|
Vasukhani posted:No. The US leadership has things it considers vital security interests. The Russian leadership has things it considers vital security interests. For Russia, control over Ukraine is a vital security interest. For the US, it is not. Therefore, no matter what happens, the US will not be willing to go as far as the Russians for Ukraine. What the US is doing now is window dressing. Why is Russia entitled to control over another sovereign nation.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:16 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 16:16 |
|
Russia's interest in Ukraine is not security, it's PR theater.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:30 |
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:Why is Russia entitled to control over another sovereign nation. THE next summer Alcibiades sailed with twenty ships to Argos and seized the suspected persons still left of the Lacedaemonian faction to the number of three hundred, whom the Athenians forthwith lodged in the neighbouring islands of their empire. The Athenians also made an expedition against the isle of Melos with thirty ships of their own, six Chian, and two Lesbian vessels, sixteen hundred heavy infantry, three hundred archers, and twenty mounted archers from Athens, and about fifteen hundred heavy infantry from the allies and the islanders. The Melians are a colony of Lacedaemon that would not submit to the Athenians like the other islanders, and at first remained neutral and took no part in the struggle, but afterwards upon the Athenians using violence and plundering their territory, assumed an attitude of open hostility. Cleomedes, son of Lycomedes, and Tisias, son of Tisimachus, the generals, encamping in their territory with the above armament, before doing any harm to their land, sent envoys to negotiate. These the Melians did not bring before the people, but bade them state the object of their mission to the magistrates and the few; upon which the Athenian envoys spoke as follows: Athenians. Since the negotiations are not to go on before the people, in order that we may not be able to speak straight on without interruption, and deceive the ears of the multitude by seductive arguments which would pass without refutation (for we know that this is the meaning of our being brought before the few), what if you who sit there were to pursue a method more cautious still? Make no set speech yourselves, but take us up at whatever you do not like, and settle that before going any farther. And first tell us if this proposition of ours suits you. The Melian commissioners answered: Melians. To the fairness of quietly instructing each other as you propose there is nothing to object; but your military preparations are too far advanced to agree with what you say, as we see you are come to be judges in your own cause, and that all we can reasonably expect from this negotiation is war, if we prove to have right on our side and refuse to submit, and in the contrary case, slavery. Athenians. If you have met to reason about presentiments of the future, or for anything else than to consult for the safety of your state upon the facts that you see before you, we will give over; otherwise we will go on. Melians. It is natural and excusable for men in our position to turn more ways than one both in thought and utterance. However, the question in this conference is, as you say, the safety of our country; and the discussion, if you please, can proceed in the way which you propose. Athenians. For ourselves, we shall not trouble you with specious pretences- either of how we have a right to our empire because we overthrew the Mede, or are now attacking you because of wrong that you have done us- and make a long speech which would not be believed; and in return we hope that you, instead of thinking to influence us by saying that you did not join the Lacedaemonians, although their colonists, or that you have done us no wrong, will aim at what is feasible, holding in view the real sentiments of us both; since you know as well as we do that right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they canand the weak suffer what they must. Melians. As we think, at any rate, it is expedient- we speak as we are obliged, since you enjoin us to let right alone and talk only of interest- that you should not destroy what is our common protection, the privilege of being allowed in danger to invoke what is fair and right, and even to profit by arguments not strictly valid if they can be got to pass current. And you are as much interested in this as any, as your fall would be a signal for the heaviest vengeance and an example for the world to meditate upon. Athenians. The end of our empire, if end it should, does not frighten us: a rival empire like Lacedaemon, even if Lacedaemon was our real antagonist, is not so terrible to the vanquished as subjects who by themselves attack and overpower their rulers. This, however, is a risk that we are content to take. We will now proceed to show you that we are come here in the interest of our empire, and that we shall say what we are now going to say, for the preservation of your country; as we would fain exercise that empire over you withouttrouble, and see you preserved for the good of us both. Melians. And how, pray, could it turn out as good for us to serve as for you to rule? Athenians. Because you would have the advantage of submitting before suffering the worst, and we should gain by not destroying you. Melians. So that you would not consent to our being neutral, friends instead of enemies, but allies of neither side. Athenians. No; for your hostility cannot so much hurt us as your friendship will be an argument to our subjects of our weakness, and your enmity of our power. Melians. Is that your subjects' idea of equity, to put those who have nothing to do with you in the same category with peoples that are most of them your own colonists, and some conquered rebels? Athenians. As far as right goes they think one has as much of it as the other, and that if any maintain their independence it is because they are strong, and that if we do not molest them it is because we are afraid; so that besides extending our empire we should gain in security by your subjection; the fact that you are islanders and weaker than others rendering it all the more important that you should not succeed in baffling the masters of the sea. Melians. But do you consider that there is no security in the policy which we indicate? For here again if you debar us from talking about justice and invite us to obey your interest, we also must explain ours, and try to persuade you, if the two happen to coincide. How can you avoid making enemies of all existing neutrals who shall look at case from it that one day or another you will attack them? And what is this but to make greater the enemies that you have already, and to force others to become so who would otherwise have never thought of it? Athenians. Why, the fact is that continentals generally give us but little alarm; the liberty which they enjoy will long prevent their taking precautions against us; it is rather islanders like yourselves, outside our empire, and subjects smarting under the yoke, who would be the most likely to take a rash step and lead themselves and us into obvious danger. Melians. Well then, if you risk so much to retain your empire, and your subjects to get rid of it, it were surely great baseness and cowardice in us who are still free not to try everything that can be tried, before submitting to your yoke. Athenians. Not if you are well advised, the contest not being an equal one, with honour as the prize and shame as the penalty, but a question of self-preservation and of not resisting those who are far stronger than you are. Melians. But we know that the fortune of war is sometimes more impartial than the disproportion of numbers might lead one to suppose; to submit is to give ourselves over to despair, while action still preserves for us a hope that we may stand erect. Athenians. Hope, danger's comforter, may be indulged in by those who have abundant resources, if not without loss at all events without ruin; but its nature is to be extravagant, and those who go so far as to put their all upon the venture see it in its true colours only when they are ruined; but so long as the discovery would enable them to guard against it, it is never found wanting. Let not this be the case with you, who are weak and hang on a single turn of the scale; nor be like the vulgar, who, abandoning such security as human means may still afford, when visible hopes fail them in extremity, turn to invisible, to prophecies and oracles, and other such inventions thatdelude men with hopes to their destruction. Melians. You may be sure that we are as well aware as you of the difficulty of contending against your power and fortune, unless the terms be equal. But we trust that the gods may grant us fortune as good as yours, since we are just men fighting against unjust, and that what we want in power will be made up by the alliance of the Lacedaemonians, who are bound, if only for very shame, to come to the aid of their kindred. Our confidence, therefore, after all is not so utterly irrational. Athenians. When you speak of the favour of the gods, we may as fairly hope for that as yourselves; neither our pretensions nor our conduct being in any way contrary to what men believe of the gods, or practise among themselves. Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist for ever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do. Thus, as far as the gods are concerned, we have no fear and no reason to fear that we shall be at a disadvantage. But when we come to your notion about the Lacedaemonians, which leads you to believe that shame will make them help you, here we bless your simplicity but do not envy your folly. The Lacedaemonians, when their own interests or their country's laws are in question, are the worthiest men alive; of their conduct towards others much might be said, but no clearer idea of it could be given than by shortly saying that of all the men we know they are most conspicuous in considering what is agreeable honourable, and what is expedient just. Such a way of thinking does not promise much for the safety which you now unreasonably count upon. Melians. But it is for this very reason that we now trust to their respect for expediency to prevent them from betraying the Melians, their colonists, and thereby losing the confidence of their friends in Hellas and helping their enemies. Athenians. Then you do not adopt the view that expediency goes with security, while justice and honour cannot be followed without danger; and danger the Lacedaemonians generally court as little as possible. Melians. But we believe that they would be more likely to face even danger for our sake, and with more confidence than for others, as our nearness to Peloponnese makes it easier for them to act, and our common blood ensures our fidelity. Athenians. Yes, but what an intending ally trusts to is not the goodwill of those who ask his aid, but a decided superiority of power for action; and the Lacedaemonians look to this even more than others. At least, such is their distrust of their home resources that it is only with numerous allies that they attack a neighbour; now is it likely that while we are masters of the sea they will cross over to an island? Melians. But they would have others to send. The Cretan Sea is a wide one, and it is more difficult for those who command it to intercept others, than for those who wish to elude them to do so safely. And should the Lacedaemonians miscarry in this, they would fall upon your land, and upon those left of your allies whom Brasidas did not reach; and instead of places which are not yours, you will have to fight for your own country and your own confederacy. Athenians. Some diversion of the kind you speak of you may one day experience, only to learn, as others have done, that the Athenians never once yet withdrew from a siege for fear of any. But we are struck by the fact that, after saying you would consult for the safety of your country, in all this discussion you have mentioned nothing which men might trust in and think to be saved by. Your strongest arguments depend upon hope and the future, and your actual resources are too scanty, as compared with those arrayed against you, for you to come out victorious. You will therefore show great blindness of judgment, unless, after allowing us to retire, you can find some counsel more prudent than this. You will surely not be caught by that idea of disgrace, which in dangers that are disgraceful, and at the same time too plain to be mistaken, proves so fatal to mankind; since in too many cases the very men that have their eyes perfectly open to what they are rushing into, let the thing called disgrace, by the mere influence of a seductive name, lead them on to a point at which they become so enslaved by the phrase as in fact to fall wilfully into hopeless disaster, and incur disgrace more disgraceful as the companion of error, than when it comes as the result of misfortune. This, if you are well advised, you will guard against; and you will not think it dishonourable to submit to the greatest city in Hellas, when it makes you the moderate offer of becoming its tributary ally, without ceasing to enjoy the country that belongs to you; nor when you have the choice given you between war and security, will you be so blinded as to choose the worse. And it is certain that those who do not yield to their equals, who keep terms with their superiors, and are moderate towards their inferiors, on the whole succeed best. Think over the matter, therefore, after our withdrawal, and reflect once and again that it is for your country that you are consulting, that you have not more than one, and that upon this one deliberation depends its prosperity or ruin. The Athenians now withdrew from the conference; and the Melians, left to themselves, came to a decision corresponding with what they had maintained in the discussion, and answered: "Our resolution, Athenians, is the same as it was at first. We will not in a moment deprive of freedom a city that has been inhabited these seven hundred years; but we put our trust in the fortune by which the gods have preserved it until now, and in the help of men, that is, of the Lacedaemonians; and so we will try and save ourselves. Meanwhile we invite you to allow us to be friends to you and foes to neither party, and to retire from our country after making such a treaty as shall seem fit to us both." Such was the answer of the Melians. The Athenians now departing from the conference said: "Well, you alone, as it seems to us, judging from these resolutions, regard what is future as more certain than what is before your eyes, and what is out of sight, in your eagerness, as already coming to pass; and as you have staked most on, and trusted most in, the Lacedaemonians, your fortune, and your hopes, so will you be most completely deceived." The Athenian envoys now returned to the army; and the Melians showing no signs of yielding, the generals at once betook themselves to hostilities, and drew a line of circumvallation round the Melians, dividing the work among the different states. Subsequently the Athenians returned with most of their army, leaving behind them a certain number of their own citizens and of the allies to keep guard by land and sea. The force thus left stayed on and besieged the place. About the same time the Argives invaded the territory of Phlius and lost eighty men cut off in an ambush by the Phliasians and Argive exiles. Meanwhile the Athenians at Pylos took so much plunder from the Lacedaemonians that the latter, although they still refrained from breaking off the treaty and going to war with Athens, yet proclaimed that any of their people that chose might plunder the Athenians. The Corinthians also commenced hostilities with the Athenians for private quarrels of their own; but the rest of the Peloponnesians stayed quiet. Meanwhile the Melians attacked by night and took the part of the Athenian lines over against the market, and killed some of the men, and brought in corn and all else that they could find useful to them, and so returned and kept quiet, while the Athenians took measures to keep better guard in future. Summer was now over. The next winter the Lacedaemonians intended to invade the Argive territory, but arriving at the frontier found the sacrifices for crossing unfavourable, and went back again. This intention of theirs gave the Argives suspicions of certain of their fellow citizens, some of whom they arrested; others, however, escaped them. About the same time the Melians again took another part of the Athenian lines which were but feebly garrisoned. Reinforcements afterwards arriving from Athens in consequence, under the command of Philocrates, son of Demeas, the siege was now pressed vigorously; and some treachery taking place inside, the Melians surrendered at discretion to the Athenians, who put to death all the grown men whom they took, and sold the women and children for slaves, and subsequently sent out five hundred colonists and inhabited the place themselves. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:34 |
|
I don't think this guy is doing well.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:40 |
|
Vasukhani posted:THE next summer Alcibiades sailed with twenty ships to Argos and seized the suspected persons still left of the Lacedaemonian faction to the number of three hundred, whom the Athenians forthwith lodged in the neighbouring islands of their empire. The Athenians also made an expedition against the isle of Melos with thirty ships of their own, six Chian, and two Lesbian vessels, sixteen hundred heavy infantry, three hundred archers, and twenty mounted archers from Athens, and about fifteen hundred heavy infantry from the allies and the islanders. The Melians are a colony of Lacedaemon that would not submit to the Athenians like the other islanders, and at first remained neutral and took no part in the struggle, but afterwards upon the Athenians using violence and plundering their territory, assumed an attitude of open hostility. Cleomedes, son of Lycomedes, and Tisias, son of Tisimachus, the generals, encamping in their territory with the above armament, before doing any harm to their land, sent envoys to negotiate. These the Melians did not bring before the people, but bade them state the object of their mission to the magistrates and the few; upon which the Athenian envoys spoke as follows: lmao E: lol
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:42 |
|
One time I was playing a multiplayer goon Civ 6 game and another player got mad that I attacked them opportunistically while they were defending another invasion. I cited the Melian Dialogue to them, then quickly finished them off. Started another game with the same player after that one. We were neighbor again, and they beelined for me early in the game and crushed me. True story.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:42 |
|
Vasukhani posted:THE next summer Alcibiades sailed with twenty ships to Argos and seized the suspected persons still left of the Lacedaemonian faction to the number of three hundred, whom the Athenians forthwith lodged in the neighbouring islands of their empire. The Athenians also made an expedition against the isle of Melos with thirty ships of their own, six Chian, and two Lesbian vessels, sixteen hundred heavy infantry, three hundred archers, and twenty mounted archers from Athens, and about fifteen hundred heavy infantry from the allies and the islanders. The Melians are a colony of Lacedaemon that would not submit to the Athenians like the other islanders, and at first remained neutral and took no part in the struggle, but afterwards upon the Athenians using violence and plundering their territory, assumed an attitude of open hostility. Cleomedes, son of Lycomedes, and Tisias, son of Tisimachus, the generals, encamping in their territory with the above armament, before doing any harm to their land, sent envoys to negotiate. These the Melians did not bring before the people, but bade them state the object of their mission to the magistrates and the few; upon which the Athenian envoys spoke as follows:
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 18:58 |
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:Why is Russia entitled to control over another sovereign nation. How did you conjure that from their post
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 19:06 |
|
Vasukhani posted:THE next summer Alcibiades sailed with twenty ships to Argos and seized the suspected persons still left of the Lacedaemonian faction to the number of three hundred, whom the Athenians forthwith lodged in the neighbouring islands of their empire. The Athenians also made an expedition against the isle of Melos with thirty ships of their own, six Chian, and two Lesbian vessels, sixteen hundred heavy infantry, three hundred archers, and twenty mounted archers from Athens, and about fifteen hundred heavy infantry from the allies and the islanders. The Melians are a colony of Lacedaemon that would not submit to the Athenians like the other islanders, and at first remained neutral and took no part in the struggle, but afterwards upon the Athenians using violence and plundering their territory, assumed an attitude of open hostility. Cleomedes, son of Lycomedes, and Tisias, son of Tisimachus, the generals, encamping in their territory with the above armament, before doing any harm to their land, sent envoys to negotiate. These the Melians did not bring before the people, but bade them state the object of their mission to the magistrates and the few; upon which the Athenian envoys spoke as follows:
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 19:07 |
|
TheDeadlyShoe posted:Russia's interest in Ukraine is not security, it's PR theater. You know better than this.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 19:40 |
|
Yeah I hate to say it but if russia invades Ukraine is poo poo out of luck, Ukraine matters much more to Russia than Ukraine matters to Europe and America.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 19:59 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:Yeah I hate to say it but if russia invades Ukraine is poo poo out of luck, Ukraine matters much more to Russia than Ukraine matters to Europe and America. I sure hope it doesn't play out that way, because Ukrainians deserve their freedom and Putin will be engaging in a completely psychotic war of imperial aggression.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:04 |
|
I think Ukraine matters even more to Ukrainians than it matters to Russia... like what next? Permanent occupation and transporting nationalists to Siberia?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:06 |
|
Nenonen posted:I think Ukraine matters even more to Ukrainians than it matters to Russia... like what next? Permanent occupation and transporting nationalists to Siberia? They’ll probably bring back the former President of Ukraine and have him treat Ukrainians the way Bashar Al Assad treats syrians with Russia providing air cover while pro Russia Ukrainians will do most of the killing and torturing
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:09 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:They’ll probably bring back the former President of Ukraine and have him treat Ukrainians the way Bashar Al Assad treats syrians with Russia providing air cover while pro Russia Ukrainians will do most of the killing and torturing I find it implausible that even Putin would go to those lenghts. Neither Russia nor Ukraine is quite the totalitarian state that Syria has been for decades, it just wouldn't fly.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:21 |
|
Def could see lovely Russian puppet Ukraine getting pretty brutal vs dissent
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:35 |
|
What if Russia attacks Serbia?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:39 |
|
Paladinus posted:What if Russia attacks Serbia? Why would they they’re best friends also there’s like 12 countries in between them
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:43 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:Why would they they’re best friends also there’s like 12 countries in between them Then I see 13 reasons to do so.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:45 |
|
I think if Russia does anything it would be just making DNR official by rolling in with their tanks and setting up shop. It would be up to Ukraine to attack which would look and go terribly. Maaaybe stretching for Mariupol. I don't think Putin is nearly crazy or desperate enough to go after territory full of people who hate him.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:49 |
|
Nenonen posted:Then I see 13 reasons to do so. if he gets belgrade and constantinople putin is crowned czar of all slavs and that's a huge prestige bonus
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:53 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:Why would they they’re best friends also there’s like 12 countries in between them Yeah, but still. What if?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:53 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:I think if Russia does anything it would be just making DNR official by rolling in with their tanks and setting up shop. It would be up to Ukraine to attack which would look and go terribly. I think it'd be something very much like this. Putin needs a short, victorious war to stem the tide of revolution.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:54 |
|
i say swears online posted:if he gets belgrade and constantinople putin is crowned czar of all slavs and that's a huge prestige bonus It still makes me laugh how the Russians went to war with the ottomans in the Crimean war by saying “your Christian citizens are under our protection now, we represent them, they’re ours now”
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 20:55 |
|
Nenonen posted:Putin needs a short, victorious war to stem the tide of revolution. which revolutionary groups are active in russia at the moment
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 21:05 |
|
i say swears online posted:which revolutionary groups are active in russia at the moment Ukrainian neo Nazis MKU
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 21:06 |
|
There's definitely more interesting questions in the Clancy scenario than whether the US/Europe will send troops, such as how long would it take before Russians come out with pitchforks to hang the denizens of Kremlin because who the gently caress wants a war In other news Lithuania, almost certainly in exchange for help of the US dealing with Belarus, is getting closer with Taiwan and making China upset. China is pressing European businesses to stop using Lithuanian produced parts. Really curious how this works out. Much more reason for "THE WEST WONT DO ANYTHING" sentiment imho https://mobile.twitter.com/ABarbashin/status/1472579359131246594 https://mobile.twitter.com/ABarbashin/status/1472579364122411018 https://mobile.twitter.com/ABarbashin/status/1472579369348575233
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 21:11 |
|
The EU should stand united against that sort of bullshit. Christ, I am so tired of Putin and Xi.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 21:47 |
|
Where would Germany sell their cars? 5 million new cars (ballpark) yearly is a lot of money, if China puts pressure on BMW and they come to the politicians what can they do?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 21:57 |
|
Somaen posted:There's definitely more interesting questions in the Clancy scenario than whether the US/Europe will send troops, such as how long would it take before Russians come out with pitchforks to hang the denizens of Kremlin because who the gently caress wants a war It's very Russian analyst to make an elaborate conspiracy theory involving the US, and not to consider that it might just be a matter of principle for Lithuania, a country in a very similar position to Taiwan.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 22:32 |
OddObserver posted:It's very Russian analyst to make an elaborate conspiracy theory involving the US, and not to consider that it might just be a matter of principle for Lithuania, a country in a very similar position to Taiwan. While one may question if US is a motivating force behind Lithuanian decisions, or to what extent, the analyst is very much on the money about how and why China means to retaliate. EU has no trade or foreign affairs measures to respond to CPC-style “unofficial” pressure against a member state, which is one of the known blind that Dombrovskis intends to address (and has intended since before the recent escalation) - but it’s not going to happen overnight, since EU is not quick to change, and since some EU member states have reservations about what they deem to be one member state’s attempt to offload consequences of their individual (or at the very least uncoordinated) foreign policy decision to the rest of the bloc.
|
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:09 |
|
OddObserver posted:It's very Russian analyst to make an elaborate conspiracy theory involving the US, and not to consider that it might just be a matter of principle for Lithuania, a country in a very similar position to Taiwan. Lol that's fair. In any case what Lithuania is doing is great but if China can pressure an EU country to back off that will be a disaster, and even worse if China pressures European businesses to indirectly cause economic damage to do that Somaen fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Dec 20, 2021 |
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:14 |
|
No, no, see, the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must! Hey, HEY. WTF, the weak are building a coalition against the strong! wtf is this bullshit, don't they know realism 101?? Did they learn nothing from the Melian dialogue, where Athens famously went on to victory after alienating its allies and pushing others to the opposing coalition?!?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:21 |
|
Cugel the Clever posted:No, no, see, the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must! They asked "why was Russia entitled to take over ukraine" the answer is because they can. Just like how the US could take over Iraq because they could. Trying to normatively argue about right and wrong is pointless; thats like the whole point of the melian dialogue. This doesn't mean normative values don't exist, it just means policy isn't directed by it. wisconsingreg fucked around with this message at 00:08 on Dec 21, 2021 |
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:51 |
|
So I take it you believe Ukraine will be included in that coalition right?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:52 |
|
Ukraine is gonna be an American ally right?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:56 |
|
Oh no its drat bootlicker tankie Blinken https://twitter.com/JonLemire/status/1404520361849413642?s=20
|
# ? Dec 20, 2021 23:57 |
|
States have interests, Ukraine is a security interest for Russia. It isn't for the US. American actions prove this. American support is unlikely to meaningfully change the outcome of any conflict and will be small.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2021 00:07 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:It still makes me laugh how the Russians went to war with the ottomans in the Crimean war by saying “your Christian citizens are under our protection now, we represent them, they’re ours now” How is that surprising? Defending the orthodox faith was a big thing for Imperial Russia.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2021 00:16 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 16:16 |
|
In actual news, poroshenko's allegedly treasonous coal scheme in donbass might end in charges https://twitter.com/AlexKhrebet/status/1472931418401611782
|
# ? Dec 21, 2021 00:34 |