|
Asproigerosis posted:do russian destroyers eventually become non garbage? There are two prevailing theories. One says it gets good at 4 and 5, is bad at 6, then good at 7 onwards, the other says it gets good at 6 onwards. Pick which experience is relevant to you. NTRabbit fucked around with this message at 16:23 on Aug 28, 2016 |
# ? Aug 28, 2016 16:15 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 00:16 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:do russian destroyers eventually become non garbage? Yes, they get accurate long-range guns with AP capable of punching through cruiser armour. Kite enemies like a bitch and watch them rage.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 16:19 |
|
The Khabarovsk is the most bullshit ship in the game right now. Obscenely fast, overpowered guns and stealth firing. You cant catch them or see them.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 16:22 |
|
Well, that was a thing. Bayern game with all the other BBs lemming-training into the corner. I proceeded to rage at them a bit and bought time. Then I defend myself against a DD and some derp tries to teamkill me for "stealing" the kill. I laugh at him in chat and then after the match, I received this:
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 16:22 |
|
Magni posted:Well, that was a thing. Bayern game with all the other BBs lemming-training into the corner. I proceeded to rage at them a bit and bought time. Then I defend myself against a DD and some derp tries to teamkill me for "stealing" the kill. I laugh at him in chat and then after the match, I received this: I actually have to agree with him after seeing your screen shots. What the ever loving Christ??!!!!!
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 16:59 |
El Disco posted:You mean Basic Firing Training? No get the Survivability one, because like all BBs you're going to be set on fire a lot and that skill makes the burning end quicker. But when you eventually get a 15pt captain, Manual Secondary Control is a good choice. Yeah, sorry...I couldn't remember what it was called. That was my instinct, so I went ahead with Basics of Survivability.
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 17:13 |
|
I just logged in and I have 83,000 free XP, what just happened? EDIT: Oh I have my Texas too, looks like my referral hit T6 I guess?
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 17:36 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:do russian destroyers eventually become non garbage? I can't answer this; however, I can take a moment to comment (yeah, I know, Russian company) that the Soviet navy during this time period sucked. It's ships were all hand me downs from other countries, or un-modernized pre-Dreadnoughts and Dreadnoughts from the imperial era, most of which acted as floating artillery (encased in concrete) during the siege of Leningrad. So the inclusion of the Russian/Soviet navy as a primary national tech tree always seemed dumb to me. And the exclusion of the Royal Navy and the German Imperial Navy/Kriegsmarine in favor of the Russians is why I just started playing this game a week ago. Okay, my grognard rant is over. Go about your business collecting a useful answer to your question.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:11 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:do russian destroyers eventually become non garbage? Kiev is fantastic once upgraded, Tashkent is so-so (but not a bad ship, just no upgrade from the Kiev, except for it's torps). And then you get the obscenities at T9 and 10 and you realize how it all was worth it.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:19 |
|
Krogort posted:I just love it when there is a full bomber Ranger in my team with a 300 battle Saipan in the opposite team. I had my first 1v1 fight with an AS Saipan yesterday in my Hiryuu, it was painful as gently caress. I was strike, so only two fighter squadrons (that's usually enough, god dammit!) and I didn't have Dogfighting Expert because come on, that poo poo is usually worthless. Still killed three ships, but I couldn't do anything about his fighters perma-spotting our DDs and getting them all sunk. I strafed two of his squadrons at once and only got a single plane kill Burt posted:I actually have to agree with him after seeing your screen shots. What the ever loving Christ??!!!!! Anime is Good Vengarr fucked around with this message at 18:30 on Aug 28, 2016 |
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:23 |
|
ZombieLenin posted:So the inclusion of the Russian/Soviet navy as a primary national tech tree always seemed dumb to me. Even the Russian players don't care about the Russian Navy, which made it a pretty huge backfire considering it was their last big chance to crack the US market after the failure of Warplanes.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:29 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Even the Russian players don't care about the Russian Navy, which made it a pretty huge backfire considering it was their last big chance to crack the US market after the failure of Warplanes. probably because the russian navy was just rowboats during the Great Patriotic War with subsequent post war build up of a real navy being boring because of the death of naval combat and rise of missile warfare. Are they even going to pretend to try to make a russian carrier tree?
