Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Legit Businessman
Sep 2, 2007


.

Legit Businessman fucked around with this message at 19:33 on Sep 9, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Risky Bisquick
Jan 18, 2008

PLEASE LET ME WRITE YOUR VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT SO I CAN FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE CALAMITY THAT IS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.



Buglord

Jordan7hm posted:

This was a good post, thanks. Food for thought at least.

e: lol the avatar isn't as bad as I expected

:what::respek::prepop:

MonsieurChoc
Oct 12, 2013

Every species can smell its own extinction.

RBC posted:

hahaha i loving hate the 21st century

At least it's better than the 19th century.

...so far.

pokeyman
Nov 26, 2006

That elephant ate my entire platoon.
That was really interesting and helpful LeschNyhan, thank you.

Jordan7hm
Feb 17, 2011




Lipstick Apathy
:shrug: The reason to post here is to talk to people who have different viewpoints and to see how your own stand up to scrutiny. I'm probably not going to be convinced on moral grounds of the value of Li being back in society, but I can certainly be convinced on practical grounds. jm20's post about how if this was a run of the mill hit and run it wouldn't even raise an eyebrow was also pretty on-point

like many of you I'm also here to shitpost

Somebody fucked around with this message at 22:15 on Sep 9, 2022

Suplex Liberace
Jan 18, 2012



Slurpees and Murder: The Winnipeg Lifestyle

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/transit-driver-attack-university-manitoba-winnipeg-1.3981581

Legit Businessman
Sep 2, 2007


.

Legit Businessman fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Sep 9, 2022

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Living at the U of M right now that is legitimately pretty disturbing.

I never met the bus driver but condolences to the family :(

Suplex Liberace
Jan 18, 2012



I take a lot of buses so I might have seen this guy or even chatted with him. This has me pretty upset.

Vintersorg
Mar 3, 2004

President of
the Brendan Fraser
Fan Club



Its so tragic. :(

Near the end of his shift.

58 - so he was getting close to retirement.

Probably a chill route down to the U of M.

Ugh - just senseless loss. Bus drivers deserve better - esp. in this loving city.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

"An officer with the canine unit fell through the ice when he went back to investigate the scene. He was pulled to shore by other officers and wasn't injured."
lol police

Vintersorg
Mar 3, 2004

President of
the Brendan Fraser
Fan Club



Baronjutter posted:

"An officer with the canine unit fell through the ice when he went back to investigate the scene. He was pulled to shore by other officers and wasn't injured."
lol police

gently caress off.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

They don't know if the attack happened on the bus, but all buses need those protective glass barriers around the driver's seat. We have them here in Toronto and it makes the drivers less approachable (obviously) but gently caress getting spit on or stabbed.

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

"Approachable" isn't a characteristic that interests me in a bus driver when things like "Shows up on time" or "Slows down by some means other than stomping the brake through the floor like Fred Flintstone" are on the table.

Lain Iwakura
Aug 5, 2004

The body exists only to verify one's own existence.

Taco Defender
Be careful about talking about public transit in any CanPol thread because there is a special snowflake who takes exception to the use of it and would rather make use of their safe space to get to work.

I support the barriers.

Vintersorg
Mar 3, 2004

President of
the Brendan Fraser
Fan Club



OSI bean dip posted:

Be careful about talking about public transit in any CanPol thread because there is a special snowflake who takes exception to the use of it and would rather make use of their safe space to get to work.

I support the barriers.

Cool that you are an alt-right weirdo.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

Vintersorg posted:

Cool that you are an alt-right weirdo.

he's making fun of the posters in the can-debt thread complaining about how awful having to smell other people or hear them talk is - and you need to chill out

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


Lobok posted:

They don't know if the attack happened on the bus, but all buses need those protective glass barriers around the driver's seat. We have them here in Toronto and it makes the drivers less approachable (obviously) but gently caress getting spit on or stabbed.

Yeah pretty much. Honestly I expect them to switch entirely to the kiosk/sealed off driver system like on the streetcars at some point because once the majority of folks are on Presto (lol) they can just have the one kiosk for the occasional person who needs to pay cash. No real reason to have the driver easily physically accessible.

Speaking of Presto the last time I tried to reload my card at one of the subway station kiosks attempting to finalize payment caused it to crash to the Windows desktop :saddowns:. How the gently caress did such a technically incompetent system pass the design phase?

Furnaceface
Oct 21, 2004




Vintersorg posted:

Cool that you are an alt-right weirdo.

Those terms have been around since I was a kid and are not exclusive to the alt-right.

Also he is mocking 2 people from the debt thread that hate public transit because it puts them into contact with poor people.

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?
They made it mandatory for cab drivers to have barriers years ago in Winnipeg, probably about about time for bus drivers. The barriers cab drivers have are absolutely useless though.

Vintersorg
Mar 3, 2004

President of
the Brendan Fraser
Fan Club



*updates canpol.xlsx*

The terms have been around but it's exlusively used by alt-right weirdos all over social media.

Look up any comments section regarding Pewdiepie getting fired for being a jackass today - PC SNOWFLAKE SAFE SPACE CULTURE EWWW ITS COMEDY

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Getting defensive about wet cops and already triggered by OSI? You're going to have a difficult time in the canpol thread :(

Lain Iwakura
Aug 5, 2004

The body exists only to verify one's own existence.

Taco Defender

Vintersorg posted:

*updates canpol.xlsx*

The terms have been around but it's exlusively used by alt-right weirdos all over social media.

Look up any comments section regarding Pewdiepie getting fired for being a jackass today - PC SNOWFLAKE SAFE SPACE CULTURE EWWW ITS COMEDY

The left would do much better if it started to use terms like "special little snowflakes" and "safe space" when referring to conservatives who are "triggered" by things they don't like.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

OSI bean dip posted:

The left would do much better if it started to use terms like "special little snowflakes" and "safe space" when referring to conservatives who are "triggered" by things they don't like.

I use those terms and "virtue signalling" with conservatives and it triggers them hard.

Vintersorg
Mar 3, 2004

President of
the Brendan Fraser
Fan Club



Also due to also calling dogs "officers" it was a dog who fell through the ice and the other cops got it out.

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

OSI bean dip posted:

The left would do much better if it started to use terms like "special little snowflakes" and "safe space" when referring to conservatives who are "triggered" by things they don't like.

"Safe spaces" is a left construct. Using that phrase to mock conservatives is mocking the construct itself and leftists with it. And that's perfectly fine because safe spaces are stupid. But realize this, the alt-right is more alt than right, it's all lefties who are annoyed with fellow lefties. Because it's a lot easier for that far left guy to say "ah that guy making fun of safe spaces is alt-right, gently caress him" rather than deal with the painful reality that it's their supposed ally. Just the ikantski take obviously as there's no solid alt-right definition.

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

Vintersorg posted:

Also due to also calling dogs "officers" it was a dog who fell through the ice and the other cops got it out.

That somehow manages to be dumber than calling them furbabies.

Lain Iwakura
Aug 5, 2004

The body exists only to verify one's own existence.

Taco Defender

Postess with the Mostest posted:

"Safe spaces" is a left construct. Using that phrase to mock conservatives is mocking the construct itself and leftists with it. And that's perfectly fine because safe spaces are stupid. But realize this, the alt-right is more alt than right, it's all lefties who are annoyed with fellow lefties. Because it's a lot easier for that far left guy to say "ah that guy making fun of safe spaces is alt-right, gently caress him" rather than deal with the painful reality that it's their supposed ally. Just the ikantski take obviously as there's no solid alt-right definition.

While I think that you're an enormous shithead I will say that the one redeeming factor you have is that while you're a contrarian amongst us all you do help break the echo chamber that comes with this place. I would be dishearten if you were to leave.

However, I disagree with the notion that "safe spaces" are a left construct--it's only viewed that way because there are those on the left who feel the need to make it aware that they need to exist. Any website that has a self-contained echo chamber (be it a news comment section, Reddit, or a place like Free Republic) qualifies as a safe space. Anyone who goes and complains that they need to drive because they cannot handle being around people who smell or have mental illness are basically saying that they need a safe space.

The idea that "safe spaces" are a leftist construct is highly disingenuous.

infernal machines
Oct 11, 2012

we monitor many frequencies. we listen always. came a voice, out of the babel of tongues, speaking to us. it played us a mighty dub.

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

How the gently caress did such a technically incompetent system pass the design phase?

My dude, have you heard of Accenture?

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

That's what scares me most about the "alt-right" is that a lot of its ideology is quite attractive to anyone, even people who "hate" conservatives and don't see them selves as right wing. It's the sort of "leftist" that ONLY wants to talk about how BLM are crazy and the real racists, identity politics are stupid, trans need to shut up with their made up pronouns, first nations need to just get a job and pay for school like I did, why can't white people or men be proud of them selves anymore??

EvilJoven
Mar 18, 2005

NOBODY,IN THE HISTORY OF EVER, HAS ASKED OR CARED WHAT CANADA THINKS. YOU ARE NOT A COUNTRY. YOUR MONEY HAS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND ON IT. IF YOU DIG AROUND IN YOUR BACKYARD, NATIVE SKELETONS WOULD EXPLODE OUT OF YOUR LAWN LIKE THE END OF POLTERGEIST. CANADA IS SO POLITE, EH?
Fun Shoe
Hell is being stuck between the alt-right and the Tumblr left screaming at each other, forever. The world needs a safe space to hide from all of this.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Postess with the Mostest posted:

"Safe spaces" is a left construct. Using that phrase to mock conservatives is mocking the construct itself and leftists with it. And that's perfectly fine because safe spaces are stupid. But realize this, the alt-right is more alt than right, it's all lefties who are annoyed with fellow lefties. Because it's a lot easier for that far left guy to say "ah that guy making fun of safe spaces is alt-right, gently caress him" rather than deal with the painful reality that it's their supposed ally. Just the ikantski take obviously as there's no solid alt-right definition.

Yup. Terms like "safe space" and "virtue signalling" are insulting precisely because they identify actually tendencies within progressive culture. Though it should hardly need to be pointed out that conservative and alt-right political tendencies also have their sacred cows and their own tendency to posture and preen about their moral superiority. The contemporary left simply lacks an effective and simple language for identifying and mocking these traits, which makes it all the more galling when the alt-right is able to popularize those terms.

OSI bean dip posted:


The idea that "safe spaces" are a leftist construct is highly disingenuous.

How so? In my experience they're absolutely a left-wing or at least a liberal / progressive construct. The right has it's own equivalents but the specific term "safe space" and the way it's used is, in my experience, absolutely an exclusive term of the left, at least when i'ts being used unironically.

Lain Iwakura
Aug 5, 2004

The body exists only to verify one's own existence.

Taco Defender

Baronjutter posted:

That's what scares me most about the "alt-right" is that a lot of its ideology is quite attractive to anyone, even people who "hate" conservatives and don't see them selves as right wing. It's the sort of "leftist" that ONLY wants to talk about how BLM are crazy and the real racists, identity politics are stupid, trans need to shut up with their made up pronouns, first nations need to just get a job and pay for school like I did, why can't white people or men be proud of them selves anymore??

It's easier to make up an enemy and divide and or unite everyone than it is to just try and get people to come to their side.

Helsing posted:

How so? In my experience they're absolutely a left-wing or at least a liberal / progressive construct. The right has it's own equivalents but the specific term "safe space" and the way it's used is, in my experience, absolutely an exclusive term of the left, at least when i'ts being used unironically.

Just because it's being used as a term by the left doesn't mean that it cannot be used to label aspects of the right.

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?
Wasn't the original idea of a "Safe Space" basically just an after-class group for LGBT students to hang out without being worried about being insulted for being LGBT?

Lain Iwakura
Aug 5, 2004

The body exists only to verify one's own existence.

Taco Defender

DariusLikewise posted:

Wasn't the original idea of a "Safe Space" basically just an after-class group for LGBT students to hang out without being worried about being insulted for being LGBT?

To be fair there are safe spaces that are warranted such as for those who are trying flee persecution for their sexual orientation or gender identity. However, it has become an insult due to misuse.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

I think a lot of people who claim to be "progressive" or "signal" that they are simply do so because in a lot of places it's a binary choice. You're either on the progressive side or you're on the conservative side, and both have a lot of pre-packaged identity issues. Maybe you loving hate homeless people and think trans folk are just mentally ill and using their chosen pronoun is enabling their delusion, but you also aren't religious, don't like "corporations", support liberalizing drug laws, think climate change is a serious issue, and hate or are embarrassed by most of the cultural things linked to the conservative political camp. So to be part of some sort of in-group you join the "progressive" camp.

But what's this, a 3rd way? You don't have to be a family values jesus conservative or market worshipping libertarian, but get to complain endlessly about safe spaces and pronouns and how white men are the most oppressed people in Canada? I can feel superior to both the left AND right? I can pick and choose an inconsistent grab bag of ideologies based on my gut feeling at the moment and call it "common sense" ?? I can let loose all my grossest most reactionary beliefs and not be called out on them? Sign me up! I love this new 3rd way!

Furnaceface
Oct 21, 2004




OSI bean dip posted:

To be fair there are safe spaces that are warranted such as for those who are trying flee persecution for their sexual orientation or gender identity. However, it has become an insult due to misuse.

Kind of like the words "socialist" and "liberal". :v:

EvilJoven
Mar 18, 2005

NOBODY,IN THE HISTORY OF EVER, HAS ASKED OR CARED WHAT CANADA THINKS. YOU ARE NOT A COUNTRY. YOUR MONEY HAS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND ON IT. IF YOU DIG AROUND IN YOUR BACKYARD, NATIVE SKELETONS WOULD EXPLODE OUT OF YOUR LAWN LIKE THE END OF POLTERGEIST. CANADA IS SO POLITE, EH?
Fun Shoe
I never heard the term safe space being used when GSAs and the like were becoming a thing, the first I ever heard the term was when it was being used to declare that all sorts of venues and events were essentially dissenting opinion free zones.

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

OSI bean dip posted:

It's easier to make up an enemy and divide and or unite everyone than it is to just try and get people to come to their side.

Speaking of attempts to make people come to our side...

quote:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/60s-scoop-ruling-aboriginal-1.3981771

Canada failed to take reasonable steps to prevent thousands of on-reserve children who were placed with non-Indigenous families from losing their Indigenous heritage during the Sixties Scoop, an Ontario judge ruled Tuesday. The ruling in the long-running and bitterly fought class action paves the way for an assessment of damages the government will now have to pay. In siding with the plaintiffs, Ontario Superior Court Justice Edward Belobaba found Canada had breached its "duty of care" to the children.

The lead plaintiff, Marcia Brown Martel, and her lawyer, Jeffery Wilson, were scheduled to address the media at 1 p.m. ET. CBCNews.ca will be carrying the press conference live.

The lawsuit launched eight years ago sought $1.3 billion on behalf of about 16,000 Indigenous children in Ontario who claimed they were harmed by being placed in non-Indigenous homes from 1965 to 1984 under terms of a federal-provincial agreement. The plaintiffs argued — and Belobaba agreed — that Ottawa breached part of the agreement that required consultation with First Nations bands about the child welfare program. Belobaba was scathing in commenting on the government's contention that consultation with the bands would not have made any difference to the children.

"This is an odd and, frankly, insulting submission," Belobaba wrote. "Canada appears to be saying that even if the extension of child welfare services to their reserves had been fully explained to the Indian bands and, if each band had been genuinely consulted about their concerns in this regard, that no meaningful advice or ideas would have been forthcoming."

The Liberal government indicated last week it was going to try to block Belobaba from releasing his ruling after Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett announced an intention to negotiate with Sixties Scoop survivors across the country. The government relented amid outrage by the plaintiffs and critics, who called the attempt to stop the ruling an unprecedented political interference.

Belobaba also took issue with the government's argument that the 1960s were different times and that it acted with good intentions in line with prevailing standards. As a result, the government had tried to argue, it could not have known the harm that might have been done to the children. "Canada's submission misses the point," Belobaba said. "The issue is not what was known in the 1960s about the harm of trans-racial adoption or the risk of abuse in the foster home." Instead, the justice said, there can be "no doubt" that what was well known even then was the importance to First Nations peoples of protecting and preserving their distinctive cultures and traditions, including their concept of the extended family.

Martel, 53, the lead plaintiff in the Ontario action, is a member of the Temagami First Nation near Kirkland Lake, Ont. She was adopted by a non-Indigenous couple in 1972 at age nine and later discovered the Canadian government had declared her original identity dead. "I feel like a great weight has been lifted from my heart," Brown Martel said in a statement. "Our voices were finally heard and listened to. Our pain was acknowledged. I hope no one sees this as a loss for our government. It is a gain for all of us — a step forward and a step closer to reconciliation."

You say failed to prevent, I say actively intended, tomayto, tomahtoh.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?

OSI bean dip posted:

To be fair there are safe spaces that are warranted such as for those who are trying flee persecution for their sexual orientation or gender identity. However, it has become an insult due to misuse.

I get that, but in actuality a "Safe Space" is basically just a support group really, how it got morphed into this idea that free speech is being oppressed is truly loving ridiculous. I mean I wouldn't run into a Young Conservatives meeting at Campus and start reading The Communist Manifesto.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply