|
Great, so Trump is pulling a Bush to boost his ratings with ARE TRUPS
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 19:04 |
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Wait, who are we going to war with now? America, probably.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:Great, so Trump is pulling a Bush to boost his ratings with ARE TRUPS But will it work?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:Great, so Trump is pulling a Bush to boost his ratings with ARE TRUPS Covok posted:But will it work? No but that won't stop you from freaking out at about 9:15 EST tonight.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:Great, so Trump is pulling a Bush to boost his ratings with ARE TRUPS but he didn't blow up any scyscrapers yet
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Wait, who are we going to war with now? Nothing certain, but here are some guesses: 1 It's an escalation of troop presence in Afghanistan. 2 North Korea 3 Having decided to allow India to declare official territory in a long-standing conflict, we go all the way and invade Pakistan or some other insane poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Wait, who are we going to war with now? The Bad Hombre Alliance.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
ARE TRUPS don't want to be stuck in Afghanistan for another decade. The only people that want that are the people who sit and home and jerk off to fantasies of killing Muslims, people who sit at home and jerk off to photos of military hardware, and people who sit on camera and jerk off to the thought of all the eyeballs from covering Muslims being killed and military hardware being deployed.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
KillHour posted:ARE TRUPS don't want to be stuck in Afghanistan for another decade. The only people that want that are the people who sit and home and jerk off to fantasies of killing Muslims, people who sit at home and jerk off to photos of military hardware, and people who sit on camera and jerk off to the thought of all the eyeballs from covering Muslims being killed and military hardware being deployed. But enough about his voting base
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
KillHour posted:ARE TRUPS don't want to be stuck in Afghanistan for another decade. The only people that want that are the people who sit and home and jerk off to fantasies of killing Muslims, people who sit at home and jerk off to photos of military hardware, and people who sit on camera and jerk off to the thought of all the eyeballs from covering Muslims being killed and military hardware being deployed. What we really need is a big, beautiful wall the length of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:03
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:Nothing certain, but here are some guesses: Pakistan has nuclear weapons, we ain't doing poo poo to them unless its under some South Vietnam esque pretense of being "invited in" to help solve their insurgency. Which we've already been doing for years with our drone program really. Shimrra Jamaane fucked around with this message at 23:06 on Aug 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/08/21/mike-allen-trumps-afghan-plan-will-have-the-u-s-not-winning-but-not-losing/ Breibart already openly mocking Trump
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Wait, who are we going to war with now? 4000ish troop increase into Afganistan. I actually doubt its going to affect his ratings positively since everybody, especially the military, is sick of the war there. They will try to spin it so that we are mostly countering ISIS but I doubt it will work.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
Covok posted:http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/08/21/mike-allen-trumps-afghan-plan-will-have-the-u-s-not-winning-but-not-losing/ Screenshot so I don't have to click on that site?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:Which means it's not wrong to use it. Just make fun of the hipsters for complaining about singular "they" because who gives a flying gently caress. Shimrra Jamaane posted:Pakistan has nuclear weapons, we ain't doing poo poo to them unless its under some South Vietnam esque pretense of being "invited in" to help solve their insurgency.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:07
|
|
|
Covok posted:http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/08/21/mike-allen-trumps-afghan-plan-will-have-the-u-s-not-winning-but-not-losing/ i thought the plan was to go after fuhrer's (((globalist))) family?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:07
|
|
|
Trump's gonna boost drift onto stage in a golf kart, announce that he MOAB'd Pyongyang thirty-five minutes ago, and peel off for a seven-day retreat at Mar-a-Lago.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
RZA Encryption posted:Screenshot so I don't have to click on that site? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Time machine: https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/307568422789709824 https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/174215838814044160 https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/179270017064513536 Blind huh?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:4000ish troop increase into Afganistan. I think we have around ten thousand troops there as of Obama so that is a pretty big increase
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
Ague Proof posted:Time machine: Blind, like a dog
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:11
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:Nothing certain, but here are some guesses: The expectation is that he'll announce an additional 4,000 troops to be sent to Afghanistan. Which just seems incredibly pointless, when you consider that we had 100,000 troops in Afghanistan at one point and it didn't seem to make much of a difference.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:I think we have around ten thousand troops there as of Obama so that is a pretty big increase I'm sure 14,000 will be able to to do the job when 100,000 weren't able to 15 years ago.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:13
|
|
|
Internet Kraken posted:What the hell is the point of making prison inmates wear pink underwear Toxic masculinity.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:13
|
|
|
Weren't a huge portion of Trump voters basically isolationists that only want Trump to pay attention to domestic issues?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:13
|
|
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:Blind, like a dog Nah, dogs aren't idiots. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:13
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:Weren't a huge portion of Trump voters basically isolationists that only want Trump to pay attention to domestic issues? Yes but those people were never ever not going to just vote straight ticket Republican anyway so it really doesn't matter. Maybe that's not totally fair, some of them might have otherwise wrote in Ron Paul I guess. Maybe.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:Weren't a huge portion of Trump voters basically isolationists that only want Trump to pay attention to domestic issues? One of Bannon's major platforms. Ironically it was the one thing that Grima Wormtongue was somewhat right on, albeit for lovely reasons.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
Internet Kraken posted:What the hell is the point of making prison inmates wear pink underwear In Arpaio's mind, the only way to make the scum of the earth feel lower than they already are is to make them feel like women.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:Blind, like a dog Blind, like a fox. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/243783684669440000
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Wait, who are we going to war with now? Increase in troops to Afghanistan and a possible change of relationship with Pakistan (which is well earned at this point, gently caress Pakistan) I'd also surmise that the US will take an official stance on the India/China border skirmish as "gently caress you both, work it out yourselves" or to rephrase it so it sounds like actual policy, "The United States calls on both India and China to continue working towards a peaceful, diplomatic solutions to the current border dispute."
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:Weren't a huge portion of Trump voters basically isolationists that only want Trump to pay attention to domestic issues? This is the official line of the alt-right but when push comes to shove, I think for most of them their lust for Muslim death will overcome their pig-headed isolationism.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
DaveWoo posted:The expectation is that he'll announce an additional 4,000 troops to be sent to Afghanistan. Which just seems incredibly pointless, when you consider that we had 100,000 troops in Afghanistan at one point and it didn't seem to make much of a difference.  "Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation."
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
Fart City posted:One of Bannon's major platforms. Ironically it was the one thing that Grima Wormtongue was somewhat right on, albeit for lovely reasons. Bannon, like fellow isolationists like the Pauls, isn't against war on any sort of principle they just don't want regular military units to do it. They want PMCs to do it because they can operate on far less accountability and drain a country dry of anything of value like it was the Congo Free State.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:I'm sure 14,000 will be able to to do the job when 100,000 weren't able to 15 years ago. We've changed strategy completely to assisting and training Afghani forces and working on strengthening the central government and anti-corruption stuff. An extra 4k will be enough to support a much larger tactical footprint, though I'm sure the Pentagon would like more.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:Weren't a huge portion of Trump voters basically isolationists that only want Trump to pay attention to domestic issues? In addition to what others have said it is hard to tell how much of the anti-intervention noise during the campaign was Russian astroturfing. It wasn't all of it by far, but there was definitely some.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Grapplejack posted:We've changed strategy completely to assisting and training Afghani forces and working on strengthening the central government and anti-corruption stuff. An extra 4k will be enough to support a much larger tactical footprint, though I'm sure the Pentagon would like more. Ah a strategy of
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
Pander posted:Nah, dogs aren't idiots. http://m.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/donald-trump-dogs_us_56b99a5ee4b04f9b57dafa54
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 19:04 |
|
|
So do we know for sure that Trump did NOT blind himself today?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:26
|
|
