|
Data Graham posted:Anything that thinks logically can be fooled by something else that thinks at least as logically as it does. The easiest way to fool a completely logical robot is to feed it with the same stimulus sequence over and over again so it gets locked in a loop. This was best demonstrated by the famous Herring Sandwich experiments conducted millennia ago at MISPWOSO (the MaxiMegalon Institute of Slowly and Painfully Working Out the Surprisingly Obvious).  Fits perfectly.
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 22:03 |
|
|
china bot posted:would 
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
dadgummit
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
china bot posted:dadgummit Im going to revoke your internet license for flagrant disregard of internet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2017 21:56
|
|
|
Sloober posted:Im going to revoke your internet license for flagrant disregard of internet. my internet license was forged anyway, i'm an intergrant
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/tigerwang/status/832298110151823360
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Seriously, how can anyone (regardless of politics) look at the just bat poo poo hilarious and insane things that have happened in just a few weeks of this presidency and think for one second that America didn't make the best choice? Its incredible. It's like the rantings of a madman in the 80's! Russia is even involved!
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Because some of us don't want to die in nuclear hellfire?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
I know you're being hyperbolic, but I've encountered people that actually think that. Like Trump is more likely to launch nukes than Kennedy or Reagan were.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 00:57
|
|
|
Bill also did better. Both times. Bush 1 is the winner of this stupid contest though. 426-111. So I guess your election doesn't predict how good a president you will be/likeliness of re-election?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:16
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Because some of us don't want to die in nuclear hellfire? I'm okay with it. I just hope they hit somewhere close by because I'd rather it be fast than suffer the painful lovely radiation poisoning.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
The Juice is loose!
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:32
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:I know you're being hyperbolic, but I've encountered people that actually think that. Like Trump is more likely to launch nukes than Kennedy or Reagan were. To be fair, Trump is a figurative child who absolutely cannot handle any criticism whatsoever without going on a tirade.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
Nuebot posted:I'm okay with it. I just hope they hit somewhere close by because I'd rather it be fast than suffer the painful lovely radiation poisoning. just move to a large urban area they arent going to nuke a rural area. unless we build silos under corn fields https://thinkprogress.org/9-terrifying-things-donald-trump-has-publicly-said-about-nuclear-weapons-99f6290bc32a poo poo like this is why people think he is gonna nuke someone. if his tiny fingers can even press the button snergle has a new favorite as of 02:00 on Feb 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:46
|
|
|
Trump as a person is more likely to launch nukes than any previous president. Luckily, he’s buddies with Russia so there are no viable partners to engage in MAD.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:47
|
|
|
snergle posted:unless we build silos under corn fields Never happen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Trump as a person is more likely to launch nukes than any previous president. I honestly don't know about that. I think Kennedy was probably the most likely one to do it seeing as though he had his finger over the button more than once and only Russia backing down at the last second kept it from coming down. Trump may be an idiot, but I don't think he's petty enough to literally launch the world into a nuclear holocaust without nukes coming our way or at our allies first. Once N. Korea or Iran or Pakistan gets them or uses them...then maybe. Solice Kirsk has a new favorite as of 01:59 on Feb 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:I honestly don't know about that. I think Kennedy was probably the most likely one to do it seeing as though he had his finger over the button more than once and only Russia backing down at the last second kept it from coming down. Trump may be an idiot, but I don't think he's petty enough to literally launch the world into a nuclear holocaust without nukes coming our way or at our allies first. Once N. Korea or Iran or Pakistan gets them or uses them...then maybe. Do you think Trump would have handled the Cuban Missile Crisis any better, if he occupied the White House in 1962? If “no”: that’s my point.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
Trump's gonna nuke the liberal lyin media.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
Dan Carlin's latest episode was about the Cuban missile crisis. The whole time he talked about it, I was imagining Trump in Kennedy's position, and it was loving terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:19
|
|
|
Rough Lobster posted:Trump's gonna nuke the liberal lyin media. For quoting him
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Trump as a person is more likely to launch nukes than any previous president. Bad news about that, the Russians aren't doing MAD any more. Rather they favor "nuclear deescalation," which is basically if they start loosing a war, they'll make "limited" nuclear strikes in a attempt to force the other country to the bargaining table. http://thebulletin.org/why-russia-calls-limited-nuclear-strike-de-escalation
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Do you think Trump would have handled the Cuban Missile Crisis any better, if he occupied the White House in 1962? Khrushchev was the one that handled it correctly. He agreed to a public show of backing down to secretly move the entire world back from the edge. At least as far as I understand it. Maybe a history goon can enlighten us? edit: oh dope posted:Dan Carlin's latest episode was about the Cuban missile crisis. The whole time he talked about it, I was imagining Trump in Kennedy's position, and it was loving terrifying. Well never mind! I'll just listen to this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
C.M. Kruger posted:Bad news about that, the Russians aren't doing MAD any more. Rather they favor "nuclear deescalation," which is basically if they start loosing a war, they'll make "limited" nuclear strikes in a attempt to force the other country to the bargaining table. Well if there's no more threat of MAD, then there's nothing at all to discourage Trump from lobbing a couple nukes when he gets the chance. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:39
|
|
|
(CNN)Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward has turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser, sources told CNN Thursday. A friend of Harward's said he was reluctant to take the job because the White House seems so chaotic. Harward called the offer a "s*** sandwich," the friend said. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/16/politics/harward-says-no-to-national-security-adviser-role/index.html To clarify: this is not an Onion article.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
But Trump has such a comprehensive grasp of the science and political ramifications of nuclear power and weapons! https://twitter.com/readerer/status/832303185826033664 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Khrushchev was the one that handled it correctly. He agreed to a public show of backing down to secretly move the entire world back from the edge. At least as far as I understand it. Maybe a history goon can enlighten us? From what I learned from Hardcore History, Khrushchev started building secret nuclear missile sites in Cuba without support from his government because the USSR was worried about US missile sites in nearby NATO countries. Cuba also wanted the nukes because gently caress the US, let's blow them up. Khrushchev brought the world to the brink of nuclear war, and then Kennedy had to very carefully convince him to stop doing that by putting a naval blockade on Cuba once he found out what was going on. To his credit, Khrushchev stood down when he saw the jig was up. It's waaaaay more complicated than that of course, so do yourself a favor and check out the latest Hardcore History.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Mr Havafap posted:(CNN)Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward has turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser, sources told CNN Thursday. You can't print that! Where did they print that?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec4jGEgzkJs 33 seconds
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 02:45
|
|
|
he Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that a florist who refused to provide services for a same-sex wedding broke the state’s anti-discrimination law, even though she claimed doing so would violate her religious beliefs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:13
|
|
|
C.M. Kruger posted:Bad news about that, the Russians aren't doing MAD any more. Rather they favor "nuclear deescalation," which is basically if they start loosing a war, they'll make "limited" nuclear strikes in a attempt to force the other country to the bargaining table. I experience schadenfreude every time someone confuses "loose" and "lose."
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ohVFVXwN4M
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
oh dope posted:From what I learned from Hardcore History, Khrushchev started building secret nuclear missile sites in Cuba without support from his government because the USSR was worried about US missile sites in nearby NATO countries. Cuba also wanted the nukes because gently caress the US, let's blow them up. Kennedy started it by flexing nuts and putting nukes in Turkey which was really threatening to the USSR.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:26
|
|
|
oh dope posted:From what I learned from Hardcore History, Khrushchev started building secret nuclear missile sites in Cuba without support from his government because the USSR was worried about US missile sites in nearby NATO countries. Cuba also wanted the nukes because gently caress the US, let's blow them up. And, I believe it was a young John McCain who saw the satellite/spy plane photos of the missiles on the barges and forced his superiors to recognise what was going on. If he hadn't pushed the issue, the US wouldn't have known about them until they were all in place and that's a scary loving thought.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:42
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Khrushchev was the one that handled it correctly. He agreed to a public show of backing down to secretly move the entire world back from the edge. At least as far as I understand it. Maybe a history goon can enlighten us? I got u fam: After the end of World War II, the world was split into two -- East and West. This marked the beginning of the era called the Cold War. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmtvTJSygcY&t=390s edit: video is timestamped to start at the relevant bit. Takes No Damage has a new favorite as of 04:35 on Feb 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Khrushchev was the one that handled it correctly. He agreed to a public show of backing down to secretly move the entire world back from the edge. At least as far as I understand it. Maybe a history goon can enlighten us? From 1992-2011 or so I'd wondered why the USSR had to back down over Cuba (and not the US over Germany/Turkey), until finding out that the US agreed to also remove theirs and just not admit it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 03:57
|
|
|
syscall girl posted:Kennedy started it by flexing nuts and putting nukes in Turkey which was really threatening to the USSR. And Italy. And tried to invade Cuba.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
C.M. Kruger posted:Bad news about that, the Russians aren't doing MAD any more. Rather they favor "nuclear deescalation," which is basically if they start loosing a war, they'll make "limited" nuclear strikes in a attempt to force the other country to the bargaining table. thats loving terrifying because they have been annexy with the former sattelites. They could easily end up in a losing war. If I was the us president I would make my position if anyone uses nukes i'm nuking you. To try to scare people into not using theirs. Although truth be told when it came time I would probably not press the button even they nuked us at least some of humanity lives.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 22:03 |
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2017 04:22
|
|
