Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Lexicon
Jul 29, 2003

I had a beer with Stephen Harper once and now I like him.
^ as I said, he's either a genius or a lunatic.

A thread on global financial governance would be excellent!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Rime posted:

I came close to dying of hypothermia a few months ago, believe me, it's easily one of the worst ways to die unless it sets in very fast. You just lie there, thinking about everything you ever hosed up.

Did you actually start living in a van? Winters a bitch, eh.

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum

Rutibex posted:

Did you actually start living in a van? Winters a bitch, eh.

I was caught in heavy rain in the high alpine for four days while solo traversing the Stein, my jacket failed, my boots split open, and it got through my pack cover and drybags. When I got down off the mountains I had a pair of dry socks and long underwear, everything else was drenched. Hot food was not an option, because there was something cracking trees less than thirty feet from my tent. I set up on the SAR helicopter pad, three days from civilization in every direction, and hugged a flare to my chest while the realization set in that I was going to die. I thought about the things I would never see again, that I would never taste my mothers cooking again, that things I'd left unsettled would remain as such, and that they wouldn't find my body for another seven days when I finally became overdue.

When I got camp set up, I was well into moderate hypothermia and heading for severe. Had my clothes not been wool and my sleeping quilt not water-resistant down, I would be dead. Had I taken an hour or two longer to reach camp, I would be dead. When I reached the cable car, my hands were blue and barely able to operate it. This lake is a lovely place to die:



The sun came out the next day and I hiked the valley in two and a half days, 22, 28, and 15km. :black101:

Kafka Esq.
Jan 1, 2005

"If you ever even think about calling me anything but 'The Crab' I will go so fucking crab on your ass you won't even see what crab'd your crab" -The Crab(TM)
You seriously walked 3 days from nowhere in boots so shoddy they broke open because of rain?!

tagesschau
Sep 1, 2006

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
THE SPEECH SUPPRESSOR


Remember: it's "antisemitic" to protest genocide as long as the targets are brown.
Percentage of Toronto condos owned by foreign investors is very low, CMHC says

quote:

For the first time, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has put a number on the percentage of condos across the country owned by foreign investors and says it's highest in Toronto -- at a mere 2.4 per cent.

:munch:

tagesschau fucked around with this message at 20:29 on Dec 16, 2014

Kafka Esq.
Jan 1, 2005

"If you ever even think about calling me anything but 'The Crab' I will go so fucking crab on your ass you won't even see what crab'd your crab" -The Crab(TM)
There's more than a few foreign owners who actually live in the condos, though, right? Is there anything on vacancy in there?

MickeyFinn
May 8, 2007
Biggie Smalls and Junior Mafia some mark ass bitches

Isn't the difference between a tight market and a loose market a few percentage points?

tagesschau
Sep 1, 2006

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
THE SPEECH SUPPRESSOR


Remember: it's "antisemitic" to protest genocide as long as the targets are brown.

MickeyFinn posted:

Isn't the difference between a tight market and a loose market a few percentage points?

I think the point is more that high foreign ownership isn't driving up condo prices, because high foreign ownership of condos is not actually a thing.

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Rime posted:

I was caught in heavy rain in the high alpine for four days while solo traversing the Stein, my jacket failed, my boots split open, and it got through my pack cover and drybags. When I got down off the mountains I had a pair of dry socks and long underwear, everything else was drenched. Hot food was not an option, because there was something cracking trees less than thirty feet from my tent. I set up on the SAR helicopter pad, three days from civilization in every direction, and hugged a flare to my chest while the realization set in that I was going to die. I thought about the things I would never see again, that I would never taste my mothers cooking again, that things I'd left unsettled would remain as such, and that they wouldn't find my body for another seven days when I finally became overdue.

When I got camp set up, I was well into moderate hypothermia and heading for severe. Had my clothes not been wool and my sleeping quilt not water-resistant down, I would be dead. Had I taken an hour or two longer to reach camp, I would be dead. When I reached the cable car, my hands were blue and barely able to operate it. This lake is a lovely place to die:



The sun came out the next day and I hiked the valley in two and a half days, 22, 28, and 15km. :black101:

I'm glad you survived and all but geez don't go backpacking multiple days in the wilderness alone. That's just common sense.

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002





Quality editing right there, TorStar. The last figure should read condos. And those numbers don't mean a lot if they're not adjust or normalized for the location/geographical distribution/square footage of condos vs apartments. Still, on the face of it... why would you rent a condo? Yeesh.

Franks Happy Place
Mar 15, 2011

It is by weed alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the dank of Sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by weed alone I set my mind in motion.

Kafka Esq. posted:

You seriously walked 3 days from nowhere in boots so shoddy they broke open because of rain?!

Rutibex posted:

I'm glad you survived and all but geez don't go backpacking multiple days in the wilderness alone. That's just common sense.

Wait, did you guys all miss his E/N thread about wanting to buy a cheap yacht and sail across the world, despite not knowing anything about sailing?

Kalenn Istarion
Nov 2, 2012

Maybe Senpai will finally notice me now that I've dropped :fivebux: on this snazzy av

Guy DeBorgore posted:

It's a little bizarre to see posters who wouldn't trust Ben Bernanke if he said the sky was blue, applauding Hal_2005's walls of financial jargon. They must be reacting to the tone rather than the content. I have a pretty strong background in econ and a bit in finance and I can hardly discern much a point out of any of it.

This post in particular seems like total gibberish to me:


A "bail-in" for those who don't know is when a distressed bank or other financial institution is recapitalized by imposing losses on shareholders and bondholders. I.e. a bailout but using private money instead of taxpayer dollars. If that sounds fairer and less open to moral hazard than the taxpayer-funded bailouts of 2008, that's because it is. The legal and regulatory mechanisms to carry out bail-ins didn't exist in 2008, but since then there's been a great deal of work to prepare for them. That's what the first sentence and the last link mean.

The bit in the middle has nothing to do with bail-ins. The second sentence appears to be describing a liquidity crunch, not a bail-in, which if anything is a tool for preventing liquidity crunches. I don't follow the markets so I don't know what he's referring to with "blowouts" "semi-hourly market breaks" or "STRIPs" except to say with 100% confidence that they're unnecessary jargon. Nor do I know anything about Canadian investment funds blowing up this weekend, or what that has to do with the Greek bond market, except that I have no idea how we got there from "bail-ins."

On a side note, if anyone would be interested in a global financial governance thread, I just finished writing an essay for a class on the topic so I would totally try to contribute/could do the OP if there's enough interest.

I'd be interested but suggest it gets put in BFC instead of D&D to enable a more balanced discussion.

Rime posted:

I was caught in heavy rain in the high alpine for four days while solo traversing the Stein, my jacket failed, my boots split open, and it got through my pack cover and drybags. When I got down off the mountains I had a pair of dry socks and long underwear, everything else was drenched. Hot food was not an option, because there was something cracking trees less than thirty feet from my tent. I set up on the SAR helicopter pad, three days from civilization in every direction, and hugged a flare to my chest while the realization set in that I was going to die. I thought about the things I would never see again, that I would never taste my mothers cooking again, that things I'd left unsettled would remain as such, and that they wouldn't find my body for another seven days when I finally became overdue.

When I got camp set up, I was well into moderate hypothermia and heading for severe. Had my clothes not been wool and my sleeping quilt not water-resistant down, I would be dead. Had I taken an hour or two longer to reach camp, I would be dead. When I reached the cable car, my hands were blue and barely able to operate it. This lake is a lovely place to die:



The sun came out the next day and I hiked the valley in two and a half days, 22, 28, and 15km. :black101:

That valley actually looks like a nice place to bite it. Better there than suburbia :v:

EoRaptor
Sep 13, 2003

by Fluffdaddy

tagesschau posted:

I think the point is more that high foreign ownership isn't driving up condo prices, because high foreign ownership of condos is not actually a thing.

That also hides investment vehicles, eg: a Canadian holding company whose assets are all real estate and whose working capital is all from foreign dollars. The officer of the company is likely also a per hour lawyer.

This will count as Canadian investment, even though it's just another step in the way money is laundered. I agree the panic about foreign ownership is overblown, but the stats depend on banks, builders and agents being truthful when reporting to CMHC, which isn't a good way of generating accurate figures.

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum

Franks Happy Place posted:

Wait, did you guys all miss his E/N thread about wanting to buy a cheap yacht and sail across the world, despite not knowing anything about sailing?

Bitch I write my CYA day skipper exam next week and passed the practical last weekend. :colbert:

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

eXXon posted:



Quality editing right there, TorStar. The last figure should read condos. And those numbers don't mean a lot if they're not adjust or normalized for the location/geographical distribution/square footage of condos vs apartments. Still, on the face of it... why would you rent a condo? Yeesh.

Some people are obsessed with having everything brand new and all the bells and whistles so they rather spend almost double to rent a shiny new condo than a perfectly great purpose built apartment that might not have granite countertops or a wifi enabled popcorn machine with built in surround-sound you can control from your phone. They also love having an amateur landlord and being treated as a 2nd class citizen by people who own.

When I was moving last year we looked at a lot of rentals, the condos were always way more expensive. I didn't think they were much nicer but holy gently caress were they more expensive for the same or less amount of space. But some of them had a gym or a roof-top bbq deck or what ever poo poo justifies the way higher price.

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

Rime posted:

Bitch I write my CYA day skipper exam next week and passed the practical last weekend. :colbert:

Wait, does this mean those mean old broads at the DMV finally gave you a driver's license?

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
Rime is a hard rear end. You can be my wing man any time.

triplexpac
Mar 24, 2007

Suck it
Two tears in a bucket
And then another thing
I'm not the one they'll try their luck with
Hit hard like brass knuckles
See your face through the turnbuckle dude
I got no love for you
Condos get fibre internet so there's that at least. My stupid old apartment building can't get it :smith:

MickeyFinn
May 8, 2007
Biggie Smalls and Junior Mafia some mark ass bitches

tagesschau posted:

I think the point is more that high foreign ownership isn't driving up condo prices, because high foreign ownership of condos is not actually a thing.

That was my question. If the difference between a tight market (totally made up number: 4%) and a loose market totally made up number: 6%) is only 2%, then having 2.4% of your property owned by foreigners is, indeed, the difference between ever increasing property prices and an easier market for buyers. I have seen here, in the LA rental market, that 2-4% vacancy is considered extremely tight and 7-9% vacancy hilariously loose. So, foreigners running in and snapping up 2.4% of the rentals in LA could very well make the difference between cheap living and expensive as hell. Anyway, my point is that "small numbers" have to be compared to something else. If 2.4% of my body was cancer, that would be really, really bad.

Saltin
Aug 20, 2003
Don't touch

MickeyFinn posted:

That was my question. If the difference between a tight market (totally made up number: 4%) and a loose market totally made up number: 6%) is only 2%, then having 2.4% of your property owned by foreigners is, indeed, the difference between ever increasing property prices and an easier market for buyers. I have seen here, in the LA rental market, that 2-4% vacancy is considered extremely tight and 7-9% vacancy hilariously loose. So, foreigners running in and snapping up 2.4% of the rentals in LA could very well make the difference between cheap living and expensive as hell. Anyway, my point is that "small numbers" have to be compared to something else. If 2.4% of my body was cancer, that would be really, really bad.

There is no shortage of condos though. Toronto is loving jam packed full of the fuckers, with 10's of thousands of units in the pipeline. There are loads of units unoccupied. So it's not like 2.4% foreign investment means anything other than less foreign investment than most people assume, at least in Toronto, which is the condo capital of the world as far as I can tell.

Lexicon
Jul 29, 2003

I had a beer with Stephen Harper once and now I like him.
:siren: Site C is a go :siren:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-government-approves-site-c-dam-1.2874433

This might be worthy of its own thread. I don't know much about it, but people I respect seem to think it's a very bad idea.

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum

Lexicon posted:

:siren: Site C is a go :siren:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-government-approves-site-c-dam-1.2874433

This might be worthy of its own thread. I don't know much about it, but people I respect seem to think it's a very bad idea.

This is the capstone on nearly two decades of mismanagement at BC Hydro, a legacy that should go down as possibly the most shortsighted and criminal actions of the BC Liberals by a significant margin.

The energy generated by Site C could be found by expanding and upgrading existing facilities, but then it wouldn't be located conveniently close to where it will be needed for LNG compression.

