|
Can't wait for the Musk fanbois to step up to the plate to defend that, whatever the gently caress that is supposed to be.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 05:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 04:06 |
|
ThanosWasRight posted:So you're worried about more people getting access to legal marijuana? Duder, I want full and total legalization; you're getting upset about the wrong thing. Arizona was whining about how much money they were spending on IDs and switched to a more difficult method for patients. The fact a PDF can be easily spoofed will lead to people getting denied, not easier access. Reminder this is the same state whose government sold its offices, then rented them back.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 05:42 |
|
paperwind posted:Can't wait for the Musk fanbois to step up to the plate to defend that, whatever the gently caress that is supposed to be. A pickup truck, supposedly
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 05:42 |
|
at least the wheels are still circles and not other shapes on constant width. I bet if Musk heard of those the car would be even more stupid.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 05:47 |
|
So he made a truck from Total Recall? Does Elon have a half brother we should know about that was allowed to design it?
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 05:53 |
|
Wow. I'm pretty sure that the Truckla that robot Youtuber Simone Giertz made by hacking at a Tesla with an angle grinder looks better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R35gWBtLCYg Parakeet vs. Phone fucked around with this message at 06:36 on Nov 22, 2019 |
# ? Nov 22, 2019 06:24 |
|
Window smashing with sound. https://twitter.com/engadget/status/1197752957250523136 paperwind posted:Can't wait for the Musk fanbois to step up to the plate to defend that, whatever the gently caress that is supposed to be. "It didn't go through!"
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 06:53 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7atGkba-Z8
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:01 |
|
Lmao N64 games had better looking cars than that
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:16 |
|
Oh no, I didn't realized the entire car was supposed to be indestructible. So how many years will it take for Musk to "invent" the crumple zone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9ML4GA47Rg&t=122s
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:22 |
|
aware of dog posted:Lmao N64 games had better looking cars than that https://twitter.com/MadeByTim/status/1197741597691195393
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:24 |
|
"I wish video game graphics looked like real life!" :monkey's paw curls:
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:27 |
|
Doggles posted:
$40k rwd, $50k 2 motor, awd, $70k 3 motor, awd with 500+ mi range and 0-60 in 2.6s In-fiction range of the Warthog, a 12L, hydrogen powered IC engine: 490 miles. Mister Facetious fucked around with this message at 07:50 on Nov 22, 2019 |
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:31 |
|
ThanosWasRight posted:So you're worried about more people getting access to legal marijuana? Its a bad thing for dispensaries and distributors as they were comitting a crime by selling a person weed if they werent medically licensed to consume it. poo poo was real yo
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 07:58 |
|
https://twitter.com/UguuUguu/status/1197742372991492096
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 08:06 |
|
Nice companion vehicle to a Delorean in some collector's garage in 20 years
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 09:30 |
|
Great design. You’d have to be 12 feet tall to grab anything out of the truck bed.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 10:53 |
|
Doggles posted:Oh no, I didn't realized the entire car was supposed to be indestructible. So how many years will it take for Musk to "invent" the crumple zone? Yeah. Making a stiff, rigid car without crumple zones is a loving terrible idea. Then again I would not be surprised if Elon Musk isn't aware of the effect of sudden deceleration on your internal organs.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 12:49 |
|
I like weird angular designs but holy poo poo lmao. This is a rough sketch brought all the way to production.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 12:58 |
|
When you realize you forgot to do your homework and have to half-rear end it at the last minute on the school bus. That’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen. It’s actually less desirable than if the Homer were made in real life.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 13:44 |
|
It was a great night for the Pontiac Aztek.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 14:30 |
|
luxury handset posted:gently caress, while i was looking at the livestream video it was closed and made private Now you are trapped, forever screaming, in the broken glass window of the CyberTruck.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 14:52 |
|
Are we 100% certain that this is not a bizarre, viral advertisement for a new cyberpunk game or movie? If someone had pulled out a pistol, shot the car, and taken out themselves or a bystander with the ricochet, this would fit perfectly in the television segments of the first Robocop. Every single thing about it screams 90s cyberpunk. The neon graffiti CYBERTRUCK logo, the pyrotechnics, the PS1 graphics looking vehicle, the lasers, the red hologram-looking performance specs. What is going on?
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 14:55 |
|
Arbetor posted:Are we 100% certain that this is not a bizarre, viral advertisement for a new cyberpunk game or movie? If someone had pulled out a pistol, shot the car, and taken out themselves or a bystander with the ricochet, this would fit perfectly in the television segments of the first Robocop. The 6000 SUX looks better than this monstrosity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkeJbiqsQP8
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:01 |
|
That CYBERTRUCK logo has to be the dumbest thing in the history of advertisement. Cherry on top I found out about the CYBERTRUCK news from slickdeals hot deals forum.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:14 |
|
What happens when you only hire yes-men, and no one wants to be fired for questioning a despot.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:21 |
|
Yea...I think Elon was too heavily into the design of this thing. It's probably not going to sell very well. While I applaud the, um...boldness of going with such an angular design, it clearly looks unfinished. Design wise it feels like they tried to go with the sleek, future-perfect featureless chassis and simple overall forms. You can do this with cars, like the Honda e: or Marc Newson's car: ...but with both of these the forms are pleasing and look finished. I think it's probably due to the curvy nature of these designs. In contrast, the Cybertruck (cybertrk? cybertrukk? the text behind the thing is unreadable) has a ton of angular forms so that while it tries to have that same super-simplistic design, the angles make it look like a kid's drawing - unfinished, with a vague concept but without the thought necessary to make it a succesful design. This isn't even saying that adding adornment to the body panels would improve things - because I don't think it would, save for some intakes. The entire silhouette just feels wrong. I think it's most heinous part is the wheel wells. The trapezoid look just...doesn't fit with the round wheels. I think the design could honestly be improved by 25% if they just rounded those off. Right now you have two very separate shapes clashing (trapezoid and circle) and it feels really disjointed, like someone didn't know how to draw a wheel well so they just kind of cut out a chunk. This could be massaged with some curves but again, the whole design feels half baked. From the side the profile and lines look exciting. The front half looks pretty cool, especially since it's a straight shot from the roof peak to the bumper since there's no engine - that's cool and shows this is an electric vehicle. But everything else just feels unfinished. That being said, we will probably see some changes before production. I noticed the truck didn't have mirrors, so I don't think it's road legal. I've heard someone mention cameras but I'm not sure if there's a legal framework for that yet. Just overall a disappointing design and presentation. EDIT: Someone on Reddit made this GIF and it helps a lot to illustrate my point; It's not about all the angles - it's about the lack of attention to the small details that makes this feel awkward. UnknownTarget fucked around with this message at 15:32 on Nov 22, 2019 |
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:23 |
|
It's the RED Hydrogen phone of cars.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:41 |
|
I think actually eliminating the external wheel wells and just having the bottom of the car continue along directly would have fixed that design and been in keeping with the cyber punk thing. Being Tesla they could happily have included some ridiculously, overly engineered motorised sliding door panel to permit access to the wheels. Wouldn't have fixed the look but it might have felt a little more coherent.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:43 |
|
I've seen crazier looking concept cars, but yeah... needs a little work. Honestly I don't absolutely hate the angular stuff but that's not to say it's not ridiculous.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:48 |
|
MrNemo posted:I think actually eliminating the external wheel wells and just having the bottom of the car continue along directly would have fixed that design and been in keeping with the cyber punk thing. Being Tesla they could happily have included some ridiculously, overly engineered motorised sliding door panel to permit access to the wheels. Wouldn't have fixed the look but it might have felt a little more coherent. I think it'd be cool if they went more for an ATV look and completely exposed the wheels and hardware, pulling the fenders behind the wheels and turning the overall shape into a sort of pod look. EDIT: Someone on Reddit said this and I feel it as well; this isn't a pickup designed by or for someone who likes pickups. "Nobody is rolling up to a jobsite in this thing any time soon." - absolutely agree with this. Elon is obviously not a pickup guy, and it seems like he's the one that really pushed this design. He knows that people wouldn't like this with a car, that's why the Tesla looks relatively normal. Why did they go all out on this weird pickup design? Because he has no understanding of the market. UnknownTarget fucked around with this message at 15:56 on Nov 22, 2019 |
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:50 |
|
Also important question if anyone has its specs: Is there a built-in Juicero?
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 15:57 |
|
Looks like the NTSB is gonna help Uber throw the driver under the bus.quote:Last year, the NTSB's preliminary report found that the vehicle hadn't applied its brakes, that the Volvo's factory-installed crash avoidance system had been disconnected, and that while the Uber vehicle's autonomous system detected Herzberg before impact, the vehicle relied entirely on Vasquez to take emergency action.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 16:16 |
|
ryonguy posted:Looks like the NTSB is gonna help Uber throw the driver under the bus. yeah i think that's actually fairly reasonable. uber, unlike tesla, does not pretend their self-driving cars are ready for consumer use and they are still in development. as a result, the human driver is being paid to monitor the car and interrupt it doing dangerous things. if the human driver is watching tv instead, that means the human driver decided to watch tv instead of perform their safety role. but that said, this is also a design flaw in that (a) obviously the car shouldn't be hitting people in the first place; but (b) less obviously, a safety system designed around a human paying attention for very long stretches of nothingness for the rare instances where they need to rapidly recognize the danger is a bad safety system. it's why tesla's autopilot is an active safety hazard. the reason that it's also on the driver as opposed to just a "look, this is asking too much of people" is that it's one thing to be bored and inattentive. it's another thing to actually be watching tv.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 16:26 |
|
the NTSB report is pretty harsh on uber as well for failing to have oversight which would have not permitted the driver to have been distracted in the first place. like having two people in the car to keep each other accountablequote:The investigation identified the following safety issues: my read on the report is like "yeah the driver was not paying attention and should have been, and the jaywalker should have been paying more attention, but seriously yall these safety protocols are completely inadequate"
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 16:32 |
|
Yeah, don't give Uber too much credit, their system was absolutely not ready for live road testing yet they put it out there anyways. Something like an order of magnitude worse in terms of operator intervention requiring occurrences than other groups?
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 16:32 |
|
Just imagine how much black leather gears and shades you have to buy to be seen in your cybertruck.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 17:08 |
|
PhazonLink posted:at least the wheels are still circles and not other shapes on constant width. I bet if Musk heard of those the car would be even more stupid. He could do one of the cool flower-petal shapes that would have multiple surfaces to spring leaks on!
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 17:09 |
|
I unironically love the MuskyTruck.
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 18:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 04:06 |
|
The dumb font makes it look like CYBERTRVKK
|
# ? Nov 22, 2019 19:57 |