|
WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:loving lol so do I pay and get a bigger character limit? Or maybe a red check mark instead of a blue one? The suggestion is that verified users with x thousand or more followers will have to pay $y/month for z features. What the features are though, who knows. It's not going to be targeted at regular users though, it's about influencers/celebrities/companies/people who generate significant revenue from the platform.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:07 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 23:11 |
|
ketchup vs catsup posted:Facebook is far worse for humanity. If hell exists, which it does not, it has a special wing for Facebook employees. I was having a bad day and wound up rage quitting a networking slack when one of the Facebook employees complained that other people kept saying Facebook was bad and one of the more talkative people in the community said that’s unfair to him and we’d accept people from We Kick Puppies Co in the community provided they follow the code of conduct.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:10 |
|
aware of dog posted:Who on gods green earth would pay for Twitter Blue checks would pay for twitter.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:12 |
|
I feel like adding patreon-like features to twitter would actually be a slam dunk as far as revenue goes
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:20 |
|
Trevor Hale posted:I was having a bad day and wound up rage quitting a networking slack when one of the Facebook employees complained that other people kept saying Facebook was bad and one of the more talkative people in the community said that’s unfair to him and we’d accept people from We Kick Puppies Co in the community provided they follow the code of conduct. Maybe it’s a bit early in the day for me but I am genuinely having trouble parsing your anecdote. Are you...agreeing with me?
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:20 |
|
Does Jack Dorsey pay to look like a hobo?
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:25 |
|
being a failperson billionaire makes you scratch and invent anything to justify why your a trillionaire instead of either random luck or being born rich.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:32 |
|
twitter jack leans hard into secular woo, with things like "my continual fasting is actually a spiritually-based health practice and not at all cover for anorexia" guys like this love the shabby-chic minimalist aesthetic. i think it's a way to deal with the lingering guilt of being massively wealthy for no reason and being unable to just give your money away because it turns out you care more about greed than any of the secular woo stuff
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:49 |
|
aware of dog posted:https://twitter.com/elanazak/status/1286311716192751616?s=21 lol the “this website is free” remarks got to him
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:53 |
|
ketchup vs catsup posted:Maybe it’s a bit early in the day for me but I am genuinely having trouble parsing your anecdote. Are you...agreeing with me? Yes, sorry. I don’t know why that came out so twisty. Trevor Hale fucked around with this message at 20:30 on Jul 23, 2020 |
# ? Jul 23, 2020 19:09 |
|
luxury handset posted:twitter jack leans hard into secular woo, with things like "my continual fasting is actually a spiritually-based health practice and not at all cover for anorexia" It's amusing to talk to people who think Jack is this really deep and spiritual guy. He definitely has a fandom that I don't understand
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 19:56 |
|
blunt posted:The suggestion is that verified users with x thousand or more followers will have to pay $y/month for z features. Yeah, along with a Patreon/OnlyFans style model as has been suggested. They'll probably give paid users the option to edit tweets and stuff like that.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 23:59 |
|
Senor Tron posted:They'll probably give paid users the option to edit tweets smh another huge transfer of public funds into private hands
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 00:23 |
|
Senor Tron posted:They'll probably give paid users the option to edit tweets and stuff like that. Maybe they could make you pay every time you delete a tweet?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 00:57 |
|
if they really want to make money they should at least make each account have a one time 10$ fee on creation.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 02:23 |
|
PhazonLink posted:if they really want to make money they should at least make each account have a one time 10$ fee on creation. ? That's crazy talk it'll never work.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 03:48 |
|
tbh I just want to see if the russian gov would foot the bill for a thousands, maybe milllion something troll farm's account creation.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 04:32 |
|
ketchup vs catsup posted:Facebook is far worse for humanity. If hell exists, which it does not, it has a special wing for Facebook employees. Nah twitter is worse. Facebook theoretically has a purpose: connecting your lived experience with the lives of other people through photos, events, birthdays, etc. Zuck has perverted and destroyed that purpose in order to make himself a fuckton of money, but an open source/"public option" version could still be useful. This is not the case with twitter. Character limits, the lovely format, and all sorts of human limitations mean that no version of what twitter is will ever be good or useful. On top of that, it got Trump elected.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 06:03 |
|
NaanViolence posted:Nah twitter is worse. facebook's original purpose was so zuck could get pics of hot girls to stare at
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 06:20 |
|
Force all tweets to use at least one donation hashtag and all white people have to use one which auto donates $5 to whichever cause if they want to create useless dialogue instead of actually helping.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 06:45 |
|
All online platforms for social communication have some pretty fundamental flaws, including the one we're on. You're talking to a collection of pixels on a computer screen instead of a human being that could alternatively cry in your face or smack you in the mouth. Body language and intonation have a major role in face-to-face communication which is lost in text. To get along in life we all construct fake personas of ourselves with strangers, and it's exacerbated with an online profile and a check mark and an audience of thousands. Alternatively, having the history of your conversations and posts saved forever means it's harder to be allowed to move on from your mistakes. It's easier to ignore people over the slightest disagreement - avoiding difficult conversations which can help both of you grow as people - and create echo chambers. I could go on really. The internet has a great capacity to allow us to learn, grow ourselves, and connect with people across the world but that potential is usually squandered. I think online communication will always be flawed and inferior to face-to-face communication, I say while I type this on a forum. It should also be remembered that the internet was originally made to be a giant encyclopedia. Would you look for friendship in a dictionary? America Inc. fucked around with this message at 09:11 on Jul 24, 2020 |
# ? Jul 24, 2020 09:05 |
|
The Internet was made to facilitate the military–industrial complex.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 09:56 |
|
Desperately hoping that this indicates Twitter has money problems and will die soon
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 10:19 |
|
Platystemon posted:The Internet was made to facilitate the military–industrial complex. Sorry about that, I should make a distinction between the Internet - the network of machines connected by the TCP/IP protocol suite - and the World Wide Web. quote:The Web was originally conceived and developed to meet the demand for automated information-sharing between scientists in universities and institutes around the world. https://home.cern/science/computing...%20the%20world. America Inc. fucked around with this message at 11:25 on Jul 24, 2020 |
# ? Jul 24, 2020 11:21 |
|
NaanViolence posted:Nah twitter is worse. Lol Zuckerberg perveted and corrupted the innocent and pure Facebook, originally created so he could stalk women.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 14:06 |
|
Last Chance posted:Lol Zuckerberg perveted and corrupted the innocent and pure Facebook, originally created so he could stalk women. it was originally made because someone else had the basic idea and hired him to make it, and he figured better to just make it for himself
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 15:20 |
|
ketchup vs catsup posted:Facebook is far worse for humanity. If hell exists, which it does not, it has a special wing for Facebook employees. Where have you been? Hell exists; we're in it right now.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 18:12 |
|
OJ MIST 2 THE DICK posted:facebook's original purpose was so zuck could get pics of hot girls to stare at No doubt. That's why I said theoretically. Facebook's purpose doesn't have to be Zuck's original idea of its purpose. There is a use case for a publicly-owned or open source version of something that resembles facebook that isn't toxic to humanity. The same cannot be said of twitter.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 00:23 |
|
NaanViolence posted:Nah twitter is worse. Counterpoint, Twitter is how all of the recent color revolutions have organized themselves and Facebook is where boomer cops "like" All Lives Splatter memes
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 00:39 |
|
The Oldest Man posted:Counterpoint, Twitter is how all of the recent color revolutions have organized themselves and Facebook is where boomer cops "like" All Lives Splatter memes None of this comes even close to outweighing the evil twitter has done by enabling Trump and his ilk.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 00:48 |
|
i dunno, like we're bias because we're still posting on a dead format, like humans in general just like/want whatever it is that social media like blogs offer. like even the cesspool that was the aol chatroom in the form of discord/ various apps seems to be more popular.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 00:53 |
|
Clearly we all need to go back to IRC, it is the Pure and One true way
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 02:06 |
|
NaanViolence posted:On top of that, it got Trump elected. Lol no it didn't. The media did by covering anything and everything he did because he was good for ratings. quote:Trump received more extensive media coverage than Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders combined 73% of Americans see his tweets not through twitter, or reposted on Facebook, or any other online platform. But TV. He could have been posting on loving MySpace and the effect would have been the same. Mega Comrade fucked around with this message at 10:13 on Jul 25, 2020 |
# ? Jul 25, 2020 10:08 |
|
Twitter is not the only thing that got him elected, sure. They were vile enough, however, to allow his hatred to find a home on their platform so they're the ones who enabled him and enjoyed the profits from the MSM covering his tweets all the time. History happened the way it did. It wasn't myspace that enabled him.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 16:51 |
|
NaanViolence posted:There is a use case for a publicly-owned or open source version of something that resembles facebook that isn't toxic to humanity. The same cannot be said of twitter.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 18:52 |
|
Sure but your argument seems to be twitter is more evil because of it. Trump being elected was bad but Facebook has been vastly more influential in recruitment for hate groups, influencing various elections and spreading conspiracy theories. Oh and being directly involved in a literal loving genocide. Twitter isn't a good company. The world would be a better place without it likely but its actual impact isn't as great as people think, Facebook is in a whole other league of its own in terms of damage done to society.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 19:13 |
|
Cicero posted:I feel like a public version of Facebook or Twitter would be impossible, at least in the US, because of free speech. The first amendment would mean that you have would have to allow even more hate speech than FB or Twitter currently tolerate, just like how the KKK is legally allowed to publicly march. You could host it in a country with more sensible hate speech laws.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2020 19:15 |
|
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1286866843307737088
|
# ? Jul 26, 2020 02:20 |
|
Eventually when you have billions of dollars, do you just spontaneously decide to do all of the possible drugs and lose your mind or what?
|
# ? Jul 26, 2020 03:31 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 23:11 |
|
Once you have that much money, people stop second guessing your decisions/outright supporting anything you say; combined with the lack of any real legal consequences in your personal or business life, you (rightfully) believe nothing you do is wrong in any way.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2020 03:38 |