|
The Proc posted:I read a book about it called One Point Safe from the dollar general bargain bin so it's probably being given away on amazon. 1. Was it good? 2. I'm not sure I can take the book seriously, the author's name is clearly a pseudonym Leslie Cockburn
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 03:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 16:23 |
|
david_a posted:I wonder what the Sopwith pilot's life insurance premiums are like. Not too expensive, you only need it for a few minutes. Unless you're properly trained, of course..
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 03:38 |
|
movax posted:I dig the hell out of this, that's awesome. The AMU at Nellis that maintains the Aggressor F-15s (which still haven't gone away...I thought they were getting BRAC'd a year or two ago) is called Flanker AMU. AGRS in general adopt "threat" country stuff pretty hard-core, well beyond minor things like exhaust covers.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 06:07 |
|
I was looking up the Aggressors a few days ago and was surprised to see both Nellis squadrons still active. I thought they were going away too. Hopefully that was reversed.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 07:28 |
|
Godholio posted:I was looking up the Aggressors a few days ago and was surprised to see both Nellis squadrons still active. I thought they were going away too. Hopefully that was reversed. Yeah the ATG is still pretty robust, both AGRS, the Space Aggressors, Air Defense Aggressors and a few others I think...maybe something good came out of WEPTAC a year or two ago.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 08:20 |
I once met an Army Chaplin assigned to some OPFOR or other (Fort Polk?) who was referred to as the "political officer" and wore a KGB uniform. Might have been a GRU outfit, I forget the specifics. Also gently caress Ft. Polk.
|
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 10:45 |
|
There's a private company called ATAC that does aggressor training with the Air Force and Air National Guard: A4 Skyhawk, IAI Kfir, Hawker Hunter. Navy E-2 with a trio of Kfirs. I really adore the Skyhawk. It was popular as an aggressor plane (as seen in "Top Gun") because it was small and agile like the MiG-17 and MiG-21. I imagine the Kfir was probably used for the same reason. The big whale hump behind the cockpit is one way to distinguish a newer A4 from an older one; the hump is home to a bunch of advanced avionics that weren't on the original plane. I didn't realize until this post just how many ATAC pictures I have on my hard drive. It makes sense, though: I like the Kfir and the Skyhawk, so any new and high-res photos of those two planes are probably going to be of the ATAC specimens. TheNakedJimbo fucked around with this message at 17:36 on Jul 28, 2014 |
# ? Jul 28, 2014 13:37 |
|
david_a posted:Can somebody explain jet <-> missile compatibility to a layman like me? For instance, in the above article they mention that it would have cost a lot of money to upgrade the F-14 to handle newer missiles. The F-106 was apparently also saddled with mediocre missiles that held it back. I'm guessing a "missile system" is a lot more than just a goodie-filled tube with fins on it? In the case of the 106 there were a couple factors. The jet was designed with vacuum tube based electronics. A modernization program was underway to create all new solid state hardware. This hit a couple stumbling blocks, some less obvious ones were weight and balance challenges due to the new components. This program started shortly before the F-4 IOC. Basically the AF said gently caress that and put the money into other programs. This is the rough story I was told by my dad who worked on the program. Tremblay fucked around with this message at 16:12 on Jul 28, 2014 |
# ? Jul 28, 2014 16:04 |
|
I've seen ATAC stage out of Elmendorf during Red Flag. I was absolutely puzzled why a Skyhawk was on the flight line.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 16:12 |
|
I'm more impressed by the Hawker Hunter. Though I guess with some really late retirements of those by Switzerland and some other countries it's not as implausible as it seems.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 17:13 |
|
Did the Soviets have anything similar to the Aggressor program/squadrons? I recall reading... something about that way back. I imagine they might not have gotten their hands on any teen series aircraft, but whatever they could nab from say Vietnam should have been fair game right? Thinking F-5s, F-100, maybe a F-4 or a couple?
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 17:14 |
|
Pimpmust posted:Did the Soviets have anything similar to the Aggressor program/squadrons? I recall reading... something about that way back. I imagine even if they could have / did, I don't know if they had the political climate (not to mention infrastructure) to try and operate a robust aggressor program using foreign jets. Would be really interested to hear about what kind of DACT (if any) was done on the Soviet side though; they certainly flew enough airframes to supply the dissimilar part.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 17:19 |
|
The idea of the Russians operating an F-15 is blowing my mind.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 17:27 |
|
Pimpmust posted:Did the Soviets have anything similar to the Aggressor program/squadrons? I recall reading... something about that way back. I did read once that they got an F-14 - an Iranian defector.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 17:39 |
|
StandardVC10 posted:I did read once that they got an F-14 - an Iranian defector. Whoa. Pre or post-revolution?
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 18:04 |
|
In the GiP idiots thread somebody mentioned finding a couple going at it inside the intake of an F-14.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 18:40 |
|
I have no problem believing most pieces of military hardware have had boning go on in, on or under them.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 18:47 |
|
I wonder if Take My Breath Away by Berlin was playing.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 18:53 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:In the GiP idiots thread somebody mentioned finding a couple going at it inside the intake of an F-14. I've found a couple in medias res under the exhausts of a display piece CF-101.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:10 |
|
I know people have hosed in the AWACS.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:14 |
|
nevermind
Cat Mattress fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Jul 28, 2014 |
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:27 |
|
holocaust bloopers posted:I know people have hosed in the AWACS. Ew on every level.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:41 |
|
Fearless posted:I've found a couple in medias res under the exhausts of a display piece CF-101. I think you mean in flagrante delicto, unless they were telling each other a story.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:43 |
|
Godholio posted:Ew on every level. Bunks, lavatory, both lower lobes. Yea, man.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:43 |
|
holocaust bloopers posted:I know people have hosed in the AWACS. Has anyone ever hosed on top of the radar dome?
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:52 |
|
Insane Totoro posted:Has anyone ever hosed on top of the radar dome? Not that I'm aware of.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 19:54 |
|
Insane Totoro posted:Has anyone ever hosed on top of the radar dome? Don't even need birth control
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 20:16 |
|
What's a lower lobe? Does an AWACS only get it after 40?
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 20:24 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:What's a lower lobe? Does an AWACS only get it after 40? On a civilian airliner a lobe is where the baggage goes and where equipment is stored. On the AWACS, both compartments -- front and rear -- are stuffed full of gear.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 20:34 |
|
Insane Totoro posted:Has anyone ever hosed on top of the radar dome? Now THAT would be a story.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 21:20 |
|
It's probably a little difficult to do in-flight, unlike the rest of them. On the other hand, when there's a will, there's a way...
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 21:22 |
|
I'd doubt it. The stands used to access the dome are only pushed to the jet when there's work to be done within the dome itself. Doesn't happen regularly.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 21:23 |
|
Did a little googling and found this blog post about a Soviet Aggressor program: http://thelexicans.wordpress.com/2013/08/12/soviet-aggressor-program/ Got some cool picks in there with markings and stuff. quote:Due to very poor showing of Soviet built aircraft in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, the Soviet Union began a program generally known with the Soviet Air Force as The Center for Flight Personnel. The Center was located in Turkmenistan at an airbase called Maryy-1 (Maryy is pronounced “Marie). quote:Generally, the syllabus used by the units at Maryy-1 consisted of 5 parts: quote:The 1st Squadron of the 1521st initially flew the MiG-21bis and then the MiG-29 Fulcrum-C. The tips of the horizontal stabilator and the wingtips were painted yellow, with a black outline, to make the aircraft look like the F-15 Eagle. To keep up that appearance, angled black converging in a black and yellow chevron were applied aft of the cockpit. Sharkmouth markings were also added to aircraft based on ground crew preference. And this post got some info on actual western planes in the Soviet Union, mostly planes-in-pieces that they picked up and like, glued together: http://thelexicans.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/western-aircraft-in-the-ussr/ quote:This is a photo of what may be an F-4 Phantom and a Mirage III (with an 3M bomber in the foreground) taken at the Zhukovskiy airfield outside of Moscow. The caption dates the photo 11 August 1971. quote:This is a fuselage from a Northrop F-5. This is probably one of the 2 Skoshi Tiger aircraft formerly operated by the Air Force of South Vietnam. This is 1 of 2 F-5s transferred to Soviet soon after the Communist North invaded in 1973. quote:This is an escape capsule from an F-111 that was shot down over North Vietnam. The USAF lost 6 of these aircraft during the Vietnam. quote:This is a piece from an A-7A from VA-82 Marauders. quote:This is the vertical stabilizer from Scott O’Grady’s F-16C shot down over Bosnia in 1995. Also a link to this video of a F-5 being test-flown by the soviets (and a A-37 Dragonfly): http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e52_1320882209 quote:With the capture of the huge air base at Bien Hoa, the heroes of the North Vietnamese Armed forces were able to supply the Soviet, Chinese, & Polish air forces a number of US designs for evaluation. This F5 and two others were tested extensively at Chkalov State Flight Tests Centre, which is similar in operation to US Edwards AFB AFFTC, or the Tonopah Test Range.The F5 outperformed the MiG-21, and these results drove the development of the MiG-23.Pilots who were assigned to the F-5E, were Vladimir Kandaurov, Alexander Bezhevets and Nikolay Stogov.The F5 was of particular importance due to it’s export demand. Here's a link in Russian (with pictures) of that pseudo Topgun program: http://www.airforce.ru/awm/agressor/index.htm Pimpmust fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Jul 28, 2014 |
# ? Jul 28, 2014 21:25 |
|
Pimpmust posted:Did the Soviets have anything similar to the Aggressor program/squadrons? I recall reading... something about that way back. Must have been difficult when both sides were Red Team.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 21:51 |
|
MrYenko posted:Whoa. Pre or post-revolution? The book I read this in (F-14 Tomcat in Action by Squadron-Signal Publications) says only "during the Iran/Iraq war" so I guess post-revolution. edit: Note however that another source says "no records exist" of an Iranian defection to the Soviet Union of this nature. StandardVC10 fucked around with this message at 21:58 on Jul 28, 2014 |
# ? Jul 28, 2014 21:54 |
|
StandardVC10 posted:The book I read this in (F-14 Tomcat in Action by Squadron-Signal Publications) says only "during the Iran/Iraq war" so I guess post-revolution. They may have been confusing it with the Iranian F-14 pilot who defected to Iraq.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2014 22:35 |
|
holocaust bloopers posted:I know people have hosed in the AWACS. This seems relevant:
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 01:33 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:This seems relevant: 1,000,000 FLYING-WHORES
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 01:52 |
|
Dietrich posted:I think you mean in flagrante delicto, unless they were telling each other a story. What passes for post-coitus pillow talk on a cement slab afterwards, so I feel my Latin is accurate.
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 04:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 16:23 |
|
TheNakedJimbo posted:I really adore the Skyhawk. It was popular as an aggressor plane (as seen in "Top Gun") because it was small and agile like the MiG-17 and MiG-21 I really need a Chuck Yeagers Air Combat II. There I was... In an F-14... At 5,000 feet... Head to Head... With 4... MiG-21s...
|
# ? Jul 29, 2014 05:46 |