|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:Something something archer, something something pipeline refactoring. Ah poo poo, I knew there was a few big ones I didn't include. Oh well, maybe next time.
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 18:46 |
|
|
I'm the guy defending Star Citizen by criticising other games for having features locked
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:insomuch that Evocati will start to receive invites in about 2-3 weeks, and there will be a PTU release by mid-June. I also said that 3.0 will be going live before the end of the year, and it appears as though the schedule supports that. I'm genuinely interested as you may know: why would CIG send invites out to Evocati in about 2-3 weeks, when Evocati testing is estimated to start in 7 weeks (5th June), i.e. 4-5 weeks after invites? TBF, a few people here said "3.0" would arrive mid-year (late-June/early-July), however feature-wise it is more akin to the 2.7 described and slated for last year. The new "3.0" will of course have new ships that were slated for later updates, as the ship pipeline isn't delayed like almost everything else. Some of the networking updates won't make "3.0" and instead arrive later. The newly planned "3.2" estimated for early 2018 is feature-wise what the original 3.0 was advertised to be at CitizenCon, previously estimated for December 2016. That's quite the delay.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
3.0 will be shat out in september with a fraction of the original features
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
3.0 will be the thing that finally crushes the backers souls, funding slows to a crawl, project dead by feb next year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Isn't it supposed to be dead in like 3 days according to the last countdown from dr. warlord?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:29
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:3.0 will be the thing that finally crushes the backers souls, funding slows to a crawl, project dead by feb next year. you underestimate the power of idiocy, sir
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:37
|
|
Welcome to the
|
big nipples big life posted:Isn't it supposed to be dead in like 3 days according to the last countdown from dr. warlord?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Isn't it supposed to be dead in like 3 days according to the last countdown from dr. warlord? Those deadlines are as credible as any others you'll read in here because there's nobody connected to the primary source, despite claims to the contrary. Quavers posted:The newly planned "3.2" estimated for early 2018 is feature-wise what the original 3.0 was advertised to be at CitizenCon, previously estimated for December 2016. That's quite the delay. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/f1og2mroavoz6r/source/EndofYear_PUTimeline_2017.png (this is not a gannt chart, btw. It's a picture.) Hav fucked around with this message at 17:41 on Apr 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Isn't it supposed to be dead in like 3 days according to the last countdown from dr. warlord? This catshit fire dumpster on a train will choo-choo well into next year. Not that I know anything about Computer Science, but if CIG pulls this game off most of their staff will be honorary doctorates for solving problems that have evaded simple minded folk for several decades. Roberts will finally solve the N=NP conundrum with Star Citizen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:40
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
Nobody will know when CIG fails. It will just happen one day when paychecks don't show up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Nobody will know when CIG fails. It will just happen one day when paychecks don't show up. If my history in mock threads has taught me anything, even when paychecks stop showing up the wet fart keeps puttering on for awhile. But you are correct, the most likely scenario is that "something" comes out, and then the company quietly fades away, while the key actors find other jobs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
MedicineHut posted:Since your post was on January 3rd, this is clearly wrong aswell. Not much left to be said really. Ummmm hey cuntifas did you know that CIG operates on a different timescale than you? Soon, weeks not months away is close to 1.5 years in your pitiful timetable
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
Drunk Theory posted:If my history in mock threads has taught me anything, even when paychecks stop showing up the wet fart keeps puttering on for awhile. But you are correct, the most likely scenario is that "something" comes out, and then the company quietly fades away, while the key actors find other jobs. It will be interesting to see what happens if CIG pulls a 38 Studios. For sure it will murder CR's reputation, but the sudden loss of 400 jobs in the gaming industry in spite of unheard of financial success should cause waves.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:It will be interesting to see what happens if CIG pulls a 38 Studios. For sure it will murder CR's reputation, but the sudden loss of 400 jobs in the gaming industry in spite of unheard of financial success should cause waves. Unless crobblers is a total moron, he has cashed out sufficiently to support a relatively extravagant lifestyle until the day he dies.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
Nuclearmonkee posted:Unless crobblers is a total moron, he has cashed out sufficiently to support a relatively extravagant lifestyle until the day he dies. Q.E.D.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Q.E.D. well he seems to be pretty good at scamming but maybe his idiocy is that thorough
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
Nuclearmonkee posted:Unless crobblers is a total moron, he has cashed out sufficiently to support a relatively extravagant lifestyle until the day he dies. Worst case scenario is the dude has kick rear end coffee for life
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:All of your faux concern for me is not endearing in the least. I don't need to frequent a gay comedy forum on my weekend off, especially one that is a holiday weekend. ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." Much earlier than mid-year > exactly mid-year assuming no delays Very, very soon > 4+ months after that statement lol sq42 Quoting the poo poo out of your post, yes, I will.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:3.0 will be the thing that finally crushes the backers souls, funding slows to a crawl, project dead by feb next year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Worst case scenario is the dude has kick rear end coffee for life i thought he was too dumb to work the machine so they pay someone
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Oh, you have to read this post from Ars Technica about an interview they just did with Chris, Erin, Tony This sounds like they are turning AC into Elite's CQC, the in-game arcade spaceship fighter championship. Which was added to Elite around the release of the Xbox version.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:lets play when 3.0 hits, we can walk around the moon together or something We can skip around naked on the moon
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Nuclearmonkee posted:i thought he was too dumb to work the machine so they pay someone Sandi can work it I think, she's the brains behind this amazingly efficient and totally on track operation
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:16
|
|
|
Sandi disappearing from CIG (because she got a divorce and quit) will be the first sign that the poo poo hit the fan.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:I'm the guy defending Star Citizen by criticising other games for having features locked It's his fallback position. Which is why he is ignoring everything else. Because, you know, it hurts like hell to be consistently owned.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:It's his fallback position. Which is why he is ignoring everything else. Because, you know, it hurts like hell to be consistently owned. Big difference between ignoring and doing work while casually observing. edit: not everything is worth replying to, old man.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Big difference between ignoring and doing work while casually observing. 'while casually observing' he types as he hurries another reply to Derek within 2 minutes of his post
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
'not everything is worth replying to, old man' He replies
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:'while casually observing' he types as he hurries another reply to Derek within 2 minutes of his post Thanks for being the one to point that out this time around.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/65wzav/answer_the_call_2017/quote:I'd say realistically its impossible for them to give anything more than a very educated guess on when it's going to release. I think they have every intention of releasing end of the year, but it won't become apparent until we get closer to their target date. quote:I agree figuring out which year a game is gonna release can be hard. But that means its even more important that hard commitments like that with no caveats not be advertised.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
sq42 starring gary "ham mill" oldman
Nicholas fucked around with this message at 18:45 on Apr 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
It's like that picture michael j fox has from back to the future when his past gets erased; I already see backers now: "they never said 2017 idiots!!!!!!" from the website: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:'not everything is worth replying to, old man' He replies Old man? Jeesus gently caress, Uncle derek confirmed in SQ42.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H2QRvbvtz8
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:58
|
|
|
nawledgelambo posted:It's like that picture michael j fox has from back to the future when his past gets erased; I already see backers now: "they never said 2017 idiots!!!!!!" scroll down, the 2017 is towards the bottom of the page
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 18:58
|
|
|
Quavers posted:scroll down, the 2017 is towards the bottom of the page oh lame, I thought they got rid of it completely. Oh well, at least they can quickly edit it out for next year as the image I screencapped is front facing
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 18:46 |
|
|
How the gently caress is there enough material for them to talk for 1 hour and 36 minutes
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 19:01
|
|
