|
Imagine a sexy spy catsuit lady with a red haired ponytail and a sniper rifle, but then turn her into a psychic bug lady, so like, she still has hair but now it's made out of segmented bug tentacles, or she still has the shape of boobs but it's actually a chitinous chestplate of xenobug exoskeleton designed to look like her old boobs. There's your movie.
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 13:19 |
|
|
They should stop messing around and make that mint they always talk about.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
i'd cut their balls off
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 03:17
|
|
|
I think it's really unrealistic how you go through a whole 2 hour movie, sometimes epic poo poo, and nobody farts. Not casually, not interjectionally. There statistically needs to be a few farts in every film to make it seem realistic. People just don't believe in the poo poo, not because of the lovely actors, not because of the bad scripts and shitcunt directors, but because the suspension of disbelief is broken by a distinct lack of realistic farts in a film.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Start taking chances on unprofitable movies. How many of the best movies you've ever seen have IMDB pages like "although a huge flop when initially released, has since become critically acclaimed" or something. Let artists make movies again.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Start taking chances on unprofitable movies. How many of the best movies you've ever seen have IMDB pages like "although a huge flop when initially released, has since become critically acclaimed" or something. Let artists make movies again. Ten years from now Batman v Superman: DoJ will finally get the recognition it deserves...
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Start taking chances on unprofitable movies. How many of the best movies you've ever seen have IMDB pages like "although a huge flop when initially released, has since become critically acclaimed" or something. Let artists make movies again.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Start taking chances on unprofitable movies. How many of the best movies you've ever seen have IMDB pages like "although a huge flop when initially released, has since become critically acclaimed" or something. Let artists make movies again. Aside from film festivals, which are arguably as incestous and pretentious as the holy guild, there really isn't much of a venue for independent films. There's not a lot of breakthrough production houses that see the cinema outside of niche metropolitan artsy fartsy poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 03:43
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:Aside from film festivals, which are arguably as incestous and pretentious as the holy guild, there really isn't much of a venue for independent films. There's not a lot of breakthrough production houses that see the cinema outside of niche metropolitan artsy fartsy poo poo. I don't mean weirdo experimental films, I mean films that are as much a labor of love as they are a major production. Directors like Terry Gilliam, Quentin Tarantino or Orson Welles. We need more people like them. Also please bring Paul Verhoven back to Hollywood.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
illumination entertainment should die a painful death. minions and the secret life of pets are the worst
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:illumination entertainment should die a painful death. minions and the secret life of pets are the worst Aww, Secret Life of Pets was bad? I haven't seen it yet but I wanted to.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:I don't mean weirdo experimental films, I mean films that are as much a labor of love as they are a major production. Directors like Terry Gilliam, Quentin Tarantino or Orson Welles. We need more people like them. The world is out of stories though. We've traversed the frontier of thought and staked all claims. The postmodern bubble has burst, and there are no more combinations of plot elements to be exploited. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:The world is out of stories though. We've traversed the frontier of thought and staked all claims. The postmodern bubble has burst, and there are no more combinations of plot elements to be exploited. People have been saying that for a hundred years I'm sure.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:People have been saying that for a hundred years I'm sure. Like draculas? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:The world is out of stories though. We've traversed the frontier of thought and staked all claims. The postmodern bubble has burst, and there are no more combinations of plot elements to be exploited. It's not what you say it's how you say it, otherwise we would all just read wikipedia articles instead of seeing movies
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
The Coen Bros. now oversee an entire cinematic universe of esoteric throwbacks to Golden Age Hollywood
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
Quick Draw McGraw posted:It's not what you say it's how you say it, otherwise we would all just read wikipedia articles instead of seeing movies Yeah, actors need to act harder. Like act really hard bitch. Own that poo poo. Acty rear end actin.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Start taking chances on unprofitable movies. How many of the best movies you've ever seen have IMDB pages like "although a huge flop when initially released, has since become critically acclaimed" or something. Let artists make movies again. You can tell that dude mentally turns off before he even enters the theater if he doesn't think it'll stroke his ego, because he could've written everything found in his review from just looking at the movie poster instead of watching it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:Full penetration.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Also please bring Paul Verhoven back to Hollywood. He tried to make make Elle in Hollywood but actresses weren't game and he couldn't get funding, so off to France it was.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 08:39
|
|
|
Neutrino posted:The fundamental concept of cinema and films in general is not that is a depiction of reality but that it tells a story using its own symbolic language. Even the most realistic documentary cannot give an accurate representation of reality once it's assembled onto celluloid. The problem isn't so necessarily the way that film-makers present the didactic story or film, but the way the uneducated audience perceives it. Because it is a language it needs to be learned as a language. Individuals can't learn a language simply by watching people speak it, they must engage in speaking, writing, and listening. The same goes for the cinematic. The visual syntax is not a literal representation but means something more complex than its two-dimensional projection implies. Dude, what?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 10:36
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Dude, what? He is mad that people don't get his films because he's a pretentious snooty doot. It's not that they are bad films, it's just everyone in the world is too stupid to understand them but him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 14:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 13:19 |
|
|
maybe they should make a movie based on a comic book property you could even do a sequel or two if it did well
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 14:58
|
|
