|
Technically, there definitely were a lot of conversations about AIDS in the 80s. We rate this claim mostly true.
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 00:14 |
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:The Courtship of Jeb Bush Quoting because everyone in the thread needs to read this.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:38
|
|
|
practically nobody outside the internet wants to hear anything but friendly platitudes when a first lady dies
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/trymainelee/status/708376713806221313
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
yeah I think Hillary should have taken a steaming poo poo on the grave of a former First Lady almost sainted in the popular consciousness in order to please the slate comments section
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:yeah I think Hillary should have taken a steaming poo poo on the grave of a former First Lady almost sainted in the popular consciousness in order to please the slate comments section
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:yeah I think Hillary should have taken a steaming poo poo on the grave of a former First Lady almost sainted in the popular consciousness in order to please the slate comments section looks like we caught  coming up to bat for the special interests again 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Look, he could be ISIS, okay? We don't even know which white person's blood that is!
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
I don't know exactly what you guys think Hillary stands to gain by criticizing the Reagans right after Nancy dropped dead but it's almost certainly nothing. She should criticize their policies but the GOP is angry enough as it is. Also when're the next Florida polls??
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Praising Nancy Reagan for her response to AIDS.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Maoist Pussy posted:Praising Nancy Reagan for her response to AIDS. This. I'm not saying she should have taken a poo poo on Nancy Reagan, but giving her praise for her response to AIDS is bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:Also when're the next Florida polls?? The most recent one I can find is: WTSP/Mason-Dixon, 3/7 - 3/9, 700 LV Trump 36 Rubio 30 Cruz 17 Kasich 8 Seems to be an outlier as most recent polls have Trump up like 15-20.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
Little_wh0re posted:I've missed a few days. What broke joementum? As the world fell, each of us in our own way was broken. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/708378574294798336 This is the most important story in the world.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
InsanityIsCrazy posted:so, everyone in this country Nah, the white people who don't support Trump and basically all ethnic minorities are going to have a good laugh at the Trumpenproles. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/708378574294798336 no one cares about journalists. they're like hobos with typewriters
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Phylis Schafly has endorsed Trump
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
we got a "Bad Dude" right here!
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Montasque posted:This. I'm not saying she should have taken a poo poo on Nancy Reagan, but giving her praise for her response to AIDS is bullshit. Ah well, that's nothing new. People actually praise Reagan for ending the Cold War, when he did everything in his power to turn it into a hot war. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Montasque posted:This. I'm not saying she should have taken a poo poo on Nancy Reagan, but giving her praise for her response to AIDS is bullshit. yes, it is very obvious, transparent bullshit that's actually a veiled attack on her to anyone who knows the story and clearly not praise to anyone who knows the story, but seems polite and nice to people who don't seriously people, did nobody put together how carefully worded that was, she didn't praise it one bit she said it "started a conversation"
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
but it's cool Donald Trump isn't a fascist have you read this essay by Eco I have some thoughts on the subject
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/708378574294798336 Back and to the left, back and to the left
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Phylis Schafly has endorsed Trump Oooh, I almost have a Trump "endorsements from the biggest sociopaths in the country" bingo! If only Kanye wasn't endorsing himself... 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
if i said that donald trump had started an important conversation about modern-day racism would anyone here fail to grasp the implicit stabbing in that sentence
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:yes, it is very obvious, transparent bullshit that's actually a veiled attack on her to anyone who knows the story and clearly not praise to anyone who knows the story, but seems polite and nice to people who don't I'm worried that we're seeing 11th dimensional chess somewhere where there isn't any, wouldn't it be much safer to just offer bland generic platitudes and everyone will just accept it as the thing you do when at a funeral?
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
Montasque posted:This. I'm not saying she should have taken a poo poo on Nancy Reagan, but giving her praise for her response to AIDS is bullshit. I took it as the most backhanded praise imaginable, tbh. At no point does she say that the BJQ did the right thing, only that her actions (like ignoring Rock Hudson when dude was dying) led to a "national conversation". You could equally say that Hitler's actions led to a conversation about anti-Semitism throughout the western world.  efb by evilweasel
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
if i told any of you that you looked relatively healthy given your weight would you think it was a compliment
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
Maoist Pussy posted:Praising Nancy Reagan for her response to AIDS. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:yes, it is very obvious, transparent bullshit that's actually a veiled attack on her to anyone who knows the story and clearly not praise to anyone who knows the story, but seems polite and nice to people who don't
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Antti posted:I'm worried that we're seeing 11th dimensional chess somewhere where there isn't any, wouldn't it be much safer to just offer bland generic platitudes and everyone will just accept it as the thing you do when at a funeral? a bland generic platitude is "she was such a nice woman" "she was such a classy woman" etc, not "oh she started a conversation about aids" when the conversation they started was about how much aids was god's punishment for the gays like, you don't just reach into your bag of generic compliments for people and come out with that
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
It just seems like a really un-Clinton move to start throwing red meat to the base and the wonks at Nancy Reagan's funeral by giving her back-handed praise. Maybe she really detested what they did (or didn't, rather) about AIDS and just couldn't help herself? That doesn't sound right either.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:yes, it is very obvious, transparent bullshit that's actually a veiled attack on her to anyone who knows the story and clearly not praise to anyone who knows the story, but seems polite and nice to people who don't That's exactly how I read it. Pro-tier passive-aggressive eulogy. Guarantee there were people in attendance that thought "oh you bitch".
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:if i said that donald trump had started an important conversation about modern-day racism would anyone here fail to grasp the implicit stabbing in that sentence I would dismiss your statement as duplicitous nonsense and think less of you for making it?
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
I can't believe how excited I am about the Jeb campaign!
H5N1 fucked around with this message at 23:33 on Oct 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:a bland generic platitude is "she was such a nice woman" "she was such a classy woman" etc, not "oh she started a conversation about aids" when the conversation they started was about how much aids was god's punishment for the gays It was a pretty specific area to faintly praise. I'm leaning towards agreeing with you. Maoist Pussy posted:I would dismiss your statement as duplicitous nonsense and think less of you for making it? I'm sure you would, MP.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:the conversation they started was about how much aids was god's punishment for the gays I probably should have connected those dots but oh welp.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/DiamondandSilk/status/708098788188155905
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:05
|
|
|
Rubs with a foreign country's flag behind him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 00:14 |
|
|
Boo-hoo people made the choice to whore around and got themselves killed and Superwoman Nancy Reagan didn't stop it from happening. Pretty hard to catch an STD when you save yourself for a committed monogamous relationship with ONE person who did the same. This is one reason why I am pro-gay marriage. Remove all excuses and then spend research money on diseases that aren't typically directly attributable to improper behavior on the part of the stricken, like childhood cancers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:14
|
|
