|
Alereon posted:I think we're jumping the gun just a tad here, it seems FAR more likely that this one developer was either using it wrong or encountered a driver bug than that Maxwell 2 doesn't actually support this claimed feature in hardware. So uhh Robert Hallock, AMD marketing head, had this to say on reddit: quote:Oxide effectively summarized my thoughts on the matter. NVIDIA claims "full support" for DX12, but conveniently ignores that Maxwell is utterly incapable of performing asynchronous compute without heavy reliance on slow context switching. welp
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 04:35 |
|
Zero VGS posted:Wiki has quite a few titles I've already played or are coming out soon as using UE4: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unreal_Engine_games#Unreal_Engine_4 I'm not saying there aren't any UE4 games coming out anymore, just that a big chunk of the companies that published UE3 games has either moved to in-house engines (EA, Ubisoft, Codemasters) or folded/heavily scaled back (THQ, Sega, Midway). Square Enix does indeed have some console exclusive JRPGs announced that will use UE4, you're right, I was mainly thinking of their major western IPs which aren't console exclusive tho (Tomb Raider, Hitman, Deus Ex). It's certainly possible that VR will do big business and UE4 becomes near ubiquitous again that way but thats in no way guaranteed.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:08 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:So what's again the release window of Pascal? If NVidia doesn't manage to retrofit working Async Compute on it, they've dropped the ball so much they're hosed. Pascal looks to be Q3 2016, delayed since AMD is gobbling up HBM2 production for the RX 400 series and so far only Samsung has announced HBM2 production besides Hynix, and they're only starting in Q1 2016. RX 400 series is going to have a few months lead on Pascal, and early Q3 2016 honestly looks like a best case scenario for Nvidia, but if Samsung has awful yields Nvidia may be staring at a 2017 release, keeping in mind AMD will likely try to aquire as much HBM2 from Samsung as possible. Daviclond posted:So uhh Robert Hallock, AMD marketing head, had this to say on reddit: This is going to be yet another hilarious Nvidia release in which awesome on the surface cards will have no longevity, isn't it? 2 years from now someone will say "buy a used 290/390" if you're desperate for performance, but no one will mention the 970.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:11 |
|
Skuto posted:There's also the issue that the consoles themselves have AMD GPUs. Yeah, that's what I mean. They're focused on using AMD GPUs well, and their engines are designed for it. Alereon posted:I think we're jumping the gun just a tad here, it seems FAR more likely that this one developer was either using it wrong or encountered a driver bug than that Maxwell 2 doesn't actually support this claimed feature in hardware. NVIDIA having weaker scheduling and asynchronous support has been hit by people in other contexts. It might not be catastrophically bad, but it's likely pretty bad even with an ideal driver. It's not about supporting it in the sense that it produces correct results, it's about whether it can be used efficiently. I really hope we have a big fight here. AMD needs a win, and they've been working hard on async/scheduling for ages. It would be nice if it was good for more than just VR time warp.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:29 |
|
FaustianQ posted:
It will be a sad state of affairs if the phrase "buy a used 290" still exists next year
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:33 |
|
FaustianQ posted:This is going to be yet another hilarious Nvidia release in which awesome on the surface cards will have no longevity, isn't it? 2 years from now someone will say "buy a used 290/390" if you're desperate for performance, but no one will mention the 970. Well, unless 1440p monitors start selling for $300-400 and VR actually takes off, then welp
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:38 |
|
A 780 Ti is still a pretty competent card. (I should sell my old one while that's still the case.)
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:41 |
|
quote:It will be a sad state of affairs if the phrase "buy a used 290" still exists next year Used video cards always have great value for the money.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 16:44 |
|
I don't really follow any of the PC parts news and whatnot, I just want to know: Should I go ahead and upgrade my HD7950 to a GTX970 (or other), or should I wait for something new to happen in the next 6-9 months? My goal is for the new MGS and the new Fallout to be on High-ish settings and run a smooth 60FPS on 1920x1080, my monitors aren't anything fancy. black.lion fucked around with this message at 17:07 on Aug 31, 2015 |
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:04 |
|
Subjunctive posted:NVIDIA having weaker scheduling and asynchronous support has been hit by people in other contexts. It might not be catastrophically bad, but it's likely pretty bad even with an ideal driver. It's not about supporting it in the sense that it produces correct results, it's about whether it can be used efficiently.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:06 |
|
Alereon posted:The thing is that Maxwell and especially Maxwell 2 were supposed to greatly improve multi-tasking performance. While it's possible it didn't, or didn't noticeably, it also seems very possible to me that nVidia hasn't yet optimized drivers for features that games aren't using yet. How DX12 can't take advantage of that is a complete mystery.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:09 |
|
Truga posted:On the other hand, console devs say async shaders give them a 30% FPS boost on ps4/xbone so who knows. Most of the published graphs shown those big gains are when moving from pixel shaders to compute for image post-processing. Most likely it's from avoiding the overhead of the rasterization pipeline which you don't even need if you are just reading and writing values to a buffer.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:14 |
|
Pity the Nano is a hundred dollars over an amazing price point, I'd have probably thrown one in a super tiny itx case and called it a day.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:24 |
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:Maxwell did greatly improve multi-tasking performance....for CUDA compute. Because then people might be able to do compute in human-relevant timeframes without buying Quadros, and nVidia figured games would just follow what nVidia wants because it always sorta worked before.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:40 |
|
black.lion posted:I don't really follow any of the PC parts news and whatnot, I just want to know: Should I go ahead and upgrade my HD7950 to a GTX970 (or other), or should I wait for something new to happen in the next 6-9 months? Probably not guaranteed 60fps all the time, but the 7950/280 is a drat fine card that will last another year for 1080p. Wait for the next generation's 970/290, 9 months is about right.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:44 |
|
black.lion posted:I don't really follow any of the PC parts news and whatnot, I just want to know: Should I go ahead and upgrade my HD7950 to a GTX970 (or other), or should I wait for something new to happen in the next 6-9 months? The ish part being important, but yes thats a good idea (without seeing actual benchmarks). Parts picking will give you better answers with links and stuff thats currently on sale and all that but youreon the right track
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:45 |
|
Skuto posted:Used video cards always have great value for the money. The 290's will still be under warranty if you get MSI/Asus/Gigabyte too, that's a plus.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 17:58 |
|
This is all hilarious and I'm glad the GPU wars might yet live.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 18:31 |
I asked this a bit ago, but given these new developments I thought I'd ask again. Currently have an evga 760 superclocked. I've been eyeing the acer xb270hu.. I was debating just getting the display and keeping the 760 hoping I can get solid fps in csgo at a low res/144hz while I wait for next gen cards. Looks like that is going to be longer than I want to wait. Not really sure what to do now that the 980ti is out of my budget. I don't NEED to play new AAA games at ultra and 144hz, but high would be nice. What do I do gpu thread?
|
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 19:28 |
|
Google Butt posted:I asked this a bit ago, but given these new developments I thought I'd ask again. Currently have an evga 760 superclocked. I've been eyeing the acer xb270hu.. I was debating just getting the display and keeping the 760 hoping I can get solid fps in csgo at a low res/144hz while I wait for next gen cards. Looks like that is going to be longer than I want to wait. E: My bad, first Google results said that was TN. Alereon fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Aug 31, 2015 |
# ? Aug 31, 2015 20:14 |
|
Turn off vsync, turn on a framerate graph, are you hitting 144fps
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 20:22 |
|
Alereon posted:Don't buy a TN-panel based G-Sync monitor, that's a LOT of money to spend on a screen that looks like poo poo. That said, CS:GO has VERY low performance requirements so it's not like a high-end videocard is that critical to get acceptable framerates. The XB270hu is an IPS gsync monitor not TN.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 20:40 |
|
What temps should I be getting with a 980 Ti? I feel mine is just way too hot for what it is. I'm getting thermally limited in benchmarks and games.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 20:44 |
|
SlayVus posted:What temps should I be getting with a 980 Ti? I feel mine is just way too hot for what it is. I'm getting thermally limited in benchmarks and games. should be around 80-85c on load
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 20:45 |
|
SlayVus posted:What temps should I be getting with a 980 Ti? I feel mine is just way too hot for what it is. I'm getting thermally limited in benchmarks and games. GPU Boost 2.0 will try to clock the card as high as possible until it thermally limits. Stock it should throttle in the 82c range. You can safely increase it to 92c. You can also set a custom fan curve to run the fans faster to bring temps down. But seriously, dont worry about it.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 20:51 |
|
I'm not worried about it, I'm just trying to get more out of my card. Right now I'm looking at putting my IC-Diamond on the GPU and getting my copper shims to replace the VRAM thermal pads.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:09 |
|
It honestly will probably do very little if anything for headroom. If you want to run cooler to oc more then do a custom fan curve.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:10 |
|
Already using a CFC with Xtreme Tuner Plus. GALAX cards have a problem with CFCs from MSI AfterBurner for some reason, so I'm using GALAX's own tuner app.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:15 |
|
SlayVus posted:I'm not worried about it, I'm just trying to get more out of my card. Right now I'm looking at putting my IC-Diamond on the GPU and getting my copper shims to replace the VRAM thermal pads. Repasting does wonders, however what temps are you getting? I cannot hit any kind of thermal limit with mine with any settings (MSI), and in this case stock paste. edit: btw, be prepared for "case flow!!" as a culprit here if the temps are indeed abnormal penus penus penus fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Aug 31, 2015 |
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:22 |
|
Wow, thats really aggressive. What temps are you hitting? I run 65% @ 80c on a ref cooler titan x and am around 80c-83c in an sli config
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:23 |
|
6 runs of the Metro 2033 Benchmark. Max is 89c with Temp Target at 90.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:38 |
|
Every day that passes is another day I have buyer's remorse about swapping my 290 for a 970.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:41 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:Every day that passes is another day I have buyer's remorse about swapping my 290 for a 970.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:44 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:Every day that passes is another day I have buyer's remorse about swapping my 290 for a 970. You really shouldn't. The 970 is the better card NOW, and is likely to remain that way for the next year+. Sure, somewhere in the future async randomness may be something to care about, but by then there'll be at least one, if not two new generations of cards, and in the meantime you can enjoy a card that excels at the games you can actually play right now.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:45 |
|
It'd be really funny if Nvidia prevented developers from using Async shaders in GameWorks games.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:47 |
|
Hace posted:It'd be really funny if Nvidia prevented developers from using Async shaders in GameWorks games. DrDork posted:You really shouldn't. The 970 is the better card NOW, and is likely to remain that way for the next year+. Sure, somewhere in the future async randomness may be something to care about, but by then there'll be at least one, if not two new generations of cards, and in the meantime you can enjoy a card that excels at the games you can actually play right now. Anime Schoolgirl fucked around with this message at 21:55 on Aug 31, 2015 |
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:50 |
|
SlayVus posted:6 runs of the Metro 2033 Benchmark. Max is 89c with Temp Target at 90. You have something wrong with your setup. No way should you be hitting those temps with your fans going at 95% unless there is no way for fresh air to get in or hot air to get out. Take a picture of your pc with the side off.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:50 |
|
Lol, nvidia is not that bad guys...
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:57 |
|
THE DOG HOUSE posted:Lol, nvidia is not that bad guys... All three GPU companies are That Bad, just in different ways.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 21:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 04:35 |
|
Sir Unimaginative posted:All three GPU companies are That Bad, just in different ways. Leave Matrox out of this
|
# ? Aug 31, 2015 22:01 |