Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahTED MOTHERFUCKING CRUZ

there I was watching Cruz give by all accounts a great speech, and the,
Something happened

The mood changed. And he's BOOD OFF THE STAGE AHAHAHA

And trump - I read his lips as he talked to Ivanka in the booth. It was on NBC tape. He said " he got BOOD? Good. How are ya?"

Everyone. I mean EVERONY E. ON MY Facebook and freed and all the comment boards HATES CRUZ

NOT A MAN OF HIS WORD

TEXANS ARE BETTER THAN THAT

BUT OF COURSE

LYIN TED FROMACASNADA

SCWIE FSIEFIUSEGBIJDFB
HOW CAN THIS GET SNY BEYTER

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

Thundercracker posted:

I've tried to explain to my younger friends why Newt was so detested in the 90's, but they really never got it until just about now.

I've always found it amusing that he goes by "Newt" in politics, considering the negative connotations to amphibians

Boosted_C5
Feb 16, 2008
Probation
Can't post for 5 years!
Grimey Drawer

Vile posted:

HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahTED MOTHERFUCKING CRUZ

there I was watching Cruz give by all accounts a great speech, and the,
Something happened

The mood changed. And he's BOOD OFF THE STAGE AHAHAHA

And trump - I read his lips as he talked to Ivanka in the booth. It was on NBC tape. He said " he got BOOD? Good. How are ya?"

Everyone. I mean EVERONY E. ON MY Facebook and freed and all the comment boards HATES CRUZ

NOT A MAN OF HIS WORD

TEXANS ARE BETTER THAN THAT

BUT OF COURSE

LYIN TED FROMACASNADA

SCWIE FSIEFIUSEGBIJDFB
HOW CAN THIS GET SNY BEYTER


It's a beautiful thing. We never have to worry about Lee Harvey Cruz potentially getting our nomination ever again.

He has made himself an enemy of WE THE PEOPLE and our successful revolution and overthrow of the GOP is not some short-lived deviation. There is no turning back. This is here to stay no matter what happens in November. And Ted Cruz has no place in our national future, and it's of his own doing.

Gravy Jones
Sep 13, 2003

I am not on your side

a cop posted:

Ah, yeah, that's what I suspected. But I meant even aside from any official statement, was there anything that was clearly, flagrantly abuse as of late? His tweets always seemed pretty benign in comparison to how he was characterized.

Retweeting screencaps of fake tweets his followers had created as if they were real was probably sufficient abuse of Twitter's terms and conditions for someone who has already had several warnings. I think he's keeps his own tweets "pretty benign" (by twitter standards) and lets his followers do the dirty work.... which is probably another thing that Twitter isn't too fond of. But no, I don't think you're find any specific tweet that got him banned. He tends to switch to the "I'm just a naughty boy having fun and making the world interesting" defence as soon as his followers start with the racist abuse/death threats etc.

blue squares
Sep 28, 2007

The Atlantic posted:

It's Official: Hillary Clinton is Running Against Vladimir Putin

The Republican nominee for president, Donald J. Trump, has chosen this week to unmask himself as a de facto agent of Russian President Vladimir Putin, a KGB-trained dictator who seeks to rebuild the Soviet empire by undermining the free nations of Europe, marginalizing NATO, and ending America’s reign as the world’s sole superpower.

I am not suggesting that Donald Trump is employed by Putin—though his campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was for many years on the payroll of the Putin-backed former president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych. I am arguing that Trump’s understanding of America’s role in the world aligns with Russia’s geostrategic interests; that his critique of American democracy is in accord with the Kremlin’s critique of American democracy; and that he shares numerous ideological and dispositional proclivities with Putin—for one thing, an obsession with the sort of “strength” often associated with dictators. Trump is making it clear that, as president, he would allow Russia to advance its hegemonic interests across Europe and the Middle East. His election would immediately trigger a wave of global instability—much worse than anything we are seeing today—because America’s allies understand that Trump would likely dismantle the post-World War II U.S.-created international order. Many of these countries, feeling abandoned, would likely pursue nuclear weapons programs on their own, leading to a nightmare of proliferation.

Trump’s sympathy for Putin has not been a secret. Trump said he would “get along very well” with Putin, and he has pleased Putin by expressing a comprehensive lack of interest in the future of Ukraine, the domination of which is a core Putinist principle. The Trump movement also agrees with Putin that U.S. democracy is fatally flawed. A Trump adviser, Carter Page, recently denounced—to a Moscow audience—America’s “often-hypocritical focus on democratization, inequality, corruption and regime change.” Earlier this week, Trump’s operatives watered down the Republican Party’s national-security platform position on Ukraine, removing a promise to help the Ukrainians receive lethal aid in their battle to remain free of Russian control.

