|
BJPaskoff posted:I know! I want to make a Commander deck where both of them start in the command zone. A Jeskai build of the deck would be more fun than mono-white. Yes I know if I'm breaking one rule I might as well break the color identity rule, but have you considered this?: I'm not actually building this Commander deck. I literally only play esper prison decks in commander to gently caress with people, I actually just want less overly powerful monowhite cards in standard because we've been in GWx midrange hell since RTR rotated Assuming you were being sarcastic. This is...interesting. I could see it being either completely meaningless or completely awesome depending on whether there's a good Ux tempo deck
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
if this meld card breaks edh players' and/or the rules committe's minds in half it will be the best thing R&D has ever done
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
Slightly worse Remand?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
Double post.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
I reread the concepts e'mrakul embodies, and of note in this block are some intersting lines: Terror of being alone, emotional and physical distance, chill of the void, desolation. The thing is, everyone is becoming part of e'mrakul. E'mrakul is associted with lonliness because everyone under her influence becomes desperate to be part of a close community, like a cult. Under her influence, people are forced to become closer than ever and emotionally dependant on each other. E'mrakul makes people so terrified of being alone and isolated that they willingly will become one with the eldrazi, and become her drones.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
e'mrakul makes you type like this so you want to punch that writer'mrakul.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Slightly worse Remand? you mean significantly worse, right
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
Slightly worse divination template: quote:2U
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
that's neat, i guess. too bad it doesn't draw a card but then it would be a better remand sooooo
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
Elyv posted:you mean significantly worse, right It's definitely worse but it still has some upside beyond remand as it can also bounce a creature.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Flashback spells still remain in exile when countered with this spell, correct?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:It's definitely worse but it still has some upside beyond remand as it can also bounce a creature. Yes, that is a thing it can do, I'm glad to know you can read it still puts you down a card and that makes it significantly worse than remand
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Zoness posted:Slightly worse divination template: This isn't a good analogy. There are sometimes where remanding a spell without drawing a card is really good. Draw a card for 3 is always unplayable.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:Flashback spells still remain in exile when countered with this spell, correct? MTG Salvation posted:702.33. Flashback
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
Emrakul is David cross from that Futurama movie.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Emrakul is David cross from that Futurama movie. Shklee would agree with you.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
This is cool
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
I think it's cool that they're now prepared to use the "return spell to hand" wording. Until Brutal Expulsion and this I believe it only appeared on Venser in TSP.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
Does the difference in templating between this spell and Remand result in any meaningful gameplay difference (only one counters)? Other than stuff like Summoning Trap
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
This can stop Abrupt Decay, at least temporarily.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:Does the difference in templating between this spell and Remand result in any meaningful gameplay difference (only one counters)? Other than stuff like Summoning Trap Some things can't be countered
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
Also delays the big E, although not very well if they have the lands to cast it again.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Also delays the big E, although not very well if they have the lands to cast it again. Not very well indeed; Emrakul has protection from instants.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
the Orb of Zot posted:Not very well indeed; Emrakul has protection from instants. Smdh
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
the Orb of Zot posted:Not very well indeed; Emrakul has protection from instants. That's not how protection works.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
you can also use it to return your own spell to your hand if the opponent shows a combat trick or something
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
dragon enthusiast posted:you can also use it to return your own spell to your hand if the opponent shows a combat trick or something remanding your own spell in response to remand is the best, this is a good imitation of that, kinda
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
You guys are missing the best part of Unsubstantiate. The flavor text.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:You guys are missing the best part of Unsubstantiate. I hope this means that Jace has literally been removed from existence and is gone forever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:You guys are missing the best part of Unsubstantiate. The flavour text is a reprint.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:I hope this means that Jace has literally been removed from existence and is gone forever. Liliana is loving with him because literally anytime the plot brings then together Jace always manages to find a way to avoid her. Especially when they were dating. Edit: Basically Entropic posted:The flavour text is a reprint.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Liliana is loving with him because literally anytime the plot brings then together Jace always manages to find a way to avoid her. still hoping that jace has been annihilated.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:37
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:still hoping that jace has been annihilated. You know WotC thinks the community as a whole definitely likes Jace so much when in fact it's just a fiction they've worked up.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
Return Decay to your hand, bash in with my 14/14 unblockable Knight In conclusion I want this new card to work with Knightfall or Grixis Delver.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:You know WotC thinks the community as a whole definitely likes Jace so much when in fact it's just a fiction they've worked up. one of many things more obnoxious than Jace: protagonist extraordinaire is people pretending that no one likes him when the truth is that they're in the minority in disliking him
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
GeneX posted:one of many things more obnoxious than Jace: protagonist extraordinaire is people pretending that no one likes him when the truth is that they're in the minority in disliking him I really could give less of a gently caress about the whole thing. I justwant mono blue walkers that aren't Jace
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
idk about you but i want more moonwalkers
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
So Maro as Vince McMahon and Jace as Roman Reigns, pushed against the fans wishes, is the greatest tale.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
I mostly just miss venser good thing we just got his effect minus the 2/2 in a new card!
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
this thing counters uncounterable spells, at least for a turn (except in rare cases like snapcaster decay in sultai)
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 02:04
|
|
