|
CyberPingu posted:Hurricane Fatrina 
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 23:03 |
|
|
Sneakster posted:She was a poo poo candidate, the DLC is a malevolent influence on the democratic party that's fully embraced Reaganomics, and the previous Clinton administration's accomplishments were virtually all far right thing policies, Bernouts still held their nose and voted for the poo poo candidate, and Trump lying his rear end off for whatever every audience wanted to hear because the Democrats had nothing to offer in an election between the two most unpopular candidates in history doesn't make Hillary's humiliating failure anything but her own fault for helping make the Democratic party what it is today: a waste, with it's own thread. I agree. Were it not for $2.50 horse armor Hillary could have won.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:24
|
|
|
Data Graham posted:Well, we saw how much it hurt him to be asked to cite his favorite Bible verse and he just shat out "eye for an eye" and then started babbling about foreign policy. Trump is an impressive revelation that all the things people thought were important to American pride (religious and family values, hard work, patriotism, kindness) are toilet paper if certain real issues (racism, employment, fear) are pandered to.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:25
|
|
|
TyroneGoldstein posted:You know, there's nothing that Foxconn even does that requires a 10 billion dollar fabrication facility. I don't even think...and I'm shooting from the hip here...that even a company like Intel could spend 10 billion dollars on a fab. Obviously the number is inflated, but it could go beyond just fab plants. Besides making tv screens, they might be putting a research facility in Madison for instance. Also for the fab plant they want 1000 acres yikes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:26
|
|
|
Quorum posted:I'm not sure if I'd cite the existence of that terrible thread as a point in favor of basically any argument to be honest JonathonSpectre posted:Literally 90% of the people I tell this lie to look completely overjoyed and start stammering about how they are buying some smoked paprika on the way home. People are so desperate to lose weight effortlessly they will believe almost anything. Data Graham posted:Well, we saw how much it hurt him to be asked to cite his favorite Bible verse and he just shat out "eye for an eye" and then started babbling about foreign policy. hanales posted:I agree. Were it not for $2.50 horse armor Hillary could have won.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:32
|
|
|
RuanGacho posted:So for the sake of civilization, how do we destroy twitter? It seems to be doing a pretty good job of destroying itself by being incredibly expensive, but unable to monetize itself. Eventually, all the people investing in it (the majority of public shares are held by about 20 people) are going to get tired of not getting paid dividends and not seeing any growth.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:38
|
|
|
Dejawesp posted:So lets talk about the scout thing. It's 2, but not because he thought they'd be too worried. He's incapable of telling the difference between something he wants to have happened and something that actually happened, and he wants to have been praised so it happened.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:44
|
|
|
Sneakster posted:She was a poo poo candidate, the DLC is a malevolent influence on the democratic party that's fully embraced Reaganomics, and the previous Clinton administration's accomplishments were virtually all far right thing policies, Bernouts still held their nose and voted for the poo poo candidate, and Trump lying his rear end off for whatever every audience wanted to hear because the Democrats had nothing to offer in an election between the two most unpopular candidates in history doesn't make Hillary's humiliating failure anything but her own fault for helping make the Democratic party what it is today: a waste, with it's own thread. My dude if the dems embraced reaganomics they would be pushing for tax cuts on the wealthy
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:46
|
|
|
Sneakster posted:Just tell them to lift weights and do plenty of meth. An actual quote from my grandfather: "We wouldn't need all this diet bullshit if the son-of-a-bitches hadn't made speed illegal!"
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:50
|
|
|
JonathonSpectre posted:An actual quote from my grandfather: America's Army Air Corps Runs on Meth! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:54
|
|
Mustached Demon posted:Where's Dis Vox to put y'all in your dietary place? I'm on vacation, not dealing with it this time. Y'all're dumb. Edit oh god you morons go away I hate you how did it geteven worse after that post Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 14:09 on Aug 4, 2017 |
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:58
|
|
|
This Trump real estate deal looks awfully like criminal tax fraud - The Washington Post
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:59
|
|
|
JonathonSpectre posted:"Well, it sounds crazy, but every morning I just put 1/4 tablespoon of smoked paprika in my morning coffee and then just eat normally throughout the day. I don't know why it works, but it does!" During college someone mentioned putting a dash of cinnamon in their coffee grounds before brewing. I did that a couple times and enjoyed it. One day though, I accidentally grabbed the cumin instead. That day was a bad day. Suffice to say, you are a monster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:59
|
|
|
Sloober posted:My dude if the dems embraced reaganomics they would be pushing for tax cuts on the wealthy https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/892775305718497282 Currency manipulation and opening up to support anti-abortion candidates. They're competing for Trump's ratings in the TV sense since he "talks a good game".
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:02
|
|
|
Data Graham posted:Honestly surprised he has yet to flip out about that Newsweek cover. I imagine newsweek is basically a flyer nowadays
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
fishing with the fam posted:During college someone mentioned putting a dash of cinnamon in their coffee grounds before brewing. I did that a couple times and enjoyed it. One day though, I accidentally grabbed the cumin instead. That day was a bad day. Suffice to say, you are a monster. I've told everyone it was a lie after letting them luxuriate in the thought of effortless weight loss for a bit. Then it usually goes like this. "I'm just kidding." "Well then how did you really do it?" "I stopped eating." "Oh." I do wonder if I hadn't confessed how many of them would still be slurping down paprika coffee and waiting for the miracle.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
they have no intention of punishing outsourcing or taxing companies that ship jobs overseas, it's just a straight up loving lie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:12
|
|
|
JonathonSpectre posted:I've told everyone it was a lie after letting them luxuriate in the thought of effortless weight loss for a bit. Then it usually goes like this. Actually, this is kind of how I've lost weight too. Eating mostly protein and fat is part of it, but the key to weight loss is to simply eat less and power through the feelings of starvation. Humans were meant to starve. You get used to eating small amounts over time. Ritalin helps, of course.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:13
|
|
|
On the 2000 calorie thing, of course that's just a rough estimate. Getting your real caloric rate is not difficult at all though. Simply with your height, weight, age, sex, and body fat % you can calculate it. And as for food labels not being accurate, they're close enough. You're talking about cutting 500 calories a day under your rate, inaccurate measurement might put you over sometimes but on average if you are trying to be 500 calories under a number, you will be.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:19
|
|
|
i preferred it when we were talking about whether montana has mountains
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:21
|
|
|
enraged_camel posted:i preferred it when we were talking about whether montana has mountains If those mountains will just stop eating they'll go back to molehills.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:23
|
|
|
Best way to lose weight: move to Montana and climb mountains.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:23
|
|
|
I lost like 9lbs in like 2 weeks simply by cutting out like 500-600 calories a day and drinking water instead of coffee/tea/juice. I was being super agressive with what i was eating though. Getting past the mid meal hunger stuff is a bit difficult because i didnt want to snack, but ive relaxed on that slightly and im still dropping weight still, but alot slower.
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:24
|
|
|
enraged_camel posted:i preferred it when we were talking about whether montana has mountains That John Denver was full of poo poo, man.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:29
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:Actually, this is kind of how I've lost weight too. Eating mostly protein and fat is part of it, but the key to weight loss is to simply eat less and power through the feelings of starvation. Humans were meant to starve. You get used to eating small amounts over time. Al Borland Corp. posted:On the 2000 calorie thing, of course that's just a rough estimate. Getting your real caloric rate is not difficult at all though. Simply with your height, weight, age, sex, and body fat % you can calculate it. Liu posted:they have no intention of punishing outsourcing or taxing companies that ship jobs overseas, it's just a straight up loving lie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:30
|
|
|
Hand Row posted:Obviously the number is inflated, but it could go beyond just fab plants. Besides making tv screens, they might be putting a research facility in Madison for instance. Site I'm at a couple miles long and maybe a mile wide. That's like 1000 acres if Google's converter isn't lying. It's more than just fab space. For one, semiconductor manufacturing requires millions of gallons of ultra pure water. Like electrically unconductive pure water purified on site.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:30
|
|
|
Liu posted:they have no intention of punishing outsourcing or taxing companies that ship jobs overseas, it's just a straight up loving lie. ? quote:Break Down Barriers to Manufacturing in the US
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
The easiest way to lose weight is to run 1300 miles while not eating for a month. Anything else breaks thermodynamics.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:32
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:The easiest way to lose weight is to run 1300 miles while not eating for a month. Anything else breaks thermodynamics. Personally i just go at my gut w/ a butcher knife
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:37
|
|
|
No, the easiest way to lose weight is to fly on a parabolic arc at high speeds around the Earth. You will achieve weightlessness for several minutes at a time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:38
|
|
|
Sneakster posted:Their response to utter failure is a platform of tax credits to employers for hiring people and paraphrasing Trump: lmao they are literally just stealing Trump's platform
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:38
|
|
|
and more
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
Covok posted:The problem is knowing your TDEE and knowing if you're eating 3000/day. It's not as simple as people think it is and there are vastly more factors than people realize to determine that. Two virtually identical people could require completely different diets. And the food you are served likely does not have as accurate measurements as you would hope. And, frankly, I've only been talking about ready-to-order foods. Anything prepared for you in that instance is likely to have vastly, vastly different figures than your assumptions. You're simply better off controlling your portion sizes, trying to eat healthier foods, and engaging in consistent exercise. You can calculate your TDEE within a very slim margin of error simply by weighing yourself every day for a few weeks and counting how many calories you consume while eating at some sort of a deficit. At that point it doesn't matter how accurate the calorie counts are, as you're still burning fat at rate of 3500 kcal/lb. The calculation of a TDEE based on height/weight/age/activity level is reasonably accurate within 100 cal/day, and the same goes for food within a smaller margin. If you're eating at a deficit of at least 500 kcal/day the swings won't matter, you'll still be losing weight. The reason why calorie counting is hard is because it takes a significant amount of discipline and consistency that people usually aren't willing to put in. This is also the reason why the majority of people end up gaining weight back on literally every type of diet. Straight calorie counting, however, has by far the highest long-term success rate.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
So, has he started tweeting about the jobs report yet?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
That's the same platform they've always had. Complaining about currency manipulation was stolen by Trump.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
That's their public facing taking points on jobs? Ugh....
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
My grandma listened to s lot of John Denver. I also had to sing Country Roads in choir, so I guess I kinda like that song.  Man, we need to hurry those Friday news dumps along.. I don't think this thread can sustain itself much longer on calorie chat.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
Xombie posted:You can calculate your TDEE within a very slim margin of error simply by weighing yourself every day for a few weeks and counting how many calories you consume while eating at some sort of a deficit. At that point it doesn't matter how accurate the calorie counts are, as you're still burning fat at rate of 3500 kcal/lb. The calculation of a TDEE based on height/weight/age/activity level is reasonably accurate within 100 cal/day, and the same goes for food within a smaller margin. If you're eating at a deficit of at least 500 kcal/day the swings won't matter, you'll still be losing weight. Straight calorie counting can also quite easily be gamified, you can make it addictive.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:42
|
|
|
Sneakster posted:Their response to utter failure is a platform of tax credits to employers for hiring people and paraphrasing Trump: Be assured that they will follow through with virtually none of this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 23:03 |
|
|
Queering Wheel posted:lmao they are literally just stealing Trump's platform
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:43
|
|
