|
Danaru posted:I'm no ethics major or anything but sweet jesus yes expose him it sucks for the hospital but also he's a literal child rapist. I cannot even imagine thinking "well a couple of raped children is just the price we pay for a hospital funding " It's a common ethics question that's been around forever--do you allow a few people to suffer in order to spare a huge number from suffering? (see: The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas) Personally I find it horrifically sociopathic, but it's something that a good number of people are OK with, especially if they don't see the suffering.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:29 |
|
If you wouldn't personally kill a baby to save 10 babies you're a bad person.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:34 |
|
Volcott posted:If you wouldn't personally kill a baby to save 10 babies you're a bad person. I'm such a good person I didn't even have to consider the ten babies.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:36 |
|
Gen X: Exposing this scandal is a complex ethical question, as the lives of etc. etc. ... Millenials: Exposing this scandal is going to cause so many Twitter meltdowns
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:37 |
|
Something something trolley problem.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:37 |
|
Mak0rz posted:He's... He's still at it, if you're wondering I like that dude is arguing about using Normal People words instead of Educated People words but he's doing it with a shitload of ten dollar words to try and look smarter than everyone else. Screaming Idiot posted:How toxic is your ideology when incels dunk on you? I can't tell if it's a serious post or some kind of ten levels of irony thing.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:41 |
|
lol just lol if you think ethics matter for people with power under capitalism anyone with 1 million or more in assets should be shot
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:42 |
|
But what if someone has, like, a big hunk of platinum and they chuck it at you and you catch it and now you're the rich rear end in a top hat and you have to shoot yourself. We need safeguards, is what I'm saying.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 18:46 |
|
CheesyDog posted:Gen X: Exposing this scandal is a complex ethical question, as the lives of etc. etc. ... Sorry, what do you think people are saying here?
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:12 |
|
Danaru posted:I'm no ethics major or anything but sweet jesus yes expose him it sucks for the hospital but also he's a literal child rapist. I cannot even imagine thinking "well a couple of raped children is just the price we pay for a hospital funding " It was not even hypothetical. this was literally an ethics lecture concluding with "Do not expose Jimmy Saville!" while technically not mentioning his name. He was Britain's dirtiest, most open secret for decades. Everyone knew. The BBC, the government, the royals, the NHS, you name it, they knew of it. As for why he was given a key to the morgue? My sad guess is someone thought it was better he diddled dead kiddies. If he had access to enough stiffs he might leave the live ones alone...
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:15 |
|
where is a giant world ending comet when you need one?
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:17 |
|
sneakyfrog posted:where is a giant world ending comet when you need one?
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:21 |
|
Midnight Voyager posted:Sorry, what do you think people are saying here? That the seemingly complex ethical standards of journalism have always largely been a fake moralizing of decorum to protect the rich and powerful, and that a generation that grew up under social media has cast them aside in favor of embarrassing the elite whenever possible
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:27 |
|
CheesyDog posted:That the seemingly complex ethical standards of journalism have always largely been a fake moralizing of decorum to protect the rich and powerful, and that a generation that grew up under social media has cast them aside in favor of embarrassing the elite whenever possible Yeah! Isn't it great?!
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:32 |
|
Volcott posted:But what if someone has, like, a big hunk of platinum and they chuck it at you and you catch it and now you're the rich rear end in a top hat and you have to shoot yourself. I think you’re overestimating the average goon hand-eye coordination
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:40 |
|
I understand that some of the victims of Saville's abuse had complained to hospital management, only to be told to keep quiet about it. Quite a lot of people clearly don't care about sexual abuse all that much.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:40 |
|
Volcott posted:But what if someone has, like, a big hunk of platinum and they chuck it at you and you catch it and now you're the rich rear end in a top hat and you have to shoot yourself. I'm a millennial, dying doesn't worry me. CheesyDog posted:That the seemingly complex ethical standards of journalism have always largely been a fake moralizing of decorum to protect the rich and powerful, and that a generation that grew up under social media has cast them aside in favor of embarrassing the elite whenever possible ethics is a field focused on finding how to justify the current social order and always has been, no gods no masters smoke weed erryday
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:46 |
|
It's kind of amazing that if pizzagaters didn't believe that Trump and his ilk are white hat pedophiles, they'd actually be pretty drat close to being right.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:48 |
|
Speaking of which, Dersh having a right normal one. https://twitter.com/AlanDersh/status/1102030042379370496
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:52 |
|
The whole Savile protection stuff is such bullshit. It's not like there's not enough tax avoiding philantropy funds to go around. If someone hosed him over, rich people would be stumbling over themselves to be the person who saved the hospital from the pedophile they just protected a pedophile for effectively nothing and that's the end of the story
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 19:59 |
|
nerdz posted:The whole Savile protection stuff is such bullshit. It's not like there's not enough tax avoiding philantropy funds to go around. If someone hosed him over, rich people would be stumbling over themselves to be the person who saved the hospital from the pedophile Most of those tax avoiding philanthropy funds are also run by pedophiles
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:03 |
|
actually rich people spent like three decades stumbling over themselves to make sure that a peer in their class would never suffer consequences
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:03 |
|
I mean, I'm just saying that using "but what about the kids" as an excuse was absolute bullshit. Like you said, the real issue here are the rich people protecting each other and their deviant interests
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:07 |
|
I'm surprised nobody tried to bring him down. There wasn't anyone out there with nothing to lose?
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:13 |
|
The Scottish comedian Jerry Sadowitz has been openly calling Saville a paedophile on stage since the 1980s. It was never a secret.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:18 |
|
Panfilo posted:I'm surprised nobody tried to bring him down. There wasn't anyone out there with nothing to lose? How long have people known about R. Kelly? And it still took a documentary and resulting public outcry (in an era when we care a lot more about sexual offenses) to get law enforcement to actually move on the creep. People knew about Saville and publicly made jokes and comments on it, but the people in position to actually stop him didn't want to.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:41 |
|
CheesyDog posted:Gen X: Exposing this scandal is a complex ethical question, as the lives of etc. etc. ... Millennials: Maybe leaving a child rapist free to rape kids in exchange for donations to one hospital isn't a good idea. Gen X: Yeah, but it's just a few kids getting raped, lol
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:41 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Yeah! Isn't it great?! Absurd Alhazred posted:Speaking of which, Dersh having a right normal one. when you're Extremely Innocent
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:54 |
|
Whoa wait, when did Gen X become the bad guys. Younger Boomers are still in charge of everything.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:55 |
|
Krispy Wafer posted:Whoa wait, when did Gen X become the bad guys. Younger Boomers are still in charge of everything. When you grew up and sold out man
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:56 |
|
Krispy Wafer posted:Gen X... Younger Boomers
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:56 |
|
Krispy Wafer posted:Whoa wait, when did Gen X become the bad guys. Younger Boomers are still in charge of everything. Have you seen Reality Bytes? They've always been terrible.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 20:58 |
|
Well poo poo. Guess it's time to yell at kids on my lawn.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:00 |
|
Don't trust anyone over thirty
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:01 |
|
CheesyDog posted:That the seemingly complex ethical standards of journalism have always largely been a fake moralizing of decorum to protect the rich and powerful, and that a generation that grew up under social media has cast them aside in favor of embarrassing the elite whenever possible The solution is to expose the rich kiddyfucker and then donate everything he owns to charitable causes when he's languishing in jail eternally. Boom, eat poo poo, ethical conundrum.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:01 |
|
Skwirl posted:Have you seen Reality Bytes? They've always been terrible. Or Rent? Eugh.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:03 |
|
Pththya-lyi posted:Don't trust anyone over thirty
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:04 |
|
Krispy Wafer posted:Whoa wait, when did Gen X become the bad guys. Younger Boomers are still in charge of everything. It was a riff off of Cheesydog's post
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:14 |
|
and on my side I'm just making light of how an exam question about protecting a generous pedo would be viewed in 2019 vs. 1996
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:29 |
|
Krispy Wafer posted:Whoa wait, when did Gen X become the bad guys. Younger Boomers are still in charge of everything. Gen X was the generation that could’ve done something, but never really did beyond writing songs and movies complaining then just sat on its rear end waiting for someone else to fix everything. I’m at that age where I could either be a young X or an old millennial, and I’ll take the millennial.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2019 21:39 |