Destroying a vast swathe of the province to subsidize an industry that isn't even profitable. Goddammit all, Bennet is spinning in his grave. :negative:

Kalenn Istarion
Nov 2, 2012

Maybe Senpai will finally notice me now that I've dropped :fivebux: on this snazzy av

Rime posted:

Bitch I write my CYA day skipper exam next week and passed the practical last weekend. :colbert:

You know it takes many, many sailings to learn enough to not die in real oceans right

Also I thought you wanted to buy a farm or something

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=368723679

Iceland had a debt jubilee. Surprisingly, it's poor people who got hosed because they didn't have the 'vision' to be spendthrifts.

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
http://thetyee.ca/News/2014/12/12/Calgary-Homeownership-Hack/

quote:

"It was almost unbelievable," said Stephen Korkoya, who with his family last month moved into a new three-bedroom townhouse in Calgary's West Springs neighbourhood.

Korkoya, a line cook at Red Lobster, and his wife Marie Razafiarisoa, a nurse, became first-time homeowners recently after six years of renting. Their down payment on a townhouse in booming Cowtown? All of $2,000.

It happened thanks to a little bit of municipal socialism in this Canadian capital of free-market thinking: a city-owned organization that's also helped at least 499 other families into their own homes.

"When I first started thinking about buying a home, the downpayment was so high," Korkoya, a Liberian refugee who came to Canada with his family six years ago, said in a phone interview. "It's not that I couldn't afford it, but coming up with it all at same time was something that wasn't easy."

Every time he tried to save money towards the goal of owning a home to call his own, a more pressing cost would arise such as repairing his car. So he'd dig into his down payment savings.

Then a friend told him about Attainable Homes.

"When we heard about this opportunity, at first I couldn't believe it," he said.

The deal sounded too good to be true: Korkoya and Razafiarisoa could, if they qualified for a mortgage and met other conditions, buy a home from the organization for only $2,000 down. That's less than one per cent of the $240,000 price of an average Calgary condo or townhouse unit.

But the deal was real. There is a catch: buyers who take advantage of the offer must give back some of whatever profit they make when they eventually sell their unit -- a variety of 'paying it forward' that Attainable Homes will use to fund future first-time buyers.

Nonetheless, with the organization's units ranging from roughly $170,000 up to $310,000, the forgivable loan is a hand up that could be worth nearly $14,000 per taker once they've paid their share. That it came out of Alberta, perhaps Canada's most pro-free market province, might surprise some. But not Attainable Homes Calgary's CEO and President (and former City of Calgary top planner) David Watson; he thinks the famous ‘left coast’ might take some pointers.

"I'm pretty pumped about what we've been doing here," Watson said by phone from Calgary. Much as in Vancouver, salaries have been outpaced by an "aggressive" spike in housing prices in recent years he explained. A growing number of middle-class Calgarians work in the city but can only afford to live in outlying municipalities.

"It's a perfect storm. A whole bunch of people in the middle are losing out." Why not bring them within city limits, slash their daily commute, and see them accessing services (and paying taxes) closer to where they work?


Kickstarter Calgary

Except that Calgary hatched an idea, one that would be both simple and require as little government support as possible. "We like to keep it as simple as possible for both the people buying and my shareholders," Watson said.

Those 'shareholders' are in fact the citizens of Calgary via their city government. It was former mayor David Bronconnier who first championed its unique tack on affordable housing: bulk-buy units from real estate developers at a discount. For the developer, the lure was a guaranteed sale of a certain number of units, for example those remaining unsold after their marketing campaign runs out.

One way to look at it, Watson explains, is to think of "that discount [as] the down payment which we pass on to the buyer." More formally, Attainable Homes advances buyers a forgivable loan to cover all but $2,000 of the down payment on one of its homes. That's offset later, when the organization captures a cut of the increase in property value on the unit's sale down the road (see sidebar).

Meanwhile, people who are used to paying monthly rent start to earn equity in their home when that money is shifted to paying down their mortgage.

"The government has a role," Watson said. "I'm not going to diminish that fact. If the government hadn't kick-started the program, we wouldn't be here."

The initial investment was modest: roughly $2 million, shared between the city and the provincial government "to start this thing up and get it moving." Since then, it's become self-sustaining. In 2013, in fact, it generated an unexpectedly big $5.2-million surplus (up from a disappointing $1.4 million in 2012).

To meet its mid-case target of an annual $3.5-million surplus, the program needs to see 200 homeowners re-sell their units every year, Watson estimated. "We haven't got to that point yet," he admitted. "Next year we think we'll see that."

A major goal for Attainable Homes was to relieve Calgary's waiting lists of tenants for rental housing who find it increasingly hard to find affordable suites.

"This is to help people get onto the property ladder," Watson said. "It's not, frankly, to get people a house they can stay in forever -- though we don't have any restrictions or say they have to be out in five years.

"Anybody I can take out of rental frees up a rental property somewhere... So anybody we can move out to make way for people who really need it is a positive."

Like Korkoya, Watson said, many of his program's buyers "never thought they ever could" own their own homes. Yet once the down payment load was removed, some find that the monthly costs of carrying a mortgage and condominium fees are the same or even lower than their former rent.

"We were paying $1,400 to rent our two-bedroom house," Korkoya said. "Now we're paying $1,418... I have to show my mortgage papers to most of my friends before they can believe it when they see the house and how much I pay!

"It was unbelievable that with a single paycheque they'll give you a home of your own... but you get to be your own landlord."

One challenge, of course, is securing that mortgage in the first place, but Korkoya said he had no trouble with that. Although there is no minimum salary to qualify, Watson acknowledges that lower-income earners are unlikely to be pre-approved by a financial institution -- one of the Attainable Homes requirements -- even by one of the organization's formal partner banks.

"Clearly some people aren't going to be able to afford a mortgage," he said. "In Calgary, the minimum [income required for a mortgage] is around $45,000. But if somebody could convince a bank they could carry a mortgage, whatever that is, we see if we can fit them in."

Back to Lotusland

So, could this work in the country's most expensive city? Watson admits that hemmed-in Vancouver's higher land costs mean "it would be quite challenging to do it in the same way."

Certainly Vancouver's 73 per cent higher average unit selling price Calgary this year, according to newly released Re/Max figures, suggests that offering a similar deal to cover the same number of buyers in this city would require a correspondingly bigger budgeting: by this logic, a city kickstart of $3.5 million (instead of Calgary's $2 million), and buyers putting down $3,500 up front (instead of Attainable Homes' $2,000).

While $3.5 million might seem like a big ask, consider that it's less than a quarter of the $16.6 million, or nearly six per cent of its capital expenditures, that Vancouver budgeted this year to "facilitate the construction of affordable housing."

Another issue might be the availability of 'bulk-buy' units from developers. "If we were to move it to Vancouver, are there builders out there interested in doing it?" Watson wonders. "You need a number of them, not just one. They need to be prepared to give back and invest expecting less margins to make things work."

Meanwhile, assuming that its first-time homebuyers start moving up and out at the rate Attainable Homes projects, Calgary's experiment continues to make headway transforming former renters into new owners.

Now moved into his new townhouse, Korkoya proudly posted photographs on his Facebook page from the day he received the keys and a toolbox from Calgary's current mayor, Neheed Nenshi, an Attainable Homes booster and board member.

"He came over to my place and did a tour of our home," Korkoya recalled. "It was a great experience for our family. He gave us the keys; we were so excited."

Korkoya also sent them to his relatives in Liberia, who "just couldn't believe" he now own a home.

"This is our first home," he boasted. "We are proud of it; we feel we have achieved something.

"I would like it if many people out there would get to know about Attainable Homes so they could benefit from it too."

what in everliving gently caress

cowofwar
Jul 30, 2002

by Athanatos
Cost of home ownership = mortgage payment duh

AVeryLargeRadish
Aug 19, 2011

I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW HOW TO NOT BE A WEIRD SEXUAL CREEP ABOUT PREPUBESCENT ANIME GIRLS, READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE!!!
I just couldn't stop shaking my head the whole way through reading that. I remember similar schemes run by some of the banks over here in the US leading up to the GFC. They liked to target blacks and other minorities, take a wild guess what these loans were commonly known as within the companies: "friend of the family Loans"

Classy eh?

FrozenVent
May 1, 2009

The Boeing 737-200QC is the undisputed workhorse of the skies.

Rime posted:

Bitch I write my CYA day skipper exam next week and passed the practical last weekend. :colbert:

The basic? Cause I did that in two or three weekends on a lake back when I was eighteen or so and uh... I wouldn't loan someone who's just passed it my boat.

The intermediate? That's a whole other six days. Congrats, you can now rent a boat. (Probably not in Europe)

To compare, the guy mopping floors on a cargo ship has three weeks of survival and emergency training.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

tagesschau posted:

I think the point is more that high foreign ownership isn't driving up condo prices, because high foreign ownership of condos is not actually a thing.

Yeah most of it is a red herring to help deflect blame from the financial literacy of the average canadian.

How prices are the fault of evil foreigners not bad local economic policy decisions.

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
The really sad thing about that tyee article is that it betrays the lack of financial literacy loving tyee editors and writers have.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

Cultural Imperial posted:

The really sad thing about that tyee article is that it betrays the lack of financial literacy loving tyee editors and writers have.

I like the whole Ponzi scheme feel of the whole thing, underwrite the whole thing since you sign up people now to get amazing future profits.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

There was a big development just outside of Victoria that basically had this system, it went bankrupt and there was a lot of rather extreme financial irregularities and funds vanishing.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

Baronjutter posted:

There was a big development just outside of Victoria that basically had this system, it went bankrupt and there was a lot of rather extreme financial irregularities and funds vanishing.

lol basically builders unload homes which will crash in the near future on high risk borrowers, while the muni government blesses the whole idea as a progressive affordable housing initiative. The whole scheme also depends on future prices always going up up up.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

More Victoria funnies. So the Oak Bay Beach Hotel is now in bankruptcy. It cost like 80 million to build but they some how owe 120 million and some people are saying some serious scam went down. Also it's a "hotel" in that you buy a tiny condo and then the building manages it as a hotel suite but you can stay in it when ever you want. Why pay a few hundred a night for your week in Victoria every year when you could pay 300k for a 1br and stay for free any time you want?!

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

The better question would be, "Why spend any free time in Victoria?"

Lexicon
Jul 29, 2003

I had a beer with Stephen Harper once and now I like him.

etalian posted:

The better question would be, "Why spend any free time in Victoria?"

Oh, come on. Victoria's a nice place. A poo poo place for a career, but not a bad little weekend jaunt.

Baronjutter posted:

Why pay a few hundred a night for your week in Victoria every year when you could pay 300k for a 1br and stay for free any time you want?!

The NYTimes had a great analogy about this a while ago - serious overbuying of property in this manner by comparing it to food.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/06/upshot/everyone-wants-to-be-a-homeowner-why-not-a-foodowner.html?nytmobile=0&_r=0&abt=0002&abg=0

NYTimes posted:

Imagine if we bought food the way we buy housing.

Instead of buying the food you need right now, you would buy a contract giving you rights to a stream of food in perpetuity. Say, a contract entitling you to five pounds of chicken breasts, delivered to you every week, forever. That’s basically what buying a home is: securing the use of a residence, indefinitely.

Buying that stream of future food would be expensive, so you’d get a loan from a bank to cover most of the cost, secured by your interest in those future chicken breasts. And if for some reason you didn’t need your chicken contract anymore (you became a vegetarian or you moved out of the delivery range of your chicken supplier), you could sell the contract at the current market price.

With this system, perverse things would begin to happen. Normally, consumers prefer that food prices be low. But this practice would create a large constituency of foodowners, who would benefit from rising food prices: If you bought your chicken contract for $20,000, and rising chicken prices pushed its value to $40,000, you’d have a nice windfall.

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
I love Victoria. It's amazing how much nicer people are there compared to Vancouver.

Best hotel I've ever stayed at is the Oswego hotel in James bay. Nothing like a full condo suite facing the ocean.

Lexicon
Jul 29, 2003

I had a beer with Stephen Harper once and now I like him.

Cultural Imperial posted:

I love Victoria. It's amazing how much nicer people are there compared to Vancouver.

So true. Like a different planet.

Kalenn Istarion
Nov 2, 2012

Maybe Senpai will finally notice me now that I've dropped :fivebux: on this snazzy av
I find Victoria stuffy, like all the old ladies were going to tell me not to step on the grass. I personally like Vancouver better. :shrug:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line
The best part of Victoria is all the poo poo outside victoria that's easy to get to

the city itself is kind of boring, but in an endearing way

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply