|
http://bethesda.net/#en/events/game/prepare-for-the-future-fallout-4-important-release-info/2015/10/08/35 SPECS, BRUH. Minimum Windows 7/8/10 (64-bit OS required) Intel Core i5-2300 2.8 GHz/AMD Phenom II X4 945 3.0 GHz or equivalent 8 GB RAM 30 GB free HDD space NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti 2GB/AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB or equivalent Recommended Windows 7/8/10 (64-bit OS required) Intel Core i7 4790 3.6 GHz/AMD FX-9590 4.7 GHz or equivalent 8 GB RAM 30 GB free HDD space NVIDIA GTX 780 3GB/AMD Radeon R9 290X 4GB or equivalent Console Storage Space Make sure you have enough space in the vault to store Fallout 4. Fallout 4 requires 28-35 GB depending on territory and languages supported. e: My 7870 will suffice it seems, I would've been very shocked otherwise
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 15:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 07:40 |
|
sout posted:http://bethesda.net/#en/events/game/prepare-for-the-future-fallout-4-important-release-info/2015/10/08/35 That's quite CPU heavy on recommended. I may have to upgrade my i5 after all.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 15:39 |
|
oblomov posted:That's quite CPU heavy on recommended. I may have to upgrade my i5 after all. No you won't, I have an i5 that can run Witcher 3 at the highest settings, this sure as poo poo won't be more intensive than that game.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 15:44 |
|
Hakkesshu posted:this sure as poo poo won't be more intensive than that game. I'm thinking less about intensity and more about optimization.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 15:49 |
Hakkesshu posted:No you won't, I have an i5 that can run Witcher 3 at the highest settings, this sure as poo poo won't be more intensive than that game. This is Bethesda we're talking about. They'll find a way to make it run like poo poo on everything.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 15:50 |
|
gently caress...well it was about time to update my CPU. drat I remember with some tweaking Skyrim ran on toasters, hopefully that will stay the same
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 16:13 |
|
Assuming whoever is doing the system requirements isn't just pulling them out of their rear end (big assumption, but let's go with it), the only prominent differences between i5s and i7s are hyperthreading and cache size. If hyperthreading is relevant, I would imagine that would mean F4 can actually utilize at least 8 threads. If that's true (and I'm building a Jenga of assumptions here), that could mean that F4 might be able to handle more things going on at once. I have no idea what more processor cache would do for F4.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 16:52 |
|
Nevermind I have google
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 16:53 |
|
OK, given the fact that they specify a 4790 instead of a 4770 for recommended and the difference is like, 100mhz when Turbo Boosting, I'm going to say there's some bullshit going on.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 16:55 |
Hmm 8 GB for both Minimum and Recommended? That doesn't raise any alarms at all for me. This is perfectly fine.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:02 |
|
SunAndSpring posted:This is Bethesda we're talking about. They'll find a way to make it run like poo poo on everything. Aren't mods that make the game run 4 times smoother usually the first to be made? I remember how much smoother Skyrim ran on ultra after a couple of those that optimized loading and what not. I don't know any
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:02 |
crime fighting hog posted:Aren't mods that make the game run 4 times smoother usually the first to be made? I remember how much smoother Skyrim ran on ultra after a couple of those that optimized loading and what not. Yeah, but you figure it'd just be better for them to have the game be decently optimized to start off with instead of just letting the mod community fix it.
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:04 |
|
My system is 3.2Ghz Dual Core 16Gb Ram GT740 w/2gb ram Win7 Home Premium So it looks like I'm about in the middle ground in terms of what the game wants.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:06 |
|
SunAndSpring posted:Hmm 8 GB for both Minimum and Recommended? That doesn't raise any alarms at all for me. This is perfectly fine. I could see a case where you need X amount of memory but that anything over that isn't really necessary. Especially if they addressed the weird texture-mirroring issue Skyrim has. But yeah, these system requirements are bad, and whoever wrote them should feel bad.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:07 |
|
SunAndSpring posted:Yeah, but you figure it'd just be better for them to have the game be decently optimized to start off with instead of just letting the mod community fix it. That's gotta be a weird feeling, knowing now matter how well or poor your game is on release, hordes of nerds will polish the poo poo outta it for free.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:07 |
|
Fallout 5 will literally just be the GECK tools.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:10 |
|
crime fighting hog posted:That's gotta be a weird feeling, knowing now matter how well or poor your game is on release, hordes of nerds will polish the poo poo outta it for free. At least once a day, somebody at Bethesda makes a crack about not needing to fix something because "the modders will take care of it." The team shares a laugh, then there's an uncomfortable silence as their lead seriously considers it.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:10 |
|
a 30gb install is relatively small nowadays right? I guess some workshop texture packs will fix that little convenience.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:26 |
|
sout posted:a 30gb install is relatively small nowadays right? For comparison, Skyrim with all the DLC and the HD textures is about 11 gigabytes. With insane modder textures, it can get to 60 gigabytes. Assassin's Creed Syndicate is supposed to be 40 gigabytes.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:31 |
|
sout posted:a 30gb install is relatively small nowadays right? Last few games I've gotten on xbox have been about 30 gigs.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:42 |
|
Peztopiary posted:A whole bunch of innocently whistling people walk past J. Fallout, each with at least one extra skull worked into their clothing. Speaking of that, I hope the armour crafting system allows me to mount skulls and bones on everything, one from each type of creature that I've slain. Skull shoulder pads, skull elbow pads, skull kneepads, skull knuckle dusters, skull boots and an antlered skull helmet with extra mounted skulls. I want Power Armour decked out like a goddamn skull golem.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:45 |
|
SunAndSpring posted:Hmm 8 GB for both Minimum and Recommended? That doesn't raise any alarms at all for me. This is perfectly fine. Considering that Xbone and PS4 both have 8GB of memory, it makes sense that the minimum would be 8 for PC too.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 17:46 |
|
sector_corrector posted:All of that stuff sounds cool in theory, but there's not much to these games aside from cleaning out warrens of trash mobs. If you take that away from the player by having trash mobs run in fear, then what's left? Chasing them down
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:00 |
|
ymgve posted:Considering that Xbone and PS4 both have 8GB of memory, it makes sense that the minimum would be 8 for PC too. That's pretty much it. The game has to run on the latest consoles and those specs are the rough PC equivalent of them. Or at least what the console makers claim them to be. Your mileage may vary. Use no hooks. This poster takes no responsibility for whatever crazy poo poo MS & Sony say they're capable of.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:15 |
|
sout posted:http://bethesda.net/#en/events/game/prepare-for-the-future-fallout-4-important-release-info/2015/10/08/35 Hmm I have an i5 2500K OC'd to 4.3 GHz, is that adequate? Or is it all the threads that the i7 does that make it better for this game I wonder?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:22 |
|
I'm not that good at parsing system requirements, would a lovely CPU (AMD fx6300 6core 3.5ghz) paired with a decent gpu (7870xt - basically a 7950 with some features turned off) be enough to run at settings that won't involve me tearing my eyes off in frustration and anger?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:26 |
|
TorakFade posted:I'm not that good at parsing system requirements, would a lovely CPU (AMD fx6300 6core 3.5ghz) paired with a decent gpu (7870xt - basically a 7950 with some features turned off) be enough to run at settings that won't involve me tearing my eyes off in frustration and anger? You're above the minimum specs in both regards, I think you'll be fine. As to what degree you'll have to turn down settings, who knows.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:49 |
|
boneration posted:Hmm I have an i5 2500K OC'd to 4.3 GHz, is that adequate? Or is it all the threads that the i7 does that make it better for this game I wonder? There's no way to tell at this time. The specs themselves are kind of wonky, but even if they weren't we'd just be speculating on how they actually relate to the way the game works. TorakFade posted:I'm not that good at parsing system requirements, would a lovely CPU (AMD fx6300 6core 3.5ghz) paired with a decent gpu (7870xt - basically a 7950 with some features turned off) be enough to run at settings that won't involve me tearing my eyes off in frustration and anger? Usually the way this goes is that the GPU is more important than the CPU.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:50 |
|
I should be able to run this game real pretty
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 18:52 |
|
Gyrotica posted:Usually the way this goes is that the GPU is more important than the CPU. This relieves me quite a bit, my GPU while certainly not stellar has always handled everything I threw at it admirably. This means I can wait until the next shiny things come out in 2016 to upgrade instead of getting something for "early Christmas"
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 19:07 |
|
Knowing Bethesda, I seriously doubt Fallout 4 can utilize hyperthreading or octas. Is that particular AMD quad so it uses at least all four?
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 19:50 |
|
GuyUpNorth posted:Knowing Bethesda, I seriously doubt Fallout 4 can utilize hyperthreading or octas. Is that particular AMD quad so it uses at least all four? He mentioned it's a six core, so yeah. I would also be surprised. As you can see above, I figure those specs are off base because of the 4790 recommendation.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2015 20:23 |
|
Pre-ordered this bad boy for my PS4. First time playing a Fallout game on a console. Was this a big mistake since I gated myself out of mods?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 05:03 |
smertrioslol posted:Pre-ordered this bad boy for my PS4. First time playing a Fallout game on a console. Was this a big mistake since I gated myself out of mods? They said they'll have mod support on consoles but something makes me doubt it. I dunno.
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 05:12 |
|
smertrioslol posted:Pre-ordered this bad boy for my PS4. First time playing a Fallout game on a console. Was this a big mistake since I gated myself out of mods? There is zero chance that it isn't going to be a shitshow the first week/month/year. Bethesda doesn't do consoles well. Also, never pre-order.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 05:46 |
|
smertrioslol posted:Pre-ordered this bad boy for my PS4. First time playing a Fallout game on a console. Was this a big mistake since I gated myself out of mods? Big mistake, Bethesda has not confirmed mods for the PS4.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 05:47 |
|
Yaos posted:Big mistake, Bethesda has not confirmed mods for the PS4. Yea I think at one point todd howard mentioned that they want to work with sony to do the same thing they're doing with microsoft but who knows if they'll actually do it once the game has been released and they've gotten everyone's money already
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 05:49 |
|
smertrioslol posted:Pre-ordered this bad boy for my PS4. First time playing a Fallout game on a console. Was this a big mistake since I gated myself out of mods? Mods for consoles are one thing, mod management tools are another. And I've not seen any mention of those for consoles.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 05:52 |
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 07:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 07:40 |
|
GuyUpNorth posted:Knowing Bethesda, I seriously doubt Fallout 4 can utilize hyperthreading or octas. Is that particular AMD quad so it uses at least all four?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 07:53 |