|
Aramis posted:I really wish there was a good Hacker News alternative out there. Schrodinger's Neckbeard
|
# ? Mar 4, 2021 18:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 23:51 |
|
Valleywag degenerated into "all the love lives of Google executives, all the time." My memory is bad, but didn't hosed Company wind up being racism all the time? I just want a place people share hot gossip about assholes in tech. Speaking of which... quote:Weeks earlier, in a companywide email, Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk had dumped on the concept of corporate hierarchy. Find “the fastest way to solve a problem to the benefit of the whole company” and don’t worry about your boss, he told them. Go straight to the top, if need be.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2021 18:32 |
|
Aramis posted:I really wish there was a good Hacker News alternative out there. at least there's n-gate Sagacity fucked around with this message at 18:42 on Mar 4, 2021 |
# ? Mar 4, 2021 18:39 |
|
Aramis posted:I really wish there was a good Hacker News alternative out there. On other things it's a lot less good and closer to the internet norm in terms of dumb opinions, though at least it's vastly less toxic than the D&D average. dang runs a tight ship in terms of people sniping at each other or baiting others into flamewars.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2021 18:52 |
|
Aramis posted:I really wish there was a good Hacker News alternative out there. There's a nice one but I'm not telling you about it.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2021 19:59 |
|
Sagacity posted:Whenever there's something that's genuinely cool and techy, the top comments are typically bitching about the homepage using 30k of js or alternatively some vague rant against microsoft That's my favourite read every week, so cutting
|
# ? Mar 4, 2021 21:19 |
|
This is my first encounter with hackernews and it just looks like slashdot to me.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2021 21:46 |
|
it's slashdot but everyone makes $400,000 at a FAANG company or pretends that they do and assume that this makes them superior to normal people.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2021 00:11 |
|
enki42 posted:it's slashdot but everyone makes $400,000 at a FAANG company or pretends that they do and assume that this makes them superior to normal people. I had a colleague at a former tech support job who posted on hacker news religiously. He was a 45-year-old “IT professional” who never seemed to be able to move higher than a 1st level support role, despite his years of “experience”. He was as insufferable as you can imagine.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2021 02:11 |
|
ShoeFly posted:I had a colleague at a former tech support job who posted on hacker news religiously. I like employees /managers that don't work on their personalities in any meaningful way and then wonder why they don't get promoted even though "they've been here the longest",
|
# ? Mar 5, 2021 02:46 |
|
|
# ? Mar 6, 2021 05:15 |
|
Doordash Presents: Publik Policy Kids Korner
|
# ? Mar 6, 2021 08:23 |
|
Volmarias posted:Doordash Presents: Publik Policy Kids Korner Maybe , but DoorDash is literally running ads with Sesame Street characters now. At least they've donated a million dollars to the Sesame Workshop. Then they spent many more millions of dollars advertising that fact. https://brokeassstuart.com/2021/02/08/doordash-spent-5-5-million-to-advertise-their-1-million-charity-donation/
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 05:11 |
|
Cool, Google uses “mental health leave” as a way to fire anyone who complains about sexism or racism in the workplace. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/google-advised-mental-health-care-when-workers-complained-about-racism-n1259728
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 21:40 |
|
Question - I know its illegal in America to record peoples conversations without consent, but is it illegal to digitally transcribe a conversation into writing automatically?
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 20:55 |
|
Pleasant Friend posted:Question - I know its illegal in America to record peoples conversations without consent, That's not actually correct. A bunch of this is all state-level. And consent isn't the only potential standard - notification (signage) may be all that's required depending on where you are. You're asking a very jurisdiction-specific question that likely has several answers just in conus.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 21:02 |
|
Pleasant Friend posted:Question - I know its illegal in America to record peoples conversations without consent, but is it illegal to digitally transcribe a conversation into writing automatically? How are you going to do that without listening to it?
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 21:10 |
|
xtal posted:How are you going to do that without listening to it? https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/google-recorder-is-a-real-time-transcription-app-that-even-works-when-youre-offline
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 21:15 |
|
Weird, I thought it was like America wide after Watergate. Thank you for the correction. xtal posted:How are you going to do that without listening to it? I would presume there would be a legal difference if it listens but doesn't store any recordings, just letting a separate program watch a "feed" Pleasant Friend fucked around with this message at 21:22 on Mar 8, 2021 |
# ? Mar 8, 2021 21:17 |
|
Motronic posted:That's not actually correct. A bunch of this is all state-level. And consent isn't the only potential standard - notification (signage) may be all that's required depending on where you are. Yeah in most of the USA, only one party has to consent to the recording. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#United_States
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 21:24 |
|
blunt posted:https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/google-recorder-is-a-real-time-transcription-app-that-even-works-when-youre-offline Recorder is a touch odd because it doesn't distinguish between speakers in the transcription, which Live Transcribe (which is also by Google but is an Accessibility feature that doesn't record the audio) is able to do. Plausible deniability, I guess, since they also do everything in their power to block call recording apps on their Pixel line.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 22:13 |
|
Even in places with two party consent laws, there are often exceptions when one party has reason to believe that certain crimes will be discussed.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 22:17 |
|
Platystemon posted:Even in places with two party consent laws, there are often exceptions when one party has reason to believe that certain crimes will be discussed. So, 24/7 in the corporate/finance world?
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 22:26 |
|
If my experience with people and doorbell cameras is any indication, middle class Americans will decry government and corporations spying on them, but will also fight to the death for the right to surveil their neighbors themselves.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 22:30 |
|
I think there should be a law that bans corporations from pushing or encouraging their employees to support or oppose legislation, candidates, or other political positions. VVV yeah, but this just feels like some kind of illegal. America Inc. fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Mar 9, 2021 |
# ? Mar 8, 2021 22:48 |
|
adoration for none posted:I think there should be a law that bans corporations from pushing or encouraging their employees to support or oppose legislation, candidates, or other political positions. Buddy, we can’t even stop tax-privileged churches from doing that.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 23:06 |
|
Pleasant Friend posted:Question - I know its illegal in America to record peoples conversations without consent, but is it illegal to digitally transcribe a conversation into writing automatically? Unclear by your wording whether or not you are a party in the conversation. If not, in California at least, the law doesn't require recording, just listening, and can be a felony.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2021 00:19 |
|
adoration for none posted:I think there should be a law that bans corporations from pushing or encouraging their employees to support or oppose legislation, candidates, or other political positions. It's not. It's only illegal if it specifically says "vote this way and donate money or we will fire you" instead of "dat's a nice job there, it would be a shame if prop 12345 were to get passed and force us to leave the state." The first amendment and an EXTREMELY permissive set of court rulings means that anything more than explicitly breaking the law is fine.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2021 01:50 |
|
Strawberry Pyramid posted:If my experience with people and doorbell cameras is any indication, middle class Americans will decry government and corporations spying on them, but will also fight to the death for the right to surveil their neighbors themselves. I mean nearly 1.5 million American women are raped, sexually assaulted, or stalked each year. In some demographics, such as young low-income Native Americans, the incidence rate is more than 90%. While men might be focused on worries about property crime, that insecurity definitely plays into it for women. When my neighbor had an ex-boyfriend hammering on her door at 1am until the cops showed up, with her dog barking the whole time, she installed a doorbell camera the next day. When my friend received death threats this week from her longtime stalker, police told her that she needed to install a doorbell camera with video storage in order to obtain evidence to be used to protect her. And her social media was filled with women sharing advice about it. Kaal fucked around with this message at 02:52 on Mar 9, 2021 |
# ? Mar 9, 2021 02:44 |
|
Kaal posted:I mean nearly 1.5 million American women are raped, sexually assaulted, or stalked each year. In some demographics, such as young low-income Native Americans, the incidence rate is more than 90%. While men might be focused on worries about property crime, that insecurity definitely plays into it for women. When my neighbor had an ex-boyfriend hammering on her door at 1am until the cops showed up, with her dog barking the whole time, she installed a doorbell camera the next day. When my friend received death threats this week from her longtime stalker, police told her that she needed to install a doorbell camera with video storage in order to obtain evidence to be used to protect her. And her social media was filled with women sharing advice about it. Police and courts aren’t there to help women. Hope this helps (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 21:05 |
|
Sextro posted:Police and courts aren’t there to help women. Hope this helps good job seeing the word "police" and just spitting this out like a reflex in response to a pretty compelling reason to have a doorbell cam that isn't "property crime"
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 21:20 |
|
TheScott2K posted:good job seeing the word "police" and just spitting this out like a reflex in response to a pretty compelling reason to have a doorbell cam that isn't "property crime" Restraining orders don’t work and aren’t enforced proactively in a way that protects anyone.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:13 |
|
Sextro posted:Restraining orders don’t work and aren’t enforced proactively in a way that protects anyone. Guess there's just no use whatsoever for video of some rear end in a top hat who won't stop showing up at your house, then.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:18 |
|
TheScott2K posted:Guess there's just no use whatsoever for video of some rear end in a top hat who won't stop showing up at your house, then. lovely ain’t it?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:19 |
|
Sextro posted:lovely ain’t it? You're a stupid rear end in a top hat.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:21 |
|
Ideally yes, the footage would be useful evidence, to get someone clearly in crisis help he needs that he likely would not seek in his own, and would so also protect the victim. I just don’t think it’s very likely to be the case and the situation is a serious one that needs much more than a camera to address.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:26 |
|
You think not trusting cops makes you special (it doesn't) and smart (you're not) and you'd rather bask in that than engage with the substance of what you replied to. Because you're a stupid rear end in a top hat.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:29 |
|
If you mean that security cameras with video storage are an effective security blanket for large swathes of the population I wouldn’t disagree.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:33 |
|
You're all stupid assholes, hth
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 23:51 |
|
Yeah I probably should have made a single better post. Just how little recourse and even less protection victims have in any kind of “domestic” situation is a major sore point of mine in general and seeing people embrace security theater as an actual answer to this is disheartening.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:42 |