|
you should have one cat, and one pro cat
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:09 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 02:47 |
|
rear end Catchcum posted:The air doesn't make sense now since laptops are so thin. Two lines for all: EDIT - In case it's not clear, I'm agreeing. Keep the lines ruthlessly simple. Avoid the 90s proliferation. Mandals fucked around with this message at 18:16 on Nov 4, 2016 |
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:10 |
|
People are discussing Mac Hardware in the Mac Hardware thread, ye gads. It doesn't need to be a fanboy circlejerk. It's 10x more interesting to lurk than when it is sleeve-chat or 'my experience at the Fruit Stand'-chat
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:12 |
|
Have you tried: phone fruit
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:12 |
|
well why not posted:you should have one cat, and one pro cat i do, i have two cats. one can jump on the windowsill underneath the curtains to chill, the other one tries to jump through the curtain and bonks her stupid head and runs away. guess which one is the new rMBP?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:14 |
|
rear end Catchcum posted:The air doesn't make sense now since laptops are so thin. Two lines for all: It's really a 2.5 line thing. MB, MBP 13" & MBP 15" iPad reg and mini, iPad Pro SE, iPhone and iPhone Plus iMac, riMac 21" &riMAC 27" also apple tv, mac mini and mac "pro" Pivo posted:i do, i have two cats. one can jump on the windowsill underneath the curtains to chill, the other one tries to jump through the curtain and bonks her stupid head and runs away. guess which one is the new rMBP?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:17 |
|
Cingulate posted:You call it .5lb, I call it 25%.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:22 |
|
Fuckin' thinkpads weight more than a macbook pro and it costs NASA like $700 per pound to fire poo poo into space. edit: NASA should just use retina macbooks and save thousands per launch.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:28 |
|
Cingulate posted:But people want a Fatbook I don't really want it to be fat, I'm not asking for optical drives or anything and I'm begrudgingly ok with no user-serviceable RAM. But I'd be totally OK if my laptop is never thinner or lighter than my 2013 15" rMBP, especially if that means I stand to gain real battery life improvements as components get less and less power hungry, and battery tech gets (slightly) better. Maybe my perspective is skewed because I carried around this for 4 years of college, along with 20lb of textbooks in a backpack:
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:31 |
|
I love that you think the Mac mini and Mac Pro still exist in any other form but inventory.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:32 |
|
Linguica posted:Going from 3.5lb to 3lb is shaving off 14%, so I hope your mega-commute job doesn't require much math In case anyone missed it, "0.5" above is in pounds, "2" is kilograms. Also, his "I travel" argument is dumb. I literally travel every week (as in, fly to some random city and run around like a chicken with its head cut off) and I concur with what many other people have said - my 2015 rMBP is one of the lightest things I carry, and it's more than light enough.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:34 |
|
rear end Catchcum posted:I love that you think the Mac mini and Mac Pro still exist in any other form but inventory.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:35 |
|
Tim Cook probably uses an iPad Pro at his desk
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:35 |
|
Most backpacks sturdy and waterproof enough to carry something as precious as a laptop probably weigh a bit, too. I say this completely unironically: cingulate harden up and injure your back carrying that laptop
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:38 |
|
Linguica posted:Going from 3.5lb to 3lb is shaving off 14%, so I hope your mega-commute job doesn't require much math MrChupon posted:I don't really want it to be fat, I'm not asking for optical drives or anything and I'm begrudgingly ok with no user-serviceable RAM. But I'd be totally OK if my laptop is never thinner or lighter than my 2013 15" rMBP, especially if that means I stand to gain real battery life improvements a On the other hand, that kind of thinking stood in the way of making the MBPs as small as they are today. If in 10 years, Apple gets another significant reduction in footprint done, making current computers look like the Air makes your old monster look, that WILL be a noticeable difference. Fling your computer around like an iPad, like a sheet of paper - if you had that, you wouldn't want to give it up. well why not posted:Most backpacks sturdy and waterproof enough to carry something as precious as a laptop probably weigh a bit, too.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:45 |
|
I cried because I had a 3lb MacBook until I met someone who had a Dell Latitude. A bunch of guys at work got 13 inch rMBP's for development work and you'd think they had just lost their ball and chains the way they carry the new laptops around.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:47 |
|
well why not posted:Most backpacks sturdy and waterproof enough to carry something as precious as a laptop probably weigh a bit, too. My take: backpacks are better for carrying heavy things in comfort. Messenger bags are (typically) better at comfortably providing access to those things.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:54 |
|
Mandals posted:My take: backpacks are better for carrying heavy things in comfort. Messenger bags are (typically) better at comfortably providing access to those things.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 19:11 |
|
AlternateAccount posted:Doesn't stay connected. Constantly dropping devices. Just trying this now with my 12" rMB and nothing weird yet. The one hosed up thing is that the Apple USB-C cable that you'd use with the charger doesn't work with the dock. You need to use the included cable... USB-C is a loving mess.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 19:29 |
|
Apple cutting prices on USB-C, Thunderbolt 3 accessories until end of the year
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:43 |
|
Pretty wide definition of accessories, too. Over $300 off that 5k monitor -- not bad.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 21:11 |
|
Looks like the dongle hatred lobby has come through.. Apple USB-C to USB adapter: Before: $19.99 Now: $9 Apple USB-C Digital AV Multiport adapter: Before: $79 Now: $49 Apple USB-C to Lightning cable (1 m): Before $29 Now: $19
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 21:14 |
|
Krispy Kareem posted:I cried because I had a 3lb MacBook until I met someone who had a Dell Latitude. This is a really funny thing to hear since I just bought a Latitude E7270, which is a 15W Skylake model like the new 13" MBP, and it weighs 2.8 pounds. Might be that they had a much older model? Personally I think Apple sacrifices too much to make the drat things so thin. My Latitude is definitely a bit thicker than my Haswell 13" MBP, but in exchange I can easily pop the bottom off and swap out just about any component in the system with 5 minutes and a Phillips screwdriver. Can't be too much of a weight tradeoff there considering what it is. Eletriarnation fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Nov 4, 2016 |
# ? Nov 4, 2016 21:30 |
|
Binary Badger posted:Looks like the dongle hatred lobby has come through.. oops we marked up our dongles too high.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 22:33 |
|
The Apple apologists on the 9to5 mac articles about the thunderbolt debacle are primo entertainment.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 23:03 |
|
Anyone see this USB-C hub popup on The Verge? http://www.bourgedesign.com/ Looks promising
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 23:18 |
|
krooj posted:Anyone see this USB-C hub popup on The Verge? http://www.bourgedesign.com/ In my opinion, having a literal loving squid of cables on my desk would be the least desirable thing. There is no way to manage those cables splaying out in every direction aside from "lol guess these go wherever they want." That said, its cool looking, definitely wins on style points, and if you're only ever plugging one thing in at time, it can't be too bad to manage.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 23:47 |
|
quote:We recognize that many users, especially pros, rely on legacy connectors to get work done
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 00:16 |
|
So My 2015 MBP is having weird wi-fi issues. If I am on the forums, I will just randomly not be able to go to the next page. It's like the Wi-fi stopped working. If I turn it on and off, I can connect again, but it is annoying. Happens like once every 30 min. Anything I should be checking? This is my first Mac, so I am less good at problems saving then I used to be.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 00:53 |
|
Eletriarnation posted:This is a really funny thing to hear since I just bought a Latitude E7270, which is a 15W Skylake model like the new 13" MBP, and it weighs 2.8 pounds. Might be that they had a much older model? I don't know the whole Dell lineup, but Lattitudes have been sold forever and for most of that time they've been square bricks. The i5 model I use is probably 5 pounds. It's not even the weight that's a problem. It's the creaky plastic and substandard Windows implementation of sleep mode that means everyone carries their work laptops half open. No one carries MBP's that way.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 01:13 |
|
Snowmankilla posted:So My 2015 MBP is having weird wi-fi issues. If I am on the forums, I will just randomly not be able to go to the next page. It's like the Wi-fi stopped working. If I turn it on and off, I can connect again, but it is annoying. Happens like once every 30 min. Anything I should be checking? This is my first Mac, so I am less good at problems saving then I used to be. Run a "ping 8.8.8.8" and see what the response times look like
