|
I couldn't pick it up. In fact I'm not having much luck at all tonight. I've settled in to listening to a couple hams talk about antennas. SoundMonkey, if you're around they're on 3988 USB. E: Hey Astro, did you ever think you'd have a 10 page thread about SW?
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2007 06:56 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 11:31 |
|
Curly Shuffle posted:Thanks for this. I'm listening in now, trying to get the hang of the SSB fine tuning on my E5.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2007 08:33 |
|
Paperweight posted:Had my first late night listening session where I didn't have to get up in the morning to go to work. I heard a lot of ham traffic on 3600 KHz and up. Got to try out the SSB adjustment. On plain old AM broadcast, I picked up an Atlanta, GA news station on 750 KHz from here in Lexington, NC. Picked up what I guess are standards stations or beacons at 10000 and 3330 KHz. They gave the time every once in a while. Also, the Atencion lady is on right now on 7887.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2007 21:05 |
|
nmfree posted:You're talking about a scanner, which is completely different.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 00:21 |
|
SpunkyRedKnight posted:Does anyone know if it's worth looking into wideband receivers or would it be better to buy a shortwave radio and scanner separately if I was looking into the AM to GHz range?
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 00:35 |
|
PancakeMan posted:This thread is what finally made me man up and buy a SA account. PancakeMan posted:Sad thing is that for some reason it skips a few chunks of frequency. Anybody else have one of these and find a way around this? (For example I was trying to get the 6.6 shortwave frequency this morning and the radio skips from 6.35 to 7.05), cause it's kinda dissappointing not being able to hear stuff you know is there.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 01:15 |
|
hudibrastic posted:2. Check out streaming audio of world band broadcasts. Edit: quote:It might be cheating, but sometimes it's your only option. Halah fucked around with this message at 06:43 on Jun 25, 2007 |
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 05:45 |
|
PancakeMan posted:You sir, are my hero. Any Idea what purpose those little switches serve anyway? There's one to switch my AM from 10000 to 9000 and the above mentioned, I am baffled by their purpose. (Edit for clarity) Halah fucked around with this message at 06:58 on Jun 25, 2007 |
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 06:52 |
|
I can barely hear that, but there is some smooth Cuban jazz/lounge stuff on 6060 right now.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 07:20 |
|
potato of destiny posted:I wish there was some way to do that on my YB-400... I can still listen to AM by directly entering the frequency, but it's a bit annoying to only be able to tune in 1 or 9 khz increments.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 07:33 |
|
The ground should be as close as possible to the side of your house/radio. I don't trust plumbing to do the work. If I'm reading your question correctly, no it doesn't go from the end of your wire back into the ground. It should split off as soon as it leaves your house. A copper rod driven into the ground (ideally 8 feet) is best in my opinion. Edit: Atencion lady is on 5883 right now Halah fucked around with this message at 08:10 on Jun 25, 2007 |
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 08:00 |
|
meatpotato posted:Getting some spanish numbers on 5900 right now (0925 UTC) on west coast of California.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2007 09:35 |
|
PancakeMan posted:Score dudes, alien conspiracy theorist on 7315, even managed to get his website:
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2007 05:13 |
|
hudibrastic posted:Free shortwave receiver for indigent goon.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2007 06:02 |
|
AstroZamboni posted:Yeah, I just HAD to get into SW during a solar minimum. Yawn.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2007 23:42 |
|
I don't know if I'm just too far away for that or what, but I can't usually hear it
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2007 00:14 |
|
nmfree posted:In the mid 90s it wasn't too unusual to hear simulcasts on at least 3 of their channels... all day and well into the night. When solar activity is super high, the MUF at night can stay up around 14 or 15 mHz, which is, frankly, nuts. "MUF" means "Maximum usable frequency." In layman's terms, imagine a European station is beaming its signal toward North America on 12000. If the MUF is 10000, you probably won't hear it. If the MUF is 14000, it will probably come in clear as day. Personally, I have experienced MUF into the 30's, which is awesome. You can see a real time MUF map right here.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2007 02:49 |
|
Pixelboy posted:There was a '10' right over Vancouver. Edit: Sir Bobert Fishbone posted:I really can't get my head around reading that map. Also, note that the highest MUF's are in areas of daylight, especially centered around the equator. These are the areas with the strongest solar influence. Halah fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Jun 29, 2007 |
# ¿ Jun 29, 2007 00:31 |
|
I had big time problems, a victim of summer storms in the South. They were all over last night.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2007 01:31 |
|
Insert the obligatory "but it's a dry heat" comment here It was something like 94 here today, but dammit, hot is hot. Reception is kinda spotty tonight as well. Some bands are coming in well, some suck. Overall, it's crap. I'm just picking up the usual suspects. Anyone having better luck?
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2007 07:24 |
|
Welp, been out of the loop for a good week now because I went and got married. Sad to hear things are dry at best. And I've never had any luck hearing the buzzer for some reason. Funny that should come up because I tried to catch that a couple weeks ago. But now I'm back and listening!
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2007 09:05 |
|
Elijah posted:Woah, no poo poo.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2007 04:40 |
|
Shastao posted:WWCR (World Wide Christian Radio) sometimes airs conspiracy type stuff, they're one of the strongest stations I can get where I am. Side note: Got a QSL from Radio Sweden today!
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2007 23:51 |
|
Stuntman Mike posted:Edit: I've got a question, just out of curiosity: What's above the 30Mhz mark for shortwave. All the radios I've seen go from receive from about AM108 to 30000khz. What's above that? Anything? Edit: Wiki does a good job breaking down the VHF spectrum. Halah fucked around with this message at 00:33 on Jul 19, 2007 |
# ¿ Jul 19, 2007 00:31 |
|
Stuntman Mike posted:VVVVV 2.4 Ghz? Christ, that's the frequency of my cordless phone. Niiice.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2007 06:26 |
|
Danton posted:My windows have bars over them, would that interfere with the wire antenna?
|
# ¿ Jul 23, 2007 21:03 |
|
I can answer scanner questions as well. They are actually easier to use vs. shortwave.nmfree posted:First, despite what anyone else might tell you, you don't need a trunking scanner to listen to a trunked system. The only way that you wouldn't be able to listen to a trunked system is if they use one of the digital voice modes/ digital encryption. The only thing that will be different is that you'll have to lock out the data control frequency (daily, if it rotates) and it's a little more difficult to follow individual conversations. quote:Other than that, there isn't much that a scanner won't be able to do. Any new radio you buy today will be set up for NFM at 12.5 kHz spacing on VHF (as opposed to the old 25 kHz channels). quote:As many as you want to pay for, basically. The traditional Bearcat/Radio Shack scanner will cover 30-54, 138-170, 400-512, and 800-950 MHz (roughly), but there are also wideband radios that will cover a much greater swath of spectrum. quote:Police, firefighters, ambulances, street sweepers, utility companies, hams, studio link feeds for commercial broadcasters, cordless phones, paging services, marine radios, NOAA weather radio, etc. quote:Here are the things I'd look for, from most important to least: This eliminates the need for huge, slinky inducing, window-wrapping setups. It does however, introduce the "line of sight" problem (for a different reason, just work with me here). "Line of sight" is exactly as simple as it sounds. Given a clear day, with no obstructions, could you see the tower? If yes, you can get the signal. If no, probably not. This explains the 50 bazillion cell phone towers out there. Higher frequencies (I'm talking about roughly 800 mhz and higher here) are adversely affected by metal. The signals literally bounce off the metal. Ever have trouble getting cell phone signals in a mall? There you go. Along the lines of antennas/scanners/police, you can hazard a guess as to where your local authorities are transmitting by looking at the antennas on their cars. Do they have a huge, 10 foot monster? They're monitoring CB or the 40-50 mhz area. Do their antennas look like a toothpick? Check the 800 mhz area. Something the length of an average car radio antenna? Look in the 150's. http://www.cityfreq.com/ has annoying ads, but some good scanner info as far as frequencies. Here's my county as an example; code:
Click here for some streaming police scanning! As always, I'm watching this thread to answer any more questions. If I (or anyone else) missed a topic, ask away! Halah fucked around with this message at 02:44 on Jul 28, 2007 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2007 06:49 |
|
Nostratic posted:Oh God, it sounds like a congregation of young, brainwashed girls saying the Rosary, over and over, FOR 20 MINUTES STRAIGHT so far.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2007 06:53 |
|
Shastao posted:What would be the "Eton E5" of scanners, in terms of capability for affordability? But I'm old school like that.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2007 07:18 |
|
blugu64 posted:Not at all, just wait for late Saturday night and listen to the police channels. Depending on your city it can get pretty interesting. (reference my earlier post on the first 2-3 pages about 'superman' running around an apartment complex)
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2007 07:42 |
|
Sennheiser posted:For example: Edit: Yeah, blugu beat me by nearly an hour. Halah fucked around with this message at 09:11 on Jul 27, 2007 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2007 09:09 |
|
Sennheiser posted:Why don't drive-thrus use FRS communications, is this frequency band just more secure or something?
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2007 02:38 |
|
Sennheiser posted:Any tips on antenna/unit placing? It could just be you're too far from the transmitter, though.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2007 02:41 |
|
Sennheiser posted:If I tape a piece of speaker wire to the antenna and run that wire outside through a window and just let it drop down a wall, will it improve reception or just be useless? This is in no way directed at you personally, but I think the recent scanner discussion has been clouded by 18 pages of big-assed, outdoor, toss some wire over a fence shortwave antennas, so I want to throw this out there. The reason long antennas work for shortwave is indicated in the names of the bands. 15 meters, for example. That is roughly the length of one wave (hertz/cycle.) Antennas work best when optimized for the frequency they are receiving. 1/4 wave or 1/2 wave, or even 5/8 wave, for example. A 1/2 wave antenna on 15 meters would be 7.5 meters long. At 460 mhz, for a 1/4 wave antenna, we're talking about 6.5 inches. A full wave antenna at 460 mhz is roughly 26 inches. For future reference, to find the 1/4 wave length, 2992/(freq. in mhz) is a rough approximation. One can do the math from there to find other combinations. Think about it like this - a 1/4 wave antenna at 94 mhz (about the middle of the FM dial) is about 32 inches. Now go measure the antenna on your car. I'm not going down three flights of stairs to measure mine, but I bet it's a 1/4 wave. None of this means you need a new antenna every time you switch bands, but I just want everyone to understand that when it comes to UHF, throwing copper around doesn't guarantee success. Sometimes smaller is really better. Another confusion I can potentially see between the shortwave vs. scanner folks is the numbers we're using. You heard a numbers station on 6833? That's 6833 khz. You heard police activity on 460.0125? That's 460.0125 mhz. 6833 khz = 6.833 mhz 460.0125 mhz = 460012.5 khz For reference; FM radio (US) is 88-108 mhz AM radio (US) is 550-1710 khz "Why type all that, Halah?" I've been saying that higher frequencies need smaller antennas. I want to note that hearing crazy number stations on 6833 is on a lower frequency than hearing police activity on 460.0125 even though the numbers might indicate otherwise. Kilohertz and megahertz operate via the metric scale. I fear that distinction may be getting lost now that scanners are being discussed, and I want to make sure that folks in the US know that.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2007 07:00 |
|
Sennheiser posted:So you don't have a traditional metal antenna at all, just a pile of speaker wire?
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2007 07:05 |
|
Halah posted:To try and explain why shortwave goes worldwide and UHF doesn't, I present the following; Take a basketball onto a court. Now take the ball and throw it down as if you were spiking a football. It's going to bounce a good distance across the court, right? Big ball, covers large distances between hops. That's shortwave. Now do the same with a bouncy ball. It's going to go straight back up into the air and bounce like crazy, but not go far (we're counting bounces here, not rolls.) That's scanner territory. If you're out of the line of sight from a UHF transmitter, you won't hear it no matter what antenna you have. Especially when you get into the police frequencies.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2007 07:25 |
|
AstroZamboni posted:Mind if I add this to the OP? E: Elijah posted:Uh, can we put the scanner stuff in a different thread? I think a lot of us would prefer to stick to shortwave here. Halah fucked around with this message at 06:45 on Jul 29, 2007 |
# ¿ Jul 29, 2007 05:54 |
|
Stuntman Mike posted:
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2007 04:13 |
|
I heart bacon posted:Good idea. Here it is: You may have some luck finding out some info about the tower here.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2008 07:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 11:31 |
|
Dolemite posted:A few pages back in the thread, I asked about how clouds/weather can affect reception. I have another weather question: can humidity itself affect reception? As for all the hams - welcome to the new kids, and good luck to those who are studying! I was going to head to Charlotte yesterday and take the General test, but my wife had to go to the hospital, so that squashed that plan. Ah well, there are many chances to test, but I only have one wife
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2008 03:51 |