|
Are you a This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| homeowner |
|
39 | 22.41% |
| renter |
|
69 | 39.66% |
| stupid peace of poo poo |
|
66 | 37.93% |
| Total: | 174 votes | ||
|
truther posted:Have you or your partner been following the DNC and Clinton leaks at all? Speaking as a Clinton voter, have you? You know this poo poo gets disproven on a minute-by-minute basis, right? Stop falling for propaganda you dumb gently caress
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 08:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 10:03 |
|
|
Ghostlight posted:I think describing John Key as politically naive is not accurate in the slightest. On the international stage he most assuredly is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 08:48
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Speaking as a Clinton voter, have you? You know this poo poo gets disproven on a minute-by-minute basis, right? Please tell me the lead singer of Blink 182 emailing her campaign chair about investigating UFOs is true. Also the thing about them wanting Trump to win the republican primary is great.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 09:29
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Speaking as a Clinton voter, have you? You know this poo poo gets disproven on a minute-by-minute basis, right? What's been disproven? From what I've seen they've just replicated Key's 'stolen emails!!!' thing
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 09:31
|
|
|
Varkk posted:Please tell me the lead singer of Blink 182 emailing her campaign chair about investigating UFOs is true.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 09:40
|
|
|
whiter than a Wilco show posted:On the international stage he most assuredly is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 09:47
|
|
|
WE B Boo-ourgeois posted:What's been disproven? From what I've seen they've just replicated Key's 'stolen emails!!!' thing In short, the WikiLeaks data have been shown to contain obviously doctored/faked items, which means that every single thing in there is suspect and the whole loving thing has been quietly dropped by anyone who ever tried to use them in anger. Somfin fucked around with this message at 09:53 on Oct 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
Somfin posted:In short, the WikiLeaks data have been shown to contain obviously doctored/faked items, which means that every single thing in there is suspect and the whole loving thing has been quietly dropped by anyone who ever tried to use them in anger. One of the reporters who quoted the one guy with the doctored/fake claims later apologized on twitter because it was bs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 10:11
|
|
|
Something something crusher blames poverty on parents something something Our next prime minister, ladies and gentlemen
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 10:39
|
|
|
Ratios and Tendency posted:One of the reporters who quoted the one guy with the doctored/fake claims later apologized on twitter because it was bs. You're gonna have to help me parse out those negatives
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 12:49
|
|
|
Ive followed the emails and leaks enough to know it demonstrates significant corruption, elitism, and bad faith... and I am ready to tap in my vote for that ticket so so hard at this point. Honestly never expected it to get this bad, go this far with Trump.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Just grab that elitism by the pussy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Jacobin posted:Ive followed the emails and leaks enough to know it demonstrates significant corruption, elitism, and bad faith... and I am ready to tap in my vote for that ticket so so hard at this point. Honestly never expected it to get this bad, go this far with Trump. She's a politician and she's drat good at her job. That means skulduggery, bad faith, and making things certain behind closed doors while they still seem malleable in the public eye. We just accept that behaviour from literally every other politician while criticising Clinton for it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Somfin posted:You're gonna have to help me parse out those negatives The claims that the leak contained some doctored and fabricated information was made by one guy and turned out to be unsubstantiated. One of the journalists(?) that quoted that guy later apologised on twitter.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Speaking as a Clinton voter, have you? You know this poo poo gets disproven on a minute-by-minute basis, right? e: oh, you were already corrected. What a joke. You go batshit on me for asking a simple question and then it turns out you based it all on some Twitter block who admitted it was bullshit. Good stuff. Bet you still think you're right though. truther fucked around with this message at 01:09 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
Please post actually damning emails from the latest dump, and not poo poo about former aides to Bill Clinton trying to cash in on his name (laughably described as pay to play), which is apparently Hillary Clinton's fault somehow? Oh no, Chelsea Clinton audited the Clinton Foundation because of her concerns over widespread conflicts of interest at top management level, what massive evidence of Clinton corruption. truther posted:They've disproven the tens of thousands of emails? The vast majority of these emails are completely irrelevant spam, and non-relevant personal emails, there are about 500-1000 that are relevant. Most of those do not directly involve Hillary Clinton, they're normally conversations between her aides. For instance, the most supposedly damning thing from this current leak is that one of her aides told someone she should make an instant denial of wrongdoing when the State Department private email server story broke in the media, because if she did not she'd look guilty. El Pollo Blanco fucked around with this message at 01:21 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
ok dude yes the only thing to come out of this is about Chelsea. good to know you're ontop of it all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
truther posted:ok dude yes the only thing to come out of this is about Chelsea. good to know you're ontop of it all. Post something relevant.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Why? I asked a simple question with a yes or no answer about the email investigation and the DNC leaks. I get one dude spitting at his screen in rage and wrongly claims it's all been disproven. I post asking how the leak was disproven, realising afterwards he was already proven wrong. Now you demand I post stuff about the Podesta leaks? gently caress off. I'm not interested in a pointless pissing contest, especially with one whose mind is already made up by claiming the only thing of interest is about Chelsea. Why would I waste my time? poo poo, I bet no one hear really wants to talk about it when we have our own Judith Collins being stink to poor people again. truther fucked around with this message at 01:35 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
truther posted:Why? I asked a simple question with a yes or no answer about the email investigation and the DNC leaks. I get one dude spitting at his screen in rage and wrongly claims it's all been disproven. Yeah he was wrong, the story was about how Sputnik misreported Sydney Blumenthal's quoting of an article as his own words in an email, which some people took to mean the email had been altered, rather than misattributed. also lol, my mind isn't made up, there is just a distinct lack of anything damning in this particular dump currently, that might change as people continue to report on it. El Pollo Blanco fucked around with this message at 01:44 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
El Pollo Blanco posted:Please post actually damning emails from the latest dump, and not poo poo about former aides to Bill Clinton trying to cash in on his name (laughably described as pay to play), which is apparently Hillary Clinton's fault somehow? http://observer.com/2016/10/wikileaks-reveals-dnc-elevated-trump-to-help-clinton/ Here you go the DNC conspired to make the republicans nominate an unsuitable baffoon to help Hillary on the general election.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
truther posted:Why? I asked a simple question with a yes or no answer about the email investigation and the DNC leaks. I get one dude spitting at his screen in rage and wrongly claims it's all been disproven. You haven't read them but you're sure they're both genuine and damning Ok bro
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Wait, so now I haven't read them? Do you always just make up stuff to suit your opinion, dude? Genuine question. Totes not loaded at all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
Varkk posted:http://observer.com/2016/10/wikileaks-reveals-dnc-elevated-trump-to-help-clinton/ So A: this is brilliant politics, and B: you're linking to a publication that is calling for the US attorney general to be impeached, and one of the only major news publications to endorse Donald J Trump, mainly because his son-in-law runs it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Plotting to destablise a political party in a democratic country is just brilliant politics? Come on dude.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
You're reading a loving headline from what is essentially the equivalent of Cam Slater, not reading the loving memo that they're talking about, and then claiming that what they're doing is plotting to destabilise a political party? They're literally talking about doing oppo research on their opponents, and releasing info to the electorate that outs the GOP primary candidates as being far more conservative than they are trying to appear. Read the actual memo. I agree though, the DNC should just let a literal white supremacist party take the presidency. Jesus Christ.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
El Pollo Blanco posted:I agree though, the DNC should just let a literal white supremacist party take the presidency. Jesus Christ. It's actually bewildering that people get so upset talking about the leaks that they resort to personal remarks or try and claim you support Trump. truther fucked around with this message at 02:40 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
truther posted:Wait, so now I haven't read them? Yeah. That's what I'm asserting. From what you've posted here, I can tell you're going by headlines and opinion pieces. I had assumed otherwise given that you called me out for doing the same. I haven't read them because Assange is too partisan to believe as a source at this point.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Yeah. That's what I'm asserting. From what you've posted here, I can tell you're going by headlines and opinion pieces. I had assumed otherwise given that you called me out for doing the same. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
truther posted:Ok take the hysteria down a notch bro. Or are you incapable of talking about leaks without shoving moronic comments about Trump down everyone's throats? I'm calling the GOP a white supremacist party because it is one, not because of DJT, nor am I calling you a Trump supporter. Not sure where you're getting personal remarks from, I just told you to read the memo? If you don't believe the GOP is a white supremacist party though. Jesus Christ. Serious question, if you think doing oppo research on political opponents in order to motivate your marginal swing voters to not vote for them is a threat to democracy, the hell do you think gerrymandering, voter suppression, and dog whistle calls for voter intimidation under the guise of 'poll watching' are? El Pollo Blanco fucked around with this message at 02:56 on Oct 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
truther posted:You get called out for making up bullshit and respond by making up more bullshit. Argument to the stone. You haven't read them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
truther posted:You get called out for making up bullshit and respond by making up more bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Argument to the stone. You haven't read them. "I read them." "No you didn't." Good one bro. Ya got me reaaal good.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
truther posted:"You didn't read them." Nothing you post indicates any actual knowledge of the contents. When someone challenged you on it, you dodged.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:57
|
|
|
truther posted:"You didn't read them." Yo in that memo you claim is a threat to democracy, and have totally read, what is in the section about undermining the credibility of GOP primary candidates in the eyes of the Democrat coalition?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
What the gently caress is this? Why are you having dumb arguments over nothing? The USPol thread is not this thread go have your stupid argument there. Discuss NZ politics here.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Nothing you post indicates any actual knowledge of the contents. When someone challenged you on it, you dodged. "I read them." "No you didn't." Please waste more of your time. Likewise, Blanco. Already told you bro, I'm not interested. You seem to resort to hysterical comments whenever someone responds. Good talk bros. Back to Collins...
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 03:17
|
|
|
truther posted:"You didn't read them."
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 03:18
|
|
|
truther posted:"You didn't read them." Stop loving posting you idiot.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 10:03 |
|
|
Ignore the obvious troll guys
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 04:08
|
|