Now, in an interview with Maggie Haberman and David Sanger of The New York Times, Trump has gone much further, suggesting that he and Putin share a disdain for NATO. Fulfilling what might be Putin’s dearest wish, Trump, in this interview, openly questioned whether the U.S., under his leadership, would keep its commitments to the alliance. According to Haberman and Sanger, Trump “even called into question, whether, as president, he would automatically extend the security guarantees that give the 28 members of NATO the assurance that the full force of the United States military has their back.” Trump told the Times that, should Russia attack a NATO ally, he would first assess whether those nations “have fulfilled their obligations to us.” If they have, he said, he would then come to their defense.

These sorts of equivocating, mercenary statements—unprecedented in the history of Republican foreign policymaking—represent an invitation to Putin to intervene more destructively in non-NATO countries such as Ukraine and Moldova, and also represent an invitation to intervene directly in NATO countries—the Baltic states, first and foremost. This is why the Estonian president tweeted in a cold panic immediately after Trump’s interview appeared online: “Estonia is 1 of 5 NATO allies in Europe to meet its 2% def[ense] expenditures commitment.” The president, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, also noted that Estonia fought “with no caveats” with NATO in Afghanistan.

Unlike Trump, leaders of such countries as Estonia believe that the United States still represents the best hope for freedom. In his interview with Haberman and Sanger, Trump argued, in essence, that there is nothing exceptional about the U.S., and that therefore its leaders have no right to criticize the behavior of other countries: “When the world looks at how bad the United States is, and then we go and talk about civil liberties, I don’t think we’re a very good messenger.”

As someone who has covered President Obama’s foreign policy fairly extensively, I feel confident in stating that he has never expressed such a negative view of the U.S. We are truly in uncharted waters.

Republican Party foreign policy, to date, has been fairly clear on a number of subjects: The United States, Republican foreign-policy thinkers have argued, should help to expand the number of free countries in the world; they believe that the U.S. should come to the defense of free peoples whether or not those peoples can, or will, reimburse the United States for expenditures in pursuit of freedom; that Europe represents the stable platform from which the United States projects its power, and ideas, into the world; that Russian imperial dreams should be countered in a robust fashion by the U.S. and its allies; and that the withdrawal of the U.S. from three key regions of the world—East Asia, Europe, and the Middle East—would create vacuums soon filled by non-democratic regimes that would operate counter to U.S. national-security interests.

Donald Trump, should he be elected president, would bring an end to the postwar international order, and liberate dictators, first and foremost his ally Vladimir Putin, to advance their own interests. The moral arc of the universe is long, and, if Trump is elected, it will bend in the direction of despotism and darkness.

I've always found it amusing that he goes by "Newt" in politics, considering the negative connotations to amphibians

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/07/clinton-trump-putin-nato/492332/

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
I'm very proud of Susan Hutchinson the Washington Chair who called Cruz a TRAITOR and had to be physically restrained

I sent her a nice email and a little money

God This is all so great. Cruz killed himself on Live TV

Trump promised a different convention.

Next week will anyone make it more than an hour into. day 1 of the horribly scripted and corporate DNC lol

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

(and can't post for 19 days!)

Shageletic posted:

Watching Newt on CBS. Other than Vilerat's mom, the worst thing I've seen in the past couple of nights was Newt extending the war on Terror to the entirety of Muslims that live in Muslim countries.

Every American should be terrified.

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Boosted_C5 posted:

It's a beautiful thing. We never have to worry about Lee Harvey Cruz potentially getting our nomination ever again.

He has made himself an enemy of WE THE PEOPLE and our successful revolution and overthrow of the GOP is not some short-lived deviation. There is no turning back. This is here to stay no matter what happens in November. And Ted Cruz has no place in our national future, and it's of his own doing.

It's incredible how uniform the backlash against Cruz is.

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Every American should be terrified.

Americans aren't Muslim you idiot

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

The right has been falling in love with Putin for a long time .

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

euphronius posted:

The right has been falling in love with Putin for a long time .

I love Putin. Mr Trump and Putin BFFs :3

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

Vile posted:

Americans aren't Muslim you idiot

Perhaps the Muslim was inside you all along

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Iron Crowned posted:

Perhaps the Muslim was inside you all along

All a ack bar

Bomb.gif

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
I had multiple liberal friends, conservative friends and in the middle ALL text/ call me last night saying Cruz was stupid and a piece of poo poo

Trump IS a Uniter. He finds common enemies. Muslims, Mexicans, Cruz

blue squares
Sep 28, 2007

Vile gently caress off stop spamming

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

blue squares posted:

Vile gently caress off stop spamming

Don't post a gigantic wall of text from the Atlantic you retard

Trash Trick
Apr 17, 2014

blue squares posted:

Vile gently caress off stop spamming

Keep posting words that you write, vile.

pangstrom
Jan 25, 2003

Wedge Regret
If the trump candidacy is dashed against the rocks and circles the memory hole Cruz will probably look better.

He still will be an even-less-charismatic Santorum but if anything he probably helped himself next go round.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

pangstrom posted:

If the trump candidacy is dashed against the rocks and circles the memory hole Cruz will probably look better.

He still will be an even-less-charismatic Santorum but if anything he probably helped himself next go round.

Yeah I think that is pretty obvious.

CelestialScribe
Jan 16, 2008
I feel like the sec gen of nato calling out Trump is going to dampen any post convention bump.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013


trump is willing to sell the whole NATO for a land plot in moscow lmao

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

CelestialScribe posted:

I feel like the sec gen of nato calling out Trump is going to dampen any post convention bump.

LMAO are you loving serious

Does anyone even know or care who that is

All you MILLENIAL armchair liberal pundits live so clueless of how REAL AMERICANS live

Dr.Zeppelin
Dec 5, 2003

CelestialScribe posted:

I feel like the sec gen of nato calling out Trump is going to dampen any post convention bump.

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/756103142304079872

TyrantWD
Nov 6, 2010
Ignore my doomerism, I don't think better things are possible
Pundits keep saying Cruz committed career suicide, when its quite the opposite. For politicians other than Trump, the conservative purity test matters. If Cruz was the lone hold-out, he would have come across as a sore loser, but at the very same time, you have Kasich who represents the "moderate" wing of the party who is basically echoing those sentiments. There is a range of establishment Republicans who Cruz will be able to point to as people who stood up for conservative/Republican principals while everyone else sold out to reality TV conman. Sure, in the height of Trumpmania he looks bad to a lot of party loyalists, but in a year or two years Rush is going to be crying over how beautiful it was to watch a man walk into a vipers nest and stand up for conservative beliefs.

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

Vile posted:

I had multiple liberal friends, conservative friends and in the middle ALL text/ call me last night saying Cruz was stupid and a piece of poo poo

Trump IS a Uniter. He finds common enemies. Muslims, Mexicans, Cruz

You mean Cruz is a uniter. Everyone hates him, not trump.

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
Trump has been making GBS threads on NATO for over a year and because Clinton News Network decides
To start running this as a talking point all you hillbots lap it up. So obvious,....

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

Vile posted:

LMAO are you loving serious

Does anyone even know or care who that is

All you MILLENIAL armchair liberal pundits live so clueless of how REAL AMERICANS live

Define: REAL AMERICANS

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Truga posted:

You mean Cruz is a uniter. Everyone hates him, not trump.

I guess. Trump is a manipulator and uses enemies to unite. Enemy last night was Cruz. China and Muslims are enemies hat will unite in GE

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Iron Crowned posted:

Define: REAL AMERICANS

Not a smug pajama wearing liberal posting on a dead website arguing with other liberals and a couple clinically insane Trump supporters how a NATO secretary whiny op Ed in he failing nyTimes impacts the election lol

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

Vile posted:

Not a smug pajama wearing liberal posting on a dead website arguing with other liberals and a couple clinically insane Trump supporters

At least you admit that you're clinically insane, have you considered therapy?

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Iron Crowned posted:

At least you admit that you're clinically insane, have you considered therapy?

This is my therapy

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
There have been -30860 posts made by Vile, an average of -7.75 posts per day, since registering on Aug 28, 2005. Vile claims to be a male.

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

Vile posted:

This is my therapy

A good mood stabilizer could help. Wouldn't it be nice to not be stressed out all the time?

Vile
Aug 28, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo

Iron Crowned posted:

A good mood stabilizer could help. Wouldn't it be nice to not be stressed out all the time?

I'm calmer than you are

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

Vile posted:

I'm calmer than you are

interesting

DynamicSloth
Jul 30, 2006

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."

Vile posted:

Trump has been making GBS threads on NATO for over a year and because Clinton News Network decides
To start running this as a talking point all you hillbots lap it up. So obvious,....

No one gave a poo poo because he was running in the Republican clown car primary.

:qq: Democrats are attacking the republican nominee for his positions.

Slate Action
Feb 13, 2012

by exmarx
https://twitter.com/DFWpolijunkie/status/756023808566304768

misty mountaintop
Jun 2, 2015

by Hand Knit

a cop posted:

I think free speech is cool. Twitter isn't a government organization, but I'd hope they'd steel adhere to the same values that allowed them to thrive.

I don't know why you'd spend any energy hoping anything about Twitter or unironically use the word "values" in a discussion about a large corporate entity.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006


I never see these numbers that denote changes that they say but the LATimes poll had Trump up last week right?


Also I guess this Cruz stuff is real and strong, the story this morning is how he blew up the convention.

misty mountaintop posted:

I don't know why you'd spend any energy hoping anything about Twitter or unironically use the word "values" in a discussion about a large corporate entity.

Also I believe the particular instance that Milo got banned over was whipping his followers into a frenzy and directing them at Leslie Jones and resulted in vile harassment and dudes calling her a monkey on line. For the unforgivable crime of making a s j w movie.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Scott Forstall
Aug 16, 2003

MMM THAT FAUX LEATHER

Vile posted:

I'm calmer than you are

Of course, it all makes sense. You're Walter Sobchak.

  • Locked thread