|
in the spirit of denouncing the badposters among our own i must admit i have had daco on ignore for weeks and the thread has been much more readable as a result
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 01:19 |
|
|
thanks fam
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
Landsknecht posted:hey ullerm/flanders if you're here, how are these new DICKS things that are ingame going to affect the meta around BS fleets/bombers They're interesting. They're pretty good at nullifying a single bombing run, but there's a few caveats: 1) it cycles whether or not it finds a bomb to shoot at 2) in practice it's iffy whether or not the destroyers all find different bombs to shoot at 3) the cycle time is bad enough that multiple waves could still wreck you. In practice, they're more about taking the edge off a bombing run than completely nullifying it. to make it really work well, the FC (or, more likely, a helper monkey assigned to the dicksquad) has to call for waves -- i.e. "first group fire," wait ~6 secs (travel time for the missiles), "second group fire"
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
E Equals MC Hammer posted:Hey hey hey, watch it jerk. I love your forum 'tar.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
ullerrm posted:They're interesting. They're pretty good at nullifying a single bombing run, but there's a few caveats: how well will they end up working in 10% tidi when I can see bombs on my overview for a few minutes? or will they be some superspeed reaction based thing?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
ullerrm posted:They're interesting. They're pretty good at nullifying a single bombing run, but there's a few caveats: I can't imagine that the shield versions will have too large of a margin of error when it comes to letting bombs slip through.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:in the spirit of denouncing the badposters among our own i must admit i have had daco on ignore for weeks and the thread has been much more readable as a result Nobody in here is as terrible as these fuckers 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
I have never encountered a poster that was worth ignoring. Edit: with the literal ignore feature I mean. Though there are certainly posts worth skimming. The only time someone is really worth ignoring is when they don't really care about the conversation that they enter. People who just do drive-by posting without contributing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
SperginMcBadposter posted:Nobody in here is as terrible as these fuckers I like Stux. I think I might be the only person in existence that likes Stux.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Viva Miriya posted:I'm amazed you actively chose to be ignorant in this case. Anyone who's not an rear end in a top hat looking for more poo poo to casually sling at people would have understood the intention behind my words. Yet you complain about not being able to have a normal, rational, reasonable conversation with people. Don't ever let it be said that I didn't try to reach out to the other side of...whatever and however you want to characterize what this "is". Aight, here it is Barney style. You are not a rational poster, since when I mentioned you being irrational, you claimed to make any honest post. Honest =/= rational. The two can be related, but not always. So claiming that you'll give an "honest" answer in response to a question when your honesty was never in doubt is an irrational thought process. I believe you honestly believe the stupid poo poo you spout. I don't think you're a troll, I just think you're not very bright.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Zephyrine posted:Though there are certainly posts worth skimming. Like all of yours
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
CainFortea posted:Aight, here it is Barney style. When I said "I'd give you an honest answer" I meant I'd reason with you and engage with you on your terms. That's it, that is all I was trying to communicate to you. If you couldn't understand that then there's no potential for discussion between you and me. Leave here believing what you believe and I'll go back to shitposting and believing what I believe about you.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
CainFortea posted:VERY round. TBH most of my concerns were indirectly addressed through a couple of threads on goonfleet.com, a lot of what I thought was confirmed and responsibility taken. There's really no need to shake trees past that except to be angry and bitter. EDIT: It didn't help that I viewed the directorate as a group with a unified message rather than viewing them as a collection of dudes, some with really dumb ideas and some with really good ones who may not necessarily spew a party line message vice some that will. Basically I had taken to viewing directors as a monolith, and that was a mistake on my part. Rhymenoserous fucked around with this message at 20:05 on Dec 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 19:52
|
|
|
WhoNeedsAName posted:Like all of yours Well then you shouldn't waste your monthly Eve thread exclusive post on me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
Rhymenoserous posted:Basically I had taken to viewing directors as a monolith, and that was a mistake on my part. this is a pretty common mistake, both within GSF and from without, so don't feel too bad
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
toe the line querns
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
Let it be said I at least tried to understand my enemies point of view. They are apparently mentally retarded and full of poo poo at least with this CainFortea dude. How he gets through life is beyond me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
Pl is going to get anyone that doesn't have a super/titan into one of they have a chacter. have a lot of rorqual mining going on now, needed more system with the big mining sites. Going to be awesome to see our 60% super ownership rate up towards 85% in the next few months
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
ok
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
I pray for that number going to 0% after mass supercapdeath.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
The Slack Lagoon posted:Pl is going to get anyone that doesn't have a super/titan into one of they have a chacter. have a lot of rorqual mining going on now, needed more system with the big mining sites. Going to be awesome to see our 60% super ownership rate up towards 85% in the next few months I'm sure it will make a great difference, seeing how you are always going into your wars as the underdogs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Death to all supers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
i think the real question here is, how is it that as much as 40% of pandemic legion doesn't have a supercap i thought that was the only real criteria for entry
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
You can think that, but it has verb pointed out that this is not the case.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:i think the real question here is, how is it that as much as 40% of pandemic legion doesn't have a supercap Its hard to earn and save for a super with strict activity requirements and zero SRP
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:i think the real question here is, how is it that as much as 40% of pandemic legion doesn't have a supercap I got into PL just on the basis of my charming personality.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Perhaps wealthier alliances can see such supercap ownership numbers but not frugal legion
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Supers were implemented badly from the jump it seems. I think it would have been much more fun to see caps and supers be utilitarian (like an extrapolation of the Titan's bridging, or the Rorq's indy core), and super vulnerable. They should represent a hardware investment that correlates to quality of life improvements for your members - but they shouldn't just be another means of escalating until the only viable strategy is n+1. Unfortunately gameplay mechanics are only a small fraction of what's wrong with this loving space game we all apparently love. evilweasel posted:how is it that as much as 40% of pandemic legion doesn't have a supercap Vouches/alts, duh. A super is actually good for not less than 2 (two) all-access passes into The Pandemic Legion.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Viva Miriya posted:I got into PL just on the basis of my charming personality. i 'got into' pl on my merit as a poster
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:40
|
|
|
1001 Arabian dicks posted:i 'got into' pl on my merit as a poster Wait I thought you were globby whose that other guy who posts like you?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
The Slack Lagoon posted:Pl is going to get anyone that doesn't have a super/titan into one of they have a chacter. have a lot of rorqual mining going on now, needed more system with the big mining sites. Going to be awesome to see our 60% super ownership rate up towards 85% in the next few months and at the current rate of mining and building y'all oughta get there by 2025 or so
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
Viva Miriya posted:Wait I thought you were globby whose that other guy who posts like you? brutal
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
1001 Arabian dicks posted:i 'got into' pl on my merit as a poster Viva Miriya posted:I got into PL just on the basis of my charming personality. See you all act like it's jokes but you have that insufferable chill-good-dude-bro thing where it's all high-fives and fist-pounds and all the doors just fly open. Pooki has it too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
if you imagine eve as a gym gsf is that weird insular group where the "leaders" are trying to rub up against women, and PL are a bunch of alpha ripped dudes doing lots of flexing and rear end-slapping
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:10
|
|
|
Viva Miriya posted:We're in the same corp but we're not of the same mind when it comes to opinions and posting in this thread. I think you are a loving idiot because of the way you act here. I think you're barely above a random commentator in an /r/EVE thread with how you articulate your poo poo. Mainly its whitenoise bullshit and its irritating to read. gently caress you Ordo Garr.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Landsknecht posted:if you imagine eve as a gym gsf is that weird insular group where the "leaders" are trying to rub up against women, and PL are a bunch of alpha ripped dudes doing lots of flexing and rear end-slapping  Viva Miriya posted:Wait I thought you were globby whose that other guy who posts like you? friend please 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
Rhymenoserous posted:TBH most of my concerns were indirectly addressed through a couple of threads on goonfleet.com, a lot of what I thought was confirmed and responsibility taken. There's really no need to shake trees past that except to be angry and bitter. I still don't even remember what the hell you guys are talking about. I poo poo on directors for stupid mistakes all the time.  I don't know what Dunfunny was referring to anyway.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Where is notable Israd goodposter Youtuber?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:35
|
|
|
Zephyrine posted:Where is notable Israd goodposter Youtuber? trying to build an ISRAD org chart? not falling for this again
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 01:19 |
|
|
Landsknecht posted:trying to build an ISRAD org chart? not falling for this again I have deadtears chart anyway. He's very thorough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 21:42
|
|