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:36 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:probably because the russian navy was just rowboats during the Great Patriotic War with subsequent post war build up of a real navy being boring because of the death of naval combat and rise of missile warfare. I meant that people have said the Russian server was as perplexed and disappointed by the decision to go Russian before RN or Kriegsmarine as we were. And sure, I can't see why they wouldn't if they can find enough old paperwork, same as the entire cruiser line past the dreadnought era, f.ex http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/1647-list-of-soviet-cvs-projects/
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:44 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:probably because the russian navy was just rowboats during the Great Patriotic War with subsequent post war build up of a real navy being boring because of the death of naval combat and rise of missile warfare. I'm pretty sure there are pictures of carriers by a naval engineer who went mad and started to scribble on the walls of his cell. So, you know, perfectly viable designs.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:45 |
|
There might not be any Russian carrier plane designs lying around though.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:52 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:do russian destroyers eventually become non garbage? I thought the Gnevny at tier 5 was extremely strong. Its only real weakness is the slow traverse on the turrets makes it hard to keep firing while dodging. Makes me really wish I had bought the premium version when they put it on sale. The Kiev and Udaloi are also way better than their counterparts in the IJN and USN trees. And the Khabarovsk is flat out ridiculous. You just have to realize they arent played the same way as the other DDs. You generally shouldnt rush into caps at the start of the game. If possible, follow a stealthier DD to objectives. If enemy DDs try to ambush him, counter-ambush them.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:55 |
|
Italian and french trees should have been way before russian. Serb needs to really learn up on how to properly capitalism.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 18:55 |
|
Vengarr posted:There might not be any Russian carrier plane designs lying around though. There was, at the very least, a Sturmovik design that could carry torpedoes. e: Really it'd be the same as the Germans, navalised versions of planes from the air force NTRabbit fucked around with this message at 19:05 on Aug 28, 2016 |
# ? Aug 28, 2016 19:01 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:do russian destroyers eventually become non garbage? I was in a div with 2 udaloi and a fletcher last night. I think I came multiple times, and that was before I upgraded it.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 19:57 |
|
jownzy posted:I was in a div with 2 udaloi and a fletcher last night. Last night I ended up facing a Khab/Udaloi in an almost-stock Tashkent (had the hull, at least). That... didn't last long. That endgame gun upgrade, drat. I hope I at least get to the Udaloi before they get nerfed into the ground.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 20:03 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:Italian and french trees should have been way before russian. Serb needs to really learn up on how to properly capitalism. Never underestimate the logic of rich Slavs when it comes to using their position and bank accounts to 'slight' others.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 20:26 |
|
will_colorado posted:lol, what in the world? What the actual gently caress? Also this: demonR6 fucked around with this message at 20:34 on Aug 28, 2016 |
# ? Aug 28, 2016 20:31 |
|
Steven Seagal has to be an ambassador for Warships because he won't fit in planes or tanks anymore.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 20:42 |
|
NTRabbit posted:There are two prevailing theories. One says it gets good at 4 and 5, is bad at 6, then good at 7 onwards, the other says it gets good at 6 onwards. Pick which experience is relevant to you. I'd say they get good at 4. I've had as many as 11 torpedo hits in the Izyaslav. Remember, it only sucks compared to higher tier stuff. And you'll be doing the game a service by teaching pubbie BB drivers about torpedoes.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 21:03 |
|
BIG HEADLINE posted:Steven Seagal has to be an ambassador for Warships because he won't fit in planes or tanks anymore. That explains the currywurst's massive size.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 22:42 |
|
I presume the farragut c hull is a waste?
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 22:50 |
|
Vengarr posted:There might not be any Russian carrier plane designs lying around though. They could just stick Yak-38s on everything, considering what a colossal piece of poo poo that plane was.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:09 |
|
LostCosmonaut posted:They could just stick Yak-38s on everything, considering what a colossal piece of poo poo that plane was. Hmmm Yak-38, I'm not familiar with that one... Wikipedia posted:The Yak-38's limited useful payload was always its Achilles' heel, and the high ambient temperatures that had been encountered in the Black Sea during the summer 1976 trials frequently prevented the aircraft from carrying any external stores at all, despite a reduced fuel load. Similar problems were then encountered when Minsk sailed off the coast of West Africa and then in the Indian Ocean; in these instances the lift jets proved unwilling to start under hot and humid conditions. An oxygen-boosting intake system helped alleviate the problem, and was installed from September 1979 during routine overhauls. In July 1979, Minsk arrived in the Sea of Japan, where the vessel was home-ported at Strelok Bay, the Yak-38 component of its air wing thereafter being provided by the 311 OKShAP subordinate to the Pacific Fleet. Hahahaha holy poo poo you weren't kidding.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:20 |
|
Now how shocked would you be to learn that the F-35B V/TOL version is largely based on the prototype Yak-141, of which the Yak-38 was considered to be the early model or stepping stone.
NTRabbit fucked around with this message at 23:27 on Aug 28, 2016 |
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:25 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Now how shocked would you be to learn that the F-35B V/TOL version is largely based on the prototype Yak-141, of which the Yak-38 was considered to be the early model or stepping stone. That explains a lot, really
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:29 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:I presume the farragut c hull is a waste? You can take Defensive Fire as a consumable... In place of smoke. So, yeah
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:32 |
|
When I see pink colored players, what does that mean?
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:42 |
|
ZombieLenin posted:When I see pink colored players, what does that mean? Team killer
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:50 |
|
ZombieLenin posted:When I see pink colored players, what does that mean? Someone drove in front of their torps.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:51 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Team killer Asproigerosis posted:Someone drove in front of their torps. So they load into the next match team killable then?
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:55 |
|
No, they just get increased friendly fire penalties for 5 games. Red people are ones you can free kill.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2016 23:59 |
|
ZombieLenin posted:So they load into the next match team killable then? No. Teamkilling a TKer still gives you the punishment. The color is just there as a warning. Also, if he keeps damaging his teammates, the damage will gradually get refleted back to his ship instead and if he keeps it up at that point, he gets auto-banned. Magni fucked around with this message at 13:39 on Aug 29, 2016 |
# ? Aug 29, 2016 00:01 |
|
Vengarr posted:You can take Defensive Fire as a consumable... In place of smoke. Now granted it's been a long time since I've played the Farragut, but I'm pretty sure this is wrong. On every other DD in the game with the option, Defensive Fire replaces Engine Boost. Smoke is only replaced by that IJN torp reload thing that nobody ever uses.
|
# ? Aug 29, 2016 00:35 |
|
The funny thing about the Yak-38 is that they theoretically could add the Kiev in as a "boss" ship. It only carries 12 anti-ship missiles and guns that have only about a 7.5km effective range. The torpedoes from the ASW helps would be more dangerous than the planes. Once the air component was dead and the ASMs expended, it'd be a turkey shoot for direct fire ships.
|
# ? Aug 29, 2016 00:37 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 00:16 |
|
Magni posted:No. Temakilling a tker still gives you the punishment. The color is jsut there as a warning. Also, if he keeps damaging his teammates, the damage will gradually get refleted back to his ship instead and if he keeps it up at that point, he gets auto-banned. It isn't gradual. As soon as you are pink, you get reflected damage for any more team damage. I know this because I watched a guy in a cruiser yell at wdarkk in a battleship for getting in front of him. Thing is, said cruiser was chucking a volley of he which set dark on fire. Dark just let it tick till the guy turned pink. Then the guy started taking that fire damage in reflection. Now, for those unaware of how fire and flood damage works, it isn't a fixed amount. It is actually a percentage of your total health. This means the guy was taking 1k/s damage from the fire he set on dark because of dark's larger hp pool.
|
# ? Aug 29, 2016 01:06 |