|
Nostradingus posted:Sorry, I'm not a mentally ill racist. Who's the tiny old man supposed to be? My first guess is Ernest Borgnine but that doesn't make any sense George Soros.
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 21:59 |
|
|
D.N. Nation posted:George Soros. It's always Soros, he's the boogeyman for conservatives
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
By the way, here's the Kaep tweet that got Garrison's knickers in a twist: https://twitter.com/Kaepernick7/status/875832378501074944 Clearly the work of, uh, internationalist bankers or something.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
Pants Donkey posted:He hasn't been drafted, but apparently a lot of inferior players got picked up over him, so it reeks of bias. Basically they have the plausible deniability of not seeing him as a good pick, while the real reason is obviously racism. It's a bit more than that. Kaepernick has a lot of flaws in his game (bad reads, tends to overthrow a lot), but it's obvious he's got the talent to succeed, but he's not putting it all together. I would say part of it is that he hasn't shown to be a good QB anymore, and also part his "baggage." Robert Griffin, a similar style QB (also black) got a 2nd chance despite a similar career trajectory as Kaepernick. But he towed the line.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
As that Wired piece shows, Garrison thinks you can just be visible progressive and the money will come rolling in. Maybe he thinks Soros is bankrolling all those webcomics too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:As that Wired piece shows, Garrison thinks you can just be visible progressive and the money will come rolling in. Maybe he thinks Soros is bankrolling all those webcomics too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:As that Wired piece shows, Garrison thinks you can just be visible progressive and the money will come rolling in. Maybe he thinks Soros is bankrolling all those webcomics too. Soros bankrolls literally everything he doesn't like. Haven't you been getting your checks?
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
Avirosb posted:Well obviously if being visibly regressive causes you to lose sponsors and be boycotted, the opposite must be true. Shouldn't that mean that Soros is the economy itself and thus the right needs to worship him because he's so drat rich?
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:As that Wired piece shows, Garrison thinks you can just be visible progressive and the money will come rolling in. Maybe he thinks Soros is bankrolling all those webcomics too. My proudest moment on Twitter was being added to a group by some nut called "paid Soros trolls," like Soros pays people on Twitter to troll for him. I don't even really troll, just state my honest opinions.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
I'm just going to set this down here and back away... don't look at the comments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmi-MtP969M
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
D.N. Nation posted:By the way, here's the Kaep tweet that got Garrison's knickers in a twist: That seven pronged star is really ugly.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
New Kelly time!
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:New Kelly time! Me, but unironically.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 22:46
|
|
|
Spicy food is good
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 23:35
|
|
|
Get hosed, Varvel. You're as guilty as anyone else for a lack of civility.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:As that Wired piece shows, Garrison thinks you can just be visible progressive and the money will come rolling in. Maybe he thinks Soros is bankrolling all those webcomics too. And despite worshipping money and power with all his soul he refuses to join the obviously winning side and take the free money and power. Some libertarian, sounds more like a trade unionist to me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
wait i thought activist judges were bad
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
cheetah7071 posted:wait i thought activist judges were bad They're not activist judges when I agree with them.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
But the judge is blocking the way.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
You'd think with all the money Soros spends on paying protestors, he would have just paid them to vote back in November and saved himself some money. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Eat poo poo, Payne  9 10 11
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
But her emails from Benghazi!
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 01:02
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:As that Wired piece shows, Garrison thinks you can just be visible progressive and the money will come rolling in. Maybe he thinks Soros is bankrolling all those webcomics too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:New Kelly time! Santa FEH is making me so very happy
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
...what?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
HAT FETISH posted:It's very interesting, to me, that this hypothetical scenario in which people who lean left are paid money for publicly stating their views doesn't count as Free Market No Regulation Good Economics Stuff That Happens Naturally for some reason Yeah, because Soros is bad, so he's screwing everything up by only paying for bad stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
KillerQueen posted:...what? Is he defending the Shakespeare in the Park thing at the same time or is this yet another instance of GOP Cognitive Dissonance (tm)
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
There's something in the side of your mouth, Al hurrr blee blurr, those ka-razy liberals and their pointing clearly unrelated things out and oh by the way pee pee doo doo global warming for some reason
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:00
|
|
|
usenet celeb 1992 posted:
Well, libtards blame everything on global warming, so some librul, somewhere said it. I bet.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
Reminder that Henry Payne throws a temper tantrum any time someone reminds him that the Hummer failed
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
Neodoomium posted:Is he defending the Shakespeare in the Park thing at the same time or is this yet another instance of GOP Cognitive Dissonance (tm) Precisely. I cannot unravel what Lester is trying to say here.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
It's basically just free association at this point. Throwing up flack to distract from whatever dumb poo poo Trump did today. Ransacking the dusty shelves of their brain and presenting the results to the wider world as though we should all be as outraged over whatever dumb poo poo got the conservative fever swamps in a kerfuffle six months ago.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
Neodoomium posted:Is he defending the Shakespeare in the Park thing at the same time or is this yet another instance of GOP Cognitive Dissonance (tm) I think it's "look at these two things that happened" Deeper meanings may just be coincidential
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
We're really at the point where Republicans can't fill a 4 x 6 inch rectangle with doodles without contradicting themselves.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
KillerQueen posted:Precisely. I cannot unravel what Lester is trying to say here. The man in the Redskins t-shirt is a football team. Shakespeare in the Park represents exclusive rights for the football team to reproduce said t-shirts. The security person represents the US trademark office, who tried to interfere with the football team's god-given right to exclusively sell merchandise with an ethnic slur on it. The judge is a judge.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:25
|
|
Randallteal posted:The man in the Redskins t-shirt is a football team. Shakespeare in the Park represents exclusive rights for the football team to reproduce said t-shirts. The security person represents the US trademark office, who tried to interfere with the football team's god-given right to exclusively sell merchandise with an ethnic slur on it. The judge is a judge. But what is the DEBT?
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
Ossoff lost in GA-6 so get ready for some crowing-rear end garbage comics written in the next 24 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:34
|
|
|
KillerQueen posted:...what? Of course, the problem is that nobody ever wanted to outlaw the name "Redskins", but just have them change it because it's a slur as a team name. There's this failure on the right to realize that the freedom to do something doesn't mean you have to do it, nor that you are absolved of and kind of judgement or consequence for doing it. Sure, I have the freedom to go out and call people on the street assholes, but they can also tell me maybe I shouldn't do that and I'm a dick for continuing to do so.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
I guess leftists also fall victim to "this thing which I only know about through extensive media reporting is being ignored by the media" syndrome.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 21:59 |
|
|
Trogdos! posted:
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 04:22
|
|
