Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
neutral
Oct 14, 2004

you're my wife now
I actually have a few.

What are the differences between the three versions of Close Encounters of the Third Kind? Like Blade Runner, I thought it was pretty good, but I'm not dying to see it again. Still I am curious to know whether its worth it to check out the other cuts.

My second question is about the different soundtracks to Man With A Movie Camera. Does anyone have preferences? I've listened to the Cinematic Orchestra's version and it was still awesome, but I know that's far from the definitive.

And my third question is about Kieslowski's Short Films about Killing and Love. I loved the Decalogue, so I guess I will probably just watch them anyways, but again, is there enough added to really make it worth it?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

neutral
Oct 14, 2004

you're my wife now
Thanks to those who answered my last batch of questions, and now I have another one, also about different cuts.

Mr. Arkadin. I'm a pretty big Welles fan so if I love it I may check out the other versions anyways, just to see examples of how important editing is (like the Love Conquers All version of Brazil). My question is, is there a "definitive" cut that I should watch first?

edit: nevermind

neutral fucked around with this message at 07:52 on Jul 20, 2008

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply