|
axolotl farmer posted:anyone remember Vivo, the preferred format in 1997? boy howdy i sure do
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 08:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 15:39 |
|
|
yeah the player cost money or something
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 08:43
|
|
|
and everything looked like a badly dithered gif
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 08:48
|
|
|
axolotl farmer posted:and everything looked like a badly dithered gif back then we just called them gifs
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 08:52
|
|
|
rotor posted:back then we just called them gifs gimme five gifs for a bmp, you'd say
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 08:55
|
|
|
i was going for more of a "are those brazil nuts?/eh, here we just call them 'nuts'" vibe but whatevs
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 08:59
|
|
|
nuts
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 09:01
|
|
|
welcome to china have some food
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 09:03
|
|
|
why does this happen on video
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 14:59
|
|
|
bcuz broadcast tv and movies are terrible old hacks and we loved it so much it's in our digital age
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 15:51
|
|
|
because an i-frame didnt get broadcast and the video decoder doesnt know to change something onscreen here is some nerd poo poo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_compression_picture_types Beve Stuscemi fucked around with this message at 16:04 on Jan 2, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
jeez louise just have perian + air video on ur mac and dgaf what "format" your "video" is in also legally buy video off itunes, ofc
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 16:11
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:because an i-frame didnt get broadcast and the video decoder doesnt know to change something onscreen no ur wrong that's frame blending from an ntsc source
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 16:34
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:why does this happen on video because patrick stewart has to pay the bills somehow
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 17:31
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:because an i-frame didnt get broadcast and the video decoder doesnt know to change something onscreen pro click pro posting champion
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 17:32
|
|
|
newreply.php posted:also legally buy video off itunes, ofc lol, yeah, let me just pay actual money for media in 2013
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 17:33
|
|
|
"its not in 10-bit mkv format no buy" -a thing i can imagine someone here saying unironically
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 17:36
|
|
|
skyfall was beautifully shot but boy howdy did it look pixelated as poo poo on an imax screen. the arri alexa still owns at a lower res though
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 18:04
|
|
|
rotor posted:lol, yeah, let me just pay actual money for media in 2013 well honey we could buy bridesmaids on itunes or you could just nut up and fix our ratio on whilst.org so we can start saving money again
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 18:23
|
|
|
Kirk posted:well honey we could buy bridesmaids on itunes or you could just nut up and fix our ratio on whilst.org so we can start saving money again i just get things from wherever, poo poo just floats around in the air, you know? you just gotta know where to pull it down from.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 18:52
|
|
|
SpecialAgentCooper posted:skyfall was beautifully shot but boy howdy did it look pixelated as poo poo on an imax screen. the arri alexa still owns at a lower res though http://www.arri.de/news.html?article=1095&cHash=2d1a22f2b0c8d8d913d5a02ad190234e shot spherical with a 2.41 crop from what i'm guessing is 2880x1620 thats still pretty good horizontal resolution compared to a 2k film scan. also lol if you complain about paying for movies then complain that every movie is the same. movie companies still serve their paying customers. thats like complaining there arent any good games for android and then go "lol pay for apps?" pagancow fucked around with this message at 18:58 on Jan 2, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 18:53
|
|
|
that the pirate bay is still around to this day is pretty lol in the face of all the energy companies are putting into fighting infringement
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 18:55
|
|
|
newreply.php posted:also legally buy video off itunes, ofc if buying media meant i actually owned it and could use it as i wanted...
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 20:13
|
|
|
what ever happened to jpeg2000. wasn't there some provision for video what that too, or am I making that up.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 20:45
|
|
|
you make a lot of stuff up i wouldnt be surprised
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 21:21
|
|
|
peepsalot posted:what ever happened to jpeg2000. wasn't there some provision for video what that too, or am I making that up. it became motionjpeg and was equally shameful
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 21:22
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:no ur wrong that's frame blending from an ntsc source p. sure thats not it broseph
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 21:24
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:it became motionjpeg and was equally shameful mjpg is not jpeg2000 jpeg2000 still has patents owned by some people and not as easily licensable as h.264. h.264 is a better codec. hence nobody uses jpeg2000. I heard that the r3d files are encoded in a "wavelette like jpeg2000" but i'm not sure how that works since it's raw video. RED also claims their .red files will do 4K masters at 20 megabits per second. and they are pushing that out to theaters. just think, being in a theater, watching a 4k projection of transformers 6 in less bit rate than your blu-ray ~my megabits~
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 22:59
|
|
|
wavelets and dcts are all lossless it's quantization that's the only lossy part
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 23:12
|
|
|
and yes bcuz you can define your own quantization matrix in jpeg with the dqt jfif tag you can effectively make a lossless jpeg file there's still some floating point roundoff but that's insignificant
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2013 23:13
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:and yes bcuz you can define your own quantization matrix in jpeg with the dqt jfif tag you can effectively make a lossless jpeg file wow, youre right jpeg still has a full 4:4:4 mode. and you can store info as RGB? waaaaaat? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 00:08
|
|
|
 jpeg cat compression no dont put the slider to 0!
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 00:09
|
|
|
pagancow posted:wow, youre right jpeg still has a full 4:4:4 mode. no you can't but you can do the DCT which is lossless and then you set the quantization matrix to divide by one so you lose nothing
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 01:50
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:no you can't but you can do the DCT which is lossless and then you set the quantization matrix to divide by one so you lose nothing Except self-respect and any hope of living a normal life
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 02:21
|
|
|
well yah that was implied it's always implied
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 02:24
|
|
|
Kirk posted:that the pirate bay is still around to this day is pretty lol in the face of all the energy companies are putting into fighting infringement why are energy companies trying to fight infringement???
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 02:25
|
|
|
I dled mplayerx the other day it works pretty well
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 03:20
|
|
|
got dat wmd posted:lol """""""""""amateur photographers"""""""""""""" more like lol professional photographers
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 03:21
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:no you can't but you can do the DCT which is lossless and then you set the quantization matrix to divide by one so you lose nothing according to this you can: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Color_space_transformation quote:A particular conversion to Y′CBCR is specified in the JFIF standard, and should be performed for the resulting JPEG file to have maximum compatibility. However, some JPEG implementations in "highest quality" mode do not apply this step and instead keep the color information in the RGB color model, where the image is stored in separate channels for red, green and blue brightness components. This results in less efficient compression, and would not likely be used when file size is especially important. theres rgb in my jay pee gee
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 05:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 15:39 |
|
|
pagancow posted:theres rgb in my jay pee gee moooddsss
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2013 05:23
|
|