|
DJExile posted:Ha ha ha Hulk Hogan is so dumb-hey why are you suing us? How dare someone complain about capitalism while being forced to participate in it to survive. And lol at calling out and reporting on a parent company for what they are doing, as a loving news site, being framed as a bad thing. Also gently caress Hulk hogan and anyone who defends him
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 14:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 09:19 |
|
They can call out their parent company all they want, but then acting like they're shocked that the parent company is offloading them is really hard to buy. Yeah gently caress hulk hogan but they played with fire and it burned them.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 14:20 |
|
DJExile posted:They can call out their parent company all they want, but then acting like they're shocked that the parent company is offloading them is really hard to buy. They aren't particularly shocked it was fairly openly being talked about that they were looking to sell GMG before that article ran. It only burned them because a rich rear end in a top hat with a vendetta specifically attacked them in a way where their insurance for these types of things wouldn't cover them, and ran a strategy of bleed them dry of all money. I'm fine with Hogan getting whatever he was due not so fine with a billionaire specifically targeting a legal attack based around bankrupting and hopefully buying the company. , Though I think it was completely newsworthy to post that Hogan tape, as he was a marketing face of a publically traded billion dollar company. But sure, if he wanted damages then pay them up that's why news sites get that insurance.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 14:57 |
|
DJExile posted:and then just a bunch of whining about barstool that, while well-warranted, is clearly giving them all the attention they want. If it weren't for Deadspin I likely would never have even heard of Barstool
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 16:03 |
|
DJExile posted:surrounded by their amazon referral links, lovely autoplay videos, and their "10 best deals". My adblocker started filtering these out at some point when it didn't used to. I don't know how but I do appreciate it. Now I can groan at seeing another Billy Haisley article even faster.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 16:12 |
|
DJExile posted:They can call out their parent company all they want, but then acting like they're shocked that the parent company is offloading them is really hard to buy. First of all, what Univision is doing is lovely regardless. They're doing the Bain Capital bullshit of buying a company, laying off a ton of people and cutting a bunch of other costs, and then turning around and selling it because now it looks more valuable with less liabilities on the books.They should be called out on it, and literally no one is "shocked" that it is happening, that's a strawman. Also, as far as the Hulk Hogan thing, you can say "they" did this or that all day long but not a single person involved with the Hogan fiasco is even at the company anymore.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 16:48 |
|
General Dog posted:If it weren't for Deadspin I likely would never have even heard of Barstool It's both good and bad that their reach is not what they think it is. Good, because thank god such a toxic shithole hasn't completely taken over. Bad, because since you need to be Very to Extremely Online to know how toxic they are, they can fly under the radar of mainstream media and sports organizations.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 16:52 |
|
Mahoning posted:First of all, what Univision is doing is lovely regardless. They're doing the Bain Capital bullshit of buying a company, laying off a ton of people and cutting a bunch of other costs, and then turning around and selling it because now it looks more valuable with less liabilities on the books.They should be called out on it, and literally no one is "shocked" that it is happening, that's a strawman. This is what literally every bankruptcy procedure/purchase is though, that's not a new thing.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 17:00 |
|
DJExile posted:This is what literally every bankruptcy procedure/purchase is though, that's not a new thing. Except they're not filing for bankruptcy? Laying off people as a mock signal to your shareholders that you're "cutting costs" (even though its barely a blip on the financial radar) is a loving atrocious thing to do. Just because it is common does not make it right and you defending the practice or criticizing the people who are pointing it out as a lovely thing is pretty dumb.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 17:41 |
|
DJExile posted:This is what literally every bankruptcy procedure/purchase is though, that's not a new thing. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? Are you arguing that because it is a common thing that it shouldn't be called out? I don't understand where you're going with this. If people don't call bullshit on it at every turn because "that's the way things are" then it's never going to stop being a thing.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 17:46 |
|
I'm saying it's hard to buy gizmodo's outrage at their situation when they're the ones who put themselves in that spot in the first place. Hell, deadspin's been sued like 2-3 times since the Hogan deal on other stuff and I believe Univision had them yank 4 articles when they bought them. Now Univision wants to sell them (or at least solicit buyers) either because they feel like the gawker/onion/splinter combo is worth more than the $135mil they originally paid for it when they went bankrupt, or they just don't want to put up with the costs anymore. Mahoning posted:Except they're not filing for bankruptcy? Laying off people as a mock signal to your shareholders that you're "cutting costs" (even though its barely a blip on the financial radar) is a loving atrocious thing to do. Just because it is common does not make it right and you defending the practice or criticizing the people who are pointing it out as a lovely thing is pretty dumb. I meant when they bought Gizmodo out of bankruptcy, i should have clarified.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 19:08 |
|
DJExile posted:I'm saying it's hard to buy gizmodo's outrage at their situation when they're the ones who put themselves in that spot in the first place. Hell, deadspin's been sued like 2-3 times since the Hogan deal on other stuff and I believe Univision had them yank 4 articles when they bought them. Ok now you’re just talking out of your rear end. Dig up, stupid! 1) as I said before, none of the people involved in the Hogan thing are even with the company anymore so this “they” you keep referring to is baffling. “They”, as in the people that work there now, shouldn’t be punished or silenced from making legitimate complaints due to something former employees did. 2) Univision JUST laid off people all across GMG last week AND I believe shuttered some of the sub-sites. (Excuse me, they were given buyouts) so this has nothing to do with the post-bankruptcy restructuring that goes on all the time. 3) The Onion/AV Club had nothing to do with Gawker and weren’t affiliated at all with them when the Hogan thing went down. And yet they’re suffering too. So, in an effort to show that you still think Gawker did a Bad Thing in the Hogan case, you have completely talked out of your rear end and haven’t made a single point that makes sense.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 19:24 |
|
The employees of The Onion have nothing to do with Gawker's editorial decisions from a decade ago, nor do pretty much any of the current employees of the Gizmodo group. No one there is "shocked" that the companies are being stripped for parts, because their union has been in negotiations regarding buyouts for months. They're allowed to react like human beings to an unfortunate situation that is threatening their livelihoods
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 19:26 |
|
Dexo posted:Though I think it was completely newsworthy to post that Hogan tape, as he was a marketing face of a publically traded billion dollar company. But sure, if he wanted damages then pay them up that's why news sites get that insurance. nothing on the Hogan tape they published was actually noteworthy unless you like watching an old dude have consensual sex it was just lovely celebrity gossip clickbait like most of the stuff that defined Gawker under Daulerio the racist comments were on a second sextape that the FBI had, one that its safe to say that Gawker never had it because they probably would have published it instead of the horribly boring one that destroyed their company
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 19:53 |
|
exploded mummy posted:nothing on the Hogan tape they published was actually noteworthy unless you like watching an old dude have consensual sex Which is the one where he says "I ate too much pork"?
|
# ? Jul 11, 2018 20:38 |
|
Finebaum signed his extension with ESPN, ending our national crisis before SEC media days.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:17 |
|
Late on this I guess but GMG is being sold/stripped down because Univision is desperate for either cash or places to cut cost because the morons running it saddled them with a ton of debt they can't get keep up with. It doesn't have anything to do with the actual content of any of the sites and afaik it's consistently turned a profit.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2018 04:16 |
|
MourningView posted:Late on this I guess but GMG is being sold/stripped down because Univision is desperate for either cash or places to cut cost because the morons running it saddled them with a ton of debt they can't get keep up with. It doesn't have anything to do with the actual content of any of the sites and afaik it's consistently turned a profit. but but my narratives.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2018 05:46 |
|
MourningView posted:Late on this I guess but GMG is being sold/stripped down because Univision is desperate for either cash or places to cut cost because the morons running it saddled them with a ton of debt they can't get keep up with. It doesn't have anything to do with the actual content of any of the sites and afaik it's consistently turned a profit.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2018 05:47 |
|
The end well for the people who did the acquiring. Everyone else gets hosed.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2018 05:47 |
|
Crazy Ted posted:Do debt-leveraged acquisitions ever end well? The only one I can think of off the top of my head is the Glazers buying Manchester United, but a sports team isn't exactly a normal business. The leverage isn’t what hosed up GMG, it’s Univision having no plan in place to run the whole thing
|
# ? Jul 15, 2018 14:36 |
|
yeah i was on my bullshit about some of that, my bad yall
|
# ? Jul 15, 2018 22:42 |
|
https://twitter.com/TheAthleticCFB/status/1018857791472091136
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 15:26 |
|
GMG.jpg (and this is technically sports journalism, as I clipped it from Deadspin)
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 20:46 |
|
You really need to click through on the HamNo story though, it's not what you think.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 22:23 |
|
Noctone posted:You really need to click through on the HamNo story though, it's not what you think. If you've ever read HamNo it's exactly what you think.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 22:25 |
|
Noctone posted:You really need to click through on the HamNo story though, it's not what you think. I think he's referring to it appearing directly below a referral-link-laden ad for stuff on Amazon.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 22:28 |
|
Advertising and Editorial at all of these companies are two different teams There is jack poo poo editorial can do about advertising deciding to put ads and Ref feral stuff on the sites. It often leads to hillarious poo poo like this.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 22:39 |
|
It's a good column
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 22:57 |
|
People only hate HamNo for reminding us that we live in Hell
|
# ? Jul 16, 2018 23:15 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:People only hate HamNo for reminding us that we live in Hell He's unfashionably shrill and angry
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 04:46 |
|
General Dog posted:He's unfashionably shrill and angry Not sure if you’ve noticed but it’s very fashionable to be both of those things lately
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 04:54 |
|
loving lmao at espn 1000 putting North and Coppock on air
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 04:59 |
|
what human being exists on earth who wants to listen to mike north
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 05:11 |
|
R.D. Mangles posted:what human being exists on earth who wants to listen to mike north Old, white people.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 06:26 |
|
I wonder if we'll ever see teams that don't have a ton of local coverage start to get covered by the Athletic.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 06:29 |
|
Rick posted:I wonder if we'll ever see teams that don't have a ton of local coverage start to get covered by the Athletic. i think they want to get all of the big teams up first, though i did see some demand for buffalo's pro women's hockey team https://twitter.com/TheAthletic/status/1019189984019058689 interesting they opened in baltimore before dc
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 13:23 |
|
Dexo posted:loving lmao at espn 1000 putting North and Coppock on air Score counters by giving Other Noted lovely Old White Guy Bruce Wolf a spot for Chet Chitchat.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 14:14 |
|
Vertical Lime posted:i think they want to get all of the big teams up first, though i did see some demand for buffalo's pro women's hockey team Finally they got Wisconsin.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 15:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 09:19 |
|
Vertical Lime posted:i think they want to get all of the big teams up first, though i did see some demand for buffalo's pro women's hockey team It's going to be extremely difficult for them to compete against the Post in the DC market.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2018 15:57 |