|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 15:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 21:04 |
|
|
 IMG_5045_hires by charliebravo77, on Flickr Kinda wish the grasses weren't in the foreground, maybe I'll attack them with photoshop at some point.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 15:44
|
|
|
charliebravo77 posted:
This is gorgeous, I love the moody lighting.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 17:34
|
|
|
The Rat posted:This is gorgeous, I love the moody lighting. Thanks! Figures a thunderstorm would find me in the high desert of southern AZ, but at least it made for a cool photo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 17:53
|
|
|
Choppy dark clouds are the best time to be in nature with a camera, the texture in the sky always looks cool.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 17:57
|
|
|
 Lincoln City by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr  Lincoln City by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr  Lincoln City by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 18:02
|
|
|
 These are from Glacier National Park   
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 02:14
|
|
|
Landscap(ing)
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2018 05:13
|
|
|
There's a british landscape photography conference that's being livestreamed. It's also running tomorrow. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5wTX1IyxRI Pablo Bluth fucked around with this message at 11:52 on Nov 3, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2018 11:37
|
|
|
 IMG_9458
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2018 19:52
|
|
|
A few more neggies developed today. Gnarled Tree by Andrew Burns, on Flickr  One Tree Hill Obelisk by Andrew Burns, on Flickr  Woodhill by Andrew Burns, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 10:08
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 10:49
|
|
|
 Central Library by Cacator, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 18:37
|
|
|
just in awe of that toyota
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 19:34
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 21:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 22:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 06:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 04:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 08:57
|
|
|
 Routeburn Track - Lake Mackenzie Kinda wish I took a tripod so I could have avoided all that noise, but they're not exactly easy to carry on a three day hike, and my pack weighed enough as it was Wafflecopper fucked around with this message at 10:51 on Nov 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 11:58
|
|
|
 Routeburn Track - Lake Mackenzie
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 13:39
|
|
|
Wafflecopper posted:
I like this one. The mountains peeking through the mist are lovely.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 15:04
|
|
|
First time actually doing exposure bracketing. Does this feel to "HDR" to anyone else? I can't decide .. some of me leans toward yes. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 16:00
|
|
|
mAlfunkti0n posted:First time actually doing exposure bracketing. Does this feel to "HDR" to anyone else? I can't decide .. some of me leans toward yes. its very uneven
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 16:09
|
|
|
underage at the vape shop posted:its very uneven Can you elaborate more? I'm trying to nail down what it is in my head that I don't like. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 16:12
|
|
|
The light and dark parts are quite uneven and unnatural.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
mAlfunkti0n posted:First time actually doing exposure bracketing. Does this feel to "HDR" to anyone else? I can't decide .. some of me leans toward yes. It looks oddly dodged and burned in spots.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 16:26
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:The light and dark parts are quite uneven and unnatural. Yeah I guess that's what bugs me about it as well. The most decently exposed of the set just lacks the detail in the darks which is why I went for the blend. I need to play around more with the original to see if I can get what I want. Edit: Worked with another photo and I have better feelings about this one.  Green Mountain Trail by jarredsutherland, on Flickr
mAlfunkti0n fucked around with this message at 17:18 on Nov 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 16:29
|
|
|
mAlfunkti0n posted:Yeah I guess that's what bugs me about it as well. The most decently exposed of the set just lacks the detail in the darks which is why I went for the blend. I need to play around more with the original to see if I can get what I want. This photo feels a little flat to me but it is much easier to look at than the last which was HDR'd to the point of looking unnatural. Your previous photo seemed to swap the focal points of the image by reversing the shadow/highlights. Your eye wants to look at the peak which should naturally be brighter than the dark green trees. But somehow the exposure bracketing made the peak dark and the dark trees really bright, especially for being in the lower right corner of the frame. It causes a weird dilemma where your eye now isn't quite sure where to go. I get drawn to the highlight areas of the image and end up staring at a bunch of trees that look like they're being shot up with light. Your next image is 10x more pleasing to the eye because it seems natural. The lighting is flat but playing with slight exposure/luminance levels could easily change that. Verman fucked around with this message at 17:55 on Nov 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 17:50
|
|
|
Verman posted:This photo feels a little flat to me but it is much easier to look at than the last which was HDR'd to the point of looking unnatural. Yeah it's much easier on the eyes, I am ashamed of the HDR one at this point. It was super overcast the day this was shot so I am not sure if there is any bringing it back from the brink of flatness. Happy to hear suggestions if there are.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 17:54
|
|
|
mAlfunkti0n posted:I am ashamed of the HDR one at this point. Ah, good, the system works.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 19:13
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:Ah, good, the system works. I honestly wasn't going for the normal hdr look. Somehow it just ended up that way. I don't know why I didn't pay attention to my gut in the first place, it didn't feel right from the moment I started working on it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 19:27
|
|
|
I want to say I'm improving, but looking through the past couple pages has me floored. Some genuinely amazing photographers in the thread. Here's the few shots from my last trip I thought turned out well.   
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 19:59
|
|
|
It may seem like the crap all over the artist's sensor would portray his carefree nature but if you look closely you will notice the hidden symbology that clearly shows the artist is a member of the Cult of the Fart Huffer.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 20:16
|
|
|
That's in the lens, sadly. But I'm poor and that was the cheapest 28mm I could get at my local shop. Get what you pay for.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
Vinestalk posted:That's in the lens, sadly. But I'm poor and that was the cheapest 28mm I could get at my local shop. Get what you pay for. It's on your sensor. It wouldn't be that sharp or defined if it were in the lens. Clean your sensor.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 20:43
|
|
|
I trust the advice and I'll get it cleaned. But I don't see the same thread or dust in this shot. Same day, different lens (worse photo)
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 20:50
|
|
|
That's because dust moves around, especially if the camera has an auto cleaning function.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 21:25
|
|
|
Vinestalk posted:I trust the advice and I'll get it cleaned. But I don't see the same thread or dust in this shot. Same day, different lens (worse photo) Because you only see dust when the lens is stopped down to a small aperture. It looks like that photo used a larger aperture, judging by the shallow depth of field.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 21:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 21:04 |
|
|
Probably don't have to get it cleaned by someone else if its just dust. Use whatever cleaning mode your body has to open the shutter and lock the mirror up. Point the body facing down so that gravity is your friend and give it a few puffs with a bulb blower. Don't use that canned air crap, you don't want propellant all up in your camera's guts. Verify your cleaning by attaching a lens, stopping your aperture down real small and pointing the camera at something bright and uniform like the daytime sky. Specs of dust will be quite visible with a tiny aperture.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 22:10
|
|