Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Trammel
Dec 31, 2007
.

MrNemo posted:

Holy poo poo, how do China get away with basically abducting another country's citizens? The USA would lose its poo poo if this was south Korean citizens getting deported to Pyongyang.

60 years of consistent policy and pressure from Beijing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

angel opportunity
Sep 7, 2004

Total Eclipse of the Heart

MrNemo posted:

Holy poo poo, how do China get away with basically abducting another country's citizens? The USA would lose its poo poo if this was south Korean citizens getting deported to Pyongyang.

you REALLY have to understand that to the PRC, Taiwan is NOT another country.

Parkingtigers
Feb 23, 2008
TARGET CONSUMER
LOVES EVERY FUCKING GAME EVER MADE. EVER.
This took me a little by surprise, but Ten Years will be available to buy on Google Play today, April 15th. I knew the DVD was coming in August, didn't know a digital version was coming so soon. Now you can all buy the winner of best picture at the Hong Kong film awards, or as it was announced in China:

Artificer
Apr 8, 2010

You're going to try ponies and you're. Going. To. LOVE. ME!!
Christ this situation is hosed up.

I wonder if China will pressure Google to remove Ten Years?

Parkingtigers
Feb 23, 2008
TARGET CONSUMER
LOVES EVERY FUCKING GAME EVER MADE. EVER.

MrNemo posted:

Holy poo poo, how do China get away with basically abducting another country's citizens? The USA would lose its poo poo if this was south Korean citizens getting deported to Pyongyang.

One of these Taiwanese prisoners holds a US passport too. The US govt. response so far has been to decline a comment about the person due to privacy issues (they've not been named yet as far as I'm aware) but it will be interesting to see how that affects this case, either by escalating it or it being swept under the rug in the name of polity.. Clearly Beijing is planning a show trial and jail, they've been banging a drum about previous Taiwanese criminals costing Chinese people money and not being punished properly.

Artificer
Apr 8, 2010

You're going to try ponies and you're. Going. To. LOVE. ME!!

Parkingtigers posted:

One of these Taiwanese prisoners holds a US passport too. The US govt. response so far has been to decline a comment about the person due to privacy issues (they've not been named yet as far as I'm aware) but it will be interesting to see how that affects this case, either by escalating it or it being swept under the rug in the name of polity.. Clearly Beijing is planning a show trial and jail, they've been banging a drum about previous Taiwanese criminals costing Chinese people money and not being punished properly.

Holy gently caress I hope the US does SOMETHING. :stare:

Ersatz
Sep 17, 2005

Artificer posted:

Holy gently caress I hope the US does SOMETHING. :stare:
Seriously. My fiance is from China, and we've talked about doing what we can to ensure that our future kids have both Chinese and US passports. If the US doesn't intervene here, we might scrap that plan and just go all-American.

vanity slug
Jul 20, 2010

Artificer posted:

Christ this situation is hosed up.

I wonder if China will pressure Google to remove Ten Years?

Exactly how do you see China pressuring Google, considering Google can't even operate in the mainland?

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

I think it's a bad idea to have a dual passport/citizenship in a brutal corrupt dictatorship (specially ones that don't really respect dual citizenships), all it creates are potential dangers/problems. My wife can't actually get rid of her former-soviet-union citizenship without going to Russia so her plan is to just never set foot in that hell hole ever again.

Really, that's the best solution: don't travel to or have legal or business dealings with lovely corrupt police states.

whatever7
Jul 26, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Jeoh posted:

Exactly how do you see China pressuring Google, considering Google can't even operate in the mainland?

Google is trying to go back to China. But China should let the whole world see Ten Year because HK Film Award gave the award to a hilariously bad junior film student project.

Cute n Popular
Oct 12, 2012

Parkingtigers posted:

One of these Taiwanese prisoners holds a US passport too. The US govt. response so far has been to decline a comment about the person due to privacy issues (they've not been named yet as far as I'm aware) but it will be interesting to see how that affects this case, either by escalating it or it being swept under the rug in the name of polity.. Clearly Beijing is planning a show trial and jail, they've been banging a drum about previous Taiwanese criminals costing Chinese people money and not being punished properly.

China neither recognizes Taiwan or dual citizenship.

The Great Autismo!
Mar 3, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Ersatz posted:

Seriously. My fiance is from China, and we've talked about doing what we can to ensure that our future kids have both Chinese and US passports. If the US doesn't intervene here, we might scrap that plan and just go all-American.

China doesn't recognize duel citizenship so you'll be going full American or full Chinese.

It's a very difficult decision, though I think I know which way you may be leaning.

MrNemo
Aug 26, 2010

"I just love beeting off"

In fact neither China nor America recognise dual citizenship so you're 100% under the legal force of whichever country you're in or is annoyed with you. That said China seems to be leaning towards any of your parents being ethnic Chinese means you're under their authority.

My outrage was less about the PRC side of things and more that other countries are letting it happen. Hence the Korea comparison.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
I don't expect the US will do much overtly about this aside from reaffirm its commitment to Taiwan's sovereignty. The real shitstorm would happen if the Chinese attempted to do something on US soil.

sincx
Jul 13, 2012

furiously masturbating to anime titties
.

sincx fucked around with this message at 05:43 on Mar 23, 2021

Trammel
Dec 31, 2007
.

sincx posted:

I believe the official line from the State Department is that the US won't stop you from having multiple passports, but if you travel internationally using a non-US passport, you're (mostly) on your own.

https://smartraveller.gov.au/countries/china posted:

The Chinese government does not recognise dual nationality. If you are an Australian/Chinese dual national, you should travel on your Australian passport, obtain a visa for China and present yourself as Australian at all times. See Laws.

Same in Australia. However, to travel to China on an Australian passport, you'll need to formally renounce your Chinese citizenship. So, it's more an rear end covering policy position than real advice.

caberham
Mar 18, 2009

by Smythe
Grimey Drawer

whatever7 posted:

Google is trying to go back to China. But China should let the whole world see Ten Year because HK Film Award gave the award to a hilariously bad junior film student project.

The movie is still better than other big budget movies regulated by SARFT

Ersatz
Sep 17, 2005

sincx posted:

I believe the official line from the State Department is that the US won't stop you from having multiple passports, but if you travel internationally using a non-US passport, you're (mostly) on your own.
My understanding is that neither the US nor China recognize dual-citizenship, but that neither will stop one of their citizens from having multiple passports. So, as far as the U.S. is concerned, an American citizen with a Chinese passport is simply American and, as far as China is concerned, a Chinese citizen with a U.S. passport is simply Chinese. We have friends in Hong Kong who managed to secure both passports for their children, and so far they haven't run into any problems.

That said, if it weren't for the fact that most of my fiancé's family lives in Beijing, I'd be tempted to think that Baronjutter has the right idea:

Baronjutter posted:

Really, that's the best solution: don't travel to or have legal or business dealings with lovely corrupt police states.

whatever7
Jul 26, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
Why the hell does anybody want to keep their China passport unless you want to save the $120 you need to pay to get a 5 year visa?

China doesn't use passport inside China. You have to use the new national ID card. And there is no way to get a new ID card if you have a US passport.

Ersatz
Sep 17, 2005

whatever7 posted:

Why the hell does anybody want to keep their China passport unless you want to save the $120 you need to pay to get a 5 year visa?

China doesn't use passport inside China. You have to use the new national ID card. And there is no way to get a new ID card if you have a US passport.
It's less about travel and more about the hypothetical advantages of the child being able to freely choose, later in life, to be a member of one society or the other.

With that in mind, the idea that the US wouldn't do anything about a US passport-holder being abducted from a third country by China is pretty disturbing.

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse

Ersatz posted:

It's less about travel and more about the hypothetical advantages of the child being able to freely choose, later in life, to be a member of one society or the other.

Read that sentence aloud a few times.

Parkingtigers
Feb 23, 2008
TARGET CONSUMER
LOVES EVERY FUCKING GAME EVER MADE. EVER.

whatever7 posted:

Google is trying to go back to China. But China should let the whole world see Ten Year because HK Film Award gave the award to a hilariously bad junior film student project.

Hong Kong cinema has been notoriously poor the last few years, a very sad decline from its heyday. In this case, the HK Film Awards didn't choose the movie with the best acting, or the glossiest production values, they chose the movie which actually had something to say. A choice between beautifully made pap, and a scruffy film with heart. The cinemas were packed out, so junior film student project or not it resonated with people across the city. If that's not a valid justification for best film, I don't know what is.

The Great Autismo!
Mar 3, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Ersatz posted:

It's less about travel and more about the hypothetical advantages of the child being able to freely choose, later in life, to be a member of one society or the other.

Ersatz posted:

the hypothetical advantages of the child being able to freely choose, later in life, to be a member of one society or the other.

Ersatz posted:

the hypothetical advantages

Ersatz posted:

hypothetical

simplefish
Mar 28, 2011

So long, and thanks for all the fish gallbladdΣrs!


If you have a Chinese and a US passport and you get arrested for whatever reason in China you will be denied consular assistance I think, because the Chinese will say you only get to choose one nationality and you chose Chinese so now you go through the legal mangle as a local with no connections. Which sounds pleasant.

If my wife had a Chinese passport she'd have renounced it by now.

MickeyFinn
May 8, 2007
Biggie Smalls and Junior Mafia some mark ass bitches

Ersatz posted:

My understanding is that neither the US nor China recognize dual-citizenship, but that neither will stop one of their citizens from having multiple passports. So, as far as the U.S. is concerned, an American citizen with a Chinese passport is simply American and, as far as China is concerned, a Chinese citizen with a U.S. passport is simply Chinese. We have friends in Hong Kong who managed to secure both passports for their children, and so far they haven't run into any problems.

That said, if it weren't for the fact that most of my fiancé's family lives in Beijing, I'd be tempted to think that Baronjutter has the right idea:

Sincx is right, if you are a national of China, you are subject to Chinese law:
https://travel.state.gov/content/tr...ationality.html

Your understanding of not recognizing dual citizenship is backwards. When you travel on your Chinese passport, the US doesn't recognize you (or has less right to) as a US citizen because it's official policy is that you can't be a citizen of both. Don't hold citizenship of a country you don't want to follow the laws in.

MickeyFinn fucked around with this message at 15:04 on Apr 15, 2016

RocknRollaAyatollah
Nov 26, 2008

Lipstick Apathy
There are no benefits to having a Chinese passport other than being able to get into China easier. They do not have many reciprocal visa free visitation agreements and if you do not live in China, you are going to be screwed in the long run by not being within the system of graft and patronage that runs China.

Your children would also probably never be able to work on a government contract and it would be impossible for them to work for anyone who requires a security clearance check.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

RocknRollaAyatollah posted:

There are no benefits to having a Chinese passport other than being able to get into China easier. They do not have many reciprocal visa free visitation agreements and if you do not live in China, you are going to be screwed in the long run by not being within the system of graft and patronage that runs China.

Your children would also probably never be able to work on a government contract and it would be impossible for them to work for anyone who requires a security clearance check.

I think you can also apply for Chinese citizenship later on if you qualify for it at birth.

caberham
Mar 18, 2009

by Smythe
Grimey Drawer
You can but you have to be a stateless person before being qualified.

That's how some south Asians in Hong Kong get Chinese citizenship and travel across the border with their "home return permit"

whatever7
Jul 26, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

RocknRollaAyatollah posted:

There are no benefits to having a Chinese passport other than being able to get into China easier. They do not have many reciprocal visa free visitation agreements and if you do not live in China, you are going to be screwed in the long run by not being within the system of graft and patronage that runs China.

Your children would also probably never be able to work on a government contract and it would be impossible for them to work for anyone who requires a security clearance check.

If you don't have Hukou, you can't live like a normal Chinese during school year and college anyway.

And when you are adult, you can not get an national ID card.

My mother got her US citizenship a few year ago. When she use her old ID card in China now, her ID card number query pulls a bland name.

HOWEVER if you want to be treated as "Chinese" in China. It's legal for US citizen to apply for Republic of China citizenship and enter China as Taiwanese. :wink:

Koramei
Nov 11, 2011

I have three regrets
The first is to be born in Joseon.
It's for a kid isn't it? Who knows what China will be like or what agreements they might have 2 decades from now. Having options is always useful.

Ersatz
Sep 17, 2005

Koramei posted:

It's for a kid isn't it? Who knows what China will be like or what agreements they might have 2 decades from now. Having options is always useful.
That was exactly my thinking. And they're going to be raised in the States and would travel on their US passports, so I'm not seeing the downside aside from the disadvantages of (potentially) being treated as Chinese nationals by China when they visit China. And as far as that goes, it's generally not a great idea to violate Chinese law while visiting anyway.

Edit: that and the point raised above about security clearances. But I'm sure they'll eventually be able to find work outside of the American military-industrial complex, so I'm not bothered by that either.

Ersatz fucked around with this message at 16:50 on Apr 15, 2016

Koramei
Nov 11, 2011

I have three regrets
The first is to be born in Joseon.
Unless you're planning on your kid being a super-spy or whatever, renouncing the non-US citizenship should be fine for security clearance for government/military jobs, I have dual citizenship and I looked into that a few years ago. And for lots of countries even after you renounce the citizenship it's relatively straightforward to get it back. No clue where China falls on that though.

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Ersatz posted:

That was exactly my thinking. And they're going to be raised in the States and would travel on their US passports, so I'm not seeing the downside aside from the disadvantages of (potentially) being treated as Chinese nationals by China when they visit China. And as far as that goes, it's generally not a great idea to violate Chinese law while visiting anyway.

Edit: that and the point raised above about security clearances. But I'm sure they'll eventually be able to find work outside of the American military-industrial complex, so I'm not bothered by that either.

Violating Chinese law while not in China should also be a thing to keep an eye on.

Ersatz
Sep 17, 2005

Warbadger posted:

Violating Chinese law while not in China should also be a thing to keep an eye on.
Good point.

i am harry
Oct 14, 2003

Ersatz posted:

It's less about travel and more about the hypothetical advantages of the child being able to freely choose, later in life, to be a member of one society or the other.

You're thinking of a British passport.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

Ersatz posted:

It's less about travel and more about the hypothetical advantages of the child being able to freely choose, later in life, to be a member of one society or the other.

On the other hand, life in China as a US citizen is actually way better than life in China as a Chinese citizen sooooo

V for Vegas
Sep 1, 2004

THUNDERDOME LOSER
From behind the FA paywall

quote:

WATCHING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY IN CHINA

Liberals and Conservatives After Trump
By Eric X. Li

In this Year of the Monkey, China has been riveted by the U.S. presidential election, and more specifically by Republican contender Donald Trump. Those who usually pontificate on the nature of democracy and about what kind of U.S. president would be better for China are at a loss to explain the Trump phenomenon to the Chinese public.

Two parallel but irreconcilable narratives about U.S. politics have guided Chinese understanding of the United States for decades. The conservatives tell the public that American democracy is a sham in which money and special interests manipulate public opinions and rig the system for their own benefit—the House of Cards version of democracy. The liberals promote it as a system in which the people determine their own fate by electing their leaders, in contrast to one-party rule at home, and as something China must aspire to—the Goddess of Democracy version.

The Chinese perspectives on democracy in general and the country’s own future are very much influenced by the divide over the United States, the standard-bearer of democracy of our time. But the American real estate mogul is forcing the Chinese public to reassess its understanding of the U.S. political system. More consequentially, depending on the eventual outcome of the election and its long-term impact, the Trump phenomenon may change how the Chinese think about democracy.

In the sphere of geopolitics, the experts are even more conflicted. Trump has made China, along with Japan and Mexico, a target of his bellicose language against foreign rivals, which would seem certain to upset Chinese hawks. Yet his expressed admiration for China’s accomplishments and his advocacy for restraint in foreign interference complicate the picture.

For those who disparage American democracy, Trump’s rise gives the impression that, at least on the Republican side, ordinary Americans are close to checkmating the well-financed elites. Trump is himself a rich man. But that is beside the point. He’s running as a protest candidate from outside the system. His policy positions speak to the interests of working-class Americans, and he has so far spent only a fraction of what the other candidates have laid out on campaigning. To a lesser extent, Bernie Sanders’ unexpected strength demonstrates a similar phenomenon on the Democratic side.

This is at odds with what China’s conservatives preach: it appears from China that the American “people” may thus be able to determine their country’s fate after all. One leading conservative paper has had difficulties grappling with the challenge. The Global Times has called Trump “big-mouthed” and “abusive” and editorialized with undisguised schadenfreude that the Trump phenomenon is highlighting the decline of the American political system. Yet, in two other editorials, it explained that labeling the large number of Trump supporters as populists reflected the “loss of rationality” by America’s elites and called Trump a smart and adaptive businessman and wished him well.

The official Xinhua News Agency, which reliably paints American democracy as a game for the rich, reported that this time things look different. Trump’s wealth, Xinhua said, allows him to buck the system that has been controlled by Wall Street and corporate masters. The conservatives may regain their footing if the Republican Party establishment manages to deny Trump the nomination despite the votes. But at the moment they seem conflicted.

China’s liberals are in a bind too. Anger and despair reign. They despise Trump. But they can’t quite bring themselves to say that the moneyed elites are right and the people are wrong. Such an admission would not help them make their case for Western-style democracy in China. After all, if the people can be so wrong, how can you give them the vote?

One popular liberal commentator described Trump supporters as forgotten Americans without college degrees and compared them to China’s own Maoists. Pundits on Phoenix Television, an outlet on which many liberal pundits appear, either belittle him— for example, calling him te da pao, “Trump the big mouth”—or repeating common charges against him, such as that he is an ill-informed liar. Another liberal commentator called Trump a “naked resemblance of fascism.”

The liberals are repulsed by Trump’s illiberal outlook. Yet his big electoral wins make them rather tongue-tied, as they have been promoting elections as the only basis for political legitimacy. Indeed, the Trump phenomenon is forcing China to look beyond its two stereotypes of American democracy long served up by the experts. A more complex and realistic picture is emerging.

Confusion and despair aside, most Chinese instinctively understand one central theme of the Trump phenomenon: class struggle. Just about every analysis in China points out the fact that Trump is getting most of his support from the working class. Some pundits are adopting American language to call Trump’s rise the revenge of the 99 percent. The official newspaper China Youth Daily ran statistics showing the shrinkage of the American middle class to explain the Trump phenomenon.

This is not surprising given China’s Marxist heritage. Since the West won the Cold War, the Chinese have largely bought the idea that Western nations have successfully resolved class struggles through their democratic politics. As the Chinese suffered tremendously from extreme class struggles in their recent history, Western democracy seemed to have reached an enviable position by erasing class lines. But the Trump campaign is showing the world that this may be an illusion. America’s working class is angry.

The Chinese public might be surprised to know that many leading American thinkers have been making exactly this assessment. As David Frum wrote in The Atlantic, just before Trump started bringing in delegates at the ballot box, the current electoral mess is the culmination of decades of elite neglect, and even betrayal, of the interests of middle- and working-class Americans. Globalization, mostly championed by the elites, has benefited the wealthy as ordinary Americans have seen their income stagnate and decline. Multiculturalism, also promoted by the elites, has helped the rich and corporations; immigration has brought lower labor costs and greater abundance of talent while working Americans lost job opportunities and saw their community cohesion threatened by outsiders. One might add that similar sentiments seem to resonate among the Sanders supporters.

As Michael Lind, cofounder of The New America Foundation, wrote in a 2014 essay, “The Coming Realignment,” the two political parties in America have long consisted of incoherent coalitions. On the Republican side, capitalist elites coopted many working-class Americans by preaching about social values and identity. The Democrats, on the other hand, also had their own economic elites, who maintained an alliance with ordinary Americans who held liberal social views. In other words, both parties were dominated by the same Wall Street and corporate elites who promoted similar substantive policies that disregarded the economic interests of their own grassroots constituents. In short, the two political parties had absorbed, or repressed, class conflicts within the party structures as a way to remain viable dominant forces at the national level.

Lind predicted that the structure was not sustainable. As social values receded as a main political fault line in American politics, working Americans would unite and fight for their economic interests. This realignment would cut across party lines. Lind was unsure which one of the two parties would become the political base for the newly self-aware working class. In this election, they are represented by Trump and Sanders both. It now seems that, even if Trump eventually loses the election, the trend he set in motion is transforming the Republican Party into the political base of working Americans and is partially dismembering the Democratic Party at the same time. Populism may realign American politics for generations to come.

In this scenario, the Republican Party would become the vanguard of working Americans who want to protect and expand Social Security and Medicare, limit immigration and trade to preserve jobs, and constrain foreign adventures that seem to primarily benefit globalizing elites. The Democratic Party, then, would be the home for urban elites who support, and benefit from, free market economics, free trade, immigration, and interventionist foreign policies.

If this election paves the way for the United States to become a society polarized by class struggle, it would be a teachable moment for the Chinese about the nature of democracy.

The Chinese public would learn that democracy is not a panacea for resolving class struggle. They would also discover that, although moneyed interests have a significant advantage in a Western democracy, once in a while the people are able to take control against the wishes of the elites and influence their country’s direction. And, lastly, democracy, practiced in even the most developed country in the world, is just as capable of producing populist and illiberal outcomes as liberal ones.

Trump’s impact on Chinese perspectives of U.S. politics goes beyond democracy. The Chinese views of, and preferences for, hawks and doves in American foreign policy may be changed qualitatively. Traditionally, Chinese opinion leaders have preferred moderate internationalists from both parties, such as George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, who seemed willing to accommodate a rising China into the existing world order. They have viewed with trepidation Republican neocons and Democratic liberal interventionists, such as some in the George W. Bush administration and Hilary Clinton, who want to aggressively contain China, interfere in its domestic affairs, or both. Even Obama falls into the category. Although the rest of the world may see him as highly restrained in using U.S. power abroad, he is viewed by many Chinese as hostile, due to his pivot to Asia and the resulting tension between the two countries.

Trump is causing a realignment in China. He blames the country for the United States’ woes and, as president, would curtail trade that is a major source of China’s economic growth. His aggressive rhetoric against China on the campaign trail has been well publicized here. Dai Xu, a People’s Liberation Army officer and a nationalistic firebrand on defense issues, called Trump an American Hitler and condemned his victory remarks after the New Hampshire primary as “an imperialist’s war-mongering speech.”

However, a President Trump would most likely refrain from aggressively challenging China in both geopolitics and domestic issues such as human rights. On several occasions, Trump has actually professed admiration for China’s achievements. Both the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Obama’s pivot, which brought China so much angst, would probably be finished. He has even made statements to the effect that, under him, the United States would curtail its defense commitments to Japan and South Korea unless the latter paid up.

The Chinese have always thought it would be better for both countries if the United States turned to fixing its own seemingly intractable domestic problems. Jin Canrong, an academic and another leading hawk in the Chinese foreign policy establishment, called Trump a pragmatist and said that the Chinese always “preferred to deal with pragmatists.” No one doubts that there would be fierce rivalry between China and the United States with Trump at the helm. But China probably does not fear an American competitor. Competition is a good thing. What China has always resisted and resented is an America that seeks to remake the rest of the world in its own image. And that is not something Trump seems ready to do.

In this spring of American discontent, the Chinese narratives on democracy and perspectives on geopolitics are all being shattered. Win or lose, on the other side of the Pacific, the Donald is leaving confusion, conflict, and discovery in his wake.

Ccs
Feb 25, 2011


Good article. I like the idea of class struggle becoming a dominant force in American politics again, now that most of the recent social issues have receded to been put to rest.

V for Vegas
Sep 1, 2004

THUNDERDOME LOSER
For an Eric X Li article it was actually pretty good!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

quote:

The Chinese have always thought it would be better for both countries if the United States turned to fixing its own seemingly intractable domestic problems. Jin Canrong, an academic and another leading hawk in the Chinese foreign policy establishment, called Trump a pragmatist and said that the Chinese always “preferred to deal with pragmatists.” No one doubts that there would be fierce rivalry between China and the United States with Trump at the helm. But China probably does not fear an American competitor. Competition is a good thing. What China has always resisted and resented is an America that seeks to remake the rest of the world in its own image. And that is not something Trump seems ready to do.

This paragraph is total bullshit.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply