples of anti-Semitic rhetoric used to attack Sanders? There was an article in Forbes a while back talking about how he'd be the first Jewish president and how rich people need to be prepared for him to take all your money like Jews are wont to do
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
Aliquid posted:The minute the players strike somewhere like USC or Notre Dame, the administrations will cave and offer a decent stipend, then it'll be replicated through the country. I can think of few things that'd be less effective than ND student athletes trying to do a walk-out and expecting to be supported instead of expelled and replaced.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
400 new posts?!? What, did Boehner change his mind? Is Rand Paul aflame on the White House lawn? Did we attack France? *clicks thread* HAY GUYS WHA-  (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:26
|
|
|
mdemone posted:400 new posts?!? What, did Boehner change his mind? Is Rand Paul aflame on the White House lawn? Did we attack France? You blithely post that like the raider's caucus wouldn't attack declare war on France in a second if their idiot tea party followers could be convinced they were a Islamic country/ betrayed us after 9/11.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
KiteAuraan posted:That's because people wanted to see Trump and the gang say crazy stupid bullshit. No one cares about the Democratic runners except Sanders and Clinton. Nice goalpost moving there.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
Klaus88 posted:You blithely post that like the raider's caucus wouldn't attack declare war on France in a second if their idiot tea party followers could be convinced they were a Islamic country/ betrayed us after 9/11. Those surrender monkeys wouldn't help Bush in his crusade against Gog and Magog!!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:31
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:There was an article in Forbes a while back talking about how he'd be the first Jewish president and how rich people need to be prepared for him to take all your money like Jews are wont to do I don't think it's becuase he's a Jew and neither does Forbes. It's because he's a quasi-socialist retard who suggested spending $18 trillion more in 10 years. VVV it's k I put it back 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:34
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
e: ^^^lol at your post pre edit So I looked into this Atlantis situation and that guy has some good points. Perhaps Atlantis IS in Bolivia. Let's get digging goons.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:34
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:I don't think it's becuase he's a Jew and neither does Forbes. It's because he's a quasi-socialist retard who suggested spending $18 trillion more in 10 years. Plus it wasn't like Forbes actually hires writers anymore. That "article" was written by some random CPA.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Plus it wasn't like Forbes actually hires writers anymore. That "article" was written by some random CPA. My recollection is that he wasn't trying to be anti semitic, he just included "and he'd be the first Jewish president and he'd be sworn in by a Catholic" as kind of a neat fact, but because of where it was in the article it came across as super racist.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
zoux posted:My recollection is that he wasn't trying to be anti semitic, he just included "and he'd be the first Jewish president and he'd be sworn in by a Catholic" as kind of a neat fact, but because of where it was in the article it came across as super racist. I think an NPR host casually asking Bernie about his dual citizenship is a bit of a better example. I've also heard pro-Iran deal people suggest that Chuck Schumer had dual citizenship.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 20:47
|
|
|
zoux posted:My recollection is that he wasn't trying to be anti semitic, he just included "and he'd be the first Jewish president and he'd be sworn in by a Catholic" as kind of a neat fact, but because of where it was in the article it came across as super racist. Yea that read more as we tried to put a kinda neat trivia thing in and oh noooo we said 'and he's a Jew btw' after a big thing about how he wants to steal your money, that's not good! Absurd Alhazred posted:I think an NPR host casually asking Bernie about his dual citizenship is a bit of a better example. I've also heard pro-Iran deal people suggest that Chuck Schumer had dual citizenship. Now THAT was just pure dogwhistle.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:05
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:
It seems like she just read something (very) wrong on the internet. I don't think Diane Rehms was really out to dogwhistle.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:It's legitimately insane that you've taken 'some people who, while supporting similar policies before, suddenly stop when Hillary does it, and that may be because of misogyny in some of them' to mean literally every non-clinton voter hates women. Like, you understand how crazy you look, right? Like when those dudes who get mad at BLM because woah are you saying ONLY black lives matter, that's how crazy. Please remember this because after the 2016 election this will be the exact message repeated ad nauseam in the USPol thread.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
mdemone posted:400 new posts?!? What, did Boehner change his mind? Is Rand Paul aflame on the White House lawn? Did we attack France? I was starting to work on the October OP last night. Somehow I was unsurprised to find out that the Sanders vs. Hillary Holy War Quarantine Thread in the OP was gassed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:07
|
|
|
Oklahoma 'bout to get its blood ritual on. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
Supreme Court denied Glossip, so it looks like we're killing an innocent man again.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
Holy gently caress what the hell are they doing/thinking?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:09
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Holy gently caress what the hell are they doing/thinking? I'm sorry, this thread is about US politics, you're going to have to be more specific.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Holy gently caress what the hell are they doing/thinking? Antonin Scalia posted:Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
Even though he's almost assuredly innocent, since the evidence of his almost assured innocence came after his last formal appeal, he's to be killed anyway.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
Teddybear posted:Even though he's almost assuredly innocent, since the evidence of his almost assured innocence came after his last formal appeal, he's to be killed anyway. gently caress the death penalty.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
Just fyi that's not an actual scalia quote - as a layperson doing some digging, the sentiment appears to be "look if we took appeals just because a dude is innocent that'd be heaps of work and whatchagonna do, y'know?" Which is kind of arguably worse.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
Pro: Oklahoma recently approved measures to add a nitrogen asphyxiation gas chamber as a method of state execution, so at least the executions will be pain free regardless of whether or not they're justifiable. Con: Glossip doesn't get this option and will instead be injected with the usual torture juice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:24
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:Pro: Oklahoma recently approved measures to add a nitrogen asphyxiation gas chamber as a method of state execution, so at least the executions will be pain free regardless of whether or not they're justifiable. I think the actual con is that Oklahoma is going to execute someone who's probably innocent, and there are no pros.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:26
|
|
|
Can some one link me to the Salon or Atlantic thinkpiece that's about his innocence, I've not heard much about this case.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:27
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:Pro: Oklahoma recently approved measures to add a nitrogen asphyxiation gas chamber as a method of state execution, so at least the executions will be pain free regardless of whether or not they're justifiable. Pro? Oklahoma has a new policy of turning off the execution chamber mic so witnesses can't hear the subject suffering as they die, ala Clayton Lockett.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
zoux posted:Can some one link me to the Salon or Atlantic thinkpiece that's about his innocence, I've not heard much about this case. The Intercept probably has the best piece on it. They started the story, I'm not sure how much other publications have written on it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
Justice Breyer is a hero on this issue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Holy poo poo Mary Fallin just issued a 37-day stay of execution.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Kro-Bar posted:Holy poo poo Mary Fallin just issued a 37-day stay of execution. Wonder if he got to eat his final meal again before this was issued. Maybe he'll get to eat it a third time in November.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:08
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:Wonder if he got to eat his final meal again before this was issued. Maybe he'll get to eat it a third time in November. They eat their final meal the night before their execution, so it looks like Lucky Ducky Glossip put another one over on us taxpayers! *shakes fist*
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
Did the house pass the CR yet?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
sudo rm -rf posted:Did the house pass the CR yet? yes, but we're busy talking about other things
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
Kro-Bar posted:Holy poo poo Mary Fallin just issued a 37-day stay of execution. Sadly this is looking like just a delay of the inevitable and not something that will in let him prove his innocence.  How the hell did a jury agree to the death penalty in a case where the evidence against a person was the word of the actually murderer?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:13
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Sadly this is looking like just a delay of the inevitable and not something that will in let him prove his innocence. It's because a lot of people lust for the murder of "criminals", doesn't matter if they are innocent or guilty, it makes them feel better about themselves.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:19
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Sadly this is looking like just a delay of the inevitable and not something that will in let him prove his innocence. Happens all the time in cases where Cops blatantly lie about why they shot and killed unarmed dudes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Sadly this is looking like just a delay of the inevitable and not something that will in let him prove his innocence. Because the sentiment "He wouldn't have been arrested if he didn't do it.  " still has a lot of traction with the people who end up serving on juries.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:16 |
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:How the hell did a jury agree to the death penalty in a case where the evidence against a person was the word of the actually murderer? I apologize for summoning fishmech, but its because juries are bad and trial by jury is dumb.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2015 22:24
|
|
