|
Jose posted:the government have decided the way to stop kids accessing porn is to make all porn sites require credit card details to be accessed what about torrent sites, or are those not even a thing anymore
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 06:54 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 11:31 |
|
they get blocked by ISPs periodically and then pop up with a slightly new domain that lasts a few months
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 07:03 |
|
yeah torrent sites are occasionally 'oh ok find a new one then' and it takes less than a minute dunno what the tories are playing at trying to block the internet tbh, mondeo man likes a quick tug as much as anyone else
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 10:26 |
|
There's no way that anything they come up with is going to get around the proxy issue. And if it meant access to free porn then kids would learn how to use proxies real quick.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 11:36 |
|
Yinlock posted:was blair ever actually popular Yeah he was very popular and was the last Labour leader to win an election.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 12:29 |
|
Shut up Pissflaps
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 12:49 |
|
Tokamak posted:Shut up Pissflaps Flaps is just super annoying and you wouldnt want to invite him to a party, flaps v2 up there is a genuinely shite person that everyone with human blood running in their veins should probably ignore.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 13:33 |
|
per my niece Doctor Hooha
|
# ? Jul 18, 2017 14:45 |
|
I dunno why british people blame blair so much for Iraq it was george w bush's fault.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 00:46 |
|
Because Blair could have not supported it but he did for bizarre religious reasons just like Dubyah?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 01:05 |
|
hakimashou posted:I dunno why british people blame blair so much for Iraq it was george w bush's fault. This is such a You thing to say
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 01:31 |
|
Bush was wrong to invade Iraq but Blair was right to support him. Hopefully the UK and Europe never get their own version of a neoconvservative cabal, but if the UK ever had a reason to start a war built on nothing but lies and asinine political theories, the US should still support them in any and every way they need.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 01:35 |
|
breaklaw posted:Bush was wrong to invade Iraq but Blair was right to support him. if canada, which is 90% american already, stayed out of it, then the uk could have as well
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:06 |
|
Nanomashoes posted:Because Blair could have not supported it but he did for bizarre religious reasons just like Dubyah? It wouldn't have made a difference. Britain blaming itself for iraq is vanity. Plus the UK kind of owes the US support in these kind of things. Blair should be forgiven, he just did what he had to do, the blame rests on GW Bush and his people.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:07 |
|
hakimashou posted:It wouldn't have made a difference. Britain blaming itself for iraq is vanity. wrong, wrong, wrong aaaand wrong. thank you, please don't come again
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:22 |
|
hakimashou posted:It wouldn't have made a difference. Britain blaming itself for iraq is vanity. Hahaha no.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:31 |
|
hakimashou posted:It wouldn't have made a difference. Britain blaming itself for iraq is vanity. turns out you can choose to participate in an american war or not like canada didn't go to iraq but was in afganistan (which while not a great idea was way more understandable than iraq) but you see tony blair was actually really into the whole iraq thing which is why people blame him for britain participating; funny how he made a decision and now he's accountable for that
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:35 |
|
what we owe to the US is to not enable them when they start insane illegal wars that kill a million people and cause decades of chaos
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:35 |
|
Terror Sweat posted:if canada, which is 90% american already, stayed out of it, then the uk could have as well Canada was part of the Coalition for Afghanistan and Iraq, so was Australia. They did less in Iraq than Afghanistan but they were there.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:37 |
|
breaklaw posted:Canada was part of the Coalition for Afghanistan and Iraq, so was Australia. They did less in Iraq than Afghanistan but they were there. Canada was the only Five Eyes nation to not join the coalition of the shilling. Harper really, really wanted to jump in and both him and Trudeau got involved in post-war deployments, but CF weren't in Iraq between 03 and 11.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:44 |
|
blair didn't sigh and invoke some oh well treaty obligation, he forced it through in the face of mass resistance to the point of cabinet resignations and 2% of the country in the streets. he put all his strength into shoving his hands in and absolutely deserves to be held to account for the blood on them
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 02:47 |
|
Agnosticnixie posted:Canada was the only Five Eyes nation to not join the coalition of the shilling. Harper really, really wanted to jump in and both him and Trudeau got involved in post-war deployments, but CF weren't in Iraq between 03 and 11. Canada didn't deploy troops to Iraq but we kicked in money for rebuilding which was money well spent let me tell you. We sort of glance over that when people proudly proclaim that canada never joined the war in iraq
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 03:08 |
|
Dreylad posted:Canada didn't deploy troops to Iraq but we kicked in money for rebuilding which was money well spent let me tell you. We sort of glance over that when people proudly proclaim that canada never joined the war in iraq Wherever there's grift to be made on the back of the global south there's always a canadian business looking to profit but yeah, true.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 03:20 |
|
*flicks asbestos at u*
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 03:31 |
|
Peel posted:what we owe to the US is to not enable them when they start insane illegal wars that kill a million people and cause decades of chaos a million people is a pretty low estimate especially if you consider it led to the current chaos in the middle east
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 08:20 |
|
one of the few cool things mexico has done as a country is tell bush to gently caress off twice
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 08:22 |
|
Breakfast All Day posted:what a shock that a country that hoists around a vestigial monarch are all subs that want to be ruled by people they despise wait are u implying there are non despicable britons
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 08:24 |
|
Peel posted:blair didn't sigh and invoke some oh well treaty obligation, he forced it through in the face of mass resistance to the point of cabinet resignations and 2% of the country in the streets. Blair not joining iraq wouldn't have changed the outcome for iraq though.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:37 |
|
Hodgepodge posted:turns out you can choose to participate in an american war or not How's he accountable? Isn't it just people mouthing off at him?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:38 |
|
hakimashou posted:Blair not joining iraq wouldn't have changed the outcome for iraq though. Yes but he's still responsible for the British soldiers who died/people killed by British soldiers. If someone asks you to help murder someone and you do it, you're still guilty of the murder even if they would have done it without your help.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:46 |
|
Nanomashoes posted:Because Blair could have not supported it but he did for bizarre religious reasons just like Dubyah? I mean yeah if the religious reason was 'what if i, blair, am actually a jesus' the crazy thing is blair actually did have influence over bush, when 9/11 happened bush dicked about in a plane for ages and the white house basically used blairs very eloquent response to the attack as their own press release, the us loved him and even the real cunts like rumsfeld acknowledged that they owed him one. he could and should have cashed in his influence in the run up to the war to counter that 'we ain't in the business of nation building' bollocks and got bush to commit longer term to preventing the region getting completely destablised thats not to say the opposition to the war were completely sane either. loving tony benn giving saddam a sympathetic interview ffs.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:54 |
|
hakimashou posted:Blair not joining iraq wouldn't have changed the outcome for iraq though. The regions british forces controlled after the war were better managed than the regions the us nominally controlled, uk forces being involved ended up having a more positive impact for the region than an all us force would have had.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:57 |
|
Vitamin P posted:The regions british forces controlled after the war were better managed than the regions the us nominally controlled, uk forces being involved ended up having a more positive impact for the region than an all us force would have had. WaR CrImInAl!!!!!!!
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:58 |
|
im not an ARE BOYS type but will probably never stop being angry at the working class lads who died on a lie in that war tbh blair should be in the hague
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 09:59 |
|
i think hakimashou just lusts for genocide in the middle east
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 10:16 |
|
The only protest I ever went to was against George W Bush.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 10:23 |
|
bush being worse than blair doesnt exonerate blair
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 10:40 |
|
hakimashou posted:How's he accountable? Isn't it just people mouthing off at him? it is people taking his decisions into account when considering the value of his opinion, which may include mouthing off at him would you like me to explain any other basic elements of social behaviour to you?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 11:09 |
|
hakimashou posted:WaR CrImInAl!!!!!!! the british forces being better than the us forces at doing the more difficult part of the job doesn't have anything to do with the politicians who sent them there and decided the overall strategy the soldiery on the ground did a decent job. the politician who lied to put them there did a war crime. its not difficult
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 12:22 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 11:31 |
|
It would be one thing if Blair merely supported and pushed for the war, but he also greatly mislead the public about the case for it in order to trick other people into supporting it. I think that makes his culpability far greater.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2017 12:26 |