|
OP has an outdated (404) amazon list of supplies to get started with development; is there a newer equivalent goon approved kit list anywhere?
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2020 04:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 19:04 |
|
|
While we're on about misguided attempts at being lazier, are the Plustek film scanners universally just not as good as a flatbed? Flatbeds are so big 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2020 08:03
|
|
|
Godspeed, Velvia 100.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2021 03:29
|
|
|
King of Bees posted:The Darkroom did well for us but we just ended up getting labbox and a refurbed scanner and doing it ourselves because its real expensive if youre shootin a lot. Seconding this, developing and scanning yourself isn't hard and is far more cost effective but The Darkroom did Okay when I was still scared of doing it myself.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2021 20:19
|
|
|
I use Cinestill DF96 and it has done a great job with Ilford and Lomography B&W medium format film for me.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2021 06:35
|
|
|
Flyndre posted:Yikes a Hasselblad 500CM in nice condition is out for a decent price on my local market place (for the second time in fact, and I regretted not hitting it the first time) It's pretty and takes good photographs. You came to the wrong thread to be convinced not to buy it.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2022 11:12
|
|
|
Recoome posted:You could try using black electrical tape and see how that goes That will leave a sticky residue, the photographer's friend is a roll of black gaffer's tape.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2023 04:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 19:04 |
|
|
dema posted:I don't have a macro lens for my DLSR. Or a light box. So, I'm thinking of just grabbing a scanner. Is the Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE fine? That's the best seller on B&H. Save future you the hassle of having bought things that didn't meet your standards and get a cheap macro lens or an extension tube for a long but sub-100 lens you already own, and a lightbox.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2023 22:20
|
|