|
dwazegek posted:
This would be perfectly fine if he had ever heard of the "break" keyword
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2008 18:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2024 06:48 |
|
tef posted:*this for new cobol title
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2009 16:47 |
|
king_kilr posted:'s' - 'a' != 1 holy loving poo poo
|
# ¿ Nov 6, 2009 23:00 |
|
Flobbster posted:Didn't they teach us this in grade school? Except when like "A" as in "neighbor" and "weigh"
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2010 23:14 |
|
Broken Knees Club posted:So why is this Epic thing treated like the bubonic plague? Because every player I can think of in the field of healthcare IT is terribly crippled beyond hope of redemption. It could be like printing money but for some reason every company that tries bungles it. I haven't met a doctor, nurse, lab tech, or hospital janitor happy with the software that they have to use. I used to work for one of these places We didn't have MUMPS, but the VB6 flowed like antifreeze-laced wine
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2010 21:31 |
|
Zhentar posted:The CEO is also a workaholic, and has built a company culture that expects everyone else to be too (my boss got a call once from someone who heard me mention I only average 42 hours a week). This is also something that seems to be common in healthcare IT...my former CEO is written about in textbooks regarding an angry letter he sent saying that the parking lot wasn't nearly full enough at 7PM
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2010 22:55 |
|
Avenging Dentist posted:You've got to know how to motivate dentists. As a dentist, the number one thing I'm concerned with in my practice is the degree to which I can cause another human being suffering. If you market the software as being able to help dentists inflict more pain on their patients, they will eat that poo poo right up. That explains a whole hell of a lot about Cerner's business and development models
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2010 03:12 |
|
Goddamn shrughes
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2010 03:23 |
|
Dijkstracula posted:The real real horror is that
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2010 19:05 |
|
DegaussMonitor My first thought was to check the URL as this must have been an extremely well-designed MSDN parody site
|
# ¿ Jan 27, 2011 15:13 |
|
JediGandalf posted:You'd be surprised how many people still use CRTs. It's sort of both...I know that a lot of people still use CRTs, but at the same time I'm surprised that at the time of introduction of Windows Vista there was enough customer pressure on Microsoft to introduce APIs for software control of degaussing the monitor, and I'm surprised it's controllable via software at all.
|
# ¿ Jan 27, 2011 21:11 |
|
NotShadowStar posted:I'm taking a numeric analysis course this semester, and the second chapter is literally all about floating point errors and bounds checking and how much this is going to gently caress you over and over until you get it right. Just out of curiousity what book are you using?
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2011 16:37 |
|
bobthecheese posted:Except that 70% of them aren't even valid bugs anymore, because the code has evolved around them, and everyone involved when the bug was reported no longer has anything to do with the project. I spent a non-trivial portion of last week going through my team's defect backlog and categorizing out those 70% so I can e: ^^^^ goddamn it, I did it wrong!
|
# ¿ May 10, 2011 04:04 |
|
pseudorandom name posted:US banks think that asking you for both your password and your security questions is two-factor authentication. But how could anyone know what year my father was born??
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2011 14:08 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:Can't! I like this one: I've seen this up in the QA pit where I work. Sometimes I'm surprised it doesn't have stab marks on it
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2011 18:06 |
|
Munkeymon posted:
We support MSSQL and Oracle where I work. I use Emm Ess Ess Cue Ell and Sequel Server pretty much interchangeably for that product, Tee Ess Cue Ell for the Microsoft language, Pee Ell Ess Cue Ell for the Oracle language, and Sequel Developer for the Oracle tool vv Never have I heard anyone pronounce it Squeal and I hope I never do. I'd probably think it was either a new scripting language that I'd never heard of or some notification tool like Growl.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2011 17:21 |
|
Hammerite posted:Not in MySQL. Haha seriously? MySQL Reference posted:Transactions cannot be nested. This is a consequence of the implicit commit performed for any current transaction when you issue a START TRANSACTION statement or one of its synonyms. Transactions cannot be nested as a consequence of their inability to be nested
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2011 04:04 |
|
AlsoD posted:As somebody with no database experience whatsoever, how would a thread with its posts be represented? Each sub-forum a table, each thread a column and each new post a row? code:
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2011 05:23 |
|
kitten smoothie posted:Of all the questionable figures in open source software history, Stallman eating his own toejam seems like one of the harmless bits. It's not like he killed his wife or anything. I'm not sure one can fairly equate the importance and impact of Hans Reiser and RMS
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2012 22:52 |
|
revmoo posted:I'm on thin, thin ice at my company for pointing out SQL injection flaws. I give up. I'm sorry, but saying you can't only validate forms in the browser is not an offensive remark in any way. gently caress. Were you nailing the boss's daughter in front of him as you said this?
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2012 19:06 |
|
Hahaha, the PHP Sadness guy turned off commenting on his site. I guess too many people called out too many of his whines. I remember one where it was pretty clear he'd never understood what static meant. e: to be clear about what I am saying: there is much to be sad about in PHP. This guy just couldn't be told that his complaints were themselves horrors.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2012 03:44 |
|
It's horrible interview etiquette to get up and walk out on them right there but man I would have been tempted if that had been sprung on me. What does it do in the larger scope of the product?
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2012 15:27 |
|
geonetix posted:I saw this excerpt in that conversation and felt it needed some attention: My new favorite image
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2012 22:48 |
|
b0lt posted:For example, if you want to find out which commit put your AWS keys in your public github repo so you can find out which commits you need to purge/how long it's been visible to the public. Nothing like a practical example
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2013 20:51 |
|
HappyHippo posted:A friend of mine is taking a data structures course in computer engineering, taught using c++. They apparently aren't allowed to use subscript notation (as in a[x]), ever. They must use *(a + x) always. I have no idea why. Just a guess, but maybe the professor feels that makes the "offset from memory address" idea of array access more clear for computer engineers?
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2013 17:25 |
|
shruges posts don't have enough commas to be teapot posts
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2013 19:38 |
|
I found this in a third party header file the other day:code:
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2013 22:21 |
|
Volmarias posted:Why would anyone do this? I mean, if your code needs to be so secure that even stacktraces give away information, just don't enable logging We once had a minidump faxed to us for debugging purposes. It ended up being 84 pages long. When we asked why they had to fax it the answer was "in case it needs redaction" edit: in case this sounds like I'm recalling a distant memory this happened in March of 2013.
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2013 04:35 |
|
teamdest posted:What? The reverse of a peristaltic process. Peristalsis is the process of moving something through a hollow tube by compressing the sides of the tube. Swallowing is a good example - the digestive system uses peristalsis to move food from one end to the other. In other words,
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2013 16:00 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:This is not a coding horror, rather a horror from a coding textbook. An excerpt from my intro to OSes class textbook: What the hell book is this, "OSes for Dummies"?
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2015 18:36 |
|
Wow, my condolences. That sounds completely insufferable. If you're interested in an OS textbook that isn't self-absorbed bullcrap, I liked Modern Operating Systems by Tanenbaum or Operating System Concepts (the dinosaur book)...but this was 10+ years ago and maybe the modern editions are also written for children by children
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2015 18:51 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:It's also fundamentally the wrong abstraction and has been since the day the concept of multithreading appeared. fork(); will only fork the current thread, so if you have resources (like a mutex) that were managed by a separate thread, your child could hang waiting for a mutex that never gets unlocked, since the other thread holding it doesn't exist anymore. So you're not allowed to call malloc(); (it takes a mutex internally), you're not allowed to basically call anything but setenv, dup, and exec();. One of the bigger horrors I've experienced at work (that wasn't code I wrote) was a third party library we use for fulltext indexing. When indexing a certain file type the indexer would hang and two of the processes would show up in the process list. Sure enough, we finally figured out that the library was fork()ing forty goddamn frames deep in the call stack. It seems that the library designers assumed it would only ever be used by a single-threaded parent process and when we changed our process framework to use per-thread mutexes instead of global mutexes then *poof* Naturally the company that created this library hasn't existed for some time and the IP is currently owned by one of our biggest competitors
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2015 17:37 |
|
Skuto posted:I'm assuming he's talking about separate feeding datastructures per thread with a lock per datastructure rather than a single global lock for "all potentially shared data" or something like that. Yep that's right
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2015 19:33 |
|
Thermopyle posted:I mean, I know nothing about this poo poo, but this sounds like gobbedly-gook from CSI. Multiple branches? Oh no we're hosed! I read this as fragmenting the encrypted files in multiple locations (that happen to be registry keys) so that a scan looking for those files wouldn't find them in any one place.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2015 22:58 |
|
Karate Bastard posted:Its --help option is almost offensively unhelpful however. It does produce a lot of help, but ain't nobody got time for reading all that. Please enjoy your Friday knowing that I opened up a terminal to find out what yes --help printed
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2015 17:51 |
|
Hammerite posted:Why would you turn it into a #define rather than a const variable? In C, const means read-only but not constant - it could be modeling a value in memory which does change, so subsequent reads could return different values. You just can't write to it. Since it's just a variable you still get all the normal variable things like storage allocation. #define is the way to form constant literal values. e: unless you want to use C enums but since we're at the moment arguing about how int-enums are literally Satan it seems in poor taste csammis fucked around with this message at 13:39 on Oct 23, 2015 |
# ¿ Oct 23, 2015 13:36 |
|
evensevenone posted:Isn't this because newer POWER has some kind of XML hardware accelerator thing? Holy poo poo, that's a real thing. I had no idea
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2015 15:30 |
|
Bognar posted:Vim plugins for IDEs give you the best of both worlds. Unless the plugin is incomplete and some basic commands aren't implemented and then you fork the plugin repo and you spend all your time figuring out how it works so you can JUST TURN OFF SEARCH HIGHLIGHTING
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2015 16:47 |
|
ratbert90 posted:Strewn about the project I inherited are C files, in these C files are bullshit like this: Are they meant to be exec()'d from another process? That would explain closing all the file descriptors since the new image inherits open file descriptors from the exec()ing process.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2016 15:33 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2024 06:48 |
|
ratbert90 posted:I'm not worried about the closing of the fd's. Why does this program exist? Why didn't they just call the two whole things from the main program? Why are they not checking return codes? Why does this thing EXIST? Yeah, my guess is that there was a need to launch a couple of things from a program but they had to run as root so a little fork()/exec() setup was created with a bunch of tiny programs that do nothing but clean up from having been exec'd and then run their commands. As for why they're not checking return codes, lovely developers do lovely things, who knows?
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2016 16:16 |