Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Burning Rain
Jul 17, 2006

What's happening?!?!

OK. it's everybody's fault btw, because nobody put a word in for poor Golding

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Boatswain
May 29, 2012

Burning Rain posted:

OK. it's everybody's fault btw, because nobody put a word in for poor Golding

gently caress Golding!

Lil Mama Im Sorry
Oct 14, 2012

I'M BACK AND I'M SCARIN' WHITE FOLKS
im reading terry eagleton's introduction to literary theory and its everything ive ever hoped for from a book with that title

After The War
Apr 12, 2005

to all of my Architects
let me be traitor

CestMoi posted:

Just picked up Dictionary of Maqiao which is a book written as a series of dictionary entries that develop into a story through their amalgamation written by someone who claims to have never read Dictionary of the Khazars

:awesome: That sounds supremely My poo poo.

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

I'm reading 'Porius' by John Cowper Powys and it's cool how he's effortlessly made every fantasy book ever written look like poo poo within the first 50 pages.

Sham bam bamina!
Nov 6, 2012

ƨtupid cat
And I'm sure they were all masterpieces before you started it.

Burning Rain
Jul 17, 2006

What's happening?!?!

Boatswain posted:

gently caress Golding!

why?

Also, I finished Aquarium and, uh, I legitimely thought it was like half a step above McEwan with some extra wokeness added. The prose was good, the tone well sustained, even if I was expecting something considerably more ambitious after some of the thread regulars' praise, but then the end came and it was as artifical as they get. Good basis for an Oscar-worthy movie though!

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

Burning Rain posted:

why?

Also, I finished Aquarium and, uh, I legitimely thought it was like half a step above McEwan with some extra wokeness added. The prose was good, the tone well sustained, even if I was expecting something considerably more ambitious after some of the thread regulars' praise, but then the end came and it was as artifical as they get. Good basis for an Oscar-worthy movie though!

lol big surprise!

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I am shocked Shocked

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.
I am interested in why you found the ending to be artificial oscar tripe because I had the polar opposite reaction

Boatswain
May 29, 2012
Sorry, I got caught up in the spirit of things. Actually I don't care about Golding.

I'm now reading To Live and Think Like Pigs by Gilles Châtelet, c'est superbien and extremely 90s.

The Belgian
Oct 28, 2008

Burning Rain posted:

why?

Also, I finished Aquarium and, uh, I legitimely thought it was like half a step above McEwan with some extra wokeness added. The prose was good, the tone well sustained, even if I was expecting something considerably more ambitious after some of the thread regulars' praise, but then the end came and it was as artifical as they get. Good basis for an Oscar-worthy movie though!

You fell for the Aquarium meme!!

Eugene V. Dubstep
Oct 4, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!
I've refused to read David Vann's Aquarium by David Vann for so long that my never having read David Vann's Aquarium by David Vann is now integral to my identity, and I believe that to intentionally read even one word of David Vann's Aquarium by David Vann would be irrevocably to harm a carefully tended self-conception.

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy
An aquandary.

Burning Rain
Jul 17, 2006

What's happening?!?!

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I am interested in why you found the ending to be artificial oscar tripe because I had the polar opposite reaction

I mean, in large part it's a character-based story about how hosed up stuff reverberates through generations with people repeatedly doing hosed up stuff... until redemption is found through the power of forgiveness, which allows every character's deepest wish to come true in the end, except maybe the mother, but her arc also finished in the best possible way. How is it not artificial?

Maybe Sundance would be better because of the texture of the story, I dunno.


Also, I feel ridiculous using spoilers in this thread, but knowing the ending would dramatically lessen the impact of the novel, I think.

Burning Rain fucked around with this message at 19:24 on Aug 26, 2018

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Eugene V. Dubstep posted:

I've refused to read David Vann's Aquarium by David Vann for so long that my never having read David Vann's Aquarium by David Vann is now integral to my identity, and I believe that to intentionally read even one word of David Vann's Aquarium by David Vann would be irrevocably to harm a carefully tended self-conception.

and

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Burning Rain posted:

I mean, in large part it's a character-based story about how hosed up stuff reverberates through generations with people repeatedly doing hosed up stuff... until redemption is found through the power of forgiveness, which allows every character's deepest wish to come true in the end, except maybe the mother, but her arc also finished in the best possible way. How is it not artificial?

Maybe Sundance would be better because of the texture of the story, I dunno.


Also, I feel ridiculous using spoilers in this thread.

I think its a completely different result though. There is no forgiveness and there is no redemption. The grandfather is not forgiven, nor has he been redeemed. Which is sort of the whole point.

This is why I said its the antithesis of the Oscar ending. None of the characters are redeemed or forgiven. Its a much muddier ending, which I like. The grandfather takes in the mother and daughter not because he has become a good person, or because he has been forgiven for the past, but because his own self-awareness of his great failings stopped preventing him from being a proactive person. He abandons the delusion he can be forgiven for what he has done and instead acts to prevent further harm rather than try to make up for the harm of the past. He isn't making anything better, he is just keeping it from getting worse.

I also disagree with the idea that everyone got their deepest wish

The story is also fundamentally about the death of the illusion of parents in the eyes of their children. Things do not end well for the protagonist at all. Sure, she gets to stay with her girlfriend and has a slightly better economic life, but it came at the realization that her mother was weaker than she had always believed. She finally saw her mother as the broken person she was and had to live the rest of her life with this new sort of broken love. The mother is still broken and justifiably angry, but has finally hit the point of exhaustion and sacrifices her self-image and sense of personal will for the sake of her daughter. The grandfather is still essentially in an eternal struggle for some semblance of penance for the past. Which is why I love the ending. No one is better off. No one is worse off. Instead, they have simply moved forward.

Tree Goat
May 24, 2009

argania spinosa
i'm reading ada or ardor

Ras Het
May 23, 2007

when I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child - but now I am a man.

Tree Goat posted:

i'm reading ada or ardor

I tried reading that once and got highly annoyed like three pages in

I'm reading Benvenuto Cellini's autobiog

Burning Rain
Jul 17, 2006

What's happening?!?!

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I think its a completely different result though. There is no forgiveness and there is no redemption. The grandfather is not forgiven, nor has he been redeemed. Which is sort of the whole point.

This is why I said its the antithesis of the Oscar ending. None of the characters are redeemed or forgiven. Its a much muddier ending, which I like. The grandfather takes in the mother and daughter not because he has become a good person, or because he has been forgiven for the past, but because his own self-awareness of his great failings stopped preventing him from being a proactive person. He abandons the delusion he can be forgiven for what he has done and instead acts to prevent further harm rather than try to make up for the harm of the past. He isn't making anything better, he is just keeping it from getting worse.

I also disagree with the idea that everyone got their deepest wish

The story is also fundamentally about the death of the illusion of parents in the eyes of their children. Things do not end well for the protagonist at all. Sure, she gets to stay with her girlfriend and has a slightly better economic life, but it came at the realization that her mother was weaker than she had always believed. She finally saw her mother as the broken person she was and had to live the rest of her life with this new sort of broken love. The mother is still broken and justifiably angry, but has finally hit the point of exhaustion and sacrifices her self-image and sense of personal will for the sake of her daughter. The grandfather is still essentially in an eternal struggle for some semblance of penance for the past. Which is why I love the ending. No one is better off. No one is worse off. Instead, they have simply moved forward.


I'm pretty sure that everybody is better off in almost every imaginable way compared to how they were before the story started. They might not have absolute perfect lives and the protagonist has lost a part of her innocence, but come on. You honestly believe they would ever want to go back to their previous lives?

And it only became possible because the mother forgave the grandfather enough to put her poo poo behind. It literally says so in the end that the grandfather died loved and forgiven. The very last paragraph also has the narrator looking for a way to forgive the hosed up stuff her mother had done, because it was inescapable, thrust onto her. The importance of forgiveness is a very central theme to the novel.

I'm also not sure I agree with you what the novel is ultimately about - although it does play a very important part in the book. To me, it had a more general theme of the realisation that evil can lurk everywhere (that's why the scene with the girls getting scared and lost in the wood out of fear of a fairytale character was there at the end) and learning that you need trust and family bonds to live with that - even after losing the illusions about their perfection.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Burning Rain posted:


To me, it had a more general theme of the realisation that evil can lurk everywhere (that's why the scene with the girls getting scared and lost in the wood out of fear of a fairytale character was there at the end) and learning that you need trust and family bonds to live with that - even after losing the illusions about their perfection.


I struggle to see how you could get this kind of reading out of it but to each their own

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

Well I ordered Terra Nostra after I figured out it was extremely my poo poo.

Also some Foucault but that's neither here nor there.

A human heart
Oct 10, 2012

Tree Goat posted:

i'm reading ada or ardor

which one? make up your drat mind!

Tree Goat
May 24, 2009

argania spinosa

A human heart posted:

which one? make up your drat mind!

english wasn't his first language so we must forgive his little slip-ups

derp
Jan 21, 2010

when i get up all i want to do is go to bed again

Lipstick Apathy
Hi I read 'how fiction works' by James wood and very enjoyed it. Any suggestions for similar?

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy
No.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

derp posted:

Hi I read 'how fiction works' by James wood and very enjoyed it. Any suggestions for similar?

I haven't read that specific title but these are my general "on writing" recommendations:

https://www.amazon.com/Art-Fiction-Notes-Craft-Writers/dp/0679734031/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_1?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=ZTPJA0ZFHGR6CFP03722

https://www.amazon.com/Steering-Cra...S792M0M9ZJ3A0PG

derp
Jan 21, 2010

when i get up all i want to do is go to bed again

Lipstick Apathy
How does sebald make me feel so weird/uneasy when nothing is even happening

thehoodie
Feb 8, 2011

"Eat something made with love and joy - and be forgiven"
Anyone read the occupation trilogy by modiano? Some sort of totally disorienting narrative that I don't really feel smart enough to understand. But I didn't really like it

Shibawanko
Feb 13, 2013

I wanna read Sebald, I only read bits and pieces of him. What's the best one to start with?

Officer Sandvich
Feb 14, 2010

thehoodie posted:

Anyone read the occupation trilogy by modiano? Some sort of totally disorienting narrative that I don't really feel smart enough to understand. But I didn't really like it

first two books were great, last one sucked. It's the only one i've read by him so idk if he got less edgy as he got older

Ras Het
May 23, 2007

when I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child - but now I am a man.
I've not read those but the couple of Modianos I have read have been good. They've both been about characters who don't understand themselves so I haven't got too bothered about whether I understood whjat's going on

Eugene V. Dubstep
Oct 4, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!

derp posted:

How does sebald make me feel so weird/uneasy when nothing is even happening

because everything from the broad structure of the narration to little commonplace turns of phrase implicitly connects everyday observations and seemingly unrelated historical trivia to the Holocaust

e: hth

Eugene V. Dubstep fucked around with this message at 15:24 on Aug 29, 2018

Jrbg
May 20, 2014

I se bald and eat it!

Eugene V. Dubstep
Oct 4, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!
like, the narrator sees a moth on the wall and remarks that it must have gotten confused by the light

which might remind you of silkworms, which are moth larvae

which might remind you of silk production in indoor gardens at a summer palace of the late Qing dynasty, which had a chapter dedicated to it for some reason, that were burned by British troops

which might remind you of his discourse earlier in the book, which seemed out-of-place at the time, on the smuggling of silkworms to Europe

and then sometime later the narrator recalls that 19th C. German schoolchildren, as part of a state-mandated handicrafts education scheme, would learn how to care for silkworms, make silk on frames, etc.

which would involve, at a critical point, dipping several thousand cocoons in scalding water simultaneously




edit: My point is, that's a moth. But Sebald is doing this constantly. He restructures your perception of events and phenomena so that everything seems to recall, perhaps just subconsciously, the systematic murder of millions by the Nazis. Every motif is a Holocaust motif—which maybe is supposed to give some insight into the psyche of a survivor, say. If you're uneasy, you're reading it right.

Eugene V. Dubstep fucked around with this message at 15:43 on Aug 29, 2018

Ras Het
May 23, 2007

when I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child - but now I am a man.

Eugene V. Dubstep posted:

which maybe is supposed to give some insight into the psyche of a survivor, say.

Sure, but let's not forget that he was a blue eyed Bavarian whose father was in the Wehrmacht

ulvir
Jan 2, 2005

wehrmacht was just regular drafted blokes tho, maybe with the exception of higher-ranking officers

Ras Het
May 23, 2007

when I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child - but now I am a man.
Yeah I know, I just mean that there's another layer to it. And that I don't trust Germans

Eugene V. Dubstep
Oct 4, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 8 years!

Ras Het posted:

Sure, but let's not forget that he was a blue eyed Bavarian whose father was in the Wehrmacht

So he's not himself a "survivor" of the Holocaust, so what? He witnessed postwar Germany collectively wash its hands and pretend nothing happened, or if anything happened then no one still around was to blame, and wrote some sensitive, empathetic, heartbreaking books about it that. And instead of parametricizing the tragedy to an individual experience, instead of appropriating the survivor narrative, he took on the challenge of portraying the sheer unimaginable scope of the crime via suggestion and impression.

e:

V V V

ok

Eugene V. Dubstep fucked around with this message at 23:22 on Aug 29, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sham bam bamina!
Nov 6, 2012

ƨtupid cat
I really don't think Ras Het was being so hostile or dismissive.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply