Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
taqueso
Mar 8, 2004


:911:
:wookie: :thermidor: :wookie:
:dehumanize:

:pirate::hf::tinfoil:

Bofast posted:

Maybe if they manage to squeeze in a 32 core CPU on AM5, otherwise 170W TPD seems kind of out there.

170W is just the design maximum of that socket right?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE
I hope AMD has a similar thing to Epyc where the CPU is in a plastic frame that you slide into the lid/frame, and then swing it down to clamp it. I much prefer that to the Intel style "just put it in the socket and clamp the lid", especially when removing the processor.

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.

Paul MaudDib posted:

I hope AMD has a similar thing to Epyc where the CPU is in a plastic frame that you slide into the lid/frame, and then swing it down to clamp it. I much prefer that to the Intel style "just put it in the socket and clamp the lid", especially when removing the processor.

Yeah it's a nice design and difficult to gently caress up! Kinda makes them like little cartridges. (not pentium II style tho)

Seamonster
Apr 30, 2007

IMMER SIEGREICH
Honestly, anything that prevents the cooler from ripping the CPU out due to crusted paste is a big improvement.

No PCI-E 5? Don't care. Would much rather have a strong DDR5 implementation (recall the temperamental IMCs on Zen 1). Navi APUs with that sweet DDR5 bandwidth are going to be lit!

Zero VGS
Aug 16, 2002
ASK ME ABOUT HOW HUMAN LIVES THAT MADE VIDEO GAME CONTROLLERS ARE WORTH MORE
Lipstick Apathy
How come HP has a line of Envy laptops with oled, and they remove the oled option the minute you try to spec from Intel to Ryzen? Is there some technical reason or did they promise Intel they'd put AMD customers in coach?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Zero VGS posted:

How come HP has a line of Envy laptops with oled, and they remove the oled option the minute you try to spec from Intel to Ryzen? Is there some technical reason or did they promise Intel they'd put AMD customers in coach?

without getting too deep in the weeds, there is a long history of Intel using soft-power strongarming to force OEMs to make their AMD-equipped products just that much worse than their Intel counterparts

Bofast
Feb 21, 2011

Grimey Drawer

taqueso posted:

170W is just the design maximum of that socket right?

That could also be the case, yeah, to account for turbo power draw and such.

Gwaihir
Dec 8, 2009
Hair Elf
Also not remotely a crazy number if core counts rise to something like 12/16/20/24. The current 12 and 16 core chips sit at 142w stock tdp already.

kliras
Mar 27, 2021
Time to rip some threads?

https://twitter.com/AMD/status/1395392492690984969

FrantzX
Jan 28, 2007
Do you remember when you thought that Threadripper was a stupid name?

Cygni
Nov 12, 2005

raring to post

I still do tbh. Epyc also sucks. Ryzen also sucks. Xeon also sucks. Core iX also sucks. GeForce also sucks.

Computer part names are so bad.

HalloKitty
Sep 30, 2005

Adjust the bass and let the Alpine blast

FrantzX posted:

Do you remember when you thought that Threadripper was a stupid name?

Nope, it was always cool

taqueso
Mar 8, 2004


:911:
:wookie: :thermidor: :wookie:
:dehumanize:

:pirate::hf::tinfoil:

80386, now that's a name

Mofabio
May 15, 2003
(y - mx)*(1/(inf))*(PV/RT)*(2.718)*(V/I)
Why not pick a name that's gender-neutral, like "Patrick/Patricia", or the most common name in the world, Mohammed?

8-bit Miniboss
May 24, 2005

CORPO COPS CAME FOR MY :filez:
Fat Agnus forever.

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.

Oh hell yes I loved our A500. Upgraded the RAM, got an extra 3.5” floppy drive.. it was the best.

Combat Pretzel
Jun 23, 2004

No, seriously... what kurds?!
Tasmania Timezone what? --edit: Or Turkish? I guess it could also be Taipei, which is likely.

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
I think “ry-zen” is cute. most are really really dumb, though.

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


Threadfuckler

Mofabio
May 15, 2003
(y - mx)*(1/(inf))*(PV/RT)*(2.718)*(V/I)
Mohammed Threadfuckler

AARP LARPer
Feb 19, 2005

THE DARK SIDE OF SCIENCE BREEDS A WEAPON OF WAR

Buglord
As the owner of a video card that has a lady-elf holding a lazer pistol on the shroud, I can tell you all that Threadripper is a loving fantastic name.

CaptainSarcastic
Jul 6, 2013



I thought Ryzen was a fine name, if only because of the kind of self-aware joking-not-joking of AMD processors having risen again.

EPYC and Threadripper are a bit crass, but could be worse.

Athlon, Sempron, and Opteron seemed like they were using some kind of Autobot naming scheme. Phenom was a good name.

At the rate they're going I wouldn't be surprised to see the AM5 workstation chips be KICKASS or RAGEMODE or something.

SCheeseman
Apr 23, 2003

CACHETHRASHER
CORECRUSHER
MIPSTWISTER
HERTZFUCKER

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
Tony Hawk PRO Threadripper

BrainDance
May 8, 2007

Disco all night long!

CaptainSarcastic posted:

Athlon, Sempron, and Opteron seemed like they were using some kind of Autobot naming scheme. Phenom was a good name.

Duron was the worst of these. No idea why, but I always imagined that if cpus were people duron would have an absolutely massive, weird looking forehead.

It's just the feel of the word..... duron.... loving terrible.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
You couldn't re-release Sempron today without a zillion instant jokes about "Simp-ron"

CaptainSarcastic
Jul 6, 2013



BrainDance posted:

Duron was the worst of these. No idea why, but I always imagined that if cpus were people duron would have an absolutely massive, weird looking forehead.

It's just the feel of the word..... duron.... loving terrible.

They always sucked, too, didn't they? I think it didn't come to mind because Duron became something that just meant "avoid" to me for many years. For a long time Celeron occupied the same space for me.

gradenko_2000 posted:

You couldn't re-release Sempron today without a zillion instant jokes about "Simp-ron"

I almost made a simpering Sempron joke in there, too. As memory serves it was just their name for their mobile processors, and since I generally avoided laptops rarely ran across them.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

CaptainSarcastic posted:

As memory serves it was just their name for their mobile processors, and since I generally avoided laptops rarely ran across them.

Nope! Sempron was their budget/low-power processor line, but there were a bunch of desktop processors. The branding carried as far as the FM2 and AM3 sockets, with Sempron models that were dual-core Bulldozer CPUs for the former, or single-core K10 CPUs for the latter.

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE

CaptainSarcastic posted:

They always sucked, too, didn't they? I think it didn't come to mind because Duron became something that just meant "avoid" to me for many years. For a long time Celeron occupied the same space for me.
I almost made a simpering Sempron joke in there, too. As memory serves it was just their name for their mobile processors, and since I generally avoided laptops rarely ran across them.

there were a bunch of socketed APUs released with Sempron branding as well, I think it was just a "downmarket" branding that slotted in under the Athlon. celeron vs pentium is probably the correct way to think about that branding.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_accelerated_processing_units

SCheeseman
Apr 23, 2003

CaptainSarcastic posted:

They always sucked, too, didn't they? I think it didn't come to mind because Duron became something that just meant "avoid" to me for many years. For a long time Celeron occupied the same space for me.

Much like early Celerons, Durons were monster overclockers which offset the performance hit from having less cache compared to similarly rated Athlons, and then some.

AARP LARPer
Feb 19, 2005

THE DARK SIDE OF SCIENCE BREEDS A WEAPON OF WAR

Buglord
If you had a Duron, and didn’t unlock it with a pencil, you never really had a Duron.

Bofast
Feb 21, 2011

Grimey Drawer

B-1.1.7 Bomber posted:

If you had a Duron, and didn’t unlock it with a pencil, you never really had a Duron.
The pencil trick was fun, though I'm not sure all Durons had that as an option. I know I did it on some Athlon CPUs, however.
Now I'm having flashbacks to FSB overclocking my Duron and burning out a floppy disk drive because the PCI clock was not separate from the FSB clock on that particular motherboard and ended up being higher than the floppy disk drive could handle. :D

Also, I liked Duron as a name.

NewFatMike
Jun 11, 2015

CaptainSarcastic posted:

At the rate they're going I wouldn't be surprised to see the AM5 workstation chips be KICKASS or RAGEMODE or something.

I can't believe you missed it

AMD posted:

Maximize Performance with “Rage Mode”, Exclusively on the Radeon™ RX 6800 XT Graphics Card

https://community.amd.com/t5/blogs/maximize-performance-with-rage-mode-exclusively-on-the-radeon-rx/ba-p/422790

BrainDance
May 8, 2007

Disco all night long!

I had a fan die on a machine with a mobile duron and before I noticed the CPU literally melted itself.

I guess they didn't shut down when thermals got wild fast enough back then?

K8.0
Feb 26, 2004

Her Majesty's 56th Regiment of Foot
AMD was way behind, they didn't have thermal management worth a drat until Ryzen. IIRC Intel started doing it properly with the Core CPUs. Nowadays you can pull the HSF right off the CPU under load and it will throttle fast enough to avoid damage, but before this CPUs would literally explode from the heat.

Fabulousity
Dec 29, 2008

Number One I order you to take a number two.

BrainDance posted:

I had a fan die on a machine with a mobile duron and before I noticed the CPU literally melted itself.

I guess they didn't shut down when thermals got wild fast enough back then?

Nope :supaburn:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf0VuRG7MN4

Saukkis
May 16, 2003

Unless I'm on the inside curve pointing straight at oncoming traffic the high beams stay on and I laugh at your puny protest flashes.
I am Most Important Man. Most Important Man in the World.
Around the same time finnish computer magazine did a similar test with a thermal camera, but they started the computers without heatsink. IIRC, a P4 reached about a 100°C within a minute before turning off. Athlon on the other hand reached something like 250-300°C in 10 seconds and failed.

CaptainSarcastic
Jul 6, 2013




Nah, I was aware of that, just thought they could also name a CPU the same thing. Computer part naming is approaching a singularity, anyway.

jammyozzy
Dec 7, 2006
<img src="https://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-jammyozzy.gif"><br>Is that a challenge?

BrainDance posted:

I had a fan die on a machine with a mobile duron and before I noticed the CPU literally melted itself.

I guess they didn't shut down when thermals got wild fast enough back then?

This exact thing happened to the Athlon TBird in our family PC. Just went from fine to smoke coming out in an instant.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ConanTheLibrarian
Aug 13, 2004


dis buch is late
Fallen Rib

CaptainSarcastic posted:

Nah, I was aware of that, just thought they could also name a CPU the same thing. Computer part naming is approaching a singularity, anyway.

drat right, next gen ryzens will presumably include a 6800X part, and if they release a refresh like they did with the 3800XT, AMD will have a CPU with the exact name as one of their current GPUs. :bravo:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply