|
The only thing Liberal Logic 101 has taught me is that I am not in any way shape or form a liberal and neither is any other left-leaning person I know, apparently. They're seriously making the requirements to consider yourself liberal pretty loving pie in the sky. I haven't even grown my dreads out yet... I'm so behind!
|
# ? Apr 6, 2013 20:49 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 20:36 |
|
The stupidest one has to be the forcing churches to gay marry since nobody has done that in the history of ever. I think one place was forced to let a gay couple do a ceremony but it was like a public park and not a church.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2013 20:57 |
|
muscles like this? posted:The stupidest one has to be the forcing churches to gay marry since nobody has done that in the history of ever. I think one place was forced to let a gay couple do a ceremony but it was like a public park and not a church.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2013 21:04 |
|
Sir Rolo posted:
Don't you usually get married in the church you attend, meaning it's just as much THEIR church as YOUR church? Or do gay people have some weird, satanic way of randomly selecting a church to get married in that I am unaware of?
|
# ? Apr 6, 2013 21:06 |
|
Sir Rolo posted:The Week in LL101: It's amazing how LL101 has managed to become even LESS coherent over time. I know the point is to fill conservatives with self-righteous fury, but at least the old ones had a certain internal logic to them (as long as you accepted their insane, strawman premises). I'm not even sure what I'm supposed to be angry at here.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2013 21:07 |
|
Alpha 1 posted:It's amazing how LL101 has managed to become even LESS coherent over time. I know the point is to fill conservatives with self-righteous fury, but at least the old ones had a certain internal logic to them (as long as you accepted their insane, strawman premises). I'm not even sure what I'm supposed to be angry at here. Black people, is my guess.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 00:01 |
|
KillerJunglist posted:Don't you usually get married in the church you attend, meaning it's just as much THEIR church as YOUR church? Or do gay people have some weird, satanic way of randomly selecting a church to get married in that I am unaware of? Nah, they just go to Unitarian churches generally.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 00:05 |
|
KillerJunglist posted:Don't you usually get married in the church you attend, meaning it's just as much THEIR church as YOUR church? Or do gay people have some weird, satanic way of randomly selecting a church to get married in that I am unaware of? All the gays are lieberal atheists so it doesn't matter anyway.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 00:10 |
|
Alpha 1 posted:It's amazing how LL101 has managed to become even LESS coherent over time. I know the point is to fill conservatives with self-righteous fury, but at least the old ones had a certain internal logic to them (as long as you accepted their insane, strawman premises). I'm not even sure what I'm supposed to be angry at here. You're supposed to be angry that liberals ostensibly want to require registration for gun ownership but not presentation of a photo ID to vote. e: Also, bonus anger because registering gun owners is ALWAYS the prelude to a totalitarian gun ban, and photo ID laws are obviously not at all an attempt to suppress poor and minority votes.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 00:55 |
|
I'm green. Red is a nice enough guy and socially liberal, which was why I was surprised when he dropped that BOMB after 60+ replies on his post. Blue, bless his heart, kept arguing after that. But I dropped out because seriously, after reading that how can one expect to find any common ground on the issue? Sorry to all non-cis people out there, but you got a long road ahead. You can use the bathroom with me though, as long as you can put up with the smell.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 00:58 |
|
I wonder how often this person has actually been confronted by a trans-person in their bathroom.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:03 |
|
Given that that person is probably a man (they speak about "the majority of females" as "they"), I imagine the only thing that would bother them about a trans person in their bathroom would be seeing someone with a vagina that doesn't look traditionally feminine. Also, I wonder if they've even considered the fact that basing bathroom use on genitals means that you have to let someone see your genitals to use the bathroom.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:14 |
|
It's always "men going into women's bathrooms!". Well if we can't go into women's bathrooms because are estrongized penises are full of pulsating male energy that may assualt someone or something, the question is are testosterone enlarged clitorises allowed into the men's room?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:21 |
|
Legalizing gay marriage will force churches to perform them, just like how the Catholic churches are currently forced to perform non-Catholic ceremonies for people of different religions who want to get married.
Dr Christmas fucked around with this message at 01:25 on Apr 7, 2013 |
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:23 |
|
What do the men who get up in arms about transgendered washroom use think happens in a women's washroom? Do they think that the women just hang around with no clothes on chatting about how glad they are no one there has a penis? Seriously, what the gently caress?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:24 |
|
Actually, in the cropped out content there was a woman who showed up and was concerned about her safety if men were able to use the women`s restroom. I pointed out that unless she is personally inspecting the genitals of everyone she uses the restroom with, she is making an assumption that puts her in the exact same "danger" today, but it didn't seem like she was buying it. It's such a weird controversy. I've used a public bathroom with people of the opposite sex and found it to be enormously uneventful.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:25 |
|
DeusExMachinima posted:At the risk of, ugh, starting gunchat, can anyone find a significant number of reported incidents of this happening? There's about 7-8 million licensed carriers in the U.S., plus another 4-5 million adults who live in states where no license is required to concealed carry. Way more than that if you count places you can open carry without a permit (but let's not because that's generally dumb in urban areas). Out of that many concealed carriers, how often does this Mexican standoff nightmare happen? Dude who wrestled the gun away from the Giffords shooter was nearly shot by a CC permit holder. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2011/01/friendly_firearms.html You want more than that, go find it yourself. But yeah, it can happen. Walter fucked around with this message at 01:49 on Apr 7, 2013 |
# ? Apr 7, 2013 01:39 |
|
Snowman Crossing posted:Actually, in the cropped out content there was a woman who showed up and was concerned about her safety if men were able to use the women`s restroom. I pointed out that unless she is personally inspecting the genitals of everyone she uses the restroom with, she is making an assumption that puts her in the exact same "danger" today, but it didn't seem like she was buying it. They're expecting to just instantly spot them by their hairy arms, bra stuffed with socks, and 5 o'clock shadow (I guess like John Travolta in drag) Clearly the solution is armed guards checking all people's genitals before they enter a washroom. "Yep that's a penis, your door is on the left"
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 02:01 |
|
I hope they never find out what a chromosome is, I don't want to have to get my blood drawn just to use the restroom.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 02:03 |
|
This one stood out to me because of how low effort it is. Literally "pee pee doo doo bad president"
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 02:49 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:
Post that cartoon as a reply.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 02:52 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:Legalizing gay marriage will force churches to perform them, just like how the Catholic churches are currently forced to perform non-Catholic ceremonies for people of different religions who want to get married. Uhhh, no they're not... People DO get turned away from Catholic churches for religious reasons. Just not very often.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 02:56 |
|
Guilty posted:Uhhh, no they're not... People DO get turned away from Catholic churches for religious reasons. Just not very often. I believe that was the joke he was going for, yes.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 03:17 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:Legalizing gay marriage will force churches to perform them, just like how the Catholic churches are currently forced to perform non-Catholic ceremonies for people of different religions who want to get married. Guilty posted:Uhhh, no they're not... People DO get turned away from Catholic churches for religious reasons. Just not very often.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 05:41 |
|
Has someone pointed out to this guy that gravity is a constant acceleration for all objects? Who writes this stuff?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 06:23 |
|
Job Truniht posted:Has someone pointed out to this guy that gravity is a constant acceleration for all objects? Who writes this stuff? Yea, but they write it out in that faggy METRES per second and throw in some liberal "squared" poo poo at the end. Just put it in good ol' Miles per Hour or you ain't proving nothing.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 06:34 |
|
Um, you understand that that's the whole point of the image macro, right? "Gravity is a natural law but I bet liberals want to redefine it so that everyone can choose to weigh whatever they want [just like hetero- and cis-normativity are natural but liberals want to redefine marriage and gender]."
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 07:19 |
|
Mornacale posted:Um, you understand that that's the whole point of the image macro, right? "Gravity is a natural law but I bet liberals want to redefine it so that everyone can choose to weigh whatever they want [just like hetero- and cis-normativity are natural but liberals want to redefine marriage and gender]." Yeah but that's mass equality, we already have gravitational equality.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 07:41 |
|
Sir Rolo posted:Yeah but that's mass equality, we already have gravitational equality. Just like we all are actually straight cis-people until liberals start re-defining marriage and sexuality and gender!
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 07:48 |
|
Mornacale posted:Just like we all are actually straight cis-people until liberals start re-defining marriage and sexuality and gender! Maybe, like gays, people with gender confusion or those who are born biologically intersex should pray a little harder until the Lord fixes the problem with his magic. Challenging God's Eternal Wisdom to suit the liberal agenda seems a little backwards to me.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 08:18 |
Job Truniht posted:Has someone pointed out to this guy that gravity is a constant acceleration for all objects? Who writes this stuff? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk Feather and a hammer.
|
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 09:41 |
|
My Aunt shared this and said "Many of our generation know this. However, things like this are no longer being taught in school these days."quote:Have a history teacher explain this if they can. The biggest inaccuracy is that Marilyn Monroe died 15 months before Kennedy was shot. Also Booth was killed in a barn, not a warehouse. The real "kicker" for me is that I found the Snopes debunking of this from the year 2000. And they refer to it as "that old one" and trace it to at least early 1999. This email is old enough to get a driver's license.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 14:55 |
|
XyloJW posted:My Aunt shared this and said "Many of our generation know this. However, things like this are no longer being taught in school these days." I remember a goon doing a hilarious rewrite of that. I wish I could find it. edit: I am entirely too fixated on the reproductive organs of goons. I am not a book fucked around with this message at 15:19 on Apr 7, 2013 |
# ? Apr 7, 2013 15:00 |
|
The silly thing (well, silliest) is that they gently caress up the punch line. It should be "Kennedy was in Marilyn Monroe!" and then full stop.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 15:09 |
|
1stGear posted:The silly thing (well, silliest) is that they gently caress up the punch line. It should be "Kennedy was in Marilyn Monroe!" and then full stop. The same way forwards pick up extra introductions over time, they also pick up extra endings. This one used to end with 'Kennedy was in Marilyn Monroe' full stop, but someone has added the 'theatre/warehouse' line, surely thrilled that they thought of one the original writer didn't, and then someone else has added the 'just had to share this' line.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 15:36 |
|
XyloJW posted:So wait a minute. You're saying if Catholic churches do actually turn people away for religious reasons... then does that mean that legalizing gay marriage won't force churches to perform them? Hang on, this is hard for me. I need to sit down and rethink this. Maybe Dr. Christmas was wrong about that whole thing. Ironically gay marriage being illegal forces otherwise willing churches not to issue legally binding licenses at the end of whatever service they've chosen to perform. But that's not real oppression, libtard. Walter posted:Dude who wrestled the gun away from the Giffords shooter was nearly shot by a CC permit holder. If not drawing counts as almost shooting people, that explains everything about cops in this country.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 16:30 |
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Ironically gay marriage being illegal forces otherwise willing churches not to issue legally binding licenses at the end of whatever service they've chosen to perform. But that's not real oppression, libtard.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 16:50 |
|
1stGear posted:The silly thing (well, silliest) is that they gently caress up the punch line. It should be "Kennedy was in Marilyn Monroe!" and then full stop. Yeah. When I first saw this years ago, it was supposed to just be this funny joke because of that punch line. People had to clean it up though and look what happened.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 17:59 |
|
A friend of mine shared this, which is just kind of weird. I did some formatting because the paragraph structure made it very hard to read.quote:Being Green The intro story is clearly a typical poo poo That Didn't Happen anecdote, and the whole thing just strikes me as an oddly specific.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 18:45 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 20:36 |
|
ZDar Fan posted:A friend of mine shared this, which is just kind of weird. I did some formatting because the paragraph structure made it very hard to read. Post this as a response. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJbdHg3hpmI Then say "you agree with the person who made this." (Yes, I know I posted the same video many pages back. I think it's insane enough to post again.)
|
# ? Apr 7, 2013 19:16 |