|
Unkempt posted:Is there a detailed account of the end of the First Age and start of the second, or is that just something he never got around to? I see there's a volume of the History called 'War of the Jewels' but looking at the contents, it all seems a bit thin. This is a section of the history that was very radically reshaped over Tolkien’s lifetime, far more so than many other parts. The Book of Lost Tales Part 2 has quite a bit of detail about what Tolkien thought would make a good ending circa 1920, but virtually all of it was discarded from the published Silmarillion because it completely and wildly disagrees with all the later Hobbit/Numenor/LOTR stuff. This is because at the time when he wrote the original end of the story, Tolkien did not yet think of there being a First, Second, and Third Age, there was no future of Numenor or Sauron or anything for him to lead into. instead there was the Elder Days when all the elves and gods stuff happens, and then real history begins and Romans and Germans start invading the place. The reason why the version of the end of the First Age in the published Silmarillion is so relatively sketchy is because it’s based on annals/outline that Tolkien did to support the later materials that he published. You can find the most updated version of those in the Annals of Aman section in Morgoth’s Ring (I think. Might be in the Tale of Years section in War of the Jewels instead). But was never a full narrative and it doesn’t seem like Tolkien ever really intended it to be: even in the frame of Lost Tales, the downfall of Morgoth is the end note that happens when all the good stories have run out, and not so much a story in its own right. skasion fucked around with this message at 23:58 on May 20, 2021 |
# ? May 20, 2021 23:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 20:50 |
|
I think the War of Wrath was left intentionally vague because it ultimately isn't part of the story of the Noldorin exiles--all the heavy lifting was done by the Valar, Vanyar, and unexiled Noldor Earendil, on the other hand, I think was something he always thought deserved full treatment but never got around to. Considering that he never even started a detailed treatment of it, in any phase of his work (to my recollection at least), I'm guessing it's one of those thing where the beginning and end were solid in his mind and the middle was just a big empty space with "adventures go here" and he never really had a satisfying idea of what those adventures were or how they fit into a cohesive whole
|
# ? May 20, 2021 23:57 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:I think the War of Wrath was left intentionally vague because it ultimately isn't part of the story of the Noldorin exiles--all the heavy lifting was done by the Valar, Vanyar, and unexiled Noldor You could compile a fair amount of detail on the adventures of Earendil between the annalistic accounts, the BOLT version with the sleeper in the tower of pearl, and the various versions of the “Earendil was a mariner” poem (especially the middle version with Ungoliant and the weird lightning sun bee thing). But yeah, nothing approaching a complete treatment, and often the details are in total disagreement with each other. Plenty of ideas, but no single story.
|
# ? May 21, 2021 00:03 |
|
Well, that's a shame. It seems such a major part of the history of his universe, but hey, up to him I suppose.skasion posted:the middle version with Ungoliant and the weird lightning sun bee thing Where's this one to be found?
|
# ? May 21, 2021 00:13 |
|
Unkempt posted:Well, that's a shame. It seems such a major part of the history of his universe, but hey, up to him I suppose. Christopher spends a lot of space discussing the versions of the poem at the point where it comes up in the Rivendell bits of the LOTR drafts, so...in Return of the Shadow, I think?
|
# ? May 21, 2021 00:27 |
|
If I recall correctly, the published poem was an early draft which mistakenly made it into the manuscript, and somehow also escaped correction in the second edition which fixed a bunch of other small things
|
# ? May 21, 2021 00:32 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:If I recall correctly, the published poem was an early draft which mistakenly made it into the manuscript, and somehow also escaped correction in the second edition which fixed a bunch of other small things The version in the published text is, I guess, the penultimate draft. JRRT made a fair copy with several differences of phrasing and a new stanza (“in might the Feanorians...”) but then lost it before he could attach it to the manuscript he sent to to the publishers. I posted it somewhere upthread. There’s a funny bit where Christopher alludes to how he eventually unearthed it, covered in notes from when JRRT found it again long after the publication of the book and had completely forgotten about it and was confused as to what it was. Here it is. He doesn’t give the full text, just notes where it’s different from the published version, so if there’s mistakes they’re probably my fault quote:Eärendil was a mariner skasion fucked around with this message at 00:46 on May 21, 2021 |
# ? May 21, 2021 00:40 |
|
Unkempt posted:Where's this one to be found? Here’s this version. It’s from Treason of Isengard, not Return of the Shadow: this is the transitional version where the poem switches from being light hearted nonsense about a little fairy guy having adventures with bugs, to being an elaboration of the voyage of Earendil (though he is still unnamed, unlike in the version in LOTR). quote:There was a gallant passenger skasion fucked around with this message at 01:09 on May 21, 2021 |
# ? May 21, 2021 01:01 |
Man that just fills the mouth like wine.
|
|
# ? May 21, 2021 03:49 |
|
A full version of the War of Wrath would be primo van painting material. “Man on flying ship with +10 enchanted stone stabs mountain sized dragon to death” would be amazing in prose.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 22:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 14:12 |
|
Okay I'm watching the Extended Edition of ROTK and why is this extended scene at the Grey Havens necessary?? You could've done Tom Bombadil or the scouring of the Shire easily if you just excise this endless sequence. Why?? I am looking forward to the discourse coming around to thinking the Jackson movies are bad.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 03:48 |
|
You will be waiting a very long time.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:00 |
|
The LOTR movies are largely good, though as adaptations go I would argue that ROTK is the weakest. However all three movies are very good films in their own right. They aren't perfect, but I honestly can't imagine a better live action version being made in the current movie making climate. Hobbit movies are not very good though.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:06 |
|
ROTK extended is dire, almost everything it added was better left out.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:15 |
|
skasion posted:ROTK extended is dire, almost everything it added was better left out. I wouldn't go quite that far, but the theatrical cut is the superior version in my opinion. The worst thing Peter Jackson did (Frodo sending Sam home) is present in both.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:22 |
|
I wouldn't want to miss out on the Mouth of Sauron.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:27 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:I wouldn't want to miss out on the Mouth of Sauron. Mouth of Sauron would be a good scene if they didn't loving murder him while negotiating with him, something they specifically did not do in the books because of how evil it would be.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:29 |
|
I just like watching him talk.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:32 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:I wouldn't want to miss out on the Mouth of Sauron. Amazingly gonzo design but terrible scene
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:33 |
|
skasion posted:Amazingly gonzo design but terrible scene The design work on so much of those movies is insanely good.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:50 |
|
Worst change in the Extended Cut is that they used a different take of Gandalf smoking with Pippin and Ian McKellan ended up coughing out his lines super pissed off rather than being amused and slightly proud of Pippin's vow to Denethor.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 04:58 |
|
sweet geek swag posted:They aren't perfect, but I honestly can't imagine a better live action version being made in the current movie making climate. Remember all the stuff that came out about how the studio wanted to interfere in the LOTR movies, "Couldn't we just have 2 hobbits?" etc. I've always been astonished just how faithful they actually managed to make them.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2021 09:18 |
|
Deptfordx posted:I've always been astonished just how faithful they actually managed to make them. I have a theory that the bigwigs were trying to use LotR as a Star Trek: The Motion Picture style tax dodge where they expected it to fail (after all no one wants fantasy movies) and wrote the costs of countless never finished projects into it. So they never interfered and ruined it because they didn’t want to be the one holding the bag for its inevitable failure. Plus there’s the general disdain the Hollywood elite has for Sci-Fi an Fantasy no matter how many billions of dollars it makes them.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 01:46 |
|
PJ was a pretty big (lol) name back then so idk
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 01:55 |
|
I don't think he was? His biggest film was Heavenly Creatures, and his last movie before LOTR was The Frighteners, which was a big box office failure. He basically got the gig himself as I understand it.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 09:08 |
|
HC was a huge critical success
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 11:47 |
|
euphronius posted:HC was a huge critical success Yes, but nothing about it screams "Let's give this man a billion dollars to make a trilogy of films based on a famously (heretofore) "unfilmable" series of books."
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 12:17 |
|
euphronius posted:HC was a huge critical success Sure, and that maybe gets him the films, but what on earth gets him the budget he had?
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 12:53 |
|
Ravenfood posted:Sure, and that maybe gets him the films, but what on earth gets him the budget he had? Money he then took to an island literally as far away from Hollywood supervision as it is possible to be while still being on the planet Earth.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 13:19 |
|
Maybe he had an unconventional uncle who left him a surprisingly valuable inheritance, or something.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 13:19 |
|
Lotr was “only” 90 million per movie or so New Zealand does a lot of work
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 13:23 |
|
Film budgets have gone truly insane in the last 20 years so its not surprising that it was "only" 90 million a pop. Marvel couldn't even poo poo out one of their more generic films for less than 200
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 13:52 |
|
Doing three at once was a major cost savings and as I mentioned “exotic” New Zealand does a lot of work. I don’t think the actors were expensive either as no one was a huge star
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 13:59 |
|
euphronius posted:Doing three at once was a major cost savings and as I mentioned “exotic” New Zealand does a lot of work. I don’t think the actors were expensive either as no one was a huge star Cate Blanchett, Elijah Wood, and Liv Tyler were the biggest names. I guess Ian McKellen was just breaking through into A-list status, as he was cast for X-Men and LOTR at about the same time. After that uh Sean Astin, Hugo Weaving and John Rhys-Davies were known quantities too, mostly as "oh well it's that guy from Indiana Jones and Sliders ok" kinda thing.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 14:13 |
|
Right none of them were the highest most expensive tier (20 million per movie for example ) Also I think LOTR is extremely filmable. The most important scenes are all very visual. There are obviously a few few hard things to adapt (Sauron isn’t ever in a scene)
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 14:21 |
|
euphronius posted:Right none of them were the highest most expensive tier (20 million per movie for example ) He is but only for a hot second, right before he dies
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 14:57 |
The biggest issue for “filmability” was always the hobbits, like do you do the Willow thing or what. Jackson cracked that nut
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 16:33 |
|
Lot of 20/20 hindsight on this page.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 16:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 20:50 |
|
Data Graham posted:The biggest issue for “filmability” was always the hobbits, like do you do the Willow thing or what. Agreed, they did a really good job with the hobbits and although I know a bit about the forced perspective tricks and what-not, I'd love to watch a really good technical making-of for the movies if anybody knows one.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2021 16:40 |