|
horton hears a snype
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 16:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:16 |
|
My data is huge, enormous too.... iykwim
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 16:48 |
|
that dude is one of the major assholes on hacker news btw
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 16:53 |
|
fritz posted:that dude is one of the major assholes on hacker news btw isn't that everyone?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 16:55 |
|
fritz posted:that dude is one of the major assholes on hacker news btw in that he has an account there?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 16:55 |
|
DimpledChad posted:hopefully it will SPARK some discussion. spark is a hilarious XMPP client. from wha ti can tell it's been stuck at the same busted version for over two years, where the second-latest version is actually the better version to use. it also likes to crap out randomly and basically require you to blow away the local profile data.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 17:34 |
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:spark is a hilarious XMPP client. from wha ti can tell it's been stuck at the same busted version for over two years, where the second-latest version is actually the better version to use. it also likes to crap out randomly and basically require you to blow away the local profile data. is that by chance and open source project? ? ? ? ?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 17:38 |
|
oh my goodness it IS!!
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 17:41 |
|
I respect hodapp quite a bit because the author named it after a plush elephant toy and then named the proserv firm for it "Hortonworks" after another fictional elephant
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 18:28 |
|
minivanmegafun posted:i can't type "hadoop" without typing "hadpoop" and then deleting the extra p You think you have problems typing "hadoop"
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 18:29 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:You think you have problems typing "hadoop" hodor
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 18:55 |
|
okay thread: sklearn vs. r vs. mahout vs. mllib vs. h20 vs openCV. go! also other ones i'm forgetting.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 18:56 |
|
DimpledChad posted:okay thread: sklearn vs. r vs. mahout vs. mllib vs. h20 vs openCV. go! also other ones i'm forgetting. nobody cares, lets smoke a joint in the back
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 19:01 |
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:spark is a hilarious XMPP client. from wha ti can tell it's been stuck at the same busted version for over two years, where the second-latest version is actually the better version to use. it also likes to crap out randomly and basically require you to blow away the local profile data. lol oldjob used spark and it was godawful i think the windows client depends on java 1.6 or something and i could get messages.app to connect to the spark server with plain old xmpp but never accept contact requests or other poo poo
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 19:05 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:nobody cares, lets smoke a joint in the back that's h420
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 19:08 |
|
BIG DATA
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 19:35 |
|
mishaq posted:lol oldjob used spark and it was godawful you should use Microsoft™ Lync® Communicator 2013 and have a lovely half baked solution that integrates seamfully with Exchange©
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 19:46 |
|
hadoop is a haboob
|
# ? Mar 4, 2015 19:49 |
|
maniacdevnull posted:you should use Microsoft™ Lync® Communicator 2013 and have a lovely half baked solution that integrates seamfully with Exchange© i introduced the dev team to hipchat and everyone started using it the second i told everyone about it
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:19 |
|
hipchat kinda sucks though i don't understand how making an im client is so hard
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:20 |
|
mishaq posted:hipchat kinda sucks though aim was so good it would stay running when win9x explorer crashed behind it. lync promptly shits itself when someone sneezes in the direction of my vpn line. progress.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:25 |
|
i still use aim but ive noticed its only people in their late 20s who are left
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:27 |
|
hipchats been pissin us the f off past few days and we are really really on the cusp of going to slack
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:29 |
|
i am deep in brent spinner right now, op
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:30 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:hipchats been pissin us the f off past few days and we are really really on the cusp of going to slack some guy on Twitter told me "scaling's a bitch" which is sexist and welp maybe it's that kind of attitude which makes it hard! figure out how to make your poo poo eventually-consistent and shart it, duh
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:45 |
|
how loving hard can scaling duplex text be
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:47 |
|
pram posted:how loving hard can scaling duplex text be it's not, irc has done it for decades without any revenue if you want it to be resistant to net splits you probably have to use a consensus protocol to bounce clients off of minority partitions, and shipping each chat line with a vector clock like thing of previous lines would keep non-sequiturs to a minimum (istr a decent Facebook engineering post or paper about how they do this with comments on things) edit: may be something in the reference graph for http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/papers/socc12-explicit.pdf Cocoa Crispies fucked around with this message at 05:57 on Mar 5, 2015 |
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:54 |
|
to be fair, once you hit a certain rate of scaling you start having to look at just taking over entire dc's at a time. seeing how fast my company grows and roughly napkin mathing twitter's data needs relative to ours i could absolutely see them needing to work on that level. and then you need the circuits to back those up i mean twitters loving huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:56 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:to be fair, once you hit a certain rate of scaling you start having to look at just taking over entire dc's at a time. seeing how fast my company grows and roughly napkin mathing twitter's data needs relative to ours i could absolutely see them needing to work on that level. and then you need the circuits to back those up with hip hat and slack and other business chat apps (lifetime campfire crew) you get sharting as a feature: Cocoa crispies dot hip chat has zero interaction with jonny290 dot hip chat
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 05:59 |
|
were not talking anything much more complicated than a tcp packet here
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:00 |
|
this is what I was looking for and why doing chat Right is more complicated than a TCP packet: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2610533
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:01 |
|
phone companies managed to establish a global namespace w/ reliable international switching in the 70s. this is bullshit pure and simple. these chat companies need to man the gently caress up
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:02 |
|
pram posted:phone companies managed to establish a global namespace w/ reliable international switching in the 70s. this is bullshit pure and simple. these chat companies need to man the gently caress up preach brotha
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:05 |
|
pram posted:phone companies managed to establish a global namespace w/ reliable international switching in the 70s. this is bullshit pure and simple. these chat companies need to man the gently caress up agreedo
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:06 |
|
pram posted:phone companies managed to establish a global namespace w/ reliable international switching in the 70s. this is bullshit pure and simple. these chat companies need to man the gently caress up Cocoa Crispies posted:agreedo but maybe not though would reliability be worth the more than $5/user-month or w/e that the price point seems to be? how do you market that, or if you don't charge more, who pays for the increased variable costs? reliability tends to increase linearly while costs increase quadratically
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:10 |
|
or is it each extra nine multiplies costs by ten
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:11 |
|
four nines is a challenge for all but the biggest companies. five is ridiiiiiculous
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:12 |
|
isnt hipchat like an internal im application? even if you work somewhere enormous the load from that should be trivial enough for like a pentium 2 shitbox to handle
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:15 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:four nines is a challenge for all but the biggest companies. five is ridiiiiiculous Got stuck in a four-hour (thankfully conference call so I could play games) meeting once listening to some grey beard who works for a telecom you've heard of rant and rave about how their startup-style internal project can't possiby be reliable in every scenario, like what if the Internet goes down or something well for one thing they're not gonna be using this dumb app lol
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:16 |
|
all this garbage is resting on the backs of giants *pulls suspenders and strokes beard* god. these weak, pathetic companies like twitter. loving morons with their ironic mustaches, macbooks with trendy stickers. maintained with love!! haha! real, hard men designed the switches these little pansies now complain isn't allowing enough 'consistency.' ahhh if i still had my pdp-11
|
# ? Mar 5, 2015 06:16 |