Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

Willem Dafosah Sherman?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kale
May 14, 2010

I can just picture the conversation with Trump's advisers over the presser being like the "You're Homer Thompson now" scene in that old episode of the Simpsons where Sideshow Bob is trying to kill Bart.

Trump: "But why do I have to condemn these people again, they're praising me?
Advisory Panel "Well sir you see it's bad for your polling all around and your party is even doing it and it might even make you look moderately more palatable to the public this week before you do the trade war thing...."
Trump: "But they're saying they love me, where's the problem?
Advisory Panel: "Well you see sir not everything is always about getting instant praise and gratification, sometimes you have to know when to cut a group loose that'll tie you die far worse later.....
Trump: "BUT PRAISE! FOR ME! ME ME ME! Where's the problem again guy? Why do I have to denounce these people that say good things about ME!"
Advisory Panel: *Collective wince in unison*

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

The Glumslinger posted:

Yeah, some of my coworkers are coming around to feel that Trump isn't just cynically pandering to white supremacists for political gain, but because he actually believes in it

I'm not convinced he believes it overtly, rather than de facto believing it through unexamined specific beliefs. But the two aren't crazy different in practice. I don't think Trump thinks "black people are innately inferior to white people" in those terms, but he thinks that they don't face real discrimination, that BLM are just causing trouble, etc.

But I'm not 100% SURE of my position and that's pretty messed up.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

GWBBQ posted:

The Red Wings are suing them.

The obvious low-hanging fruit is the actual, literal Nazi in the administration, but nobody seems to know what he does and I'm not convinced Trump does, either.

Stephen Miller is standing in for comms director, RIP Mooch.

I wouldn't exactly describe Bannon as a Nazi, he has his own somewhat enunciated neofascist ideology. Adjacent and close enough that I'm fishmeching a bit but he's exactly the sort of guy who would himself quibble about his disagreements with Adolf Hitler's ideology. :v:

Red Baron
Mar 9, 2007

ty slumfrog :)
Recently within my social groups it seems like there's a bit of the "Rey meets Han Solo" moment going on for people. Like things have crystallized and then Han says "it's true. All of it." Even the worst person I know in regards to racial divides has take a step back and contemplated, however shallow.

It's something, and I'll take it.

John Wick of Dogs
Mar 4, 2017

A real hellraiser


The Glumslinger posted:

I still find it hilarious that Teen Vogue is at the forefront of mainstream wokeness

God, 2017 is loving weird

It's not like it's staffed and edited by teens.

Toaster Beef
Jan 23, 2007

that's not nature's way

Red Baron posted:

Recently within my social groups it seems like there's a bit of the "Rey meets Han Solo" moment going on for people. Like things have crystallized and then Han says "it's true. All of it." Even the worst person I know in regards to racial divides has take a step back and contemplated, however shallow.

It's something, and I'll take it.

That's cool, because I've seen way too many pearl-clutching middle-aged white women insisting both sides are bad and BLM violence is just as unacceptable.

Because BLM is the Nazi opposition party? I guess?

Spiritus Nox
Sep 2, 2011

Unoriginal Name posted:

I'm not even sure Trump's hesitation to condemn this come from his racism. I really think its because he's that loving lazy.

"Hmm? Nazi March? Do I really have to get on TV for that? I guess I can say it's bad or whatever but I'm going to the course afterwords"

It's a basically meaningless distinction from any practical perspective, but I do wonder sometimes how much of Trump's behavior is sincere, specific racism and how much of it is just an extension of his overwhelming misanthropy and narcissism. He hates black people, sure, but I feel like he hates absolutely everyone, his hatred is simply easier and more socially acceptable to act upon when it's directed towards minorities.

Not that it really matters, like I said. Just a chicken and egg question I find myself dwelling on occasionally.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Al Borland Corp. posted:

It's not like it's staffed and edited by teens.

*angrily cancels subscription to Cat Fancy magazine*

MasterSlowPoke
Oct 9, 2005

Our courage will pull us through

theflyingorc posted:

I'm not convinced he believes it overtly, rather than de facto believing it through unexamined specific beliefs. But the two aren't crazy different in practice. I don't think Trump thinks "black people are innately inferior to white people" in those terms, but he thinks that they don't face real discrimination, that BLM are just causing trouble, etc.

But I'm not 100% SURE of my position and that's pretty messed up.

Trump's first newspaper article was about him denying rent to black tenants. There's been no reason to think his views have changed in all his years.

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

theflyingorc posted:

I'm not convinced he believes it overtly,

His dad was in the KKK, he was born in the 1940s and he has been sued multiple times for discrimination. Is there literally any reason at all to give him benefit of the doubt? Except that gross thing where we just give white people benefit of the doubt as "not real racists" forever and ever no matter what they do?

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Arrgytehpirate posted:

I just realized we're not even at a loving year yet holy poo poo

What are you talking about, Scaramucci was fired eighteen months ago

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Reflections85 posted:

free will stuff
Yeah, I'm firmly in the Younger Strawson's camp here. I honestly don't really get the point of X-Phi here. Collecting folk intuitions seems to me a good thing in itself, but it doesn't really address what I care about. And even compatibilists like Dan Dennett will start out with the position that folk ideas are incoherent.
I could say more, but really, Galen Strawson says it all much better than I could.

Reflections85 posted:

I think blame is important for two reasons. First, because I find retributionism appealing and have not been won over by the no-moral responsibility team, believe that blameworthiness and praiseworthiness of patients should change our attitudes about them, even if we have other reasons for action that compel us to a similar conclusion. That is to say, I think blame is a salient moral characteristic when we use morality to guide our actions and determine appropriate attitudes. Second, most people believe in blame and praise and act accordingly to blame and praise. So that seems to give me a pragmatic reason to care about it.
Sure, but in the same sense we should also care about hatred and envy and pettiness, or maybe starvation and disease and war. They're facts, very important facts, that govern our lives. But they're contingent.

Reflections85 posted:

And, honestly, I find discussion of causes difficult because it seems very hard in most cases to know what the effects of actions will be.

E.g. You, I believe, have mentioned the rise of the Nazis and communist street violence in Weimar as relating to the success of the Nazis. On the one hand, that is probably responsible for some success, but I am skeptical with how much. When I think of Weimar, I certain structural problems. I see the SPD failing to work with the far left and setting the freikorp against them in 18-19 and a cult of violence built amongst ex-soldiers (look at the soldiers profiled in Male Fantasies). The state itself was unstable and had to survive a putsch from Kapp. And the major conservative party (DNVP) opposed democracy and in the wake of the Great Depression effectively ended democracy by vesting dictatorial power into the president (by 1930, there is a article by Michael Dreyer who understands it as effectively a four part coup where different elements of the democratic system of Weimar are destroyed, but I do not have it right now, could probably get it in a week or so).

So, I would read the destruction of democracy as being primarily caused by the Great Depression and by the DNVP (and to a lesser extent the KPD). Yet the DNVP would always face the problem of being very unpopular and the only party that they could turn to would be the Nazis. I look at the Reichstag fire as being ultimately secondary to their ascension to power, because the DNVP would have always been weak on the popular front and so would have always needed to turn to a right-wing violent band with popular support (like the Nazis).
I agree: I wouldn't want to claim street violence was the primary reason the Nazis ended up in power (the Reichstagbrand was more about consolidation anyways). Just that the effect of much more brutal nazi punching than we're seeing right now was not, so it seems, good. And I'm not saying this with much confidence either, given how hard it is to identify causality.
I'm also not saying violent resistance would have been bad. I'm with Tucholsky here: if you can save democracy and civilisation and civil liberties only with rifles, then you better get rifles. But if you can save them by other means, or if violence can't save it either, then that is clearly a different situation.
And of course, more saliently, violence might make it much worse in some situations, and I think this is one.

Reflections85 posted:

But this also seems to have further implications to me though. The person who burned down the Reichstag was, as far as I can tell, an unemployed Dutch Communist. It seems like it would be very difficult to control all people who have ideological affinity to you, especially in situations where democracy is dying and violence has been intensely normalized. So even if it was the cause, it hardly seems to tell us what we should do about violent antifa now (especially when the US has a number of points of disanalogy with Weimar).
Well, we shouldn't cheer on them. If it's clear to the centre (to the extent it is still there) that the left is horrified by lone wolves nominally in their camp, then a brutal crackdown probably won't have much public support. If people are dancing in the streets and celebrating leftist violence, then the centre will more readily support oppression.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Chilichimp posted:

Willem Dafosah Sherman?

*Sherman stands on a hill overlooking Atlanta as it burns to the ground*

"Chaos reigns!"

Azhais
Feb 5, 2007
Switchblade Switcharoo

Data Graham posted:

I'm going to laugh a lot if Charlottesville with its "defend the Lee monument" headline is the catalyst that prompts the entire South to take down all their Confederacy monuments.

Since people hate history so much, we should also plow Gettysburg under and put in a waterpark or something

Fajita Queen
Jun 21, 2012

Does anybody know a good place to archive crawl for Reddit? I'm trying to find quotes from posts in r/altright (which has since been banned) that show support for neo-nazi ideologies and I haven't had any luck with finding something to view them.

Notably, this post which was a "mission statement" listing their goals: https://www.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/4zr372/

KickerOfMice
Jun 7, 2017

[/color]Keep firing, assholes![/color]

Spaceballs the custom title.
Fun Shoe

boner confessor posted:

*angrily cancels subscription to Cat Fancy magazine*

:v:

perfect, perfect.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Chilichimp posted:

Yes, it's the battle hymn, but I mean literally the part of the song where he's singing "Glory Glory Hallelujah".

I can see why they didn't go with "As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free"

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

MasterSlowPoke posted:

Trump's first newspaper article was about him denying rent to black tenants. There's been no reason to think his views have changed in all his years.

Sure, and that can easily be capitalization on racism, rather than actual racist feelings - ie society is/was racist, so he happily does racist things that benefit him because he doesn't give a poo poo about people or doing racist things.

In practice, the two positions aren't really that different - the question is whether or not he's more like a white character from Get Out or a white character from American History X. Is he happy to use racism or does he actually hate minorities? I don't know, and both are horrible.

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

His dad was in the KKK, he was born in the 1940s and he has been sued multiple times for discrimination. Is there literally any reason at all to give him benefit of the doubt? Except that gross thing where we just give white people benefit of the doubt as "not real racists" forever and ever no matter what they do?

A big part of my point is that it doesn't really matter. He's going to be a force that makes black lives worse regardless of whether his motivation is actually hating black people or lining his own pockets.

theflyingorc fucked around with this message at 19:53 on Aug 14, 2017

Grapplejack
Nov 27, 2007

Arrgytehpirate posted:

Looks like WV has two confederate statues

It really shouldn't have any, considering.

Red Baron
Mar 9, 2007

ty slumfrog :)

Toaster Beef posted:

That's cool, because I've seen way too many pearl-clutching middle-aged white women insisting both sides are bad and BLM violence is just as unacceptable.

Because BLM is the Nazi opposition party? I guess?

Yeah, there's plenty of those too, but I'm just trying to focus on the people who seem to be waking up to the reality of what's happening right now. I'm hoping a groundswell in their immediate social circles will help them see what's going on as well, but I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.

JehovahsWetness
Dec 9, 2005

bang that shit retarded

The Shortest Path posted:

Does anybody know a good place to archive crawl for Reddit? I'm trying to find quotes from posts in r/altright (which has since been banned) that show support for neo-nazi ideologies and I haven't had any luck with finding something to view them.

Notably, this post which was a "mission statement" listing their goals: https://www.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/4zr372/

It's partially quoted by a few other posts like: https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/50hzxf/a_definitive_answer_to_the_question_what_is_the/

quote:

The Alt Right is a racial movement and has always been a racial movement. Race is at the very core of the alt right and there is absolutely no way to be alt right without discussing racial realism, especially from a white perspective. The mainstream media was not lying to you when they said we are full of white nationalists, racial realists, and fascists. That is what we are and we really do not give a poo poo about tax cuts or other policy issues.

Drunk Theory
Aug 20, 2016


Oven Wrangler

theflyingorc posted:

Sure, and that can easily be capitalization on racism, rather than actual racist feelings - ie society is/was racist, so he happily does racist things that benefit him because he doesn't give a poo poo about people or doing racist things.

In practice, the two positions aren't really that different - the question is whether or not he's more like a white character from Get Out or a white character from American History X. Is he happy to be use racism or does he actually hate minorities? I don't know, and both are horrible.

But you bring up that in practice the two positions aren't that different. So why even care about the question when the conclusion ends the same way? It just extends the benefit of the doubt when the outcome is already known.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Blue Footed Booby posted:

:lol: loving Brazil?!

Someone probably already covered this but there was a weirdly specific diaspora of southern shitbags that glorify antebellum and, uh, midbellum culture to this day

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Chilichimp posted:

Yes, it's the battle hymn, but I mean literally the part of the song where he's singing "Glory Glory Hallelujah".

The shrine to the Confederacy plays "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"?

:psyduck:

HappyHippo
Nov 19, 2003
Do you have an Air Miles Card?
https://twitter.com/ryanbeckwith/status/897166829122179072

https://twitter.com/ryanbeckwith/status/897167248426762243

https://twitter.com/ryanbeckwith/status/897167685288689667

https://twitter.com/ryanbeckwith/status/897168175988711426

Bicyclops
Aug 27, 2004

I missed approval ratings chat, but both Bushes, Carter, Truman and Nixon have had lower approval ratings (he's also tied with Johnson's lowest rating).

His highest approval rating is the lowest of any president since 1937.

Truman, Nixon and Bush II are the only Presidents who've beat him on highest DISapproval rating.

That's pretty loving bad for less than nine months in.

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







Bicyclops posted:

Truman, Nixon and Bush II are the only Presidents who've beat him on highest DISapproval rating.

That's pretty loving bad for less than nine months in.

Truman: Post ww2/civil rights/massive corruption
Nixon: Watergate
Bush: Iraq/Katrina
Trump: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Bicyclops posted:

That's pretty loving bad for less than nine months in.

Also, as above, for not having really done or been challenged by much of anything.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Flip Yr Wig posted:

Not so sure about that. The Nazis know that they're still marginal enough that Trump needs to occasionally distance himself from them. They'll interpret his begrudging tardiness as support.

Yeah, this is exactly what happened during the campaign when Trump finally condemned the white supremacists after waffling for a few days first - they took his clearly-reluctant condemnation as just a token move that he had been forced by the media and the politicians to say. The fact that he resisted it for so long was the dogwhistle, and they heard it loud and clear.

Azhais
Feb 5, 2007
Switchblade Switcharoo

See, now this I'm OK with. Take them all and put them in a museum/gallery of Confederate things.


Black bagging the statues and dragging them off to who knows where, less so.

Grapplejack
Nov 27, 2007

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Someone probably already covered this but there was a weirdly specific diaspora of southern shitbags that glorify antebellum and, uh, midbellum culture to this day

Don't forget the actual Nazis that moved there during the end of WW2.

Jayisspecial
Sep 16, 2006

Therock Obama

theflyingorc posted:

Sure, and that can easily be capitalization on racism, rather than actual racist feelings - ie society is/was racist, so he happily does racist things that benefit him because he doesn't give a poo poo about people or doing racist things.

In practice, the two positions aren't really that different - the question is whether or not he's more like a white character from Get Out or a white character from American History X. Is he happy to be use racism or does he actually hate minorities? I don't know, and both are horrible.

There was a story that came out during the election about his ownership of a book of Hitler speeches. That is very likely the only interest in history that Trump has ever taken. The dude probably doesn't want to put Omerosa in chains but he has made it very clear that the correct world order is one where the white man holds all the power and keeps the blacks in line with their superior abilities. His obsessive hatred of Obama, the only black man to actually lord over him, is also very tellling. He didn't denounce these nazi's because his ideal world is their world view. They are his people.

Bicyclops
Aug 27, 2004

Just imagine if there's a national disaster, he drops a nuclear bomb, and the Russian investigations accelerate. He could break all the records!

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

Red Baron posted:

Recently within my social groups it seems like there's a bit of the "Rey meets Han Solo" moment going on for people. Like things have crystallized and then Han says "it's true. All of it." Even the worst person I know in regards to racial divides has take a step back and contemplated, however shallow.

It's something, and I'll take it.

I noted this earlier in the thread. My facebook wall isn't awash with apologism for once, and it seems like Punching Nazi's going mainstream, which is nice.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

Drunk Theory posted:

But you bring up that in practice the two positions aren't that different. So why even care about the question when the conclusion ends the same way? It just extends the benefit of the doubt when the outcome is already known.
Fair enough. I don't think it's "benefit of the doubt" but more "speculation on what kind of evil motivates Trump." I'd be hard pressed to call either position morally worse than the other. I only care about the question because it's interesting to me, not because I think it radically changes the situation.

Fajita Queen
Jun 21, 2012


Thank you, this is very helpful.


In other news...

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/346487-trump-approval-falls-to-lowest-level-ever-in-gallup-poll

61% disapproval, though this was before his new statement condemning nazis so it might change again soon.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

farraday posted:

The shrine to the Confederacy plays "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"?

:psyduck:

it's a whole big thing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pnKMFwb8mI

ReidRansom
Oct 25, 2004


theflyingorc posted:

I'm not convinced he believes it overtly, rather than de facto believing it through unexamined specific beliefs. But the two aren't crazy different in practice. I don't think Trump thinks "black people are innately inferior to white people" in those terms, but he thinks that they don't face real discrimination, that BLM are just causing trouble, etc.

But I'm not 100% SURE of my position and that's pretty messed up.

I'm with you.

Like, I'm not sure it's not just him reflecting the ideals of his supporters because he's an insecure narcissist and they have projected their beliefs onto him and support him unconditionally or some poo poo. I'm genuinely not sure the man has an original thought that wasn't put there by someone else or otherwise subconsciously (or even purposefully) adopted to ingratiate himself with whatever group.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


'Here's the thing,' I say to people. 'If one side is labeling themselves antifa - ANTI-fascist - who do you think makes up the other side?'

  • Locked thread