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 01:33 |
|
Yeah despite that apparent weight disadvantage, the plastic in a dell is going to weigh less than aluminum. I have an old style 13" RMBP and while it's a perfectly fine size I will say it is amazing to pick up a 12" MacBook and feel how thin and light it is. Makes the MBP feel like a brick, and I imagine the new revision will also feel nice on the move. I also have a 15" for work and that's definitely of a weight where I wouldn't mind lighter. At the same time it's a valid point that if you wanted a desktop replacement you're not going to care.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:05 |
|
Mac Hardware megathread - the next macbook pro will be awesome we promise
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:09 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Run a "ping 8.8.8.8" and see what the response times look like Allright. Here is a set of them: PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=43 time=33.771 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=36.300 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=43 time=34.710 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=43 time=36.338 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=43 time=37.037 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=43 time=35.662 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=43 time=35.548 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=7 ttl=43 time=40.018 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=8 ttl=43 time=56.391 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=9 ttl=43 time=35.579 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10 ttl=43 time=37.525 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=11 ttl=43 time=37.124 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=12 ttl=43 time=35.943 ms Don't know what any of that means
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:12 |
|
Snowmankilla posted:So My 2015 MBP is having weird wi-fi issues. If I am on the forums, I will just randomly not be able to go to the next page. It's like the Wi-fi stopped working. If I turn it on and off, I can connect again, but it is annoying. Happens like once every 30 min. Anything I should be checking? This is my first Mac, so I am less good at problems saving then I used to be. did you update to sierra from el capitan? may need to clear out your wifi settings.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:17 |
|
Strong Sauce posted:did you update to sierra from el capitan? may need to clear out your wifi settings. Yes I did. And I also do not know how to do that. Also going from 20 years of PC to Mac has me feeling dumb as poo poo.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:23 |
|
Went to the Fruit Stand in Grand Central just a few hours ago, grabbed the two cheapest dongles that I know I'd eventually use, went to pay for it, and was immediately cockblocked by the Apple person acting as cashier. Told her the USB-C to USB cable was only $9 instead of $19. She didn't believe me, so I brought up the Apple website on a new 13-inch MacBook Pro (seems they don't have any new 15-inch rMBPs, just the two-port USB-C 13-inchers.) She was dumbfounded and said she had to check with her manager. Sure enough her manager confirmed the prices, and then the cable scanned in at a measly $9.00. Evidently they had only learned about it two hours ago, not long enough to call a meeting and tell everybody about the new prices. They congratulated me on being the first So yay, paid only $41 for a pair of cables that was $70 yesterday (got the USB-C to USB and the Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter.)
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:25 |
|
Snowmankilla posted:Yes I did. And I also do not know how to do that. Also going from 20 years of PC to Mac has me feeling dumb as poo poo. A bit long of a guide to "clear out" the wifi. I heard this was a common issue but my laptop (late 2013) had no issues updating to Sierra. http://osxdaily.com/2016/09/22/fix-wi-fi-problems-macos-sierra/
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:30 |
|
Oh yeah, quick trip report on the new 13-inch rMBP.. they only had the entry model (8 GB) but it was snappier than the Late 2015 version. Didn't give a poo poo about the keys. Screen is incredibly sharp and on some websites 'felt' likee it was sharper. Booting to the desktop fairly quick. In general practice felt like a snappier, brighter rMBP than the 2015s which they were easily compared to because they still had more of those on demo than the new models.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:34 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 02:47 |
|
Strong Sauce posted:A bit long of a guide to "clear out" the wifi. I heard this was a common issue but my laptop (late 2013) had no issues updating to Sierra. http://osxdaily.com/2016/09/22/fix-wi-fi-problems-macos-sierra/ quote:Avoid 5 GHz G and B networks if possible, aim to join a 2.4 GHz network N if one is available for faster speeds
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 02:42 |