|
Wait someone explain why 1 vote = lynch?
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 12:00 |
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Wait someone explain why 1 vote = lynch? Apparently at the end of the day the person with the most votes gets lynched regardless of if there's a majority. I think? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
Oh right, with it being up in the air in cases of a tie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
I guess maybe SWEETBOY could have found some way of undoing a clear pre-game joke vote but muyb seems pretty intent on escalating things.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Maybe we should all unvote in case we do something dumber than usual
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Wait someone explain why 1 vote = lynch? Remember when you posted Asphyxious posted:Just sit back and enjoy it you knobs That was in response to the conversation about the new "whoever has the most votes gets lynched" rule.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
tithin posted:Maybe we should all unvote in case we do something dumber than usual This really seems like the way to go. Those On My Left posted:Remember when you posted Yeah I was talking about the ties, I didn't realise he'd put in a weird mechanic. I stand by que sera sera for ties though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
tithin posted:Maybe we should all unvote in case we do something dumber than usual I was wondering if that could be another way to avoid the certainty of a lynch in this game. If we all undid our votes by the end of the day. But that seems like a logistical nightmare that we should't count on, since the scum could just "oh darn not make it in time" or what have you, and have their few votes stand instead.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:05
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Yeah I was talking about the ties, I didn't realise he'd put in a weird mechanic. I stand by que sera sera for ties though. This is literally the default setting
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I was wondering if that could be another way to avoid the certainty of a lynch in this game. If we all undid our votes by the end of the day. But that seems like a logistical nightmare that we should't count on, since the scum could just "oh darn not make it in time" or what have you, and have their few votes stand instead. Yeah the more people who vote at this stage the better the odds are for the scum, which is why Gough should have pulled his head in a bit. If I was more reactionary I'd throw a vote against him but I'm a firm believer in the day one no lynch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Yeah I was talking about the ties, I didn't realise he'd put in a weird mechanic. I stand by que sera sera for ties though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
sweetroy posted:This is literally the default setting Spare me your space age technobabble Attila the Hun!
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
Unvoting sound reasonable given our chances of hitting a scum are low and luck based at this stage. loving around with the new votefinder rules on day one will only benefit scum.
Anidav fucked around with this message at 02:12 on Jan 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Yeah the more people who vote at this stage the better the odds are for the scum, which is why Gough should have pulled his head in a bit. If I was more reactionary I'd throw a vote against him but I'm a firm believer in the day one no lynch. You think so? Most of the information I gleaned last game was from throwing votes around and seeing who flinched. ##vote Gough Suppressant
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:it's the exact same mechanic - whoever has the most votes gets lynched Oh god I'm going full Anidav in my first game okay. Back to the wiki sorry.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Yeah but being fair in the last game there were 7 of us, period. So the stakes were higher. Smart scum will play it cool and let us hang ourselves.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Unvoting sound reasonable given our chances of hitting a scum are low and luck based at this stage. loving around with the new votefinder rules on day one will only benefit scum. Anidav, don't edit your posts.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:You think so? Most of the information I gleaned last game was from throwing votes around and seeing who flinched. Okay yeah but saying that as you throw a vote is priming the scum to not react if Gough is scum. Best case scenario you've marked out someone for them to throw under the bus. Unless you're scum using what I said to throw Gough under the bus. But then either way it'd be a scum kill so no reason to worry I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
oh poo poo i now see why everyones flipping out, i basically just copy/pasted the rules bit of kommandos OP. you gotta have enough votes to lynch, it's not 1 vote can lynch. my b, should have read it a little more closely. i'll update it now
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
Twas a typo sorry. Phoneposting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
sweetroy posted:oh poo poo i now see why everyones flipping out, i basically just copy/pasted the rules bit of kommandos OP. you gotta have enough votes to lynch, it's not 1 vote can lynch. my b, should have read it a little more closely. i'll update it now Okay cool so everyone can settle down a bit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Okay yeah but saying that as you throw a vote is priming the scum to not react if Gough is scum. Best case scenario you've marked out someone for them to throw under the bus. Yeah, if the scum are already resorting to the bus on D1 then things are going pretty good!  Sounds like we can all relax a bit about the lynch rules, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
That's a relief. We should probably lynch Hambeet on principle though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:You think so? Most of the information I gleaned last game was from throwing votes around and seeing who flinched. holy poo poo that's aggressive, bif.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
Splode posted:holy poo poo that's aggressive, bif. I forget doesn't quoting votes count as votes?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I forget doesn't quoting votes count as votes? nope votefinder is smart enough to handle it, I believe
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:42
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I forget doesn't quoting votes count as votes? Splode posted:nope votefinder is smart enough to handle it, I believe yeah that looks right. Fixy, you can check here: http://votefinder.org/game/auspol-9#votecount
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:43
|
|
|
Oh cool thanks guys  Also you've opted for "Fixy" TOML? Interesting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
he implies you are a hipster, not a real bikie
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Wow did muyb pull a OMGUS on me? For my joke vote? Okay obviously none of you read mills' recent game, or got the point of it at least. Go with your gut, stop waiting for data. Those who sit back waiting for data I'm a little bit suspicious of. If you haven't read it, go read it now it's a shirt thread and was amazing. No special roles everyone was vanilla.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Wow did muyb pull a OMGUS on me? For my joke vote? I thought the point of mills game was more keen observance of what people say, less about gung ho tactics, personally. Do I take it from this that you're not going to unvote?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
auspol mafia worst mafia
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Some of us are slow to post because we live in WA and only just woke up and feel awful. Meth: not even once.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I thought the point of mills game was more keen observance of what people say, less about gung ho tactics, personally. I thought this was the good thread for a minute and was going to tell you to take it back to the mafia thread
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I thought the point of mills game was more keen observance of what people say, less about gung ho tactics, personally. Well yeah, but scum aren't just going to reveal themselves by chit-chatting about the weather. Theories need to be put out there. Sometimes votes too, to see if anyone actually reacts or joins in, and who that is and why they say they're doing it. I'm just throwing poo poo at the wall and seeing what sticks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
sweetroy posted:oh poo poo i now see why everyones flipping out, i basically just copy/pasted the rules bit of kommandos OP. you gotta have enough votes to lynch, it's not 1 vote can lynch. my b, should have read it a little more closely. i'll update it now oh okay ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Wow did muyb pull a OMGUS on me? For my joke vote? This would mean a lot more if your vote against me wasn't still standing hth
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I thought the point of mills game was more keen observance of what people say, less about gung ho tactics, personally. Yep, let's get this baby started. You all want data let's have data. Muyb is scummy because of how quick he is to jump on me for what's obviously a joke vote. He'll try and say it was because of the confusion of the most votes = lynch mechanic and he was only voting to stop him being most votes blah blah, but it's still early in the day, a lot can change between now and deadline. Come on I want to see theories.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Yep, let's get this baby started. You all want data let's have data. Gough Suppressant posted:This would mean a lot more if your vote against me wasn't still standing hth
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 12:00 |
|
|
For a guy who cast the first vote, Matthew Beet sure seems to be bent out of shape about having a vote cast against him
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2015 03:11
|
|