|
Cardboard Box A posted:Hmmm... 
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 10:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 17:23 |
|
|
That stain on his crotch made me thought he'd legit uploaded a picture where he'd pissed his pants.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 10:46
|
|
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Hmmm... I still don't get why someone with such a lack of interest in his physique would publish pictures wearing a gym shirt. incidentally, I wish someone would run hormone profiles on these people.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 11:02
|
|
|
Remember, this is how milo actually used to look like prior into his transformation into a literal shield for the alt-right. And he's still just as pathetic
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 12:08
|
|
|
Are those glasses they're holding filled with loving mountain dew. I don't know why but out of everything in this picture that is the worst part.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:18
|
|
|
I'm shocked Milo could get over his burning hatred of women long enough to buy a Playboy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 13:59
|
|
|
Slate Star Codex posted:Soviet jokes on Reddit. Pretty good. Most depressing is: “Q: Don’t the Constitutions of the USA and USSR both guarantee freedom of speech? A: Yes, but the Constitution of the USA also guarantees freedom after the speech” – not because of what it says about Russia but because it’s basically just the “freedom from speech does not guarantee freedom from consequences” argument that so many people love in a non-joke way here in America. Scott is still doing well
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Scott is still doing well He's not totally wrong, but a lot depends on what's meant by "consequences."
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
When the hell did conservatives forget what the First Amendment means? I was a teenage Dittohead in the early 90s, and I remember very well having arguments with liberal friends about how freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences or the right to have a venue provided. I remember saying things like that being an American means being allowed to call someone a racial slur and him being allowed to call you an rear end in a top hat in return, without anyone getting arrested. I became a liberal without ever changing my opinion on free speech, and meanwhile the rest of the right appears to have jumped ship. I can't help but wonder what William F. Buckley and conservatives of his generation would think of this "I have the right not to be called an rear end in a top hat on Twitter" nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:47
|
|
|
pookel posted:When the hell did conservatives forget what the First Amendment means? I was a teenage Dittohead in the early 90s, and I remember very well having arguments with liberal friends about how freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences or the right to have a venue provided. I remember saying things like that being an American means being allowed to call someone a racial slur and him being allowed to call you an rear end in a top hat in return, without anyone getting arrested. The principled version of this argument (which is not inherently right-wing) is that freedom of speech as an abstract moral principle is broader than the First Amendment, and that the principle of freedom of speech includes the right not to be punched in the face or fired by a private party for expressing one's opinions. Anyone who argues for a right to make other people listen to them (or worse, for the Doctrine of the Preferred First Speaker) is an unprincipled rear end in a top hat who should be ignored, though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 14:57
|
|
|
The thing is, it's already illegal to punch people in the face, and it doesn't matter why you're doing it. As for firing, I don't see a way you can reasonably make it illegal to fire someone for saying "I hate feminazis and libtards" without also making it illegal to fire them for saying "you're a lovely boss and I hate this job."
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:20
|
|
|
pookel posted:As for firing, I don't see a way you can reasonably make it illegal to fire someone for saying "I hate feminazis and libtards" without also making it illegal to fire them for saying "you're a lovely boss and I hate this job." California, New York, and DC have laws against discrimination on the basis of an employee's political activity or affiliation, and Colorado and North Dakota prohibit discrimination on the basis of "lawful conduct outside of work." So it's not like such laws are impossible.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
pookel posted:The thing is, it's already illegal to punch people in the face, and it doesn't matter why you're doing it. You shouldn't be able to fire them for the second one either, since people angry about lovely bosses and bad jobs are basically how unions get started.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
A notable exception is when people in PR and other positions where they can directly represent their company (such as ones running twitter/their web presence etc.) say that kind of poo poo. In those circumstances, the company can indeed argue that the poo poo they said was damaging to the company, and fire them over that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 15:40
|
|
|
pookel posted:The thing is, it's already illegal to punch people in the face, and it doesn't matter why you're doing it. you should absolutely be able to tell your boss he sucks and you hate your job, that's how things get fixed
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
David Severa: Selections from my forthcoming Harry Potter and the Methods of Neoreactionquote:“Slytherin!” the sorting hat cried before it even touched Harry’s head.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:12
|
|
|
divabot posted:David Severa: Selections from my forthcoming Harry Potter and the Methods of Neoreaction A much more significant criticism:  
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
Yeah, the right to say that second one there is one of the main arguments for protecting the first one. Economic power is as important as formal coercive power and a lot of the left responses to alt-right grumbling about 'free speech' falls into the libertarian trap of strongly separating the two.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:23
|
|
|
guess it's time to repost Ayn Rand's Harry Potter: http://the-toast.net/2015/04/09/ayn-rands-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows/ (links to earlier ones are in that one) “Steal Dad’s Anglia to fly to Hogwarts?” Ron cried in astonishment. “Mum would never let us hear the end of it!” “The question isn’t who is going to let me,” Harry said, already climbing into the driver’s seat and making an informed, personal decision about whether or not he chose to wear a seatbelt, “it’s who is going to stop me.”
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:27
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:guess it's time to repost Ayn Rand's Harry Potter: http://the-toast.net/2015/04/09/ayn-rands-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows/ (links to earlier ones are in that one) presumably someone kills and chops up hermione at some point
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:28
|
|
|
the problem with these ayn rand harry potter things is there are so many where the real punchline is right at the start. for example “Actually,” said Harry, pocketing his e-cigarette, edit “She deserved it,” Harry said, with a preternatural calmness. “Make no mistake, this was an essentially generous act. To have allowed her to continue to insult me would have been an act of self-genocide. She deserved what she got. You keep away from me.” He fumbled behind him for the latch on the door. “I’m going,” Harry said. “I want to be an architect.” Uncle Vernon was purple with fury, but said nothing. “I’m going to build a building so tall you’ll break your neck if you try to make eye contact with me,” Harry said, and then he was gone.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
Heath posted:I feel my statement speaks for itself  Agreed. Doesn't seem very 'alt-right' at all?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
shut the gently caress up immortan
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:shut the gently caress up immortan I don't think Dylann Roof was a fan of black cock and pink dildos but what do I know?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
The problem is that all these parodies are far more subtle, nuanced, and less about the voice of the author than Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
Immortan posted:I don't think Dylann Roof was a fan of black cock and pink dildos but what do I know? Oh he totally was, the only way to get a hate boner for blacks on the level he had is to secretly want their actual boners on an even higher level.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 18:56
|
|
|
New DE roleplay: hyperactive fangirl who ships Elliot Rodger and Dylann Roof, as well as Nick Land and Mike Anissimov Though that might just be HBD Chick, I'm not sure
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 19:05
|
|
|
I've never actually paid much attention to Immortan in the past and I'm bored right now so I took a quick look at his post history and I'm sure glad I did because that poo poo's golden
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Oh he totally was, the only way to get a hate boner for blacks on the level he had is to secretly want their actual boners on an even higher level. So he went to prison to become familiar with black boners?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/GabrielDuquette/status/738757536938135552
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
What does that even mean?
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/literalbanana/status/738757655041212416 This is a sophisticated rationalist technique known as "Oh yeah, let's see YOU do better" Also known as the Uwe Boll defense Curvature of Earth posted:What does that even mean? Standard anger that other people have heuristics for what is and isn't worth spending time arguing against, as if Gabe or St_Rev spend all their time arguing against time cube theorists, postmodernists, hindu nationalists, and all the other people who are safely out of the LW Overton Window. The Vosgian Beast has a new favorite as of 20:25 on Jun 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
So, wait, sneer culture is other people laughing at the alt-right? Whereas the alt-right laughing at "cultural marxism" and other things that don't exist isn't sneer culture because
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
pookel posted:So, wait, sneer culture is other people laughing at the alt-right? Whereas the alt-right laughing at "cultural marxism" and other things that don't exist isn't sneer culture because https://www.reddit.com/r/HPMOR/comments/2n3yh5/what_is_it_with_dark_lord_potter_and_hpmor/cmad6x3?context=3
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/GabrielDuquette/status/738818546835292160 Some serious salt being generated here
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 21:07
|
|
|
pookel posted:So, wait, sneer culture is other people laughing at the alt-right? Whereas the alt-right laughing at "cultural marxism" and other things that don't exist isn't sneer culture because The 'alt-right' doesn't exist either. It's a bogus talking point just like 'cultural marxism'.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
Immortan posted:The 'alt-right' doesn't exist either. It's a bogus talking point just like 'cultural marxism'. Dyke Feminists are everywhere pushing to raise the “age of consent” from whatever it is to 18, or even 21. If you you’re a 24 year old (heterosexual white) male and have sex with your 17 year old girlfriend, they’ll call you a “rapist” and throw you in jail, where you’ll actually be raped by friend of the familys and fart cum every day for a decade. No worries though: our brave MRA defenders (faggots) will make sure that the law applies EQUALLY to 24 year old women who sleep with 17 year old men. That will show those Feminists! I’m sure the Feminists are very terrified of such a development & it certainly wasn’t their plan all along as part of their “agender agenda”. human being pedophiles and friend of the familys and Mohammedans can still violate your kids, though. That’s Progress. But having heterosexual normal sex with your wife will be outlawed by these witches, so you better hope trannies don’t all decide unanimously to sew their anuses, because tranny anuses are soon going to be the only legal sexual outlet for heterosexual white males. Because some women have cock and balls, bigot. Gas the dykes, clitoral war now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
They missed an opportunity by not using the phrase "Clitoral Marxists".
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 17:23 |
|
|
"Clitoral War" would make a good death metal song title.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2016 22:11
|
|
