|
This also sounds kinda interesting~ http://blog.spacesocket.com/2012/07/23/learning-ada/
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2012 18:07
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 01:30 |
|
|
heap posted:Thank you! These are great, just the kind of thing I was looking for. Any other suggestions are appreciated too. http://www.99-bottles-of-beer.net/ 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2013 09:11
|
|
|
When is that gonna overflow?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2013 19:18
|
|
|
But he's using %d anyway, on what platforms does that print more than, like, 2^31? There's plenty of space, clearly.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2013 11:39
|
|
|
What's he supposed to do in ANSI C tho 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2013 17:29
|
|
|
You could modulo them to both be between 0 and 2 pi before comparing them, I think. Look up how your language's modulo operation works on negative numbers or w/e but you should be able to get angles normalized like that.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2013 17:59
|
|
|
Am I missing something or is i the CSV reader object and not actually any bit of the data in the file? You need to do CSV.open(...) |csv| csv.each do |line| ... end end or something?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2013 00:51
|
|
|
pipes! posted:So if I make a folder called "foo" and link it to a folder called "bar", then delete the folders, the symlink will restablish if I create two new folders using the old names in their old locations? That doesn't sound like unix symlinks. You wouldn't be making a folder and then linking it to another folder, you would make a symlink that points to the other folder and that's it. If you delete it like any other file, it's gone for good. Symlinks just sit in the filesystem and are visible to ls and pretty much everything that lists file, they aren't some subtle invisible thing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2013 00:12
|
|
|
You're basically doing modular arithmetic, so there's gonna be a multiplicative inverse of 215 that is not 1/215, so that x * 215 * that number = x. You can bruteforce that to be 231 since there's only a handful of numbers between 0 and 256. Java's signed bytes are a bit distracting here, I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
I don't understand oauth, what's stopping just about anyone from extracting the client id and then using permissions users have granted to my app in their own app?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2014 19:49
|
|
|
I was looking at https://developers.google.com/drive/web/auth/web-client and it all sounded like it'd happen in javascript served to users and not my hypothetical server at all.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2014 21:18
|
|
|
I did click the "Web (Server-side)" link first but then went to the client-side page because the server-side one said "If your application does not require offline access to user data, consider using the client-side authorization flow, which can be implemented using only JavaScript and HTML." 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2014 21:38
|
|
|
That wouldn't stop someone with a spoofed client library that doesn't do that check, would it?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2014 17:57
|
|
|
If the user reassigns V, you've lost control of the loop. If they reassign _node, it's their own fault for touching a variable with a name starting with an underscore, they should know better.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 01:30 |
|
|
SQLite doesn't have a date/time data type.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 10, 2014 12:27
|
|