Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
vertov
Jun 14, 2003

hello
I really can't get behind this movie. It is excessively sentimental, to the point of almost becoming camp. Many of the characters (particularly the warden) are completely artificial and under-developed, which gives the film a really forced feeling at times. It's also completely manipulative and arbitrary in its sense of morality, forcing characters and actions to fit into the broader narrative rather than letting them develop through the performances or the (absent) direction. Deakins's cinematography is breathtaking (as always), but that's the only "great" element at work in this film, the rest of it is compentent but forgettable. Worst of all, Darabont continues to repeat these mistakes in other films, constantly indulging in melodrama and other excesses.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Post
  • Reply