|
ElMaligno posted:i know for a fact everyone in the USCG involved in this has a raging erection right now because prosecuting hoax callers is a rare thing for us. As an added bonus, they'll sometimes seek to recoup the cost of a false alarm activation. I'm sure a NEST deployment is real cheap...
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 23:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 12:45 |
trump calling out killary again https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/875438639823675392 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/875441788110110727
|
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 23:50 |
also lollin that he probably wrote 'but my dealings are' before throwing the 'non' in front just to make sure everyone knows he's innocent
|
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 23:51 |
|
Porn. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/15/trump-russia-investigation-obsession-239614 quote:Trump, for months, has bristled almost daily at the ongoing probes. He has sometimes, without prompting, injected “I’m not under investigation” into conversations with associates and allies. He has watched hours of TV coverage every day — sometimes even storing morning news shows on his TiVo to watch in the evening — and complained nonstop. Additional porn: Mueller is digging into Kushner's finances. Early, but I wonder how scummy his poo poo is. https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...m=.c87f8c2a6838 facialimpediment fucked around with this message at 00:21 on Jun 16, 2017 |
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:13 |
|
Missionary Positron posted:Holy poo poo Holy gently caress Holy gently caress posted:Prime minister Theresa May is facing growing calls to respond to claims that her government has concealed evidence relating to Russian assassinations in Britain. In her six years as home secretary, she spearheaded the British government’s response to national security threats and presided over cuts of £2.3 billion from the national law enforcement budget that several senior officers have blamed for a drastic reduction in police capabilities. May personally intervened to delay the public inquiry into Litvinenko’s death, citing the need to protect “international relations” with Russia. And in the Perepilichnyy case, her government has withheld sensitive evidence from the inquest on “national security” grounds. Downing Street, the Home Office and Scotland Yard did not respond to repeated requests for comment. Edit: Oh gently caress. If they've gotten this far into Britain, what have they done to us? posted:The core reason British authorities have turned a blind eye, a current senior national security adviser to the British government told BuzzFeed News, is fear. Ministers, he said, were not prepared to take the “political risk of dealing firmly and effectively in whatever way with the activities of the Russian state and Russian-organised crime in the UK” because the Kremlin could inflict massive harm on Britain by unleashing cyberattacks, destabilising the economy, or mobilising elements of Britain’s large Russian population to “cause disruption”. Deep law enforcement funding cuts mean “our capabilities are very weak”, he said. It was also impossible to rule out the risk of “general war with Russia” in the current climate, he said, and “if it were to happen it would happen very, very rapidly, and we would be entirely unprepared”. As a result, he concluded, ministers “desperately don’t want to antagonise the Russians” and senior figures in government had told him bluntly that there was “no political appetite to deal with the Russian Federation”. If they can gently caress Britain's economy, what about us?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:16 |
|
windshipper posted:Holy gently caress Have you been around for 2017?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:25 |
|
Yeah seriously, welcome back from your North Korean coma
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:30 |
|
You loving retard if you want that looked at then appoint a special prosecutor like you promised
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:43 |
|
windshipper posted:Holy gently caress Well that's goddamn horrifying.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:45 |
|
For a very, very, very long time, Russia has been the world leader in one specific field: creating dead Russians. Don't worry about it too much.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:46 |
|
let the nukes fly
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:51 |
how long before russia is the only superpower in the world? will this come before or after world war 3?
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:53 |
|
gently caress Teresa May. Holy poo poo.facialimpediment posted:For a very, very, very long time, Russia has been the world leader in one specific field: creating dead Russians. Yeah but these are dead Britons.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 00:54 |
|
TBeats posted:how long before russia is the only superpower in the world? Russia isn't looking to become a superpower and lack the means to become one even if they wanted to. They just want to make sure no one else gets to be one.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:02 |
|
Terrifying Effigies posted:Russia isn't looking to become a superpower and lack the means to become one even if they wanted to. It isn't so much that they're any scarier than anyone else, it's been mentioned several times in this thread (I have several times) that computer security across industry is so bloody terrible I personally wouldn't find it particularly hard to knock over a bunch of factory SCADA systems in some other country and make things go boom. What's terrifying about the Russians is that they're pushing this stuff, while the rest of us are looking at the potential consequences of doing so (The ICBMs all get launched) and we're wondering what in the name of gently caress they're playing at.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:10 |
|
Russia is the living embodiment of Crab Mentality.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:10 |
|
Nostalgia4Butts posted:reports of active shooter at Ft Carson Nothing on local Colorado Springs news yet. Just Wheel of Fortune and whatever.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:34 |
|
cowboy elvis posted:Have you been around for 2017? Yeah yeah yeah elections are one thing, but when you try and investigate it, and the result is this: posted:“political risk of dealing firmly and effectively in whatever way with the activities of the Russian state and Russian-organised crime in the UK” because the Kremlin could inflict massive harm on Britain by unleashing cyberattacks, destabilising the economy, or mobilising elements of Britain’s large Russian population to “cause disruption”. “desperately don’t want to antagonise the Russians” “no political appetite to deal with the Russian Federation”. That's a different level of hosed. Basically - Hexyflexy posted:What's terrifying about the Russians is that they're pushing this stuff, while the rest of us are looking at the potential consequences of doing so (The ICBMs all get launched) and we're wondering what in the name of gently caress they're playing at. We could gently caress their financial system just as easily as they could gently caress us, if not more so. But we don't. But they're loving with us to the level of... It's that car ride with your siblings in the back seat, where you keep going, "I'm not touching you," because, hey, the Russians aren't touching us (with bullets). But here's how close we can, here's how much we can just gently caress with you, what are you gonna do about it? That's scary. It's the same as it was just a week ago, but it's just that much more clearer how much they're trying to gently caress with us, now what are we gonna do?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:35 |
|
Fort Carson poo poo was over pretty quick, apparently. One injured, shooter in custody.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:38 |
|
LITERALLY SHAKING posted:Fort Carson poo poo was over pretty quick, apparently. One injured, shooter in custody. Someone get into an argument with the wife they met at the strip club?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:42 |
|
I would assume something like that, probably yeah. Army gonna army.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:45 |
|
windshipper posted:Yeah yeah yeah elections are one thing, but when you try and investigate it, and the result is this: Your analysis is correct, and the thing is we aren't going to do poo poo because the consequences are horrible for everyone. Have no doubt, if they went totally nuts tomorrow, we (I'm English but same difference, that bit of our security services is basically the same service) could shutdown every factory, hospital, facility that isn't isolated and military in their whole country. Thing is, we're not nuts, and this is a problem. That and some idiot might press the button, and that stuff isn't networked.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:47 |
|
Hexyflexy posted:It isn't so much that they're any scarier than anyone else, it's been mentioned several times in this thread (I have several times) that computer security across industry is so bloody terrible I personally wouldn't find it particularly hard to knock over a bunch of factory SCADA systems in some other country and make things go boom. There's a reason why we don't let electrical engineers design networks anymore.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:55 |
|
I'm wondering if there's an element of hesitation for both parties here in regards to the Russia poo poo. If we were to definitively prove the Russians interfered in the election and either Trump or people he knows played ball, what's our response?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:56 |
|
cowboy elvis posted:I'm wondering if there's an element of hesitation for both parties here in regards to the Russia poo poo. If we were to definitively prove the Russians interfered in the election and either Trump or people he knows played ball, what's our response? As mentioned above, kill their economy. It's pretty much the only sane move you could make.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:59 |
|
cowboy elvis posted:I'm wondering if there's an element of hesitation for both parties here in regards to the Russia poo poo. If we were to definitively prove the Russians interfered in the election and either Trump or people he knows played ball, what's our response? Canned shitposting responses about nothing mattering aside, such a revelation obviously be politically ruinous for Trump and congressional Republicans. Ronnie was able to weather the storm because he knew when to keep his mouth shut, but Donnie will probably dig in and ride it all the way down to conviction by all 48 Democrats and 3 moderate Republicans.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 01:59 |
|
psydude posted:Canned shitposting responses about nothing mattering aside, such a revelation obviously be politically ruinous for Trump and congressional Republicans. Ronnie was able to weather the storm because he knew when to keep his mouth shut, but Donnie will probably dig in and ride it all the way down to conviction by all 48 Democrats and 3 moderate Republicans. About that math of yours....
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:00 |
|
Oh, you mean retaliation wise. Well, the US deems election equipment as critical infrastructure. It's murky because it's never been tested, but US doctrine has been that a computer attack on critical infrastructure is treated the same as a physical attack, and all means of retaliation, including kinetic, are on the table for a response.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:01 |
|
MazelTovCocktail posted:About that math of yours.... You're right, it requires a 2/3 majority. So probably not going to happen until 2020 if Trump gets reelected.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:02 |
|
psydude posted:There's a reason why we don't let electrical engineers design networks anymore. So we can let the bean counters do it instead? While people are starting to grasp the idea that network security is actually important I'm not willing to give a whole lot of credit on follow through. Information systems security is still, generally speaking, seen as that line item on the budget that you make as small as possible to cover legal liability. We're a loooooooong way away from it being taken seriously, and I am of the personal opinion that it won't ever be until there's a global scale pants-making GBS threads disaster to drive the lesson home.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:05 |
|
bird food bathtub posted:So we can let the bean counters do it instead? No, because declaring that airgapped networks are safe, designing PLCs to accept input from unauthenticated sources because it's easy, using hard-coded root credentials to run software, and failing to design SCADA protocols with authentication mechanisms is retarded. But I agree - the energy sector is really the only one taking IT security seriously. psydude fucked around with this message at 02:10 on Jun 16, 2017 |
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:08 |
|
bird food bathtub posted:So we can let the bean counters do it instead? While people are starting to grasp the idea that network security is actually important I'm not willing to give a whole lot of credit on follow through. Information systems security is still, generally speaking, seen as that line item on the budget that you make as small as possible to cover legal liability. We're a loooooooong way away from it being taken seriously, and I am of the personal opinion that it won't ever be until there's a global scale pants-making GBS threads disaster to drive the lesson home. Mathematician reporting in. We're working on that poo poo, but we're realistically about 50 years away from building systems that are resilient against attack. And getting company X to pay for upgrade to I.T. system Y is basically impossible as you described.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/DewsNewz/status/875494310132813827 Interviewing him was a terrible idea in the first place and now look. Also he basically just said he still thinks sandy hook was fake at the end right?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:25 |
|
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:37 |
|
Proud Christian Mom posted:The only heroes in this thread are the physicians that decommissioned your baby makers this is a better loving burn than dr solder did on my nuts hats off
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:38 |
|
Have anyone considered the possibility that Otto Warmbier may have preferred to return in a coma rather than see himself rescued by Trump?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:50 |
|
Democrats fuckin shelled the GOP tonight in the game, 11-2
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 02:57 |
|
This statement is very, very weird. I assume issued under duress. https://twitter.com/JonLemire/status/875530713218600960
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 03:02 |
|
psydude posted:No, because declaring that airgapped networks are safe, designing PLCs to accept input from unauthenticated sources because it's easy, using hard-coded root credentials to run software, and failing to design SCADA protocols with authentication mechanisms is retarded. But I agree - the energy sector is really the only one taking IT security seriously. there is going to have to be legislation passed that requires companies that manage our nations infrastructure to have IT security.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 03:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 12:45 |
Nostalgia4Butts posted:Democrats fuckin shelled the GOP tonight in the game, 11-2 the shooter probably had bets down on credit with the wrong people
|
|
# ? Jun 16, 2017 03:06 |