Blow posted:

lol.

Maybe you need to read this short Sci-Fi story?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Pail_of_Air

Kiryen posted:

I LOL every time I see some freakout about something he said or did, from the same people who told me he couldn't win over and over again. Yeah, OK I totally believe you after you told me for almost 2 years that he couldn't get nominated, then he couldn't get elected, then you've freaked out twice over his steak dinners.

I didn't even vote for Trump, but what's funny is these people - Republicans, Democrats, the press, all of them

You lost to Donald Trump. You got proven wrong by Donald Trump

Donald loving Trump

Like anyone should ever listen to anyone freaking out about Trump ever again. No matter how big a clown Trump is or isn't, he's made his opponents into even bigger ones

loving LOL

Cubone posted:

having your sole criteria for a successful presidency being "he was elected" is a little bit like having your sole criteria for why you said something stupid and horrible being "free speech"

Blow posted:

lol.

Maybe you need to read this short Sci-Fi story?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Pail_of_Air

Jose posted:

here's a brexit lol

VOA News posted:

A federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of inciting violence against protesters at a presidential campaign rally last year can move forward, denying a free speech argument against the suit.

The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge David Hale in Louisville, Kentucky, opens the way for the lawsuit brought by three protesters to proceed through the legal system. The suit is against Trump, his campaign and three of his supporters.

Plaintiffs Henry Brousseau, Kashiya Nwanguma and Molly Shah say they were battered by Trump supporters at a March 2016 rally in Louisville as Trump repeatedly said “Get ‘em out.”

Trump’s lawyers argued a free speech defense against the lawsuit, and said Trump did not intend for his supporters to use force.

Hale wrote in an opinion and order that “it is plausible that Trump’s direction to ‘get ‘em out of here’ advocated the use of force. … It was an order, an instruction, a command.”

.....

Trump’s lawyers argued that the protesters assumed risk of injury when they decided to attend the rally and the defendants cannot be held liable.

The judge, however, countered that under the law, every person has a duty to every other person to use care to prevent foreseeable injury.

Kiryen posted:

Well, when he won against all odds he changed my mind about him.

Because you know, that's what intelligent people do. Allow themselves to be persuaded when they're shown to be incorrect.

Unintelligent people come up with stupid names like Trumpets and try to pretend they're on the high ground after losing both houses of Congress, most of the State governments, and the Presidency

To Donald Trump

Kiryen posted:

Well, when he won against all odds he changed my mind about him.

Because you know, that's what intelligent people do. Allow themselves to be persuaded when they're shown to be incorrect.

Unintelligent people come up with stupid names like Trumpets and try to pretend they're on the high ground after losing both houses of Congress, most of the State governments, and the Presidency

To Donald Trump

NotWearingPants posted: