|
kiimo posted:Is that the woman from HBO's Togetherness? She was good in that if so. Yeah that's her, Melanie Lynskey. She's also good in other stuff I've seen her in, like Heavenly Creatures, dang that's a long rear end time ago
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 18:28 |
|
|
New Ghost In The Shell trailer, which goes a bit more into the story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEDctELIm3I
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 09:14
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:New Ghost In The Shell trailer, which goes a bit more into the story. Beat Takeshi looks so good in this. I can't remember the specifics from the original anime was she a person who thinks she's part human part robot, but actually 100% robot and artificial, or was it the other way around?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 11:03
|
|
|
algebra testes posted:Beat Takeshi looks so good in this. No. She had an existential crisis about the meaning of identity in a world where memories can be manipulated/invented and AIs develop sentience. But she was always consensually a human brain in a robot body (In fact she pursues taking a step further by the end...), and Hanka were never villains. They're just adding a dash of robocop. A crisis of identity because you are a pawn of an evil corporation is easier to sell than a crisis of identity due to the philosophical implications of emerging technology. I'm pretty excited for this based on imagery alone though. Even if the story doesn't have much to do with GitS, the visual design is so on point that I don't care. Bugblatter fucked around with this message at 11:23 on Feb 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 11:15
|
|
|
Bugblatter posted:I'm pretty excited for this based on imagery alone though. Even if the story doesn't have much to do with GitS, the visual design is so on point that I don't care. This is also me. I am shameless in this regard.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 13:23
|
|
|
Bugblatter posted:
As someone who's not familiar with this property at all, this new trailer makes it look like they're doing a straight up female asianish robocop reboot
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
I'd be excited if it weren't for the fact that they're still going with the stupid bodysuit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NrjKgwqNOU
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
I'm intrigued
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
I'd watch the hell out of this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
Yeah, movie looks dope. Also I don't know why they don't mention it but that's totally Jim Carrey as the leader.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:Yeah, movie looks dope. Also I don't know why they don't mention it but that's totally Jim Carrey as the leader. You mean Keanu Reeves?
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
flosofl posted:You mean Keanu Reeves? I hosed up, I saw that Jim Carrey was in it and thought he was Keanu in one shot, he's actually the hobo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 02:19
|
|
|
Pretty awesome, and Annapurna is always a safe bet. That voiceover was pretty bad though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:Pretty awesome, and Annapurna is always a safe bet. That voiceover was pretty bad though. I'm in for anything Neon or A24 are snatching up at this point.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 03:13
|
|
|
A friend of mine saw a screening of it and said it was like if Refn re-made The Rover and Springbreakers at the same time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
A dystopian love story in a Texas wasteland and set in a community of cannibals. The spoiler isn't that surprising based on what the trailer showed. I'll be seeing it for sure.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Anne Hathaway is an alcoholic and (SPOILERS) also the monster. https://twitter.com/SheIsCOLOSSAL/status/832289758609031168
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Anne Hathaway is an alcoholic and (SPOILERS) also the monster. I really, really, really, loving really hope this is good because it's probably at the top of the list of movies I want to see
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESLXnt6fe_8 Mine, about a Marine who gets stranded in the middle of a desert minefield, and must hold out for a couple of days until he can be rescued. It looks like it could be interesting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 07:20
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9t4SKWryWM Here's the trailer for the new Terrence Malick.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 06:37
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9t4SKWryWM Yeah that sure is a Malick movie. What happened to A Voyage of Time? Did that actually come out? I figured Malick doing trippy space imagery and landscapes would have gotten some traction, but I haven't heard a thing about it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 07:04
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9t4SKWryWM That looks really good. Runaway is an amazing song to set a trailer to. Granted I am a huge fan of Malick films, but I wasn't big on his last few autobiography films (excluding Tree of Life which is amazing), though I must admit each one demonstrated interesting concepts/editing and gorgeous cinematography. I really think we're witnessing someone in the act of reinventing his entire filmmaking process and it's kind of an incredible ride, one in which the success of the end product is as dependent on what the actors are willing to give as it is on the patience and focus required in editing...which runs contrary to his early films where he'd just successfully edit towards abstraction. GrandpaPants posted:Yeah that sure is a Malick movie. Voyage of Time has already had a very limited release. It hit PDX at one theater and one theater only, a single showtime per day for a week and was then gone. There are two versions with different narrators and the longer version may get another release in the future, but who knows.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:06
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9t4SKWryWM I mean, it looks good. But they always do, don't they?
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 08:29
|
|
|
BeanpolePeckerwood posted:Granted I am a huge fan of Malick films, but I wasn't big on his last few autobiography films (excluding Tree of Life which is amazing) FWIW this is also one of the autobiographical ToL appendices. They were a trilogy that was shot somewhat simultaneously, and this is the last to be released. There's a lot of shots and scenes in this that are inversions or twists of shots from TTW and KoC already. For instance, that's the same party at a mansion from KoC and the protagonist is doing the same wandering by the windows. But now the composition is inverted and instead of being lost and distanced while watching eroticised women in the distance, he's engaging happily and playfully with the girl on the other side. There's a lot to dig into with this trilogy and I love them, but given their more formal poetic nature and lack of central narrative, I can understand most people not liking them. The good news for you is that this is the last and his upcoming projects sound like a return to the style he is more famous for. Edit: For those curious, his next film is Radegund and is about a man who refuses to fight on behalf of the Nazis in WWII and is executed for it. Bugblatter fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Feb 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 11:23
|
|
|
Bugblatter posted:FWIW this is also one of the autobiographical ToL appendixes. They were a trilogy that was shot somewhat simultaneously, and this is the last to be released. There's a lot of shots and scenes in this that are inversions or twists of shots from TTW and KoC already. For instance, that's the same party at a mansion from KoC and the protagonist is doing the same wandering by the windows. But now the composition is inverted and instead of being lost and distanced while watching eroticised women in the distance, he's engaging happily and playfully with the girl on the other side. I found it interesting that To The Wonder was simultaneously his most experimental and derivative film. McAdams wandering through the buffalo was an absolutely intense scene tho.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 11:40
|
|
|
Is derivative really the word you mean? I'm curious what makes you say that. If anything I'd say it was the most distilled. I am a huge Malick fan who is also feeling a bit exhausted by the ToL appendices (that's a great term for it). Although I will be interested to see how this film comments on the other two. One of the things that I think is true of these movies is that Malick is basically casting people to be really fuckable actors. This can sometimes work brilliantly with his style (Cate Blanchett) and sometimes backfire if the person can't act in silence with enough presence (Affleck). I think Rooney Mara and Ryan Gosling will end up being great choices for this one, because they're each pretty well practiced at emoting with very little dialogue. I'd also be interested if Malick could try a movie without Lubezski now. It's starting to feel that his style is over-taking Malick's a bit in these films. Also I am excited for Radegund.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:Is derivative really the word you mean? I'm curious what makes you say that. If anything I'd say it was the most distilled. I kind of feel like they both found the clearest version of their visual style working together (I partially think that because it's something Lubezki said). That said, whenever Lubezki works with a director who lets him cut loose, it ends up looking like a Malick film now. Even though Inarritu's camera movements and blocking are completely different, those lighting and lensing sensibilities are very pronounced. I think the likelihood of Malick doing a film without Lubezki at this point is about on par with the odds of Spielberg doing a film without Kaminski. I'm curious to see if they maintain the ToL camera movement in Radegund, or if they settle back into the style of Malick's previous period pieces. I'd love a reprise of The New World's aesthetic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:Is derivative really the word you mean? I'm curious what makes you say that. If anything I'd say it was the most distilled. Yeah, poor choice of words on my part. Extreme late night posting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
I get the feeling that Malick knows he's coming to the end of his life so just wants to make as much as he can before he's gone. I do wish he was able to take a few years off, as he seems to put out better content when he has a break. His last two were duds.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 04:01
|
|
|
zandert33 posted:I get the feeling that Malick knows he's coming to the end of his life so just wants to make as much as he can before he's gone. I do wish he was able to take a few years off, as he seems to put out better content when he has a break. His last two were duds. Perhaps, though it does seem like ToL was a catharsis for him, something that opened the floodgates to a particular desire to explore artistic boundaries again. One thing that is very notable about his first 3 films though is how much risk was involved during their making, financial, legal, injury, etc. There was a lot more freedom (or impetus perhaps) to take risks with resources and actors in the 70s, and there is a lot more regulation these days that tamps down unnecessary risk with regard to process, but also happens to dilute spontaneity (one of Malick's strong suits). I think as he's gotten older and more comfortable in his skin he's also had to reinvent much of his previous methodology. There are very few directors who could focus on so many projects at once, which makes the grand scheme of it all perhaps a bit more interesting than some of the individual films themselves.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 08:18
|
|
|
Mel Gibson also funded all four of the post ToL films simultaneously as a single package, they were seen as a single project. There were also a couple years between Song to Song's completion of primary photography and the beginning of Radegund. So, while it looks like he's been working constantly since ToL, that's largely a product of the trilogy and documentary's release schedule. He hasn't actually been pulling a Ridley Scott and filming a feature per year.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 09:50
|
|
|
Bugblatter posted:Mel Gibson also funded all four of the post ToL films simultaneously as a single package, they were seen as a single project. There were also a couple years between Song to Song's completion of primary photography and the beginning of Radegund. So, while it looks like he's been working constantly since ToL, that's largely a product of the trilogy and documentary's release schedule. He hasn't actually been pulling a Ridley Scott and filming a feature per year. What? You mean through Icon Films?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 10:17
|
|
|
I think it was privately? An undisclosed sum for a collection of low-budget films, no requirements made on content. It stuck in my memory because it was kind of a weird deal, not something that would normally happen through a studio or normal exec-prod position. I can't find any sources now, all searches just bring up Venice Film Fest articles. Mel Gibson was originally going to produce and star in ToL. However, as the project progressed, production wound up being taken up by Brad Pitt with Heath Ledger in Mel's role (and then Pitt himself after Ledger's death). Mel Gibson discretely helped out financially with the smaller films afterward instead.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
Huh. Weird and interesting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:Yeah that sure is a Malick movie. It came out. There are three versions - a 45-minute IMAX version with narration by Brad Pitt (which I think is mostly playing in museums), an "ultrawidescreen" IMAX version with no narration, and a feature-length version with Cate Blanchett narrating. I don't believe the longer version has been commercially released in the US yet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
The new Ice-T movie, “Bloodrunners“ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d83MK2M3QUo lmao e: vvv cheers, I never get linking a video right on mobile vvv System Metternich fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Feb 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 11:57
|
|
|
Fixed the link. The whole thing looks glossier than a porn movie.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 12:12
|
|
|
I didn't expect Domino's Pizza to go so dark with their newest ad campaign... The Void https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8-PgUzkUU8
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 18:28 |
|
|
Alehkhs posted:I didn't expect Domino's Pizza to go so dark with their newest ad campaign... I was just thinking about that movie the other day, wondering when it was being released. I want this to be good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 18:58
|
|