Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
red19fire
May 26, 2010

So this article was posted on MSNBC today, and I thought it was pretty awesome, so I posted it to facebook.

First response: "Whats the other side of the story?"

:stare:

What other side of the story? The side that's sympathetic to Bain Capital/Romney for laying off American autoworkers and exporting their jobs to China, while simultaneously campaigning on "More Jobs for Americans, gently caress China"? The side where the 170 autoworkers are paid too much, and the Free Market demands that their jobs be sent to China at a fraction of the cost so that Romney's stock options will increase their value?

How do you respond to this?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

XyloJW
Jul 23, 2007
"Makers and Takers: Why conservatives work harder, feel happier, have closer families, take fewer drugs, give more generously, value honesty more, are less materialistic and envious, whine less … and even hug their children more than liberals" Holy poo poo, that book.

King Dopplepopolos
Aug 3, 2007

Give us a raise, loser!
I got this wonderfully vague piece of trash on my Facebook feed today:

I Am The Scum
May 8, 2007
The devil made me do it

King Dopplepopolos posted:

I got this wonderfully vague piece of trash on my Facebook feed today:



Bin Laden didn't.

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

King Dopplepopolos posted:

I got this wonderfully vague piece of trash on my Facebook feed today:



Why is it that everyone who posts this kind of thing thinks that those people don't know that we hate them back? It's almost as if they endorse the side they dislike/fear the most in order to damage their chances!

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Grem posted:

Or just tell him the government doesn't have the right to tell people what to do with the money they have, and if they believe that the government SHOULD have that right, tell them to find a political party that's left of the Socialist Party here in America (there isn't one).

Part of their argument is that foreigners are donating, which is illegal (I think?).

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

Doctor Spaceman posted:

Part of their argument is that foreigners are donating, which is illegal (I think?).

It is; unless it's through a shell corporation! :dance:

Goatman Sacks
Apr 4, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

I Am The Scum posted:

Bin Laden didn't.

pretty much the best response.

Countblanc
Apr 20, 2005

Help a hero out!

King Dopplepopolos posted:

I got this wonderfully vague piece of trash on my Facebook feed today:



False. I hate America, and I don't like Obama. Your move, Facebook Guy.

Neptr
Mar 1, 2011

King Dopplepopolos posted:

I got this wonderfully vague piece of trash on my Facebook feed today:



Maybe because everything America did before was because it was the will of old rich white men. Turns out the difference between dynastic WASPs and Obama is purely superficial, but still a big enough difference to earn him a Nobel Peace Prize.

XyloJW
Jul 23, 2007
So my brother is a really smart guy. But right out of high school, he joined the military and spent 5 years in Baghdad. Then when he got back, he spent 4 years in the mountains of Tennessee without internet. He finally has regular internet again, but his opinions have... degraded since the last time I talked politics with him.

quote:

http://news.yahoo.com/ohio-voter-fraud-billboards-come-down-sponsor-stays-225217520--sector.html

A picture of a gavel and the words: "Voter fraud is a felony, 3 1/2 years and $10,000 fine" the billboard was pulled due to it being a "political" ad and they said it was meant to intimidate minorities. Exactly how does stating a law intimidate minorities? If as the democrats suggest, voter fraud is nearly nonexistant, then this billboard must not apply to anyone at all correct? so which is it? voter fraud almost never occurs, or pointing out the penalties for voter fraud is intimidating to minorites (for apparently no reason at all)?

Normally, I'd let something like that go, because people who post a long rant like that on Facebook aren't interested in having their minds changed, but I know my brother, and despite that idiocy, he's actually got critically thinking skills. I argued with him for about an hour, over the course of 50 posts. While he didn't admit he was wrong, he stopped responding--something utterly uncharacteristic for him. I think I changed a mind today.

Arglebargle III
Feb 21, 2006

Sarion posted:

You guys make it sound like if someone actually read and understood and agreed with Smith; they'd end up to the left of most Democrats. :psyboom:

No it's more that Adam Smith lived in England two hundred years ago and doesn't fit neatly on the modern American political spectrum. His background was theology (his parents thought he would never succeed at anything else) and his Christian concern for the general welfare was necessary for him to come to his revolutionary way of thinking about money and trade. Before him the idea of the economy as a whole thing that could be measured and economics as a field didn't exist. He needed to be concerned about the common people in order to realize the interconnectedness of costs and benefits for all of society.

The way Adam Smith is appropriated by proponents of modern oligarchic state capitalism is nauseating, but he wouldn't have agreed with a lot of socialist programs either. He predates both ideas. Honestly Smith is a pretty refreshing read; he's still working out the basics of a market economy and so he has virtually no biases we would associate with modern schools of thought. He argues against excessive government control, and argues against corrupt businesses as well.

SixPabst
Oct 24, 2006

Facebook this morning:

quote:

Will we be microchipped in 2013 (or at a undetermined time) under obamacare? Is it Obamacare specifically or is this old news, old ideas that have been played with for decades? I've tried reading up on this in many articles that I feel have credibility but it remains unclear to me. What does the fine print mean? It's very suggesting but yet could be easily misconstrued. Anyone?

:wtc:

How on earth do you read about being microchipped and say "hmm yes, these articles seem credible to me"?

Ghost of Reagan Past
Oct 7, 2003

rock and roll fun

mintskoal posted:

Facebook this morning:


:wtc:

How on earth do you read about being microchipped and say "hmm yes, these articles seem credible to me"?
I'VE BEEN MICROCHIPPED HELP

Sorry my cat ran on the keyboard and apparently typed that...?

ultimateforce
Apr 25, 2008

SKINNY JEANS CANT HOLD BACK THIS ARC
If being microchipped means I get to go to the doctor for the first check up in 15 years, chip me up.

XyloJW
Jul 23, 2007
I'm surprised the microchip thing hasn't fused with the NATIONAL ID JANUARY 2013 thing. They both play on the Big Brother fears.

Anubis
Oct 9, 2003

It's hard to keep sand out of ears this big.
Fun Shoe

XyloJW posted:

I'm surprised the microchip thing hasn't fused with the NATIONAL ID JANUARY 2013 thing. They both play on the Big Brother fears.

No, you see when the government wants to have a hand in forcing private insurance companies to provide the services that you paid for so that you don't die it's big brother taking over.

When the government comes in and gives everyone a unique identity card and potentially purges large swaths of citizens from the roles, removing their rights and benefits, due to incomplete or incorrect paperwork issues that's just securing the borders and protecting the country!

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011
I honestly think a private insurance company is much more likely to instigate microchipping for wealthy clients than the federal government is.

A Fancy 400 lbs
Jul 24, 2008

Doctor Spaceman posted:

Part of their argument is that foreigners are donating, which is illegal (I think?).

Honestly if there were "fake" ZIP codes, it was probably people getting lazy/typoing with their small online donations, not wealthy foreigners.

Leon Einstein
Feb 6, 2012
I must win every thread in GBS. I don't care how much banal semantic quibbling and shitty posts it takes.

XyloJW posted:

I'm surprised the microchip thing hasn't fused with the NATIONAL ID JANUARY 2013 thing. They both play on the Big Brother fears.
They also play on religious fears. Being microchipped is believed to be the "mark of the beast" by many religious fanatics.

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

I love the idea that in two months the government is going to start to surgically implant microchips in 300 million people, but they haven't even started to get ready or notify anyone or anything. Even if it was true, what a logistical clusterfuck it's set to be!

Ratmtattat
Mar 10, 2004
the hairdryer

Sarion posted:

I love the idea that in two months the government is going to start to surgically implant microchips in 300 million people, but they haven't even started to get ready or notify anyone or anything. Even if it was true, what a logistical clusterfuck it's set to be!

I do like that conspiracy theories so often rely on the government simultaneously being the most incompetent entity and the most effective.

"The government screws up anything they touch and they are going to suddenly implant microchips in 311,000,000 people overnight without anybody being aware of it."

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Ratmtattat posted:

I do like that conspiracy theories so often rely on the government simultaneously being the most incompetent entity and the most effective.

"The government screws up anything they touch and they are going to suddenly implant microchips in 311,000,000 people overnight without anybody being aware of it."

It actually makes perfect sense. You're forgetting that government also can't do more than one thing at the same time. That ties it all together: government can't do any of what it's supposed to do right because it's too busy preparing to implant everyone with chips that will force them to have gay abortions every day.

RagnarokAngel
Oct 5, 2006

Black Magic Extraordinaire

Sarion posted:

I love the idea that in two months the government is going to start to surgically implant microchips in 300 million people, but they haven't even started to get ready or notify anyone or anything. Even if it was true, what a logistical clusterfuck it's set to be!

How would you even loving monitor that? Have half the population sit at computers watching the other half, then switch over at noon?

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.

RagnarokAngel posted:

How would you even loving monitor that? Have half the population sit at computers watching the other half, then switch over at noon?

Well, people will start getting headaches and twitchy muscles, then the government will announce there's a problem but it can be resolved by going to these specialty clinics found all over the country, then you get the new chip installed and then Hugh Darrow Barack Obama makes everyone go mad.

Oh wait, that's Deus Ex. That's literally more crazy than a Deus Ex plotline.

Countblanc
Apr 20, 2005

Help a hero out!
I don't really "get" the chip thing. I mean, I'd rather not have one, but what do people think President Barack Obama is going to do with the knowledge that some 45 year old home maker drives the minivan down Main St. at 3:15 PM to pick up the kids from school every day? What is the chip endgame, exactly?

Loving Life Partner
Apr 17, 2003

Countblanc posted:

I don't really "get" the chip thing. I mean, I'd rather not have one, but what do people think President Barack Obama is going to do with the knowledge that some 45 year old home maker drives the minivan down Main St. at 3:15 PM to pick up the kids from school every day? What is the chip endgame, exactly?

gently caress if I know. I already filtered people's "check ins" from Facebook because I didn't give a gently caress when they volunteered the info on a regular basis, nevermind if it's constantly dumped at me at all times.

Psygnosis
Jul 30, 2003

Countblanc posted:

I don't really "get" the chip thing. I mean, I'd rather not have one, but what do people think President Barack Obama is going to do with the knowledge that some 45 year old home maker drives the minivan down Main St. at 3:15 PM to pick up the kids from school every day? What is the chip endgame, exactly?

Barack Obama will use those chips in order to broadcast Muslim curses into the children's ears whenever they are not near a bible or a parent. Afterwards they will become communist atheist who support Nazism and want to destroy Family Values. :tinfoil:

prom candy
Dec 16, 2005

Only I may dance
To monitor the political dissent that they've been posting on their public facebook profiles.

Dr Christmas
Apr 24, 2010

Berninating the one percent,
Berninating the Wall St.
Berninating all the people
In their high rise penthouses!
🔥😱🔥🔫👴🏻
Well, if you have done a LITERAL reading of the Book of Revelation, you'd realize that the microchip is predicted in the passages that describe the Mark of the Beast.

Seriously, the thing about microchips is meant to evoke imagery from Left Behind.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp
This old chestnut is making it around on my facebook:

quote:

Had to share this--- we all like beer...
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100...

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this...

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.” Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage.

They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got $10!”
“Yeah, that's right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That's true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn't get anything at all. This new system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists, and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

I think the part that story misses, is the part where the bartender gives them back $20, but only if the first 4 aren't allowed to "drink beer" anymore.

Ghost of Reagan Past
Oct 7, 2003

rock and roll fun

Zeitgueist posted:

This old chestnut is making it around on my facebook:
If that was actually written by a PhD in economics he should have his PhD revoked.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Ghost of Reagan Past posted:

If that was actually written by a PhD in economics he should have his PhD revoked.

If you google him literally the first thing in his bio is "I did not write that crap".

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Zeitgueist posted:

If you google him literally the first thing in his bio is "I did not write that crap".

Note the bolded caveat, though:

David R. Kamerschen, PhD posted:

Contrary to Internet folklore, Dr. Kamerschen is NOT the author of "Tax Cuts: A Simple Lesson in Economics" or “Bar Stool Economics” or anything similar to that. [Additionally, he does NOT know who wrote it and he has no opinion on its merits.
:what:

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Note the bolded caveat, though:

:what:

Presumably he's a lazy dude who doesn't want to waste time going back and forth with people.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Note the bolded caveat, though:

:what:

Yes he'd rather avoid idiots attacking him for calling it crap and just went with 'hosed if I know or care about anything at all about that', what a monster.

A Neurotic Jew
Feb 17, 2012

by exmarx
The idea of someone handing that in as their PhD thesis is giving me giggle-fits.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Glitterbomber posted:

Yes he'd rather avoid idiots attacking him for calling it crap and just went with 'hosed if I know or care about anything at all about that', what a monster.
If somebody wrote something in my name which I thought was bad, and reflected poorly either on me or on my discipline(s), I would take the time to refute it. Then again, I will occasionally argue with Moon Landing deniers, so perhaps I'm just a glutton for punishment.

A Neurotic Jew posted:

The idea of someone handing that in as their PhD thesis is giving me giggle-fits.

I would kill to sit in on that defense, though.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

I also like that they forgot the part where:

The tenth man make $30,000 a month.
The ninth makes $20,000.
The seventh and eighth each make $10,000.
The fifth and sixth each make $7,000.
And the last four each make $3,000.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply