|
FizFashizzle posted:This is when Trump became dril.
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 15:12 |
|
|
I no longer enjoy this if he does.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:10
|
|
|
Waiting for the Fox & Friends clip with excoriate in it. I'd even bet that it was on screen.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:12
|
|
|
8 pages over a goddamn typo. I'm going back to sleep.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:17
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:8 pages over a goddamn typo. I'm going back to sleep. may you never wake
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:17
|
|
|
Booyah- posted:may you never wake same tho
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:21
|
|
|
awesmoe posted:Carter Page is immensely, amazingly, astonishingly stupid and I desperately want him in front of every committee and every microphone that can be found There's something about this guy that makes me want him kept away. I think its how he seems so desperate to be involved and seen as a player. I guess I worry that he'd fall on a grenade pushing some bullshit story for the admin if it meant he got to look like a Big Deal. ( and also bank whatever other perks a bunch of super rich and connected fuckers could come up with to sweeten the pot )
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:32
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:8 pages over a goddamn typo. I'm going back to sleep. To be fair it was a "typo" in the same way weird messages from a relative who suffers from some degenerative brain syndrome is a typo. Except this is grandpa crazy being the President of the (at least for now) the most powerful nation in the world. DarkCrawler fucked around with this message at 12:41 on May 31, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:38
|
|
|
he meant to put out a booty call to his fefos
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:41
|
|
|
this is good for ... Jeb ... ? ...  jeb ((((JEBBBBBBBBBB
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:43
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:8 pages over a goddamn typo. I'm going back to sleep. You and I both know it'll be a typo that launches the nukes. Also pro username post combo.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:46
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:8 pages over a goddamn typo. I'm going back to sleep. Night shift needs something to poo poo post about.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:47
|
|
|
ought ten posted:This will be gone in a sec so I'll add the screenshot https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/869766994899468288 Lol at the bots that were already submitting likes and retweets.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:48
|
|
|
I wake up and covfefe happened. Thankfully the Washington Post is on the case: 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:54
|
|
|
Jealous Cow posted:https://twitter.com/axios/status/869879115981221888 Who didn't see this coming? Woooo!!!! Coal power gently caress yeah!
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:55
|
|
|
So much for the moderating and adult influence of Ivanka and Kushner. Also someone should tell this loving turd that this isn't his inane reality TV shows and that no one cares about the big reveal of his mock deliberations because no one actually believes he's thinking carefully about these things
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 12:56
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/intelligencer/status/869886628734447616 this is excellent news!!! for donald!!!
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:16
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:https://twitter.com/intelligencer/status/869886628734447616 Except he deleted the post like a bitch. But now he's trying to claim it as I knew would.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:18
|
|
|
Well, Republitards distinguishing themselves as "deplorables" was a pretty good method of separating them from people with functioning brains, but now we can remove all doubt with a new signifier https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/869887986095280128 Also, just lol if anyone thought for a second that Trump gave a poo poo about the Paris climate accords, or that Jared loving Kushner or Barbie was going to even attempt to sway him or care at all. e: <snip> fiiiiiiiiine WeAreTheRomans fucked around with this message at 14:00 on May 31, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:18
|
|
|
Jared and Ivanka were able to influence him on social issues because 1) He doesn't give a gently caress about conservative social policy and 2) They want to maintain their New York credibility. They obviously have some influence over him but I think both would have to really fight Trump to make any impact on something he's made a decision about and are totally unwilling because challenging Trump seriously would carry a strong chance of falling out of favour. Neither would be willing to put the fate of the planet ahead of their own comfort. Also I think the Paris accords are the kind of thing Trump has a strong opinion on because 1) Environmental protection laws have caused him inconvenience in the past. That's the list, I think that's genuinely all Trump knows about this and all he wants to know. He doesn't give a poo poo about the short term, observable impact of environmental protection. Keeping a species of grass from going extinct is less important to him than being able to build his golf course however he likes. He assumes everyone else thinks as he does so would have assumed environmental protections wouldn't matter on land he was going to buy (because he wouldn't give a gently caress about it) and when it turned out to matter assumed there was some nefarious alternative motivation for enforcing them (because he wouldn't give a gently caress about it). He also cannot comprehend the longer term effects of environmental damage because he can't see it with his own eyes and doesn't understand science. Ivanka and Jared were never going to persuade him to stay in the Paris accords because it would require changing his mind on something not just stopping him from siding with someone else. If you're not able to make a case for why doing something would make more money in a way that someone who's understanding of economics requires immediate and tangible results you won't be able to persuade Trump. Like literally, if you can't point to why signing the Paris accords will get the US more money (and more money than other countries who are signatories) then you won't persuade Trump it's a good idea. And not something like, 'macroeconomic forces will see a massive restructuring of the energy market which we are well positioned to capitalise on'. I mean like, 'we're going to set up carbon taxes that will severely punish EU nations and the developing world by making them pay us for sequestering waste products' type argument. It would have to involved direct and tangible payments from other countries to the US for Trump to think it was a good deal.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:23
|
|
|
Josh Lyman posted:We all agree the correct pronunciation is cov-FAY-fay, right? fay-fay is clearly the right pronunciation for the second and third syllable and the accent is on the second syllable, but is cov- pronounced as in cov-en or cov-ert?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:25
|
|
|
I think the person most able to influence The Donald is whoever was last in front of him because he's a befuddled old piece of poo poo whose brain is rotting to its core and we're all subject to it.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:31
|
|
|
Sure glad the internet has incredibly important #covfefe business to distract from Trump just pulling out of the Paris Agreement.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:38
|
|
|
I thought it was pronounced cov-fief. It's about the planned return to theocratic feudalism.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:39
|
|
|
Meh, any other republican president would have done the same bullshit re:Paris accords
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:40
|
|
|
double nine posted:Meh, any other republican president would have done the same bullshit re:Paris accords Not sure this is true at this point
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:42
|
|
|
Good news Under the terms of the deal, the U.S. cannot officially withdraw until November 2019. Bad news But even an announcement that the country is looking to leave the deal shows that the White House has no plans to meet earlier targets for slashing greenhouse gas emissions. That much was already clear. In March, Trump ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to review the Clean Power Plan ― a sweeping regulation passed by former President Barack Obama to limit emissions from the utility sector, by far the country’s biggest emitter. The policy was already stayed by the Supreme Court in February 2016 as a result of a lawsuit filed by former Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, who is now Trump’s head of the EPA. Without the Clean Power Plan, the U.S. wouldn’t even come close to meeting its goals laid out in the 2015 Paris Agreement. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_592dae29e4b0c0608e8bb885?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:42
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Good news We really need to knock those 2018 elections out of the park.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:44
|
|
|
WeAreTheRomans posted:Well, Republitards distinguishing themselves as "deplorables" was a pretty good method of separating them from people with functioning brains, but now we can remove all doubt with a new signifier What an awful loving post. "Republitards" and assassination talk. You loving moron.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:46
|
|
Maybe these guys would like to take an open-top drive around Dallas, lots of nice grassy knolls this time of year
|
Ramos posted:We really need to knock those 2018 elections out of the park. Even then, a Democratic Congress can't just re-join the Agreement. Only the executive can do that. They could pass legislation that brings the US into compliance with it though without being an official member of it, but Trump would almost certainly veto.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:47
|
|
|
terrorist ambulance posted:What an awful loving post. "Republitards" and assassination talk. You loving moron. thank you for your concern
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:48
|
|
|
Look everyone, the New Republic figured out what Dems need to do to win in 2018, just double double down on conservative centrism! https://newrepublic.com/article/142372/elitism-liberalisms-biggest-problem The New Republic posted:First of all, middle Americans go to church. Not temple. Church. God and Jesus Christ play important roles in their lives. Elite liberals are fine with expressions of faith among African Americans and Latinos, but we often seem to assume that white people who are religious are conservative. It’s not remotely the case. 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:49
|
|
|
He's right though. That post sucks. But fit being offensive even, really, just because "republitard" is something an unoriginal idiot would say
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:51
|
|
|
WeAreTheRomans posted:thank you for your concern it's worth pointing out people in the various incarnation of the Tormp thread have been perma'd for less. Lowtax really, really hates having to talk to the Feds
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:52
|
|
|
Drone posted:Even then, a Democratic Congress can't just re-join the Agreement. Only the executive can do that. Trump veto'ing is kind of a moot point, if there's a democratic congress, he's getting impeached as fast as possible and even if another Republican lines up and doesn't get impeached as well for all sorts of shared Russian connections, they'll probably stick with the Paris Agreement.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:53
|
|
|
Glazier posted:Look everyone, the New Republic figured out what Dems need to do to win in 2018, just double double down on conservative centrism! That's one of the most excitingly bad takes I've seen in a while, but I especially enjoy quote:Second, politics simply doesn’t consume middle Americans the way it does elites on the coasts. Just because you have bad opinions and don't understand anything about the world, doesn't mean you can't cover your truck in MAGA stickers and spend all day parroting RWM talking points. How's that for being "consumed by politics"
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:53
|
|
|
Ramos posted:Trump veto'ing is kind of a moot point, if there's a democratic congress, he's getting impeached as fast as possible and even if another Republican lines up and doesn't get impeached as well for all sorts of shared Russian connections, they'll probably stick with the Paris Agreement. This is a sweet thought and I appreciate it but c'mon
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:54
|
|
|
Tatsuta Age posted:This is a sweet thought and I appreciate it but c'mon But c'mon what?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 15:12 |
|
|
Booyah- posted:this is good for ... No, it's Gorka. The Dragon of Budapest shall rise! GORKAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 13:57
|
|