|
This thread has Opinions About Tinsley.
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 06:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 06:33 |
|
|
reignonyourparade posted:This thread has Opinions About Tinsley. Well, this entire thing started as a Tinsley thread way back.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:05
|
|
|
Foreign cartoons! From Costa Rica 1  From Sweden 2  From the Netherlands 3  From Jordan 4  From Costa Rica 5 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:14
|
|
|
woww!
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:20
|
|
|
Erenthal posted:Well, this entire thing started as a Tinsley thread way back.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:36
|
|
|
King Possum III posted:From the Netherlands This guys art is appalling.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:50
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:Wow, how long ago was that?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:51
|
|
|
Okay Tinsley, let's think about this. Why would different groups of people have different tastes in recreation? There are two possible answers: either your skin color directly affects how much you like camping, or people are socialized differently according to their skin color. You seem to reject the latter, but the former is absolutely ridiculous. The real question to ask after panel 3 is "but why do different groups of people have different tastes in recreation? What makes camping less attractive to black people than to white people? How do social pressures and the environment in which one is raised affect one's opinions and tastes later in life?" But no, to Tinsley, that's the be-all end-all of the situation. Different groups of people have different tastes in recreation. No need to think about it any deeper than that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:58
|
|
1
|
Samurai Sanders posted:Wow, how long ago was that? The Pants Donkey cartoon turned seven, just to put things into perspective.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 08:12
|
|
|
Pants Donkey posted:If you count the Tinsley mock threads, I believe this thread turns ten either this year or the next.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 08:18
|
|
|
Pakled posted:But no, to Tinsley, that's the be-all end-all of the situation. Different groups of people have different tastes in recreation. No need to think about it any deeper than that. If you ever admit that anything has a cause other than lots of people making entirely free and independent decisions, then it makes it just a little bit harder to admit that poverty is entirely due to people deciding to be too lazy to be rich and then o boy do the floodgates open
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 08:30
|
|
Angepain posted:If you ever admit that anything has a cause other than lots of people making entirely free and independent decisions, then it makes it just a little bit harder to admit that poverty is entirely due to people deciding to be too lazy to be rich and then o boy do the floodgates open Hmmm, I'm going to assume you meant "isn't" there, at least I sure hope so.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 09:03
|
|
|
Well I mean, if different groups have different tastes, isn't that... isn't that a result of society's influence? I mean aren't you proving your own point? Unless you're trying to argue that the dislike of camping is genetically ingrained??  fake edit: beaten "It's not important what happened, or why, or how it affected relations, or the problems it creates, or how it does or doesn't line up with the policies Trump claims to have. Context, especially, does not matter -- neither for this president's actions, nor those of the last. What REALLY matters is I can stick it to "Obama's Legacy"." What's up with this loving obsession over "Obama's Legacy"? McCoy, Ramirez, Branco, and a few others have been harping on it literally since the election. Do they just want to scrub any trace of Obama from the history books, or are they that intent on pissing on the idea of him? Or both?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 09:40
|
|
2
Vib Rib posted:Well I mean, if different groups have different tastes, isn't that... isn't that a result of society's influence? I mean aren't you proving your own point? Each and every one of them is a massive racist and Obama was the first black president, of course they want to erase him from history and piss on everything he ever did. They'll be ranting about Obama on their death beds.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 09:47
|
|
|
Vib Rib posted:What's up with this loving obsession over "Obama's Legacy"? McCoy, Ramirez, Branco, and a few others have been harping on it literally since the election. It really sticks in their craw that the first black president was actually pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 09:55
|
|
|
Yo G2A is hot garbage and everyone knows that. How's Kinguin though? I've been using them instead, and I'm really liking the deals.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 10:02
|
|
|
Turtlicious posted:Yo G2A is hot garbage and everyone knows that. JRRose comic: Man sitting at a computer with a sewing needle, trying to fix holes in a shirt: "Honey, I can't seem to patch this up!" Dispairing housewife: "It's because you're using the wrong thread!"
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 10:12
|
|
|
Turtlicious posted:Yo G2A is hot garbage and everyone knows that. Kinguin has too much crosshatching, not enough labeling.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 10:12
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Kinguin has too much crosshatching, not enough labeling. Too many tabs fuuuck me. Sorry!
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 10:23
|
|
|
Out of all the flaws they could project onto Obama's Legacy in the era of Trump, they go with vanity.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 11:01
|
|
|
Trapezium Dave posted:Out of all the flaws they could project onto Obama's Legacy in the era of Trump, they go with vanity. Personally I think Obama's worst aspect is how active he was on Twitter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 11:07
|
|
|
Bell with the quick turnaround. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 11:18
|
|
|
Trapezium Dave posted:Out of all the flaws they could project onto Obama's Legacy in the era of Trump, they go with vanity. Its the "attack them where you are weak" strategy, which is meant to preempt attacks on their own weak points. If they keep projecting all of Trump's flaws on Obama or Hillary Clinton or whoever else, they figure they'll be able to go for the "both sides are equally bad" defense when Trump is attacked. It's extremely hypocritical, like everything else the conservatives do, but it's effective because the medias are too dumb to see through it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 11:23
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:Its the "attack them where you are weak" strategy, which is meant to preempt attacks on their own weak points. It's more than that, because he's been complaining about Obama's vanity and self-centeredness since long before Trump was elected, or even running. Heck, just look at his 'I <3 Me' cups, and that's not the only one. He just really hates that Obama did things, and sometimes people remember them as good things to have done. Prism fucked around with this message at 12:33 on Apr 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:30
|
|
|
My favorite thing about all the "Strong Trump actually attacked Syria unlike weakling Obama" is that after Obama used military action in Lybia the republicans freaked out about him not going for congressional approval for the action. So Obama went to congress looking for approval for military action in Syria but Republicans refused to give it to him. Now they're all clapping as Trump takes military action against Syria without congressional approval 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:32
|
|
|
Selachian posted:Bell with the quick turnaround.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:34
|
|
Prism posted:It's more than that, because he's been complaining about Obama's vanity and self-centeredness since long before Trump was elected, or even running. The 'I <3 Me' cup, the self-admiration... The whole thing with portraying Obama as vain and self-centered is because these people are racists, they see a black person aspiring to or achieving something impressive and instantly they jump to the conclusion that they are vain and self-centered because how dare a black person achieve anything? To them a black person doing anything other than living in a ghetto is rising above their station. To them Obama becoming President was morally wrong, McCain and Romney should have won by default regardless of the voters will because a black person becoming president is wrong.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:40
|
|
|
"hitler didn't own! ", i continue to insist as my head slowly shrinks and transform into a corn cob
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:41
|
|
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:The whole thing with portraying Obama as vain and self-centered is because these people are racists, they see a black person aspiring to or achieving something impressive and instantly they jump to the conclusion that they are vain and self-centered because how dare a black person achieve anything? To them a black person doing anything other than living in a ghetto is rising above their station. To them Obama becoming President was morally wrong, McCain and Romney should have won by default regardless of the voters will because a black person becoming president is wrong. I agree. It's more than projecting Trump's weaknesses onto him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:42
|
|
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:The whole thing with portraying Obama as vain and self-centered is because these people are racists, they see a black person aspiring to or achieving something impressive and instantly they jump to the conclusion that they are vain and self-centered because how dare a black person achieve anything? To them a black person doing anything other than living in a ghetto is rising above their station. To them Obama becoming President was morally wrong, McCain and Romney should have won by default regardless of the voters will because a black person becoming president is wrong. They can't understand why anyone would want to be president, so they project their own negative motivators- vanity, pride and parasitic need for recognition (which they have because they do art [source: I do art]) onto everyone that they hate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:52
|
|
|
DUCK WAS FIRED.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 13:35
|
|
|
So since this was posted again, has anyone actually figured out what it means? I mean, even that Anubis cartoon by Ramirez(?) has been successfully analyzed. vvv Goddammit, I've been reading this thread for like a year and didn't know that. vvv Thoughtless fucked around with this message at 14:08 on Apr 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 13:48
|
|
|
Thoughtless posted:So since this was posted again, has anyone actually figured out what it means? I mean, even that Anubis cartoon by Ramirez(?) has been successfully analyzed. It's from The Onion, and intentionally incomprehensible.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 13:54
|
|
|
Oh I hope Drybones tries to spin Spicey's shite. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:02
|
|
|
Thoughtless posted:So since this was posted again, has anyone actually figured out what it means? I mean, even that Anubis cartoon by Ramirez(?) has been successfully analyzed. It was drawn to be absurd. But if you want an interpretation: the Democratic rear end has come with an empty jar of ethanol and wants to use the Republican Elephant's grain (see inbox) to make more, possibly to use as a biofuel to replace petroleum. The Republican Elephant, however, has other plans: instead of ethanol, he's churning out lies and curses because it is an election year. Meanwhile, he's also turning profits into ashes and smoke by upholding the Cuban embargo. This makes sense of everything except the "forestry" and "steel" labels.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
 1 2 3And a look at sanctuary city Red Bank, NJ.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:15
|
|
|
Someone replace Assad with Lester.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
Oh, so you're saying United suddenly isn't allowed to run their business the way they want to? Sounds like pro-regulation snowflake talk to me. When did you turn into such a bleeding hard loony lib, Lester????
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 06:33 |
|
|
I'm not going to say that right wing cartoonists (mainly Lester, McCoy and Ramirez) are racist because they always want to poo poo on Obama's legacy. I'm sure there's a racial aspect, but I think it's more that their current president is realllly unpopular and even people in his party hate em (although they'll go along with him because he mostly gives what the party wants). So it's a lot easier to make fun of Obama's legacy being destroyed than to prop Trump up as an actual good human being like Branco and Garrison do.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:31
|
|
