|
If you have knowledge of the lease you sure aren't going to win a bfpfv argument.
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 10:29 |
|
|
ulmont posted:Are you sure? I thought the purchaser - as a bona fide purchaser for value - would be able to repudiate any lease - as an encumbrance on the property - unless the lease was recorded with the applicable authority prior to the purchase? In California or Minnesota, the lease survives a change in ownership except maybe foreclosure.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 03:44
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:If you have knowledge of the lease you sure aren't going to win a bfpfv argument. MoCo has constructive notice if the tenant is occupying afaik.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
So no go in moco for bfpfv afaik.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 12:12
|
|
|
I live in Montgomery Country and am a lawyer. Pay for my Virginia CLE so I can waive into Maryland and I'll consider answering your question
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 12:49
|
|
|
You're a lawyer in the same way blarzgh is a lawyer: barely.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 13:03
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:You're a lawyer in the same way blarzgh is a lawyer: barely. He said, from the cubicle under the "collections" sign.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
I have a window office overlooking another office building!
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
I like to believe that Blarzgh's office is his car, which he parks a quarter mile down the road from any speed trap he comes across. That's just smart.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:I have a window office overlooking another office building! Oh, what I wouldn't do for a window!
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
I just pay off the cops to slip my card to the driver along with the ticket. which confuses them greatly since I'm the prosecutor
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
ONE WEIRD TRICK! Bar associations HATE it!
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 19:35
|
|
|
spacetoaster posted:Well, we have a lot of states (cities even) that have larger size and populations that many countries. Does that really matter? Are lease agreements really that different from one giant city to another? I get that ~~~state's rights~~~ are a big deal in the US, but in the end it usually works against the the average Joe just trying to not get hosed when renting out an apartment.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
Hypothetical: Mr. and Mrs. Smith live in Texas and have joint accounts at the same bank. Mrs. Smith also has an individual account just under her name. One day the bank sends an account notification for Mrs. Smith's account to Mr. Smith, alerting him of the existence of the account and its balance. Mrs. Smith calls the bank to find out why this happened and is told it is some manner of IT error and to call back next week for more information. (The bank confirms this was a mistake on their part and the information should not have been sent to Mr. Smith, and apologizes). Mrs. Smith is pretty miffed but doesn't really know what to do - complain to some sort of regulatory agency, just let it go? Hypothetically, no damages resulted from Mr. Smith receiving the account notification. Would there be any point for further action?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 00:11
|
|
|
Ur Getting Fatter posted:Does that really matter? But what if some states/cities want to treat their renters better than what Central Services decided? The US is a big place and one size doesn't always fit all.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 00:14
|
|
|
joat mon posted:But what if some states/cities want to treat their renters better than what Central Services decided? The US is a big place and one size doesn't always fit all. Public interest laws are the bare minimum standard? I don't think I've ever seen Federalist system that forbids regional jurisdictions from bolstering federal laws.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
Federal laws are really light weight in the us on most things, or simply don't address it. For instance, there's no federal law mandating that a security deposit be returned to a tenant.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
MY GF was in an employment law conference and has been texting me fact patterns all day: Investment advisor dismissed after having sex with a prostitute in his office after hours. He refused to pay her and left her in the lobby when she refused to leave. She made calls through the company directory and eventually to his supervisor demanding payment. He also subsequently sued her. Was he wrongfully dismissed? LeschNyhan fucked around with this message at 01:58 on May 7, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 01:56
|
|
LeschNyhan posted:MY GF was in an employment law conference and has been texting me fact patterns all day: This depends on whether the prostitute was properly reported as a business training expense.
|
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
LeschNyhan posted:He refused to pay her and left her in the lobby when she refused to leave....Was he wrongfully dismissed? Hell no he wasn't, he's clearly loving incompetent.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
LeschNyhan posted:MY GF was in an employment law conference and has been texting me fact patterns all day: Was he an at will employee?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
sullat posted:Was he an at will employee? Canada, so I'm guessing no. I only know my province for sure, but I don't think we have at-will employment here at all.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
Ur Getting Fatter posted:Does that really matter? I don't know. Do you really think people that live 2,500 miles away from you should be getting a say in the minutia of your city/county law?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
I'm on the board of my local neighborhood association in San Francisco, California and we are having Drama. Someone has started attending the meetings and recording them without making that known in advance, then posting the entire recording online. We don't like this. We want to say at the beginning of the next meeting something along the lines of "please turn off any recording devices it makes some of us uncomfortable". This person has made it known to us that she plans on recording anyway, because the meeting is open to the public there is no expectation of privacy. What should the board be aware of? She's a paid member of the neighborhood association. In principal, we could kick her out of the association and refund her dues, right? We don't actually want it to come to that. Do we need a lawyer?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 04:27
|
|
|
spacetoaster posted:I don't know. Do you really think people that live 2,500 miles away from you should be getting a say in the minutia of your city/county law? Hermsgervørden posted:I'm on the board of my local neighborhood association in San Francisco, California and we are having Drama. Someone has started attending the meetings and recording them without making that known in advance, then posting the entire recording online. We don't like this. We want to say at the beginning of the next meeting something along the lines of "please turn off any recording devices it makes some of us uncomfortable". This person has made it known to us that she plans on recording anyway, because the meeting is open to the public there is no expectation of privacy. What should the board be aware of? She's a paid member of the neighborhood association. In principal, we could kick her out of the association and refund her dues, right? We don't actually want it to come to that. Do we need a lawyer? 2. What are you discussing in your neighborhood association meetings that anyone not there would give a poo poo about?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 04:38
|
|
|
Gobbeldygook posted:1. What do your bylaws say about expelling members and refunding dues? quote:2. What are you discussing in your neighborhood association meetings that anyone not there would give a poo poo about?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
LeschNyhan posted:Canada, so I'm guessing no. I only know my province for sure, but I don't think we have at-will employment here at all. In the US the case would be pretty clear-cut. Canada, I don't know. Probably it would be decided by a moose-riding contest or something.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 04:59
|
|
|
Hermsgervørden posted:I'm on the board of my local neighborhood association in San Francisco, California and we are having Drama. Someone has started attending the meetings and recording them without making that known in advance, then posting the entire recording online. We don't like this. We want to say at the beginning of the next meeting something along the lines of "please turn off any recording devices it makes some of us uncomfortable". This person has made it known to us that she plans on recording anyway, because the meeting is open to the public there is no expectation of privacy. What should the board be aware of? She's a paid member of the neighborhood association. In principal, we could kick her out of the association and refund her dues, right? We don't actually want it to come to that. Do we need a lawyer? Saw neighborhood association and san francisco and determined you needed a lawyer.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 06:06
|
|
nm posted:Saw neighborhood association and san francisco and determined you needed a lawyer. There is no more vile, regressive or unholy instrument of American law than the homeowner association (which I assume is what you mean, since google tells me neighborhood associations are a separate type of entity that lack the horrific, satanic powers of HOAs).
|
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 08:11
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:There is no more vile, regressive or unholy instrument of American law than the homeowner association (which I assume is what you mean, since google tells me neighborhood associations are a separate type of entity that lack the horrific, satanic powers of HOAs). First of all, agreed that HOAs are horrible. Neighborhood Association is exactly what I mean. I'm a renter. The neighborhood association has exactly no real powers, except that certain groups have to notify and meet with us, but we discuss lots of important (to us) things, and we have a small amount of political influence. nm, I assume you are being sincere? What kind of lawyer would we even want?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 08:59
|
|
|
If the meetings are open to the public, you don't really have a leg to stand on. Probably a real estate lawyer.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 09:58
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:Federal laws are really light weight in the us on most things, or simply don't address it. For instance, there's no federal law mandating that a security deposit be returned to a tenant. ??? Because it's state law? It's early in the morning this probably duplicative.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 11:52
|
|
|
I was explaining that there is no one size fits all law in the US because federal law doesn't cover most topics if concern. Add an example, I mentioned security deposits. Since there's no federal law, states regulate it. Which is why there are 50 different laws about security deposits.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 12:58
|
|
|
That's true. It was early. Though there is some uniformity because in 49 states LT law derives from English common law.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 13:30
|
|
|
euphronius posted:That's true. It was early. Though it has diverged significantly since in many cases.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
Hermsgervørden posted:First of all, agreed that HOAs are horrible. Pretty much yes. I'd look for someone who knows something about the California open meeting act\brown act. Real estate might be useful too.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
euphronius posted:
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
nm posted:Saw neighborhood association and san francisco and determined you needed a lawyer.
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
Tag line for you "Our law isn't common, it actually civil. 
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2016 22:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 10:29 |
|
|
We don't have a Napoleon smile. No wait 
|
|
#
?
May 8, 2016 23:30
|
|